Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, August 05, 2009
Ed Feulner :: Townhall.com Columnist
Piling on the Spending
by Ed Feulner
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

This year, millions of Americans accepted a salary freeze or even a pay cut so they could keep their jobs. They ought to be asking why the federal government isn’t willing to make a similar sacrifice.

Even though faced with declining tax receipts and increased borrowing, lawmakers and President Barack Obama have ramped up federal spending -- and not just temporary spending. They intend to make this year’s big increases permanent. Washington will shell out almost $34,000 per household in 2009. That’s $8,000 per household more than it spent last year. President Obama’s proposed 2010 budget would replace many “temporary” spending programs with officially permanent ones, meaning that by 2019 (when, presumably, this recession will be over and the economy will have enjoyed some years of growth) the federal government would still spend $33,000 per household.

That number ignores any spending that might be caused by the president’s attempts to reform health care. Should his administration succeed in creating a “public option” health plan, the government could be on the hook for trillions more.

It’s always difficult to make accurate long-term projections, of course, since so much can change during any decade. But all the experts -- the Congressional Budget Office, think tank economists and even the White House -- agree that our country’s deficit will be massive in 2019.

Overspending isn’t a partisan issue. Discretionary spending -- the money Congress chooses to spend (in contrast to entitlement programs, which are on autopilot) -- has increased 74 percent faster than inflation since 2001. That means a Republican congress and a Republican president signed off on massive voluntary spending increases, year after year. No wonder Republicans have lost their brand.

When President Bush flew home to Texas this year, he left behind a $1,186 billion budget deficit. That was bad enough. But President Obama’s policies have made that situation even worse. In just a few months, his administration tacked another $659 billion on to that amount. The fiscal year ends Sept. 30.

And plenty of this spending is simple waste.

Government auditors have combed through several recent budgets and found that one fifth of federal programs fail to improve life for the groups they’re supposed to be serving. That’s at least $123 billion wasted, every year. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Dr. Edwin Feulner is president of The Heritage Foundation, a Townhall.com Gold Partner, and co-author of Getting America Right: The True Conservative Values Our Nation Needs Today .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Ed Feulner's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Spending
Very true. Unfortunately, there are no politicians who support smaller government. They only disagree about who should be in charge of the ever larger government.

What they SHOULD do...
Today's Congress SHOULD do a lot of things - TABOR might indeed be the prudent thing to do - but it won't happen! They are on a spending frenzy as intent as sharks! I look back and am reminded that BILL CLINTON conceded to balancing the budget (under a Republican Congress). IF a Democrat HAD to win in 2008, I now wish HILLARY HAD beaten out Obama...she could not have been WORSE than Obama.

Obama requires trimming $100M from budget, but Congress ADDS $200M for NEW GULFSTREAMS for their imperial use...

Obama said "No more earmarks," and they STUFF bills with multiple times previous earmarking... HE DOES NOTHING TO HALT THE SPENDING; HE APPROVES IT. The argument could be made that that's becuz it fits HIS AGENDA -or- it's the price of him getting Other Things HE WANTS. Either is cynical and reckless disregard for its destructive effects. INSANITY REIGNS!

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.