Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, October 16, 2006
Frank Gaffney :: Townhall.com Columnist
Snatching defeat?
by Frank Gaffney
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


For example, they were instrumental in withdrawing Mexico from the decades-old mutual defense pact known as the Treaty of Rio, a decision announced ironically just days before the 9/11 attacks in 2001. They seemed determined to find occasions to work at cross-purposes with the United States – notably, in connection with our effort to hold Saddam Hussein accountable to various Security Council resolutions.

Most troubling, however, was the Castañeda cabal’s efforts to convert the initially pro-U.S. Fox and his government into friends of the hard left throughout Latin America.

Castañeda personally engineered closer ties to the Castro apparatus in Cuba, encouraged the narco-terrorist FARC in Colombia and strove to rehabilitate Danny Ortega and his Sandinista Party in Nicaragua. It is not hard to assign responsibility for these initiatives since they were abandoned immediately after Castañeda left the foreign ministry.

As a result not only of their ideological bent but their incompetence, Castañeda and his team blew the opportunity afforded when the newly inaugurated George Bush assigned top priority to what he called a "special relationship" with Mexico and traveled there as his symbolic first trip abroad. Mexico dropped in the priority list for Washington, even before 9/11, and has never recovered since.

The possibility that the likes of Jorge Castañeda might return to power is especially dangerous for both Mexico and the United States at a moment when Ortega may triumph over a divided democratic-right in Nicaragua and the Chávez-Castro axis is making inroads in so many other places. Under Castañeda or his cabal, it is unimaginable that the Mexican government would play the constructive role it might otherwise perform in the post-Castro transition in Cuba.

It would be a tragedy if, at this critical juncture – and despite the preferences a majority of Mexicans expressed at the ballot box, Felipe Calderón were to squander the chance for Mexico to serve as a bulwark against the combined dangers of Chavismo and Fidelismo and to enjoy a strong, constructive and mutually beneficial relationship with the United States. It is in the interests of both of our countries that President Calderón’s vision of a freedom-loving and -supporting Mexico be represented at the Foreign Ministry, not that of Hugo Chávez, Fidel Castro and Jorge Castañeda.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Frank Gaffney Jr. is the founder and president of the Center for Security Policy and author of War Footing: 10 Steps America Must Take to Prevail in the War for the Free World .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Frank Gaffney's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.

have we ignored South America?
Much of what I have read seems to say there is an alert eye to what is happening but that area is not ready for capitalism nor do the populations generally want it. So many are poor that they want stability and predictability and they will settle for a dictator to get that state of affairs. Some reason for hope in the demostrations on behalf of Chavez's opposition.

Once again
Our drug policies & trade policies are driving more people into poverty and enriching the corrupt. It makes the masses prime pickings for the likes of Chavez -- they see us as their enemies and I can't blame them. For all the good we do, when we craft trade bills that favor the wealthy & do nothing to protect the laborers (like fair trade practices & minimum wages), we contribute to the poverty and thus to illegal immigration. Our drug war has led to mass spraying of crops - including legal ones -- killed & sickened children & livestock, driven indigenous people from their lands, and allowed the corporations to take them over with no compensation to the peasants. We have fostered a hugely profitable world-wide black market that has turned entire countries into a giant prohibition era Chicago gangland. We must learn the lessons of prohibition over again in this drug war. Tax & regulate, like with alcohol. You cannot stop people from doing something they've done for thousands of years. Every group has had their drug of choice, whether cannabis, alcohol, coca or opium. It was never an unmanageable problem until prohibition. Prohibition makes a small social problem into a worldwide war on people, crops & civil rights. It poisons every aspect of our relationships with many countries. The refusal of our government to work with the Afghan farmers to set up a legal system to sell their hemp & opium crops may well be responsible for our failure to win hearts & minds there. We will never "win" until we do that.

From: http://blogs.salon.com/0002762/

When your drug war is a failure, silence those who actually have a solution

Everybody in the entire world is in agreement that the international effort to deal with opium in Afghanistan has been a colossal failure. Everybody is blaming everybody else and nobody has a clue what to do about it, with one exception: The Senlis Council (a European think-tank) has developed and promoted concrete and workable plans, including: Opium Licensing for the Production of Essential Medicines: Securing a Sustainable Future for Afghanistan.
So when you have a complete failure on your hands, have no clue how to turn it around, and a bunch of very smart people come up with a comprehensive plan to solve your problems, what do you do?

The Afghan government has ordered the closure of all offices of a group that wants to promote new ways of dealing with the global drugs problem.

And from the Christian science monitor:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0927/p01s04-woam.html

"We have spent $4.7 billion in Colombia ... and we brush under the rug a host of uncomfortable questions - about the military ... degrees of corruption, and overall efficacy of the drug war effort," says Bruce Bagley, an expert on drug trafficking at the University of Miami. "And then, along comes a Jamundí (massacre of U.S. trained agents by Columbian Army)and calls the entire presumption of this war on drugs into question."

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.