Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, February 24, 2008
George Will :: Townhall.com Columnist
Pondering the Choice of Vices
by George Will
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


WASHINGTON -- "Do you think he'd do it?" That was the first question Ronald Reagan asked when, 24 days before the 1976 Republican convention, his campaign manager suggested that Reagan immediately name Pennsylvania's Sen. Richard Schweiker as his running mate. Reagan was narrowly behind in the delegate count as he attempted to wrest the nomination from President Gerald Ford. Three days later Schweiker joined the ticket.

This was designed to pry loose some Ford delegates, particularly among the 103 of Pennsylvania's delegation (Schweiker was one of them), and prevent Ford from clinching the nomination before the Kansas City convention.

A callow young columnist without a lick of sense (George F. Will) criticized the tactic as "slapstick," but it worked: Walter Cronkite pulled back what would have been that night's CBS lead story saying Ford's nomination was assured, and the battle raged until the convention.

Today, Hillary Clinton in extremis could contemplate a similar maneuver: Pennsylvania's April 22 primary may be climactic and Gov. Ed Rendell is available. But so far only John McCain is certain to need a running mate, and his choices are limited by his needs and his nature.

McCain needs someone who will help him win and be a plausible president during the next four years. He has been in Washington more years than Clinton and Barack Obama combined, and today, as usual, but even more so, Washington is considered iniquitous, partly because McCain, our national scold, incessantly tells the country that its capital is awash in "corruption."

It would be reassuring were he to select a running mate with executive experience administering something larger than a senator's office. So an otherwise well-qualified senator, such as Kay Bailey Hutchison, might not be suitable.

Besides, McCain, who will be 72 on Inauguration Day, might need someone younger. Which would prevent the selection of Colin Powell, 70. Also, a McCain-Powell ticket would slight domestic issues, with which Powell has never been professionally engaged and McCain has rarely been preoccupied.

In politics, gratitude is optional but admirable, and McCain is indebted to Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, 51, who endorsed McCain on the eve of his state's primary. Because the disastrous recent performance of Ohio's Republican Party will make it difficult for McCain to hold that state's 20 electoral votes that Bush won, McCain must keep Florida's 27. Crist won the 2006 Republican gubernatorial primary 64-33 even though, as Michael Barone writes in his Almanac of American Politics, that election was notably unpleasant: "Here a candidate was attacked for being both gay and for fathering a child out of wedlock."

Crist remains popular, but not more so than his predecessor, Jeb Bush, 55. Bush, however, seems determined to take a sabbatical from politics. And it might seem tribal to have a Bush on the national ballot for a seventh time in eight elections.

Three two-term governors might help McCain, including Mississippi's Haley Barbour, 60. He has two things McCain lacks -- impeccable conservative credentials and a genial disposition. He was conspicuously competent in Katrina's aftermath. As a political director in the Reagan White House, and as national party chairman, 1993-1997, when Republicans ended 40 years of Democratic control of the House of Representatives, Barbour demonstrated political subtlety and an agreeable absence of righteousness, qualities McCain as president would need close at hand. Unfortunately, Barbour also was a lobbyist for a while, and the right to "petition the government for a redress of grievances" is another part of the First Amendment that the co-author of McCain-Feingold finds unimpressive.

South Carolina's Gov. Mark Sanford, 47, is more of a maverick than McCain, and Sanford faults his state party for being insufficiently conservative. His frugality has had him at daggers drawn with the state Legislature, which Republicans control. His populism is an acquired taste -- he should not have lugged those two live pigs into the Legislature to express his disapproval of pork -- but he favors expanding school choice, eliminating the state income tax and, at the national level, reforming entitlement.

Finally, Minnesota's Tim Pawlenty, 47, is national co-chairman of McCain's campaign. His is the only state (10 electoral votes) to go Democratic in the last eight presidential elections. The candidate who wins a majority of the electoral votes in the Mississippi Valley usually wins the White House. Pawlenty is a center-right politician in a center-right country, and the Minnesota Twins will open a new ballpark in 2010 because he helped to provide public funds, a practice that red-blooded Americans deplore in principle but enjoy in practice.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
George F. Will is a 1976 Pulitzer Prize winner whose columns are syndicated in more than 400 magazines and newspapers worldwide.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read George Will's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Where Are Romney and Thompson?
It would seem obvious to at least consider Romney and Thompson, two former opponents with conservative credentials who could really help McCain with the alienated base of the Republican Party.

I Say Wot George
You never considered Condi Rice? I'm shocked.


Too bad that MccRainman,
.... the only-by-nepotism saved from being an Annapolis drop-out, the slippery, sleazy and slimy (his words for his ilk, not mine) effective North Vietnam Air Ace, (five USN fighter aircraft destroyed) and five-year-veteran North Vietnam and USSR Military Adviser, life-time RINO and enemy of the United States Constitution has no damned chance, thank God, of being elected DC Dog Catcher. Let alone of his choice of running dog being other than moot.

Okay I will bring it up
the only logical choice would be Mike Huckabee who has demonstrated the strength to bring the enthusiasm of the social conservative wing of the party to the table. Without the enthusiasm and walk the neighborhoods of that group, the election of John McCain becomes an iffy thing. None of Mr.Will's selecions ignites our fervor. And in an election as close as this one will be, you need every part of the coaliton actively involved.

From what I read...
...about Gov Pawlenty of Minnesota,he would be a disaster on the national ticket.Yes,he had the ability to get elected in Liberal Minn.,but only by governing in a liberal Democrat manner.The Republicans could not afford to have two liberals in the White House at the same time.

McCain's Choice
How about J.C. Watts?

Silk Purses Out of Sows' Ears?
Let's see, the two corrupt establishment political parties are offering a left-wing Republican Senator and two left-left-wing Democrat Senators from a Congress with about a 25% approval rating, or more accurately, 75% disapproval rating, and all are open borders/amnesty/globalist sellouts contrary to what 90% of the American people want. And we're supposed to think that VP choices will help? Unless there is a third party or write-in miracle, we are going to be presented with the worst President we have ever had in times when we need the best. Perfect! Let's see, who do I think would be a cute VP?

The other George W's
been in Washington too long as well.

Vice President
I really like Haley Barbour. He's intelligent and, as you say, genial. His showing in the Katrina aftermath was admirable, and he certainly knows the ins and outs of the game.

As for the Democrats; as a Pennsylvania resident I wish someone would take Rendell off our hands, but I'm not sure I want to see him at the national level!

Let McCain convince Ron Paul...
--
...to become his running mate in November.

Think of it.

Dr. Paul is *THE* only real conservative in the Republican race. His statements on economic issues, his determination to amend the role of government in domestic issues, and his condemnation of RINO foreign policy are all "hard line" consitutionalist.

He stands for every conservative message voiced by Nehemiah Scudder - pardon; "Mike Huckabee" - without alienating people who can't stand the Huckster's populist bullcrap and his feculent odor of sanctity.

And Ron Paul is the only candidate who has kindled real grassroots support for a Republican campaign message. He's proven the ability to raise funds from thousands of individual donors - with no dependence upon big corporations or PAC managers - indicating a level of broad popular strength that can be counted upon to "get out the vote" on his behalf.

Which is more than you can say for John McCain, who generates the same level of enthusiasm among us *real* conservatives as does the prospect of a barium enema.

And if you can convince "Dr. No" - of *ALL* people - to "hold his nose" and support John McCain to the extent of standing for the vice-presidency under a McCain administration, it should be possible to convince conservatives that, at the very least, if McCain should suddenly drop dead (oh, happy thought!), they'll have an honest-to-God "limited government" guy running the White House for a change.

Gawd, a McCain/Paul ticket might actually win.



----------------------
"I’d love to be remembered as a Goldwater Republican. But I don’t pretend in any way to live up to the legacy of the man who literally changed the face of politics in America."

-- John McCain

Panther
Exactly the person I was thinking! I suspect though that J.C.would rather be run over by a truck than have to go back to DC and deal with that slime......

SJ Doc: McCain is having enough trouble

keeping the Conservative base. paul as a running mate would make the base he has run away in horror!





Choices of Vice
For Obambi, probably a white woman as a sacrifice, but not Hillary (now an enemy and she may not be a woman). For McCain, it doesn't matter. But I think it probably will be someone hoping that a 71 year old will not last. Not someone who has hopes for national politics beyond 2008. George Will is a member of the CFR.

paradigm & Panther: I was thinking

the same thing... J.C. would be great! I'm just now sure who would want to run and "work for" McCain.

After McCain's admission about his lack of "knowledge" of economics, Romney might be his best bet... (besides, I think he owes Romney, big time!)




made me laugh Iowa, PatN
This whole election cycle would be one HUGE belly laugh, were it not so critical. Your absolutely correct in your asessment of needing the BEST, and stuck with about the worst.

Doesn't matter who the VP is, it's simply trying to put lipstick on the pig.

I wish Haley or J.C. would have made their own runs, but it is what it is.

McCain may be a fiscal hawk, but speaking from personal experience if you disagree with him, and I have over the years since he's my Senator, he has a tendency to lash out. I was off his mailing list for years, but I'm good enough to be back on it now. Go figure.

Hmmm
I seriously doubt that naming Rendell now would pull this out for Sen Clinton, but it's probably worth a try.
As for McCain: He's really got the potential to choose the next president (certainly in 8, possibly in 4 years time). Crist-NO, please.

Newsflash for some of you: Hello? Condi has said she is not available. Paul: I thought the goal was to win the election. Thompson is too old-the VP needs to be seen as someone who can take the reins in 4 years time. Huckabee, sorry, brings nothing to the ticket. Romney probably does, and 4 years seasoning in national politics would be a good thing for him. JC Watts if he'd do it would be an excellent choice, as would Michael Steele. Both solid people, not of the DC in crowd. Wouldn't hurt to take the race card out of the game.

Panther
I heard J.C.Watts speak at a breakfast meeting this week and he said that being out of politics was really good. At the same time he laid out what he saw as the things that needed to be addressed and spoke of America moving in the wrong direction. I and, I am sure, many others there were wondering why, if he thinks this way, did he step away from being in a position to affect change? It may be the closer you get to the center of the storm the more you understand it can't be fixed.

Watts is a really smart guy. He won his last election to Congress with 65% of the vote and was moving up in the congressional power structure. Were he putting himself back on the path to power I think moving to Oklahoma and running for governor would do it. I don't think he wants it or thinks it would really do any good.

Anne - Ooh, thanks!
--
Per Anne (the reliably witless):

"McCain is having enough trouble keeping the Conservative base. paul as a running mate would make the base he has run away in horror!"

And good old Anne (reliably) goes on to post:

"After McCain's admission about his lack of 'knowledge' of economics, Romney might be his best bet... (besides, I think he owes Romney, big time!)"


Given Anne's previously *PERFECT* record of being totally wrong-headed and impeccably hostile to conservative purposes, these comments prove that a Romney vice-president selection would be a disaster, and the choice of Ron Paul as McCain's running mate would be the only way to ensure a GOPvictory in November.

Folks, we can always count on Anne.

Think of her as our "compass-in-reverse."

--



Be Practical
Jeb Bush would be a good choice because of his stature with Florida voters and his Hispanic draw. It should not be the name that is important; it should be based on merit and demonstrated Executive ability. There are still many Southern Democrats (older) that will not vote for a Black candidate--they will cross the bridge to vote Republican. If J.C. Watts is on the ticket, the bridge is removed. We can save J.C. for later, he is very capable and still young enough. McCain will need all types of support to win and you cannot legislate against a private bias.

Gee sj doc: Spoken exactly like a

rabid, vitriolic paulist... who often make the leftists look tolerant.




Anne
Doesn't that name calling go against your 'vile speech' code? Or, maybe, by your own rules, this is your way of admitting you lost the debate to SJ Doc? Your illogical contortionist positions would make a pretzel envious. Have you no pride, or shame for that matter?

It is great fun pointing out your inconsistencies. Thanks for the early belly laugh.

McCain
He needs to choose wisely! He needs someone to bring conservatives back into the fold but also someone who make an image that exudes youth and confidence.

Obama also needs to choose wisely. He needs someone with some experience that will not upstage him.

Who to Choose?
I doubt that Romney or Thompson want the VP slot, and I also doubt that Jeb Bush would be a good choice. Just as it appears that the Clintons have had their run, I suspect that the Bushes have as well. Jeb, in my view, was always the better choice than George Jr., but right now, the animosity toward's Bush would be as polarizing as Clinton. McCain is trying, after all, to develop some room between himself and Bush's unpopularity.

At the same time, McCain's track record is not one that indicates that he's going to listen to anyone who isn't in line with his agenda. All of this talk about nominating a conservative might help with Conservatives, but it could also put into play his age. And that could work against him with the Independents and Moderates who he seems to think he needs to win the election. And, if he thinks he's setting up the VP to be the next president, then it would seem likely that he'd pick someone who continues his views, which would indicate someone who is more moderate.

Mocha Marvin would do well...
--
...to lay hands on Lieberman or someone similarly palatable.

Remember, the Mulatto Miracle Boy not only has to energize the "Socialist Party A" faithful but also to disarm the presumably vast conservative resistance, who would otherwise be energized to come out and savage him for his utterly damnable "Liberal" positions on every issue under the sun.

Lieberman might buffer him a bit.




-----------------
"There's nothing a Northerner likes better than a black person who is completely white."

-- P.J. O'Rourke, *Modern Manners* (1990)

Truth Time
Obama and Clinton are both Socialist/Communist. Both titles must be used together because they are the same in ideology. The majority of their funding and political organization is provided surreptitiously by the American wing of the International Communist Party. No conspiracy theory here , just fact. George Soros is a Communist and his MoveOn.org has the primary function of furthering the Communist cause in this country. Anyone on this board that wants the truth can go to Accuracyinmedia.com and read for themselves or you can be lazy and wallow in stupidity. It is all there with names, dates and particulars.

VEEP is irrelevant!
Case in point: what has Cheney accomplished in reigning in Bush's liberalism the last 2-3 years?


Absolutely nothing... zero, zip, nada, rien.


conservatives are irrelevant
Just thought I'd repeat the basic message of Will's editorial, and most of the comments on it.

JC Watts is a crook. That makes two of us who'd rather he was run over by a bus than have him go to Washington.

Jeb Bush... in case no one remembers, has an hispanic wife. Oh yeah! THAT will really reassure us conservatives that McCain is going to seal the border! You betcha! Jeb Bush is just the man to give up any hope of ever "getting any" ever again for the sake of border security. Okay, maybe not.

"Crist won the 2006 Republican gubernatorial primary 64-33 even though, as Michael Barone writes in his Almanac of American Politics, that election was notably unpleasant: "Here a candidate was attacked for being both gay and for fathering a child out of wedlock.""

Boy, this guy will sure bring in both the social conservatives and the evangelicals, eh? A sodomite AND a fornicator.

" South Carolina's Gov. Mark Sanford, 47, is more of a maverick than McCain, and Sanford faults his state party for being insufficiently conservative."

Oh yeah, that maverick thing's really endeared McCain to the conservatives, hasn't it?

" Finally, Minnesota's Tim Pawlenty, 47, is national co-chairman of McCain's campaign."

Woo hoo! we can really count on THIS guy to reign in McCain's maverick liberalism, huh?

George, for the sake of brevity, please try to trim down your editorial a bit. Here, I'll give an example of how you might have worded this editorial more succinctly:

"F* you, conservatives".

REJECTING HUCKABEE PROVES DETRIMENTAL!!!
Mike Huckabee has specific plans and ideas to counter Obama's and Clinton's socialist vision for America. Huckabee is the only candidate with a strategy to improve the US Economy and not just those of foreign nations. Even those talking heads who promoted other candidates besides John McCain suddenly are jockeying for position to inject McCain's campaign with the bad policies that got the establishment in trouble with conservatives. If Mike Huckabee's voice is not heard in the white house as president or as Vice President, Republicans don't have a chance to win this years election. Mike Huckabee is the best speaker and can neutralize Barak Obama's momentum. Mike Huckabee's campaign and base is use to doing much for less money, this would also give McCain an edge if he makes Huckabee his running mate since McCain is under financial restrictions until August 2008.

http://evolutionfacts.blogtownhall.com/2008/02/15/the_shift _in_momentum_is_for_president_huckabee_in_2008__exposing_th e_tactics_of_political_masons.thtml

Cheny and Jorge
Brian, what makes you think Cheney doesn't share Jorge's views?

ProfessorX writes:
Having visited your site I'm left with the impression you wear a tinfoil hat. Sorry but that's the way your site comes across. Paranoid perhaps?

HongKongCharlie, to answer your question
Cheney has a very long and distinguished history of true conservatism on the national stage.

A little research on your part would have saved both you and I time in writing this exchange.

PS, HingKong
Why do you think Jorge chose him to begin with?

He was facing the same issues as McCain about his "compassionate conservatism". Cheney was the sop thrown to conservatives to get our vote:

"Dick'll keep him honest".

Didn't work out so well. How often are we supposed to fall for the same line of BS? Do they think we all have Alzheimer's?


DON'T FORGET
Gov Fast Eddie Rendell officially made Pennsylvania the "VOTER FRAUD STATE".

PPS, HongKong
Thanks for visiting my site, and adding to my SiteMeter count.

Tinfoil hat? LOL

Well, whenever I post a new essay -- usually weekly -- that essay usually hits the No 1 spot; it also usually takes my blog up to one of the Top Blog spots, also. So I guess there must be a lot of us tinfoil hat wearers running around. Too bad YOU guys need US to win, if you're going to do so at all.

Unfortunately for you, I think this election's going to be Dole Redux. Bummer for you, bud.

But that really was such an insightful critique. I'm sure you'll understand if I don't pattern my future writings around it.

Plus, let me take this opportunity to remind you once again that you can certainly do your own research instead of flouting your ignorance, as you did in your question about Cheney's conservatism.

Ron's Paul for VP?
Whoever came up with this idea that Ron Paul would make a good VP needs to do a little reality check. Paul's drawing power is like 3 percent of the republican PRIMARY vote. So he is going to be an "asset" on the ticket in the general election? Gimme a break!

Paul's quixotic campaign has indeed set him apart..as a flake. Perhaps he could partner up with Dennis Kucinich to form the Kook party....the might just win an election today by mobilizing the kook vote...which seems to get larger every day!

BrianR
As scarey as it is to contemplate Cheney's presence may have tempered what could have been an even more liberal administration. As bad as it was it could have been worse.

TruLib: How?
How could it have been worse?

Maybe if Bush had physically morphed into Ted Drunkennedy.

Well, as I think about it, I guess if McCain's elected, we'll find out just exactly how much worse it CAN get, with a RINO in office.

warrior
Thanks for truth time (12:23pm). I think some of the people who support Mr. O would be pretty apalled if they knew exactly what they were supporting. I also think that some of the people who claim to be VERY conservative need to know what's at stake. Mr. O is NOT the same as Mr. McCain.

I agree with your other post that Jeb Bush is very much qualified, but I wouldn't look for that to happen. His last name is too polarizing to risk. If you'd like to see JC run, why wait? Why not in 4 years from the VP slot?

Rush
says Crist really, really, really wants the veep job. And having watched how he sandbagged Romeny at the last minute, he's the picture of ethics and integrity isn't he? Just what we need, another moron with no ethics, no integrity and no morals.

Gov Romney
Would be the best choice.

The 3 legs of conservatism would be strong -

National Defense - Sen McCain
Economy - Gov Romney
Social issues - Both

Gov Huckabee has proven too unreliable with the economy. His only strength is #3.

I would also be glad to see Michael Steele.

More people need to take a good look at this intelligent, articulate conservative.

VP is more important on the republican side.
It will make little difference for the Dems.

Sen Obama will probably choose Sen Edwards.

Lots to think about
VP choices I like: Romney, Barbour, Watts, Crst, Pawlenty - all good men. VP choices that should never be considered: Huck and Paul because they are wing nuts; and, unfortunately, Fred - who is a great guy but together they are just too old. Republs have a great field to choose from. Not so the dems - everyone is to the right of Obama - Biden? Edwardds? Hey maybe he will pick Pelosi - she seems his kinda empty head. They could form up committees to study soda-pop, lady wrestlers, NHL and other really important things for the country. I mean, don't we all feel so much better since the MLB investigations.

Never
Doesn't matter. Conservatives who aren't Republicans, such as myself and most of my family, won't vote for a liberal Repub regardless of who he picks for VP. McCain can't win so why waste time worrying about it?

Anybody got a clarification?
"Here a candidate was attacked for being both gay and for fathering a child out of wedlock."

Was Crist that candidiate, as jdw assumes, or was it someone else? I gathered the quote referred to a different candidate.

Regardikng J.C.Watts
I get the impression he figured out pretty quickly that the problems can't be fixed through the political system; that the political system itself is part of the problem.

J.C. Watts
On a now defunct website entitled:

"The House of Crooks" which maintained by a student at Univ of Wisconsin-Madison, it was alleged that:

"Julius Caesar Watts fathered a child out of wedlock much to the consternation of his Minister Father who doesnt share his sons views on morality or politics."

Maybe having such things written about him, (whether true or false) has made him gun shy about being a public figure.


Bush and higher food prices
Thanks George Bush for making it more expensive to feed our families, in your push for biofuel. You, Sir, are a blooming idiot. This conservative absolutely sees you as one of the worst -- and maybe most corrupt -- presidents in history. What a sleazebag.

Ph.D., J.D
Please, please, think before you post.

It was the Dimwits that actually pushed through e-85 and MBE.

The Gov't needs to stop paying compnaies to NOT grow food!

Three good VP candidates
I'm 100% in support of John McCain - his Potomac Primary Speech won me over - and I was one unhappy conservative about McCain being the front-runner before it. No joke. I recommend everyone here to check it out:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/02/john_mcca ins_potomac_primary_s.html

Good stuff.

Ken Blackwell and Michael Steele would be good candidates for VP. Plus I know she's fairly new - but Governor Sarah Palin of Alaska - is pretty impressive!

Buck
I notice you list the party's interest before the nation's, which is what you're priorities obviously are. For some of us, nation is at the top, and party comes further down the list.

At some point in any campaign, interest will turn to running mates. That's hardly "being reduced to".
And what in your experience would make you think someone who's won a nomination would step down, or would declare himself a lame duck before he starts? That's kinda like the guy in the commercial who outbids everyone for the art at the auction, then wants to sell it right then. A real box of rocks, that guy.
Don't give up your day job, whatever it is.

McCain-Rice
Has anyone noticed that the Republicans will be tarred as the white male party if McCain picks any of the candidates Mr. Will has suggested?

Condolezza is smart, prepossessing, and well, beautiful. And she is the perfect tonic for those who think the Republicans are single race, single gender.

Don't even think about Huckabee!!
We may hold our nose and vote for McCain over a democrat, but add an idiot like pastor Huckabee to the ticket and forget it!

McCain/Condi is winning ticket
Yes, others in the comments here support McCain's picking Condi for VP.

Pawlenty and Sanford both said they are too busy with their day jobs to consider being VP. Same for Condi. So regardless of her comments on Feb. 22 about not running for VP, the truth is that if McCain reaches out to her, she will take the job. She is a powerful image on the DC horizon, and if the Republicans want to win with strength and leadership, then members will seek out McCain's campaign and beg him to pick Condi.

McCain/Condi is a winning ticket.

Oh COME ON
First off, Condaleeza Rice is NOT beautiful. She's not even pretty. But is that even what's important? Yeah, our veep nominee is corrupt as gangrene, liberal as McCain, and as competent as Herbert Hoover. If race, sex and beauty are the standard, then Hally Barry for veep.

"Has anyone noticed that the Republicans will be tarred as the white male party if McCain picks any of the candidates Mr. Will has suggested?"

And what is wrong with white males?

Look around. Look outside. See all that? That didn't all happen IN SPITE of white males, y'know.

What no one seems to have noticed is that both Will and Fox News are pushing liberal veep nominees. We conservatives are having a finger stuck in our figurative eye. (Fox news is also bashing the heck out of Hillary, in some cases unjustifiably; they either want Obama in the White House or are so stupid that they think McCain can beat Obama).

Okay...
they want to run a female or minority for veep, cynical as they are... okay...


Two possible choices leap right to mind.

Ann Coulter. I would vote for McCain if she was his veep, because within 30 days of being in office she would drive him into having a stroke.

No? Well, there's a woman far better suited than Kinda Sleazy Lice, also a minority, definitely to the right of McCain, and would definitely hound him on the illegal invader issue.

Why not Michelle Malkin?

Not only is she female (check), minority (check)... she's also quite a bit younger than McCain (youth vs old age... check).

Either one of these females would be competent for the job, would fill the requirement of non-white-male, are far younger than McCain, and would appeal to conservatives.

Now watch all the liberal republicans scream and howl. It should become clear that they are entirely unwilling to throw us conservatives any kind of a bone. This "compromise" stuff is all one-sided.

vice selection
I understand the VP shoud be from a state where you need help ie Fla, MN. If you are looking for conservative & executive experience, what about the Gov of Alaska?

Condi or $$$ men
I think Condi makes an interesting pairing. Only problem is they are both foreign policy figures while McCain needs a strong economic/domestic partner. Why not Steve Forbes or Jack Kemp. Solid conservatives both...with name recognition as well as recognized for being strong economic minds.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.