Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, April 08, 2007
Frank Pastore :: Townhall.com Columnist
A Leftist Declaration of DE-pendence
by Frank Pastore
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Ultimately, rights come from either God or Government. If rights come from God, then government is under God, since it is the role of government to secure those rights. But, if government is the source of rights, then what is granted can be withdrawn. Rights would be alienable, only temporary. Similarly, laws are either divine or positive. All positive laws are expressions of power, while all divine laws are claims of authority. The Founders understood these things better than anyone before or since – they are the greatest political philosophers in history.

Consider slavery. Lincoln argued slavery was immoral though legal. Douglas argued it was both moral and legal. Both men accepted the divine origin of rights. But, if rights were mere positive rights, as the Left contends, then that which is legal is that which is moral. This is why to the Left, nothing is higher than the law, not even morality. Which is why there could be no leftist moral argument against slavery, they would be limited to merely a legal appeal. If so, Dred Scott would still stand. It does not because we believe the Declaration, that the moral trumps the legal, that the legal at-tempts to codify the moral. Our Founders believed this. It is the American way.

Consider an Atheist’s Declaration of Dependence:

We claim these opinions to be our relative truth, that most men are to be considered equally evolved, that they are granted certain temporary rights by government, that among them are generally life, lib-erty, and the pursuit of happiness, that to create, define, and enforce these rights, governments are insti-tuted to rule over men, deriving their powers from the ruling elites, that whenever any form of govern-ment is threatened, it is never the right of the people to alter and abolish it, for they are to never insti-tute new government. For it is the power and authority of government to create and destroy all rights, and to always determine what is in the best interests of the people. For the people are forever depend-ent upon government for all things.

The Newsweek poll is good news. It is a high, noble and an especially American thing to do to reject secularism, atheism, evolution, and other ideologies of the Left – for such thinking could never have drafted the Declaration of Inde-pendence.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
The Frank Pastore Show is heard in Los Angeles weekday afternoons on 99.5 KKLA and on the web at kkla.com, and is the winner of the 2006 National Religious Broadcasters Talk Show of the Year. Frank is a former major league pitcher with graduate degrees in both philosophy of religion and political philosophy.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Frank Pastore's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
No One Left?

It seems that that ther are no posters here to challenge my views.

I believe in science. The problem is that science presents questions that the Evolutionists choose to ignore. That tells me alot about the stand of the Evolutionists.

I have been accused of having a closed mind. Maybe that is so. Or perhaps my mind is open to opinions that differ from the closed mindedness of the Evolutionists.

It seems to me that anything that questions a point of view must be examined; and if the results of that examination point to a different conclusion than first held, a change in viewpoint must be made.

It is the Evolutionists that have closed their minds to examination of the facts.


Gen 1:14-18

Do not take this the wrong way, I am being serious.

Gen 1:14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:

I don’t see anything here stating the earth is flat or that everything revolves around it.

Gen 1:15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.

I don’t see anything here stating the earth is flat or that everything revolves around it.

Gen 1:16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.

I don’t see anything here stating the earth is flat or that everything revolves around it.

Gen 1:17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,

I don’t see anything here stating the earth is flat or that everything revolves around it. Perhaps you think this says something more than it does. Does the fact that the lights in heaven give light upon the earth prevent the heavens from giving light on the moon or Jupiter or on another heavenly body for that matter? Is it your understanding that their light is given exclusively to earth?

Gen 1:18 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.

When I read verses 14-18 as a whole I don’t see anything here stating the earth is flat or that everything revolves around it. Maybe I am dense or maybe you are reading something into the Scriptures that is not there.

Now the link you provide gives one man’s (Marshall Hall’s) opinion that the Copernican Model is a counterfeit, does that mean everybody in Christianity must believe him? To be honest I thought you were pulling my leg – you know, tongue-in-cheek sorta and I did not even read any of it. Is that how you see this debate? Because Marshall Hall (who is he BTW?) believes this hogwash you can put me in HIS camp and think you’ve won some points by kicking the supports out of HIS argument?

In case you did not receive the word, the Roman Catholic Church is not the final word on God or Scripture. They, in that institution, may think so but I happen to disagree with them. So please don’t use their position for a straw man argument here.

Well, that's all for now. It has been enjoyable. Have a Good Night.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.