Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, June 10, 2007
Frank Pastore :: Townhall.com Columnist
Wallis is Wrong, Part II: The Socialist Christocrats
by Frank Pastore
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


In an earlier column, I discussed why the religious left is wrong on budgets, morality, and priorities (available here). Here, in Part II, I want to focus on what happened Monday night between the three Democrat frontrunners and the sponsor of the event, Jim Wallis of Sojourners.

First, some general impressions.

I found it both ironic and troubling that the top three Democrats talk more comfortably about their faith than do the top three Republicans. I guess it shouldn’t come as a surprise though—after all, they’ve been rehearsing for this performance since Bush’s reelection in 2004.

The actors knew the script. Director Wallis had coached them well. Real Christians care about poverty and global warming. No more of that sin-salvation-Jesus stuff for us. Don’t talk about heaven and hell, we’re for the Kingdom now! Let’s raise taxes and the minimum wage, grow government, start more unions, provide universal health care and child care, with free college for everybody–including illegals. And above all, let’s replace greedy-selfish capitalism with generous-loving socialism and truly achieve social justice. Vote out poverty now! Raise taxes on the rich!

Right. And Jesus was a big government Robin Hood socialist. And so they’ve created God in their own image.

Second, what did we learn about the candidates on Monday night?

John Edwards believes in theistic evolution, he is “personally against” gay marriage but for civil unions, believes the separation of church and state means a Christian president should violate his religion if it conflicts with his politics, and that poverty can be cut in half in the next ten years by starting more unions, raising the minimum wage to $12.50 an hour, providing free government housing to those who can’t afford their own place, and by having universal health care and day care, along with free college tuition for all students.

That sounds very expensive. And who’s going to pay for all this?

I wish he had said, “I personally oppose abortion and gay marriage on biblical grounds, and I support abstinence education and a Protection of Marriage Amendment. As President, I will take an oath to uphold the Constitution. And though no President can impose his will on the Congress, I will work to overturn all laws I believe to be immoral.” Again, that’s why it’s only a wish. (I hope Fred Thompson reads this.)

We learned that Jim Wallis believes poverty is a “gospel issue,” and that eliminating it is a “biblical priority” for the government.

Another wish: I wish Wallis cared about teaching the Bible to the poor and in our schools half as much as he cares about baptizing his schemes for the redistribution of wealth.

We learned from Barack Obama that he believes God doesn’t take sides in war, but that the Civil War and World War II were just wars fought against evil. When asked about this, he answered,

I always remember Abraham Lincoln, when, during the Civil War, he said, "We shouldn't be asking whose side God is on, but whether we're on his side." And I think that's the question that all of us have to ask ourselves during any battle that's taking place, whether it's political or military, is, are we following his dictates? Are we advancing the causes of justice and freedom? Are we our brother's keeper, our sister's keeper? And that's how I measure whether what we're doing is right.

I wonder if he thinks God was rooting for the South, or the Nazis—or today, if He’s for al Qaeda? If we’re supposed to be following God’s dictates in order to advance justice and freedom, I’m sure Ahmadinejad and Osama have a different opinion as to what Allah’s dictates are. Therein lies the root of the global war against radical Islam. I would have liked him to mention that.

Obama also opposed taking away educational programs in prisons in order to be tough on crime. If he was really concerned about reducing recidivism, he’d support the wonderful success of Prison Fellowship, they teach God’s dictates too. He also criticized the high salaries of corporate executives. He said, “I also would like to see executives recognize that when they're getting as much in one day as their average worker is getting in an entire year, that there is a moral element to that.” Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
The Frank Pastore Show is heard in Los Angeles weekday afternoons on 99.5 KKLA and on the web at kkla.com, and is the winner of the 2006 National Religious Broadcasters Talk Show of the Year. Frank is a former major league pitcher with graduate degrees in both philosophy of religion and political philosophy.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Frank Pastore's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Excellent Column
I read the comments about what liberals are all
about, and I was once again reminded about how
proud I am to be a liberal.

I do not agree with the politics of all liberals
and certainly not the life style of all liberals,
but I am a liberal because I am a Christian. I
cannot imagine being anything else and still
call myself a Christian.

P.S. Socialism I don't think exists anywhere in
a pure form. But socialism and capitalism can
exist together and does exist side by side in
many places all over the globe, including here in
the U.S.

And yet, when a Town Haller wants to call you a bad name, they will call you a socialist. OOOh
I am scared! Socialism is not Communism. It is
not an all or nothing sort of thing.

P.S. to Mr. Pastore. I know of no one who is
asking for free college education.

In reponse to Knight
About the police:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/04/national/nationalspecial/04police.html?ei=5090&en=8bf8550c348bbc33&ex=1283486400&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=print

http://www.officer.com/article/article.jsp?siteSection=15&id=25779

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article10089.htm

About the National Guard:
http://www.decaturdaily.com/decaturdaily/news/050903/calvary.shtml

http://www.cnn.com/2005/WEATHER/08/30/katrina.neworleans/index.html

http://crime.about.com/b/a/198921.htm

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/28/national/nationalspecial/28guard.html?ei=5090&en=1218fd35c0af7127&ex=1285560000&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=print

About the State Police:


About the lawless and anarchy that you claim didn't exist in New Orleans:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/09/01/america/web.0901kat.php

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/01/AR2005090100533.html

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/html/20050902T000000-0500_87459_OBS_ANARCHY_IN_NEW_ORLEANS.asp

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/28/katrina/main1446208.shtml


Conclusion:
The New Orleans Police Department was unable to provide effective law enforcement following Katrina, especially as there were many areas they could not reach.
The Louisiana National Guard was not present in News Orleans initially, and had great difficulty achieving access to much of the city.
The New Orleans State Police was sent into New Orleans, but was certainly not concentrated there before the storm, and obviously suffered the same delays getting access to many neighborhoods.
Federal troops were not even ordered into New Orleans for some time, and the flood waters delayed their effective access to much of the city as it did everyone else.
Your claim that the conditions did not constitute anarchy are demonstrably false.

Unless you would like to provide the same evidence for your contentions that I have provided for mine, of course.
Historically, you generally simply state that something is so without providing evidence, so I doubt you will do that.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.