Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, September 03, 2007
Frank Pastore :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Latest Problems with the “Man Evolved From Apes” Thesis
by Frank Pastore
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


No. We are no closer today proving those last two theses than we were in Darwin’s day, a century and a half ago. In fact, we’re actually farther away.

So, what were these two important recent discoveries?

First, as reported here on August 9, two alleged ancestors of man, Homo Erectus and Homo Habilis, were found to be living together about 1.5 million years ago (MYA). This is a big deal because Erectus was supposed to have evolved from Habilis before later evolving into Sapiens (us).

Think of it as finding out dad and grandpa were actually brothers, not father and son.

This chart on Early Human Phylogeny at the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History, will have to be revised—again. The mythical evolutionary tree of life with man’s ascent from ape is looking more like a patch of thousands of blades of grass with the passing of each generation. Sapiens ends up all by himself—an evolutionary orphan—almost as though he just appeared in the fossil record fully formed—as though he were created and placed here. Imagine that.

The second discovery, reported here, pushed the hypothetical human-ape split back another 10 million years, to now around 20 MYA. How so? The traditional theory is that man evolved from chimps about 6 MYA, chimps evolved from gorillas about 8 MYA, and gorillas evolved from orangutans about 14 MYA. But, with the discovery of a 10.5 million year old gorilla in Africa, this pushes the human-ape split back to at least 20 MYA.

But between 15-20 MYA, there were dozens of primate species in Africa, and the hominid trail goes completely cold after 7 MYA. It looks like a dead end—or to the true believer, at least a serious detour over uncharted territory.

Bottom line, not only do we find that dad and grandpa were brothers, but now we find out that we were adopted—or created.

As the authors of the report on all this in the British journal Nature noted, “We know nothing about how the human line actually emerged from apes.”

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
The Frank Pastore Show is heard in Los Angeles weekday afternoons on 99.5 KKLA and on the web at kkla.com, and is the winner of the 2006 National Religious Broadcasters Talk Show of the Year. Frank is a former major league pitcher with graduate degrees in both philosophy of religion and political philosophy.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Frank Pastore's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Bipsy Quee
You are very right, John's Reveletion/Apocalipsis' reference to Babylon is believed by many as a reference to Rome not necessarily to the early Christian Church at Rome, but to the Roman government/empire.

Many of that Apocaliptic writing style was on purpose due to the persecutions of the Early Christian Church, therefore there have to use codes, knicnames, symbols, etc., but people at the time understood the message. There is a duality of the massage that has applicability to our times because the message was universal=> ?a??????? (Greek) => catholicós (Latin-ization).

You too, take good care.


T H E E N D .

Paco
Thanks for that. I am just beginning to get knowledgable on the whole ID/ evolution thing.

Well, it has always been of interest to me, being that although no longer a Roman Catholic I do not hold them in contempt but rather view them somewhat akin to the Jews, who are something like our older although fallen brethren. I respect certain aspects of their faith, their organization and their revering certain aspects of the faith that the evangelicals seem to diminish (confession and communion, for instance) but I distrust the basis of their faith and their insights.

There are many who feel that "Babylon in eschatology is referring to the RCC, and they make a good case for that position. I am not ready to concede that, but I remain open to the possibility. The previous Pope's overtures to Islam, for example, and his call for ecumenicism, are troubling developments and bear accounting for in light of eschatological points which can be verified with some accuracy.

Take care, my friend. It seems this thread is coming to an end.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.