Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, April 15, 2007
George Will :: Townhall.com Columnist
Jackie Robinsn's legacy
by George Will
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Like many New Yorkers leaving home for work on April 15, 1947, he wore a suit, tie and camel-hair overcoat as he headed for the subway. To his wife he said, "Just in case you have trouble picking me out, I'll be wearing number 42."

No one had trouble spotting the black man in the Dodgers' white home uniform when he trotted out to play first base at Ebbets Field. Suddenly, only 399, not 400, major league players were white. Which is why 42 is the only number permanently retired by every team.

Jackie Robinson's high school teachers suggested a career in gardening. Robinson's brother Mack had finished second to Jesse Owens in the 200-meter dash at the 1936 Berlin Olympics. Whites who won medals found careers opened for them. Mack, writes Jonathan Eig in "Opening Day: The Story of Jackie Robinson's First Season," wore his Olympic jacket as a Pasadena, Calif., street sweeper, while Owens found himself racing against horses at county fairs, "one small step removed from a circus act."

To appreciate how far the nation has come, propelled by what began 60 years ago this Sunday, consider not the invectives that Robinson heard from opponents' dugouts and fans, but the way he had been praised. "Dusky Jack Robinson," as the Los Angeles Times called him, alerting readers to the race of UCLA's four-sport star, ran with a football "like it was a watermelon and the guy who owned it was after him with a shotgun."

That cringe-inducing fact is from Eig's mind-opening book, an account of a 28-year-old man ``filled with fear and fury,'' and terribly alone. It includes unfamiliar details about familiar episodes. There is Lt. Robinson's 1944 refusal, 11 years before Rosa Parks, to move to the back of a bus at Fort Hood, Texas. And shortstop Pee Wee Reese, a Kentuckian who until 1947 had never shaken hands with a black person, crossing the infield to put a hand on Robinson's shoulder when Cincinnati fans were being abusive.

But Eig is especially informative about the dynamics among the Dodgers, who, like many teams, had a Southern tinge. The most popular player was nicknamed Dixie (Walker) and one of the best pitchers was the grandson of a Confederate soldier. The Dodgers' radio broadcaster, Red Barber, a Mississippian, considered resigning, then thought better. Radio presented Robinson as television cameras could not have done -- as, Eig shrewdly writes, "all action," undifferentiated by visual differences from his teammates.

After the opening two games against the Boston Braves, the Dodgers played the Giants at the Polo Grounds in Harlem. The president of the National League, fearing excessive enthusiasm, suggested that Robinson should develop a sprained ankle. He did not, and the crowds were large, dressed as if for church -- men in suits and hats, women in dresses -- and decorous. Soon a commentator wrote, "Like plastics and penicillin, it seems like Jackie is here to stay."

The Dodgers were not. Ebbets Field's turnstiles clicked 1.8 million times in 1947, more than they ever had before or would again. But in 1947, in a Long Island potato field, Levittown was founded, offering mass-produced low-cost housing emblematic of postwar suburbanization. Dodger fans were moving east on the island. After the 1957 season, the Dodgers moved west.

Only 25,623 fans went to the game on April 15, 1947 -- 4,000 fewer than on opening day 1946 and 6,000 fewer than the ballpark's capacity. Perhaps some white fans were wary of being with so many blacks. Usually blacks were no more than 10 percent of Dodger crowds but on this day they may have been 60 percent.

By 1956, Robinson's last season, he had lost his second base position to Jim Gilliam, a black man. Robinson died of diabetes-related illnesses in 1972, at 53, the same age Babe Ruth was when he died. Ruth reshaped baseball; Robinson's life still reverberates through all of American life. As Martin Luther King Jr., who was 18 in 1947, was to say, Robinson was "a sit-inner before sit-ins, a freedom rider before freedom rides."

"Robinson," writes Eig, "showed black Americans what was possible. He showed white Americans what was inevitable." By the end of the 1947 season, America's future was unfolding by democracy's dialectic of improvement. Robinson changed sensibilities, which led to changed laws, which in turn accelerated changes in sensibilities.

Jack Roosevelt Robinson's middle name was homage to the president who said "speak softly and carry a big stick." Robinson's deeds spoke loudly. His stick weighed 34 ounces, which was enough.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
George F. Will is a 1976 Pulitzer Prize winner whose columns are syndicated in more than 400 magazines and newspapers worldwide.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read George Will's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
George Will
"Jackie Robinson" was the first black to play in the major league and has become immortal simply for that.

Can you tell me (without Googling it) who were the other names on Robinson's contract?

O.K., maybe YOU can, George, but it seems inappropriate to plaster praise on Robinson but to ignore those WHITE folk who made it all possible.

There actually were WHITE people who were sympathetic to universal civil rights.

White people
DavidMac writes "There actually were WHITE people who were sympathetic to universal civil rights." [in 1947]

SOME (at least) of them, observing what has become of our public schools, colleges, prisons, welfare recipients, entertainment, illegitimacy rates, neighborhoods, elections, et. al., rue that sympathy.

I know that SOME of them do. . .I do.

Reflections
Ah, baseball. It may not be as popular as football, but it is something that people on both sides of the aisle can still appreciate. Keith Olbermann did a similar tribute to Mr. Robinson on Countdown last night.

Thanks George Will
Thank you George for this superbly crafted tribute to Jackie. I only wish he could have lived longer. In 1960 Republican Jackie campaigned for Nixon. One can only speculate how a public appearance of Nixon alongside Jackie would have affected the votes of millions of Americans.
I was most amazed to read the allegedly "favorable" print tributes to Jackie. The allusion to a black man fleeing with a watermelon was no doubt written by a man who condemned lynchings, opposed segregation etc.

I wonder if one day the DODGERS might be willing to print commemorate #42 jerseys with ROBINSON across the back. What better way to pay tribute to this ground-breaking American hero.

How much have things really changed?
Will, whom I genuinely admire, fails to mention the concern at the time over a shooter making his way into one of the stadiums where Robinson played, particularly in the South.

I find it incredibly ironic that just today we learn that the German government has deliberately targeted black urban male images for target practice.

Interestingly, I am having trouble pulling up that article here. It's disappeared from the world news section, and a search of german video just takes me back to homepage. Is anyone else?

to DavidMac
how many of the white signees to the Robinson contract risked immenent threat to life and limb every time they went to work?

By the way, you display your ignorance. Jackie Robinson was a civil rights pioneer who served time in the brig as a result of peace sit down demonstration during his service in the military at time when being so, if you were black, presented an imminent threat to life and limb.

Ou Sont Les Jackies D'Antan?
Every time George writes an essay on TH I say something like: "George Will is not a conservative. He is a grumpy guy who likes baseball and looks in the mirror a lot." There, it's now out of my system. For a brief time, George was editor of the National Review book section. Everyone at NR (William F., Jr., Priscilla, Russell Kirk, and others were very supportive of young conservative writers. Everyone that is, except George, who was extremely supportive of himself.

Jackie Robinson: the real issue today is: Where have all the Black baseball players gone? Barry Bonds doesn't count, because he's nearly as old as I am and the steroids are making his head look like The Great Pumpkin.

Anyway, I'd like everyone not at the ball park to come to my site (click on my name above). We're going to see how many Townies (TH types, silly) can fit in a phone booth -- if we can stil find a phone booth.

Did I mention I'm not a great fan of George Will? I think it's that heavy starch in the shirts and the William Howard Taft-era glasses.

steve maloney
ambridge, pa

my 2 cents
Words that lie comatose in the hands of most come to life at the touch of George Will and whenever and whatever he writes I read. When he writes about baseball I read it over and over. Whether or not I agree with what he says (most times I do) I always enjoy reading it because it is so well crafted.

In addition to that he is tweedy looking and academic looking and when he is on TV he speaks quietly and intelligently.

We can't let that get around.


COLUMN OF THE DAY
Mr. Will, thank you for a wonderful tribute to a great and deserving individual. God bless you.

Need more like Will
What a shame that thoughtful, articulate conservative columnists like George Will, Thomas Sowell, Charles Krauthammer, Mark Steyn, and Jonah Goldberg are outnumbered about 5 to 1 by evangelical flamethrowers and moonbat-baiting "radio personalities." I'm a dyed-in-the-wool conservative, but put this column up against the same-day offerings by Frank Pastore and Kevin McCullough and tell me there isn't cause to lament. (Ann Coulter is a moonbat-baiter, too, but at least she's funny.)

bryce
If you go to FoxNews.com you will find the story about the German Army video. However it is not clear that it was a government video and not done by a few individuals.















bryce
My "ignorance" is miniscule compared to your hypocritic hyperbole.

The term "civil rights pioneer" is specious. How many WHITE people risked assault in the old Democrat-ruled south?

Robinson was no better and no worse than any other American. That's why the term "equal rights" was used. Not better rights under affirmative action, but "EQUAL" rights.

How many white people DIED 3 years earlier so that people like Robinson could play baseball?

You are a racist, Bryce. We don't need your kind in America.

davidmac
You stated that Jackie Robinson was immortal simply because of his playing baseball. Again, the statement displays your absolute ignorance about the man and his legacy.

It is also seems rather disingenuous of you to try to make this tribute to Jackie Robinson about white people. If you would like to contribute a seperate peace about the brave white people who put their lives on the line in the pursuit of equal rights I would greatly appreciate reading it.

About WW II
Davidmac, it is ironic that you mention those who died fighting for freedom in WW II. One of the major factors in the emergence of the civil rights movement was reaction of black GIs who risked their lives fighting for freedom overseas only to return to the Jim Crow America of the 1940's.

I'm sure your retort will be to label me a racist for not listing the white freedom fighters of the era. If so, please feel free to list them yourself instead of flinging insults.

Thanks WiPer06
Strange, I first read the article here, then suddenly it disappeared. Very odd.

To Steve
Peut-etre ils se sont alles avec les neiges...but no, I don't think so. Rosa Parks, for one. And a few folks I just now saw on Tim Russert, talking about Imus and saying, enough already, and making the point that racial humor sells: the question is, who's still buying it, and why? My impression is that a fair number of the customers are regular posters to townhall.

bryce
Some people deserve insults thrown at them. You are one of those people.

I have no tolerance with those who only see one side of the story.

I agree with Baldy. It's a shame that "equality" now means pandering to black racists. You imply that some blacks died in WW II and therfor the whites who died are irrelevant. That is sophistry.

The USA fought WW II to eliminate the threat of Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany, and to preserve "EQUAL" rights, not to establish "BLACK" rights.

The concept of universal equality was implemented just after the Civil War (1868, the XIV Amendment). It reads, in part, "equal protection". What part of that don't you get?


Jackie Robinson
Fine article by George Will. Who can name the first black professional football player? What year?.......At its inception in 1920, the American Professional Football Association had several African-American players (a total of thirteen between 1920 and 1933). Fritz Pollard and Bobby Marshall were the first black players in what is now the NFL in 1920. Pollard became the first black coach in 1921. Who ever heard of these guys? To take nothing away from Jackie Robinson, these two were the real pioneers.

Will
Will's essay was beautiful from start to finish. I am mystified that it could provoke people to rant about Will's nerdiness or reverse racism.

davidmac
First off, you mention one side of the story. I'm still waiting for you to take the positive step of anotating the many white people, contempory to Robinson's hiring, who fought for civil rights. I'll give you one, Albert Einstein.

Nowhere in my post do I state or imply that whites who died fighting for freedom in WW II are irrelevant.

I will repeat my point. One of the major factors in the civil rights movement was the affront many black soldiers felt when they and others sacrificed their lives in the fight for freedom then were denied the rights and freedoms of citizenship when they returned to Jim Crow America.

Yes, the concept of equal rights were introduced in the 19th century. Unfortunately, these rights were not recognized until the Brown vs. Board of Ed decision of 1954, and were not fully implemented until the voting rights act of 1964.

What part of history don't you get?

Please note, no insults here. None needed.

make that
the concept of equal rights regardless of race, color, creed, etc...

Racism Today
I've been a Dodger fan since the Dodgers were "dem bums from Brooklyn." And Robinson is certainly one of the best baseball players. However, today the ONLY baseball player who is celbrated is a black player, and he is being celebrated because he is black. And that is RACISM. All of the hundreds of white players are shunted to the sidelines of history. And that's racism.

Back in the 1940s, not eveyone was in favor of integration. Owners of black baseball league teams, for example, were going to be put out of business if the black league was replaced by integeration.

Yes, Robinson was a great player, and it was a major change when the Dodger mangement brought him in from the black baseball league. But that doesn't make racism any better today. Racism is racism no matter what color you are racist for and against.

Bob, I don't follow baseball but
weren't the African American superstars superceeded by the Latin Americans, and the Latin Americans most recently by the Japanese imports?

Bob and all, censorship today on TH
In my origianl post here I juxtaposed Will's statement that things were changing with the article here about German Army using images of urban blacks as target practice. I then mused that it was odd how that article had disappeared.

Well guess what goes. A second article appeared...briefly. It is now gone also. A keyword search of 'german video' brings up the two articles, but when you try to link you are taken back to the front page.

I guess freedom of the press here means you're free to read articles that undermine the charges of black paranoia and victimization rampant on these pages if you go to another site!

bryce
It's still available on Fox New.com as of 2:28pm mountain time.

team owner
I am always a bit dismayed that the owner of the team is not held in higher esteem for his actions. He took a big chance by putting Robinson on his team. He risked the success of his team and his money, and I would not doubt that his life was put in jeopardy because of his actions. In all the news reports I have listened to over the past week I have not heard him mentioned one time. We should be giving the owner his due as well.

Thanks WiPer06
At least they're demonstrating some integrity on the issue. TH on the other hand, is using censorship as a means of stifling informed debate on racial issues and god knows what else.

It's a shame
Jackie Robinson overcame things that the majority of us could not imagine. He didn't just play baseball, he played it extremely well. He should be commended on both counts.

What concerns me is the talk about the decline of black players in major league baseball. With all due respect to Mrs. Jackie Robinson, fans do NOT 'come to see their own' (as she stated in support of tryig to get more blacks into the major leagues during the Dodgers-Padres game while in the broadcast booth). Fans come to see their team and they root for the players on their team.

Where are the people trying to get more white/ asian/ mexican/ latino into the NFL???

As a child I rooted for Willie Davis, Davy Lopes, and Reggie Smith the same as I rooted for Sandy Koufax, Steve Garvey, and Ron Cey.

It is ludicrous to state (as has been repeatedly) that black children need black role models - ALL children need role models that exhibit the qualities of integrity, a solid work ethic, and dedication to family.

Jackie Robinson should inspire us all - not because of the color of his skin, but because of the content of his character.

And Another Thing
I would never ask black ex-players and Mrs. Robinson not to promote baseball to black kids.

But I would ask that they be intellectually honest about the reasons why they are doing it.

I would suggest that they come out and say 'I am black and I want more black kids to love the game of baseball the way I do.' and leave the rhetoric about baseball being a 'way out' or manufacturing some percentage number of blacks that there should be in baseball.

A question - what percentage of blacks should there be in Major League Baseball? Or the NBA? Or the NFL? Or the NHL?

The idea that the demagraphics of any business should reflect the makeup of the country is demeaning to people of any and all races that work hard to gain marketable skills.

We should honor achievement without regard to skin pigmentation. That is what will make the United States of America a truly great country.

Tadpole writes that ....
.... (Mr) Robinson (And those other Americans who advanced his career) should inspire us all - not because of the color of (their skins), but because of the content of (their) character(s)."

And THAT is the simple Truth.

It's Black and White!

David Mac and Bryce

David Mac states:
"The concept of universal equality was implemented just after the Civil War (1868, the XIV Amendment). It reads, in part, 'equal protection'. What part of that don't you get?"

Bryce responds:
"Yes, the concept of equal rights were introduced in the 19th century. Unfortunately, these rights were not recognized until the Brown vs. Board of Ed decision of 1954, and were not fully implemented until the voting rights act of 1964.

What part of history don't you get?"

Who is right? Unfortunately, not Mac. The 14th Amendment was in fact passed after the Civil War, but it wasn't implemented in the States until well into the 20th century, when "incorporation" became law. It is worth noting that Republican Administrations failed to enforce the Reconstruction Amendments in great part due to a judicial philosophy that deferred to States when it came to criminal acts. For a brilliant and chilling example of what happened during this era please read "Contempt of Court" about the lynching of Ed Johnson or visit http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/shipp/shipp.html.

David Mac: There is little doubt that the intent of the Reconstruction Amendments was to live up to the promise Lincoln made in the Proclamation, that blacks would not only be free but protected by the Federal Government. Tragically, Grant and subsequent presidents failed to muster Lincoln's courage. I sympathize with your frustration. The saddest consequence of Sharpton and company's antics is that decent people have been fatigued into adopting a false sense of historical absolution.

I apologize for seeming preachy, but I once shared some of your views. I was in the "get over it!" crowd. A personal crisis compelled me to look more deeply into the causes of our racialist malaise. Many of yours and my heroes on the right were complicit in Jim Crow, despite the obvious intent of the Reconstruction Ams. to enforce basic civility on the South.

Should you doubt this please read Justice Harlan's stinging dissent in Plessy v. Ferguson. The same Harlan, who, incidentally, acted on behalf of the Court to save Ed Johnson by issuing a stay on the latter's execution, only to be ignored by Sheriff Shipp who, it was later proved, was complicit in Johnson's murder.

None other than Antonin Scalia has said he would probably have sided with Harlan's dissent (just in case you think the dissent was liberal!). http://www.umich.edu/~urecord/0405/Nov22_04/13.shtml

Bryce: I am afraid you fall into the ahistoricist trap. Intellectual history is a study of the two most baffling problems known to man, namely, ourselves and history. The jurists who failed to enact the Ams. on the states operated under a set of premises which were accepted. Harlan's dissent is remarkable because he alone had the courage and vision to break from precedent, to recognize that equality before the law had to include all citizens. The Constitution wasn't a compact among states but among people. States couldn't violate constitutional rights. As bizarre as it seems, this was a novel, and truly revolutionary, idea.

rogue historian
Great post. However, could you be more specific about how I am being ahistoric?

I ask because
Like everyone else I come to the table with my particular set of biases.

Bryce:

It is easy to impress upon historical figures our sense of time and place. The judges who opposed incorporation did so based on precedent and judicial deference. As late Harvard Law professor Raoul Berger forcefully argued, the records of legislative debate over the Reconstruction Amendments fails to provide convincing evidence that the legislators intended voting to be included under "rights and immunities" or equal protection. Thus, political rights were largely left up to the individual states to protect. This was a fatal omission.

Subsequently, as demonstrated unequivocally in a must-have for American historians, "The Great South Carolina Klu Klux Klan Trials," by Lou Faulkner Williams, (http://www.amazon.com/Carolina-Trials-1871-1872-Studies-History/dp/0820317950), Republicans were caught between two hard places. They were inclined to defer to legislatures, in general, and State legislatures, in particular, where ordinary crimes were committed. So they were in a position not unlike that faced by Pro-Choice justices in Roe: They had to invent a law in fabric-whole. (The analogy falls apart when one considers the real differences between abortion and lynching, but that is a different discussion.)

Judges then, unlike today, were a conservative lot. They adopted the notion that the role of the Justices was to discover not invent law. Also, state-centered lawyers, who benefitted by having criminal statutes vary across states, opposed the move to federalize criminal law. Enter Harlin.

Harlin defied them all. He understood the threat posed by not requiring states to abide by, let alone enforce, the Supreme law. He too considered the Judges' role to be limited. Yet when it came to fundamental rights, especially equality before the law, he couldn't abide. There is perhaps no better window into the agonizing contradictions present in the judicial branch at the end of the 19th century than Harlan's dissent.

In summary, we are remiss to impose a two-dimensional framework on the causes of Jim Crow. My personal view is that strict adherence state's rights doctrine cost our nation fifty years or so of freedom and dignity. Had the Feds lived up to Lincoln's promise, and enforced civility on the South, subsequent generations of black Americans wouldn't have inherited a devastating sense of abandonment. What is instructive is how some Republicans did behave courageously, going to the South and putting the KKK on trial. As Williams shows, however, most of these prosecutions never went to trial and when they did the accused often disappeared.

This is what I meant by ahistoric. And ahistoric is what I meant. Not ahistoricist. You were right to correct me. Sorry so wordy.

BTW:
There was precedent for Harlan's notion that the Constitution was a compact among citizens, not states. Hamilton and Marshall carried this notion during the founding years and Marshall enforced it as Chief. Of course, Hamilton and Marshall's nemesis, Thomas Jefferson, entertained a different view. He thought the state's could nullify federal laws. He also believed that the Supreme Court was a largely symbolic branch, especially when it defied him. Marshall's stand against Jefferson regarding the trial of Aaron Burr revealed how deep were the two men's differences.

It still gives me chills to consider how fair Marshall was to Burr who murdered Hamilton. And how vituperative was Jefferson, who desperately wanted Hamilton dead, to the same.

rogue historian
no apology for wordiness needed here. It's interesting that you perceive the late 19th century Supreme Court as conservative. Most do. Personally I see the application of the 14th amendment to uphold Ferguson and later defend the rights of industry vis a vis worker's rights and protections to have been very activist indeed.

Just saw your last post rogue historian
Yeah, good ol' judicial review. I remember it fondly. Unfortunately the same cannot be said about some in the WH.

Excellent Point...
Private property was a fundamental right...substantive due process, contract, etc.,...but suffrage was not. The justices were still wary of wading into what they perceived as political waters. But Holmes was on the court (as of 1902, I believe) and Frankfurter still to come. The era of restraint was soon upon us. While liberals took up the battering ram left idle by Peckham and his lot, conservatives fiddled. With the vast exception of Taft. How I admire him.

History and perspective come alive
Will's words. Even on the rare occassions that I disagree with his opinion I find joy in his craftsmanship. Each is a piece of literature.

In this article he paints Jackie Robinson as a mortal man with an immortal legacy. America can learn a lot by this man who refused to be a victim or court victimization.

Enough Already

.....Will ...

.....Robinson played ball 60 years ago and we are still making a big deal over it ...when is enough enough? ...

.....Robinson broke the baseball color barrier because of Branch Rickey ...it was Rickey who decided it was time to intergrate baseball and who signed Robinson to a contract ...yet I never hear Rickeys name mentioned as the man who broke baseball's color barrier ...

.....Jackie Robinson Day is just another way for white Liberals to divide the races by playing on "white guilt" and reminding blacks of a segregated past ...it don't think it helps race relations one single bit ...in fact ...I think on balance, it makes them worse .....COLOSSUS

postscript: It is worth noting that Rickey's decision to sign Robinson was based on his own sense of fair play and not on Civil Rights Laws or quotas or afirmative action ...no Jesse Jacksons or Al Sharptons had to demonstrate or threaten boycotts to force Rickeys hand .....Colossus

baseballdoc
You make some great points here, specifically about the lack of credit to Rickey.

However, I must take exception with your statements about this reminding blacks of a segregated past.

It is in fact incidents like the Imus racial slurs and images of urban black males being used as target practice by the German Army, our allie, that reminds blacks of segregation and continuing racism.

acceptreality
You are so right about Will. Being a liberal, I don't generally agree with Will's conclusions, but his analysis, perspective, and logic are almost invariably impeccable...Will is the man!
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.