Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, April 30, 2007
Ed Feulner :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Paperwork of Paper
by Ed Feulner
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Some jobs are harder than others -- selling snowshoes in Jamaica, for instance, or swimsuits in the Antarctic. Yet either of those jobs would be a snap compared to selling paper products to Congress.

Last year the Architect of the Capitol needed to buy paper towels and toilet paper for congressional rest rooms. Sounds simple. Americans stock up on paper products all the time. But in Washington, D.C., nothing’s that easy.

Before buying anything, the architect’s office had to describe specifically what it wanted and how the products should be delivered. Federal requirements stipulate that “the minimum thickness of 12 single plies of the paper towel material provided shall be 0.070 inch when measured under an applied pressure of 0.5 psig.”

Plus, “the rate of absorption of paper towel material provided shall not be greater than 20 seconds for the absorption 0.1 millileter of water on any representative sample of paper towel as submitted.” Got that? Oh, and for the toilet paper, “the tissue shall be substantially free from shieves, specks, holes, wrinkles and other imperfections in accordance with the requirement of Interim Federal Specification UU-P-00556K dated January 10, 1978 for Type I, Grade A toilet tissue.” Nothing but the best will do, apparently.

These requirements filled 32 pages. Oh, and for anyone who hopes to break into the paper-supply business, your government has some helpful advice. “The contractor is encouraged to submit paper documents, such as offers, letters, or reports, that are printed or copied double-sided on recycled paper and meet minimum content standards.” Indeed. We wouldn’t want to waste any more paper than is necessary.

Of course, paper products matter little in the grand scheme of things. But they’re a useful canary in the coal mine of public policy. The trouble they warn of here is that there are, simply, too many federal laws and regulations.

The Code of Federal Regulations for 2006 had 144,040 pages. Our federal government is so awash in regulations that The Washington Post runs a regular column devoted solely to “The Regulators.”

Consider one of the ways convoluted federal laws and regulations affect your life: through taxes. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Dr. Edwin Feulner is president of The Heritage Foundation, a Townhall.com Gold Partner, and co-author of Getting America Right: The True Conservative Values Our Nation Needs Today .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Ed Feulner's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Typos
I know it is funny that I wrote documentation, considering the typos I make, but I did.

Of course, that was before my hands stopped working right.

(Actually, I was the "document guy" because I was the one senior programmer who was a native speaker of english. Non-native speakers, regardless of proficiency, seemed to produce kind of bizarre documents (I know, I spent days rewriting them), so I was made the document specialist -- in addition to my regular programming duties, of course.)


Been There
When I worked at Dept of LAbor, my jobs was to write user and technical documentation for software. Then we wanted "CMM Level 2" certifcation (what a waste!), and I had to write a document on how I wrote documents.

I waited to be asked to write a document on how I wrote a document about how I wrote documents... The CCM standrards read that way, constant uselss navel-gazing and endless subcommittee meetings.

The sad part is that the Gov't and Go'vt contractors view CMM as a means to increase efficiency! The endless documenting of everything, considering every change to death in countless committees, and wasting hours of every day in meetings discussing how we discuss things, that is the path to efficiency according to technical efficiency "experts"?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.