Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Ed Feulner :: Townhall.com Columnist
More Money, Less Knowledge
by Ed Feulner
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


This year, the economy promises to make Independence Day less explosive than usual.

“In yet the latest reminder of the economic crisis,” The Washington Post reported recently, “more than 40 communities across the country have already cancelled their Fourth of July fireworks.” Families are cutting back too, of course. The savings rate has risen to its highest level in 15 years and consumer spending is down as people focus on making ends meet.

At least one industry, though, is bucking the cost-saving trend: higher education.

In recent decades, the cost of college has increased roughly 8 percent every year -- about twice the general rate of inflation. For the just-completed academic year, tuition jumped 6.4 percent. The College Board, which tracks such information, expects a similar increase next year.

During this patriotic holiday, parents and students alike should start asking whether they’re getting their money’s worth from colleges. Because, when it comes to understanding basic concepts about American history, evidence indicates they aren’t.

Consider a series of surveys by the Intercollegiate Studies Institute. In 2006 and 2007, ISI gave 14,000 freshmen and seniors at 50 colleges a test to determine their knowledge of American heritage. In both years, freshmen and seniors alike failed, earning scores in the low 50s.

Last year ISI extended its effort, surveying a random sample of 2,500 adults. Those results, too, were sobering. Americans with a bachelor’s degree averaged only 57 percent, just 13 percentage points higher than the average score among high-school graduates and a failing score in its own right.

What haven’t American colleges taught well?

“Only 24 percent of college graduates know the First Amendment prohibits establishing an official religion for the United States,” ISI found, to cite one example. And: “Only 54 percent can correctly identify a basic description of the free enterprise system.”

Today’s college graduate is “highly unlikely” to “have a solid command of the founding and Civil War eras, core constitutional principles, and market economics,” the report concludes. “After all the time, effort and money spent on college, students emerge no better off in understanding the fundamental features of American self-government.”

Thomas Toch, co-director of the non-profit think tank Education Sector, agrees. In the July issue of The Atlantic he writes, “We need to shed more light on how well colleges are educating their students -- to help prospective students make better decisions and to exert pressure on the whole system to provide better value for money.”

That doesn’t mean we need more federal spending on education. In fact, we ought to have less. Unfortunately, the Obama administration has already agreed to throw money at colleges.

In July the maximum amount for Pell Grants will jump to $5,350, up $500 per year. Obama’s 2010 budget declares it wants to “ensure the Pell Grant continues to grow steadily by making it an entitlement.” And the administration plans to provide $200 billion in scholarships and credits over the next decade.

But the more aid government provides, the higher colleges raise their tuitions. As a recent White House staff report on higher education notes, “schools with the steepest increases in tuition receive the most loan assistance from the federal government, clearly incentivizing higher tuition.”

Instead, parents and elected officials should use their financial leverage to break the downward spiral in higher education. They should demand that colleges teach basic American history, political science and economics. Schools should be graded so those that don’t -- or won’t -- teach these subjects can be punished by losing customers (students).

That’s a lesson in free-market economics that colleges need to learn -- one that can help more Americans understand part of what we celebrate on the Fourth of July.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Dr. Edwin Feulner is president of The Heritage Foundation, a Townhall.com Gold Partner, and co-author of Getting America Right: The True Conservative Values Our Nation Needs Today .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Ed Feulner's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Ignorance is Strength
Wasn't it Lenin or another hero of the left who said something to the effect that the future is already known, but the past must be re-written?

The sooner everyone forgets this nonsense about liberty, freedom and constitution, the quicker we will all get our treats after pushing the levers to lock our cages.

What is useful

There are usually two kinds of minds, those that like the maths and those that like words.
Of course people who like math can like books too, but basically the insticts lead us to a career that uses one or the other.

The idea of higher education though, is to teach a person to think. To use reason.

To be successful, one needs those lessons.

If a man is a math genius but does not know how to function in life, then what? A math genius needs a free government as much as an artist or writer.

College is not too late. There are so many trash courses that fill up the schedules and programs, there is no time for education.

High schools need to teach history and civics but there is not that much depth in the programs. I was so bored with high school American history but when I was able to read the fascinating books on the market - I grew to love it. College should be able to teach it so that it is the story of the struggle of man - not just the bare facts. It is the story of people, part of you, part of me. My ancestors were there - they fought and cried and died and gave me the United States of America. I feel as though I too were there.

Education is understanding - not the ability to make money - that is the sideline which an educated man can acquire and use not only for himself but for posterity.

No Maddoxes - for man is not an island (as the saying goes).

Good for you
I congratulate you on an article the country badly needs.

The universities are too busy teaching marxist ideology to teach real American History. If it is taught, it is distorted.

When kids were asked why they voted for obama they say he is "cool". Frankly, I think no one should vote before 21 years of age except soldiers because they are giving their all, sometimes their lives and should have a say.

Kids at 18 have no experience of life, no wisdom, MP EDUCATION. no values on which to base a vote that affects millions of people.

Of course many adults are just as ignorant, but there is no way to avoid that - it is too late.

I might suggest that President obama is a perfect example of the idealogue's education. He knows nothing of European history - and cares less. He knows only of African studies - and Muslims. He is angry with the white men who colonialized Africa.

History cannot change mistakes, but it puts them into perspective.

For one, the loss of America to the Indian was inevitable - unhappily, but there would be no way to stop it. It could have been worse - Spain could have controlled North America and we and the Indians (I have two Indian lines) would be living in a banana republic. The history of Spain and the Catholic Church would have inevitably made it so.

We at least are lucky that it was England with its long history of rights - the Magna Carta for one - and their legal rights, court practices (in spite of the monarchy - which finally had to give much of its power to the parlaiment) gave us the basis for the Declaration of Independence.

I Am Sure
Ward Churchhill and Bill Ayers would totally disagree with your article, but I think it is fantastic and very timely. Someone wrote a book about how Obama got elected. I didn't read it, but I hope it addressed the facts as well as you did. Obama got elected because he knew the facts stated in your article are true, and that he could be elected as President of the United States of America by simply stating that he was a Harvard Graduate and something about a Law Review. I seriously wonder how the 57 State President would have scored on the test. Wow that is a great idea. Every Politician running for office must pass the same test with a score of 90 or above to be placed on the ballot, especially Moderate Republicans.

Hmm...
Well, I also find it depressing that most people aren't interested in history.

But I find Feulner's critique of higher education a bit wanting.

The whole point of studying at a university is to specialize in a field that will earn you money. The real reason people shell out major greenbacks for that sheet of paper is that the cache of xyz degree from abc U. will be worth it in the long run.

If knowledge of US history made money, I bet those kids would be scoring in the high-90s. The real lament here is the materialism of our culture and the vapidity intrinsic in a system that values wealth over wisdom.

I remember my Civic's teacher
That was a long time ago now. But I remember my civics teacher very well. He taught strictly what civics should be. how the government was structured and function. He never interjected his own political beliefs into the class. When we had debate in class. He would always take the opposite view point that you were arguing. And he did that very well.
I also remember my french teacher. She had a big pot leaf tattooed on her shoulder blade.

High Cost of Liberals

Liberals are expensive. They are inefficent. They spend enormous amount of time & energy accomplishing absolutely nothing.

Colleges are dominated by Liberals seeking more Federal Money, so they are expensive.

Healthcare is also dominated by Liberals seeking Government money so again we see costs rising faster than inflation.

Liberals can only survive in industries where there is a High Value added, like the entertainment industry, or a product where government funding is without limits.

In a competative enviorment where knowledge, skill and hard work are measurements of success, Liberals don't do well.

College & Healthcare used to be very affordable in the United States. That was in more conservative times. That was before the Liberals got the Government involved.

So if you want to hurt the maximum number of people, elect a liberal.

I've always had the mentality...
If you want to do something constructive with your life, don't go to college.

Lilly
The "correct" answer, for those of your ideology, depends on the latest talking points.

Silly Premise
I would imagine that a student about to graduate with a Bachelor's degree in Electrical Engineering might know an awful lot about Electrical Engineering and still not know what's in the Second Amendment or whatever. Should we restore some form of what used to be called Civics, so that our citizenry may understand our government? I think so. But to assume that students know nothing because they don't know Civics is silly. And if the test that is given to college students to assess their grasp of socio-political issues should be constructed by a conservative group, so that the only right answer is "free enterprise and laissez-faire business" and the wrong answer is "government regulation", then the whole exercise would be not an evaluation of knowledge but a political instrument.

Replace math with Econ
I've been saying for a couple years now that we should replace math in grades K-12 with economics.

The students will learn the math in the process. Actually, I might have prospered in math had the problems actually been based in a problem or something concrete, rather than just numbers floating magically in the air. I mean, come on... working math problems about money are a hell of a lot sexier than learning pi. Who doesn't like money? Who doesn't want to know more about money? Who doesn't want to eventually have or earn more money?

Kids who are more proficient in math can opt to take additional advanced math courses.

I hated math as a kid. Took econ in my masters program and found I loved it. I look at the world with entirely different eyes after taking a few econ courses. In fact, being exposed to economics actually changed my voting pattern and political affiliation.

I propose some state actually experiment with this concept: replace math with economics for all kids K-12. run the program for a dozen years and then test these kids later. My hunch is not only will kids be smarter in math but they'll eventually be much smarter about their personal financial decisions, too, thus helping us avoid another food-stamp mortgage meltdown designed and executed by the free-lunch bunch.

But we'll never see this ever come to pass, because once voters actually understand economics, the rarely EVER vote for liberals or democrats after that point.

Liberals have yet to explain how my life will be better if the government takes MORE of my money. Or how my life will be better if I only agree to work for that much less, or even for free.

Terri
I hear you there. My daughter is 10. Just the other week I had to explain to here that while the vast part of the population of Russia is centered in the European part of the nation. That is a nation that actually spans both Europe and Asia.
But she did come home over one weekend after school to tell me just how we were destroying our environment. Thankfully I have a copy of "The Great Global Warming Swindle." Which I find about as dull as anything Al Gore does. Its almost no wonder so many just accept what Gore says. My god, who wants to listen to such a dull subject, and the science is dull, droned on about by what may be the most Boring Man on Earth, That would be Al Gore.

What happened to
teaching Geography and History in Grammar School? These were subjects that I had in the 50's. High School had Political Science, American History and Economics. College is too late to start learning about these subjects.

Today it's shameful that kids don't even know where the USSR (Russia) is on a map.

We need to start earlier, like the "Old days".

Before I read the article I knew it was
about education.

College is too late for some of these subjects. They need to be taught in high school.

I got through my entire high school career with 1 history class, no economics classes, and no political science classes. I decided I didn't have a good enough history background to take AP History in high school like all my frieinds, so I only took a semester of government. That's it!!

By chance I took my first economics class as a freshman in college. I hated it! The professor kept drawing graphs on the board and saying that everything could be explained with a graph. It was all greek to me.

After hating that first econ class in college I chose econ as a major because it was the shortest major in the entire college. I grew to love it and graduated with a nearly perfect gpa because I enjoyed the challenge of learning a new way of thinking (and the math to back it up) about the psychology of financial markets, monetary policy, governments, etc.

Luckily my economics teachers had a capitalist/free market bent, or I probably wouldn't be reading townhall today.

I vote for more American history in high school and in college.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.