Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, April 09, 2007
Ed Feulner :: Townhall.com Columnist
Flying the Flag of Freedom
by Ed Feulner
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Even before it was officially born, the United Nations was beset by tensions.

President Franklin Roosevelt floated the concept of a "United Nations" during World War II. It seemed achievable: After all, free countries such as the United States, Britain and Australia managed to set aside their differences with the Soviet Union long enough to defeat Nazi Germany.

But once the war ended and the U.N. charter was ratified, the Soviets formed a bloc of communist countries (many were Moscow's satellites) and began opposing measures proposed by the free world. The U.N. General Assembly became a farce -- a debating society where little was accomplished.

Today, the Soviet Union is long gone, but the bloc system remains alive and well at the U.N. And it's still working to stymie the U.S.

In 2005, according to the State Department, the General Assembly voted against the United States 75 percent of the time on non-consensus votes. (Most U.N. votes are non-consequential motions adopted without vote.) Granted, that's a higher-than-usual level of anti-Americanism. Over the past two decades, members of the General Assembly opposed American positions "only" two-thirds of the time on average.

The United States is the world's most powerful nation, so it's natural that some nations would oppose us sometimes, just on principle. But this overwhelming, knee-jerk opposition to American-held positions has severely blunted U.N. effectiveness. Washington should be able to use the U.N. to promote policies, such as democracy, human rights and economic freedom, which would benefit the entire world. That can't be done, though, unless we build support for American positions.

One would think the amount of foreign aid we distribute would make some sort of difference. No nation hands out more foreign aid than the U.S. But that largess obviously hasn't created much goodwill at U.N. headquarters.

According to The Heritage Foundation's own Brett Schaefer and Anthony Kim, in 2005 more than 90 percent of U.S. foreign-aid recipients voted against the U.S. a majority of the time in the General Assembly. Three out of four aid beneficiaries voted against the U.S. a majority of the time on General Assembly votes deemed important by the State Department.

So what should the U.S. do to help the United Nations live up to its promise? Form a bloc of its own -- a Freedom Coalition within the U.N. that will promote both economic and political liberty. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Dr. Edwin Feulner is president of The Heritage Foundation, a Townhall.com Gold Partner, and co-author of Getting America Right: The True Conservative Values Our Nation Needs Today .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Ed Feulner's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Foreign Relations 101
You talk against the US

The US gives you some money to either; shut you up or, show good will.

You see that talking against the US got you money so you talk against it some more.

Now the US cannot stop giving you money, because to do so would make the first donation seem like a bribe; so the US keeps giving you money as you rail against "American Imperialism."

Eventually, if you keep attacking the US long enough, march on the street, burn down a US embassy or two; Washington sends an special envoy, maybe even Nancy Pelosi, to promise more 'good will' and more US bucks.

Any questions?

Check out Latin America; since the Alliance for Progress was put into effect, the rethoric against the US has done nothing but to increase.

Even countries we regularly treat as equals; such as Mexico, respond by constantly whining about our policies, taking no responsibility for their own actions and, inviting America whenever possible to a Ropinol induced date-rape.

The U.N. was America's idea
I don't like what the U.N. has become either.

But the ideal of collective security and the U.N. itself were American principles. President Franklin Roosevelt came up with the basic idea for the U.N. as early as 1942.

Today, America can certainly lament how far off the track the U.N. has gotten. But to attack the whole idea as just a "POS" would be impossible to justify given the facts that a) America invented the U.N. in the first place; and b) America has been a staunch supporter of the U.N. ever since.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.