Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, April 29, 2007
George Will :: Townhall.com Columnist
Federal Aid to the Southern Plains
by George Will
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
With unemployment at 10.2%, what will happen by the end of Obama's first term?



``The soil is the one indestructible, immutable asset that the nation possesses. It is the one resource that cannot be exhausted.''

-- Federal Bureau of Soils, 1878

Seventy-five years ago, America's southern plains were learning otherwise. Today, amid warnings of environmental apocalypse, it is well to recall the real thing. It is a story about the unintended consequences of technological progress and of government policies. Above all, it is an epic of human endurance.

Who knew that when the Turks closed the Dardanelles during World War I, it would contribute to stripping the topsoil off vast portions of Texas, Oklahoma, Colorado and Kansas? The closing cut Europe off from Russian grain. That increased demand for U.S. wheat. When America entered the conflict, Washington exhorted farmers to produce even more wheat, and guaranteed a price of $2 a bushel, more than double the 1910 price. A wheat bubble was born. It would burst with calamitous consequences recounted in Timothy Egan's astonishing and moving book, ``The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl.''

After the war, the price plunged and farmers, increasingly equipped with tractors, responded by breaking up more prairie, plowing under ever more grassland in desperate attempts to compensate for falling wheat prices with increased volume. That, however, put additional downward pressure on the price, which was 40 cents a bushel by 1930.

The late 1920s had been wet years, and people assumed that the climate had changed permanently for the better. In that decade, another 5.2 million acres -- equivalent, Egan says, to the size of two Yellowstone Parks -- were added to the 20 million acres previously in cultivation. Before the rains stopped, 50,000 acres a day were being stripped of grasses that held the soil when the winds came sweeping down the plain.

In 1931, the national harvest was 250 million bushels, perhaps the greatest agricultural accomplishment in history. But Egan notes that it was accomplished by removing prairie grass, ``a web of perennial species evolved over 20,000 years or more.'' Americans were about to see how an inch of topsoil produced over millennia could be blown away in an hour. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
George F. Will is a 1976 Pulitzer Prize winner whose columns are syndicated in more than 400 magazines and newspapers worldwide.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read George Will's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Technocracies rule!
While it's true that the Nazi regime was highly technocratic, it was also democratically elected - yet we don't go around denouncing democracy for that reason. Nor do we doubt the virtues of patriotism just because Roman rule, which was highly patriotic, ruthlessly conquered and enslaved its enemies.

In short Andrews' comment sums up everything that has gone wrong with the conservative movement since "The Gipper" proclaimed government to be the problem rather than the solution. If you don't believe in a positive role for government (think education, defense, emergency relief, the court systems) just imagine life without government! Or you can try it: visit any war-torn African nation, where government is all but non-existent and war-lords run the day. Great if you belong to the raping and pillaging minority; not so fun if you're on the receiving end of the rape and pillage.

We have ALL surrendered our freedom to some degree to technocrats - it's called the social contract. For instance, I am willing to elect city officials who will enforce strict but fair zoning practices. While this curtails my freedom to do whatever I want with my lot, like build an extra story on my house, it (thankfully) also prevents my neighbor from exercizing her freedom to build a slaughterhouse next door to me.

This is a parable, but it illustrates the kind of positive role that bureaucrats can play, even at the federal level. The level of well-being and social equality we enjoy today is the product of well-run and transparent institutions like financial markets, a legal system with equal access and, yes, bureacracies at the local, state and federal level - combined of course with the capitalist system and natural resources. Remove any of the insitutions that are vital to our success and you will quickly see us lagging behind the rest of the world.

Of course, you could go the other way and strengthen state and federal bureaucracies, a mixture our European cousins have chosen. In most of Europe the state apparatus is not distrusted and ridiculed but seen as a useful tool for improving public welfare. And, it turns out, they do pretty well over there.

Lilly
Just because one is acadmeically trained, or even very intelligent, does nto guarantee one will do good work, or not do harm.

John Maynard Keynes was a brilliant man with impeccible training, who was just completely wrong and did immense harm to the economies of Europe and North America for at least a decade or more with his theories.

Aristotle was the brightest man of his era, yet, reading him now, you can find fallacy after fallacy.

See, just two examples, but both were brilliant, well trained men who were often wrong.

I would rpefer to see the well educated and bright bureaucrats pushed out along with their less bright brothers and sisters. Anything that elminates federal employees is ok with me. But, I know you are to the left of my position, and you seem to have an inordinate amount of faith in the "educated" to make things better, if just given a chance to run things.

Just because the Fed Gov't has well trained, smart people does nto mean we should defer to their judgment in anything. I may be wrong, but I would rather make my own decisions and suffer my own consequences, than surrender any of my freedom to even the brightest, best educated bureaucrat.

Sorry. Guess I am not a lib.

Thehn again, you may want to look up the history of "technocracy" (essentially what you suggest, a rule of the best educated) and how quickly many of them merged into the fascist/falangist/nazi movements of the 30's and 40's.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.