Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, September 04, 2006
Ed Feulner :: Townhall.com Columnist
Rebuilding in the Big Easy doesn't have to be so hard
by Ed Feulner
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Perhaps Thomas Wolfe was correct -- you can't go home again. Certainly that's what many former Louisiana residents are saying one year after Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans and nearby communities.

Fewer than half of the 450,000 people who lived in the Crescent City last August have returned. One reason is that the governments that are supposed to help these people have instead failed them.

Not because of a lack of spending. If simply throwing cash around could accomplish anything, New Orleans would be repopulated already. The federal government has dedicated $7.5 billion simply to help rebuild and repair hurricane-damaged homes.

But the program, called "Road Home," is taking the scenic route. So far, the Associated Press reports, it's helped only 42 -- that's right, 42 -- homeowners. Gov. Kathleen Blanco admits that progress is slow. "We are moving in government speed," she told reporters last week.

But let's compare the government's response with that of faith-based organizations. While elected "leaders" dither, religious leaders are building homes and lives.

First Presbyterian Church of Iowa City sent 19 members to New Orleans this summer to rebuild a family's home. "It's a blessing, really a blessing," said recipient Alicia Boswell.

Dulin United Methodist of Falls Church, Va., sent a team to Mississippi to rebuild a home. It also adopted a family that fled New Orleans, helping them furnish an apartment and giving them a car.

A team from Wilton Baptist Church in Wilton, Conn., traveled to Bay St. Louis, Miss., to help a family rebuild. They hung dry wall, painted and installed plumbing. "Meeting this family humanized the loss and helped us feel like we could make a difference," Pastor Bob Guffey said.

Parishioners at University Baptist Church in Baton Rouge, La., adopted two families that had lost virtually everything in Lacombe, La. Church members helped the families rebuild their homes, and they purchased new furniture and household items to replace those Katrina destroyed.

These are all small steps, of course. But that's why they're successful. Instead of burning through billions of bucks to help everyone simultaneously (the Washington approach) these churches do what they can -- and make a difference. "You help one person at a time," volunteer Don Garland says. And it adds up. "The only way you can [do disaster relief] is by making life better for one person, then another person, then another. Anything else is good intentions."

John Daugherty understands this. He coordinates Cooperative Baptist Fellowship of Louisiana's relief efforts. The group has rebuilt dozens of houses. "It seems like a drop in the bucket, but with these 50 homes, we've made a significant difference," he says.

Not all faith-based efforts were small in scope. Catholic Charities USA took in $16 million and helped 200,000 people. The United Methodist Committee on Relief collected $62 million last year alone. But these big charities worked through local coordinators and groups to ensure their money funded real progress.

Again, compare that with the federal approach. Remember the FEMA trailers? There are 9,855 mobile homes parked near an airport in Hope, Ark. The federal government spent more than $30,000 per trailer, and they've sat empty for a year while Katrina evacuees spread out around the country. Adding insult to injury, Washington has since spent an additional $4.3 million just to keep them from sinking into the ground.

"American taxpayers are spending $250,000 per month to maintain these empty mobile homes, and it is time we do what is right and put them to use," Rep. Mike Ross (D-Ark.) said recently. Maybe he doesn't realize FEMA is "moving in government speed."

As is often the case, Washington's talking heads have missed the point. The lesson of Katrina isn't that we need more federal involvement in our lives. It's that faith and civil society works -- and big, centralized government programs don't.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Dr. Edwin Feulner is president of The Heritage Foundation, a Townhall.com Gold Partner, and co-author of Getting America Right: The True Conservative Values Our Nation Needs Today .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Ed Feulner's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Hmmmm.....
"The federal government has dedicated $7.5 billion simply to help rebuild and repair hurricane-damaged homes... American taxpayers are spending $250,000 per month to maintain these empty mobile homes, and it is time we do what is right and put them to use,"

Again, I've forgotten what section of the Constitution grants the federal government the authority to spend my tax dollars this way.

I'm sick of this whole topic
Can't anybody come up with something ELSE?

Brian - right on. They are only spending the money to ease any guilt that doesn't belong with the feds. They should have NEVER gone in, but should NOW GET OUT.

Talk about a sinkhole to throw money down.


Abandon
"Just a thought" is right about NO being a sinkhole. Not just figuratively, but literally. New Orleans is a bad place to build a city. The reason much of it is below sea level is that it has been sinking for years.

It is sinking because the Mississippi River can't flood the land to replenish it with silt. This is due to the levees built to keep the river out of people's homes.

New Orleans should be abandoned. Maybe it can be rebuilt somewhere else, if there are people who want to do that. But preserving this place will only get more complicated, and more expensive.

I'm surprised the leftists aren't screaming about the environmental disaster of having a city there. I guess their hatred for President Bush is greater than their concern for the environment.

Turn it over to Christians and Wal-Mart
Wal-Mart and Christianity -- soup, soap and salvation writ large.

Give 10% of the money the Democrats are stealing, losing, wasting and pissing away to Wal-Mart and direct them to co-ordinate with people like the Christian churches in this article, and stand back and leave the American people to do what they do best.

That part of New Orleans that is worth rebuilding will be up and running by this time next year and the money not wasted or stolen can be given back to the people to whom it belongs -- those who earned it.

I'm so sick of
hearing about this rat hole we keep throwing money down. The people have spoken, they don't want to return to a sinking, nasty, violent town anytime soon. Mr. Chocolate City had better just accept the reality of change because he certainly earned it. If our government rebuilds on the same low lying land, and the inevitible happens again, the taxpayers should revolt if any more money is thrown down this nasty rat hole.

Send Them Dirt!.
Lord knows that in my breast there beats a charitable heart. My compassion for the poor folks who have been forced to live below sea level knows no bounds. It's not their fault that all the good land for building cities was taken by Haliburton.
Send them money? Pah! The average New Orleanian would pass it on the street, saying: "I have twice that amount in my freezer, and had to sublet my ice chest for the remainders."
Those folks need dirt.
Good honest soil to raise their fair city above the ravages of the cold cruel ocean.
I intend to show the world what a man with blood in his veins can do.
I am boxing up some of the best dirt in my yard to send to N.O.. I will not stop there; I intend to spare no expense. I am also sending them some rocks.

Awesome, Lazlo
That is definitely a more common sense approach to the situation.

Feds can't do what individuals don't
Lazlo-- there was a plan being whimsically floated to solve three problems simulataneously by (1) digging a deep moat along the Mexican border; (2) trucking the dirt to NO to raise the city; and (3) deporting all the troublesome Florida alligators to fill the moat.

Regardless of topographic or other problems, nobody will be able to rebuild NO except the people who want to live there. As long as they expect to see outside help--whether it's federal money, churches sending little help committees, or whatever else. What are the quarter-million people who remain displaced doing to help themselves? Nothing, for the most part.

To put this in perspective: In February 1904, most of downtown Baltimore was destroyed by fire. Reduced to fist-sized rubble for the most part, except the shells of a few buildings, some of which required demolition. This was still the era of "muscle" labor--men, mules and horses. Steam power had not effectively been harnessed in a way that could have helped; hydraulics had not yet been invented; the internal combustion engine was not in practical use; telephone service was in its infancy; computers had not even been dreamed of. Yet, within weeks, all the streets had been made passable. Within three years, the central part of the city had been rebuilt, on a new street plan designed to make firefighting easier. New building codes were in force. All this was accomplished without federal, or even outside money. It was done by the people who had the most at stake.

In spite of technology and much larger government, I don't think things work any differently today than 102 years ago. Among the hundreds of thousands displaced in NO, aren't there ten or twenty thousand people willing to get their hands dirty and rebuild their own city? If not, then it deserves to be barricaded and abandoned.

Where Are the Environmentalists?
Wolfpat brings up an interesting observation of "the environmnetal disaster of having a city there" has apparently gone unnoticed.

Could it be that the Governor and Mayor are both Democrats? Are the important environmental principles put aside until a Republican shows up on the radar?



One other thought....a little off track.

If a "new" New Orleans were to emerge/survive at about 300-350,000 people - all employed, all working and paying taxes, with their previous criminal, dependent 150,000 "citizens" scattered to the four winds - wouldn't that be a much more desirable city to visit, to live in , to invest in, etc.?

The two major tourist attractions (sorry, Ninth Ward, you missed the cut) - the French Quarter and the Garden District - remain intact. So the tourism industry should also return.

A smaller, more successful city? Is it possible?

Rebuilding Mississippi
Haven't we all forgotten something here? Wasn't Mississippi hit as hard as Louisiana? Last I heard Mississippi is pretty functional now. How come they can do this but the folks in Louisiana can't? Any body ever heard of "Tough Love"? It's called being responsible and taking care of yourself. Perhaps we need for Louisiana to pay back all the money that our Government gave to re-build it! Maybe they would learn the value of "Doing it yourself." Maybe?

JudoEd
That's the 7.5 Billion dollar question.

Water and New Orleans
The first government official to recommend that New Orleans not be built where it was was Lafayette. He was right then and he is right now. If they rebuild they will have a problem sometime in the future with water. Water is powerful and really cannot be controlled under all circumstances. If the wind blows hard enough and the rain comes down the water will have its way.

Here's a thought
Instead of spending $7.5 BILLION on rebuilding 450,000 homes and $190 BILLION

Here's a thought --
Instead of spending $7.5 BILLION on rebuilding 450,000 homes (which is interesting because the 2005 census estimate was that there were only about 450,000 residents before the storm) and an additional $190 BILLION for rebuilding the New Orleans infrastructure, why not cut the federal spending, turn the entire place into "nation wetlands," and give each of these former residents $500,000 to buy a home and get a job on property ABOVE SEA LEVEL? ...it would be a lot cheaper.

We can't build anything
I really don't know of any major infrastructure projects this country has pulled off successfully for alot of years. We have forgotten how. We now just create administrative and legal barriers that actually encourage corruption which prevents success in such projects. The big dig and our efforts in Iraq come to mind.

Turn the city over to Disney or some resort outfit. Build a small community to support the oil and shipping resources and let it go at that.

We stand at the juncture...
...where committing to spend $285 billion is no longer enough to show that Americans are not racists; where the blame game has become more important than solving the problem; where a system of dikes and levees that were once considered "public goods" have indisputably become "public bads". The juncture at which we stand is the place where we voters have instructed the Congress and the Army Corps of Engineers to manhandle the Mississippi eastward, away from its natural course. And spending any money at this juncture will not simply result in wasteful pork; it will become a tragedy of gargantuan proportions, and we will have only ourselves to blame.

Here's a question that is tragically more relevant to the current discussion than all the Katrinas and Ernestos that have ever hit that shore: What is the name of the fifth largest river in the U.S.? (Hint: Go to the juncture.) Bigger than the combined flows of the Missouri, Tennessee, Willamette, Hudson, Delaware and Potomac combined, the Atchafalaya River is a distributary of the Mississippi. (The opposite of tributaries, which flow into larger rivers, distributaries flow out of major rivers as they approach the sea.) The Atchafalaya is important because no matter what the Army Corps of Engineer designs, no matter how much successful politicking Nagin and Blanco do, no matter how much money Congress and Bush throw at New Orleans ($121B and counting), no matter how high government contractors build and rebuild those levees, and, interestingly, no matter how few or how many hurricanes hit Louisiana in the future, the Mississippi is going to flow into the Atchafalaya sometime within the next three to five decades. There is nothing we can do about it, unless Moses comes back to life and permanently parts the Red, Mississippi and Atchafalaya rivers.

Yet nobody is discussing this geological and hydrological inevitability. What we are discussing is how many taxpayer dollars - $200 billion or $300 billion - should be spent to build and rebuild the dikes, levees, and below-sea-level New Orleans itself.
For the last fifty years, ever since the Army Corps started diverting water from the Atchafalaya to the Mississippi, the Atchafalaya has been eroding (sinking) and the Mississippi has been silting (rising) to such an extent that if you stand at the distributary point today - the juncture - you will look 30 feet up at the Mississippi River? How long can humans withstand what nature and nature's God has planned for the Mississippi? Not much longer, I'm afraid. And the differential increases at an accelerated pace as the each river's respective erosion or silting process continues.

If we are lucky, the Mississippi will flood somewhere upstream, and when it recedes there will be a new Mississippi River route to the sea (generally, due south of the distributary point, where the Atchafalaya now goes.) But if we are unlucky - rather, if those who live in the downstream flood plain of the Atchafalaya are unlucky - the increasingly strained levees will fail sometime in the next few decades, and the Mississippi torrent will sweep around 100,000 southern Louisiana residents into the Gulf of Mexico.

Talk privately to individuals in the Army Corps and they will confirm what I am writing; indeed, they will say I understate the problem. But as public choice economists and scientists point out, these same individuals know who butters their bread, and they are not about to get off the gravy train, probably until it is too late.

So yes, let's blame W and Ray and Kathleen and Michael and Brownie and others for what happened in the aftermath of Katrina. But Katrina is not the problem. It never was. It was not even an unusual hurricane, and its effects were predictable, predicted, and accurately modeled.

But most of all, let's blame ourselves for not getting the log out of our own eye long enough to tell Congress to stop this foolish nonsense about rebuilding New Orleans (except the French Quarter), the dikes, and the levees. Their Babelian plan will fail, and hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars will not merely be wasted; they may send tens of thousands of good Louisiana residents literally out to sea. And the blood from that flood will be on OUR hands.

The point is...
...that NO could be rebuilt much quicker if the governments got out of the way. San Francisco was rebuilt, Galveston was rebuilt, Chicago was rebuilt by the citizens. There was no FEMA when all of these tragedies occurred and it seems that things were done just fine without it.

And I believe that NO should be rebuilt and it can be safe from the storms that batter it from time to time. The problem was not that the city was below sea level but that the monies that were supposed to be used to update and repair the levee system got swallowed up in NOs corrupt political system. That is where the problems were, and are, not in the location of the city.

Wetlands
If we are going to be environmentally correct and consistent, much of New Orleans can't legally be rebuilt because it is wetland, within the meaning of the appropriate regulations.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.