Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, April 17, 2008
Dr. Matthew Ladner :: Townhall.com Columnist
Jeb Bush's Reforms Improved Public Schools
by Dr. Matthew Ladner
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Democrats have the time to read their own health care bill before voting on it?


Is demography destiny?

If so, say some experts, states with growing Hispanic populations seem doomed to fail, weighed down with ineffective school systems and abysmal test scores. One academic goes so far as to predict the Southwest will become the “Appalachia of the 21st Century.” His logic was simple: Hispanic populations are growing rapidly, Hispanic students under-perform academically, southwestern states are doomed.

Balderdash.

States can overcome this challenge. Exhibit A: Florida under Jeb Bush and Charlie Crist. Startling statistics show that with abundant school choice and systemic education reform, Florida’s Hispanic students already eclipse the average academic performance of many states.

Tackling education reform in Florida is a tougher nut to crack than in Massachusetts or New Hampshire. Low-income students make up more than half the K-12 student body, with a “majority minority” ethnic mix. Florida’s per student funding is below the national average.

Governor Jeb Bush pushed through a bracing dual strategy of accountability from both the top down (high-stakes state testing) and bottom up (widespread parental choice) in 1999. Governor Bush’s A+ Plan emphasized standards for the schools and transparency for parents. Schools faced real consequences for prolonged failure, including school vouchers for their students.

Bush’s school choice strategy also included the creation of the nation’s largest voucher program--the McKay Scholarship Program--for students with disabilities and the “Step Up for Students” tax credit for economically disadvantaged children. Today, 820 Florida private schools educate 19,000 children with disabilities through McKay. A similar number of low-income parents exercise choice through the tax credit program. Florida also has a vigorous and growing charter school movement, with 375 charter schools educating over 106,000 students.

So what does Florida have to show for this tough mixture of testing and parental choice? The best source of data to answer this question comes from the federal government. The National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) tests representative samples of students in the states on a variety of subjects. NAEP provides the nation’s most reliable and respected source of K-12 testing data.

Children who do not learn to read in the early grades almost never recover academically, falling further and further behind with each passing grade. Reaching the middle school years, they literally cannot read their textbooks and often become academically frustrated and disruptive. Hopelessly behind, these children begin dropping out of school in large numbers in the eighth grade.

Researchers, therefore, focus heavily on fourth grade reading scores as a bellweather for the effectiveness of schools. In 1998, a stunning 47 percent of Florida fourth graders were on this dismal track, scoring “below basic” on the NAEP reading test. In 2007, 70 percent of Florida fourth graders scored basic or above on reading.

The percentage of Florida children failing to master basic literacy dropped by 36 percent in less than 10 years--a remarkable achievement. Meanwhile, the percentage of fourth graders scoring “proficient” increased by 54 percent, and the percent scoring “advanced” (the highest level of achievement) doubled, from four to eight percent.

Best of all, improvements among Hispanic and African American students helped to drive the overall results. Scores of Florida’s Hispanic students have soared in recent years. Florida’s Hispanic students now have the second highest reading scores in the nation, and African Americans score fourth highest.

The average Florida Hispanic student NAEP reading score (conducted in English mind you) is now higher than the overall scores of all students in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee and West Virginia.

Hold on to your hats, because this list is likely to grow in coming years. Florida’s free and reduced lunch eligible Hispanics outscore the average for all students in several of  the above states, including California.

In 2007, a family of four needed to earn $20,650 to be qualified for a free lunch, $38,203 for a reduced price lunch.[i] Nationwide, approximately 80 percent of free or reduced lunch children qualify for a free lunch. Median family income in California, by comparison, is $64,563.

Likewise, Florida’s African American scores have soared since 1998; from significantly below the national average for African Americans to significantly above. In 2007, Florida’s African American scores nearly tied the average score for all students in California.  

If Florida can maintain the current momentum, Florida’s African American students will have their own long list of states that they outperform. As it stands, they already score higher than the average for all students in Louisiana and Mississippi.

Florida’s reform record provides hope to a nation struggling to improve education and to close racial achievement gaps. Given the proper incentives, public schools can improve. Disadvantaged children can learn at levels previously thought reserved for the privileged. It now falls to current Governor Charlie Crist, who served as Florida Education Commissioner during the Jeb Bush administration, to keep these gains going.

Demography need not become destiny, in the Southwest or elsewhere. Reform minded governors must realize that the education unions fought Jeb Bush every step of the way. The prize, an education reform legacy which is the envy of the nation, was well worth the fight.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Dr. Matthew Ladner is vice president of research for the Goldwater Institute and an expert on educational reform and school choice. Dr. Ladner holds a Ph.D. from the University of Houston.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Matthew Ladner's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
It was not just the unions
who fought standardized testing and alternative schools. It was practically the whole public school system from the principal level up. The school boards, the superintendants, all the empire building bureaucrats who cared nothing for education, but feared any vestige of accountability or loss of funds to alternate schooling. However, powered by a firmly GOP and conservative state govt, and generally conservative voter base, progrews was made, and as the old mom network sees the alternative schools are doing a better job, momentum is being maintained. We have just established the Florida Schools of Excellence committee to oversee selected public Charter schools. this will enable selected charter schools to get out from under the harassing thumb of the county schools boards and superintendents who see us as a thorn in the side. The charter school i work at has just been chosen first school to come under the administration of FSE.

By the way
Gain scores on the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test, the dreaded FCAT, are the measure of how much each student has learned since the previous year's FCAT. Our gain scores place us in the upper 1 per cent. The 7th grade class i work with comprises 7 whites, 8 blacks, and 9 Hispanics/Oriental/polys.

vouchers part one
vouchers part one
i am an elected school board member and a small business owner.
i would like to step outside of political labels for an instant and discuss vouchers from a community based perspective.

my district implemented a voucher system for the low income areas of our district.

we tried it for 5 years before returning to traditional and charter schools.


the reasons vouchers failed was that the low income parents hated it and demanded we return to the traditional school system.

they hated for very practical and understandable reasons.

first, transportation became a huge problem.
although the district provided free bus service to any school within 20 miles, it caused some children to be away from home for 12 hours a day with four of those hours spent on a bus.

second, parents were upset because they could not use their older children to baby sit their younger ones after school.

third, schedules became difficult for the parents. some children were on year round, some on semesters and some in other districts on a totally different shedule.

fourth, financially, the money was not enough for most parents to send their kids to private schools.


vouchers part two
fifth, vouchers pretty much rule out extra-curricular sports for low income.
it costs about 1000 dollars a year to be in sports or cheerleading these days so those kids with sports talent found themselves not being able to play.

finally, the student themselves hated it.
they wanted to go to school with their friends from the neighborhood.
even when they understood they might get a better education most returned to their old school after a year.

now again, i have tried to not be political about this so don't give me arguments about government schools and liberal indoctrination.

that is a discussion for another day.

my school board was split conservative and liberal but we voted to try vouchers on a bi-partisan basis and voted to stop it on bi-partisan basis.

i have tried to present an objective assessment of one school districts experience with vouchers.

i am certain that we made some honest mistakes in this process but it was a sincere attempt to see the worth of vouchers.

other districts may have better luck although we found the problems i have cited to large to overcome.

vouchers part three
now a personal comment, i have some problems with vouchers in that i don't want my tax money to go to a school run by saudi wahbi sect that preaches hatred towards democracy and america and the killing of Christians.

i am all for charter schools and my district now has about 25% of our schools as charters.

charters work because of parental involvement, which is the key for any successful student or school.

savage99
first if you are in florida why aren't you grading papers at this late hour.
just kidding

see my post about basketball over on the larry elder thread.

Ouch
That grading papers bit is more truth than poetry. I be;ieve in a quiz to start the class every day, and careful grading. To discourage cheating, i usually give 4 separate versions of a quiz, since about 25 per cent of our new 7th graders will cheat if they can, even if they can do the work. The amount of personal time and money put into teaching by the average teacher makes a joke out of that 12 months pay for 9 months work. However, i'm a retired engineer, i only put in 20 hours/week, and i will quit when it gets to be work. You are bang on when you say the Public Charter School's biggest advantage is parent participation. Since just getting the child to school is a hassle, we get the parent's (in general) who care.


savage 99
7th graders are rough man.

i always know immediately when i walk into a middle school cause the noise and confusion are much higher than at a high school.


Florida schools in general
As the father of a 6th grader and an 11th grader in Florida, an ex-teacher (high school physics and math), a former PTA president, and someone who has been on a first name basis with most of my kids teachers... I can state the following with a fair degree of certainty and expertise:

The school grading system encourages teachers to teach kids how to pass tests, NOT how to learn or think. As an anecdotal example of this, I know of a 9th grader who scored in the 85th percentile on his reading tests... yet he read a 6th grade book written in the first person and couldn't answer when asked from who's point of view the story was told. When given a paragraph to read AND THE PARAGRAPH WAS THEN COVERED UP, he could rarely answer ANY questions from it... yet when taking a test where he could go back to the paragraph to look up the answer he always scored above the 80th percentile.

A school get a lot of money (over $100,000 in many cases) for getting a good 'grade' on the FCAT and school rating. That money is usually divided among the staff - frequently leading to a bonuses of $1,000, $2,000 or even more for each teacher. Obviously, having that much financial incentive naturally leads to a STRONG desire for high test scores.

The emphasis is ALWAYS on the lower part of the curve. During the 5-6 weeks that FCAT is the virtual only worked on in class, those kids who are more advanced WASTE THEIR TIME (what counts is the percentage that 'pass', that is get a 3 or higher on the FCAT - whether somweone gets a 4 or a 5 has NO EFFECT on the school's grade).

My youngest son is taking a computer 'work at your own pace' class - high school algebra honors (he is in 6th grade). During FCAT time he had to stop that course and do weeks of, what for him was remedial work... even though he has NEVER scored less than a 5 (highest) on the math FCAT! Those weeks were a total waste of time for him!

Maybe more later... I have a lot to complain about.

This Floridian says FL Schools Suck!
And so did Jeb. He has completely screwed up this state, and is no more a real conservative than his free spending brother W in the White House. Fl Education is awful. One of the worst in the country. NO WAY we will send our kid to a public school. Forget it. More time spent teaching to illegals than the bright citizen children. GET OUT OF THIS STATE ASAP if you want your kids to get a decent public school education.

I cannot STRESS enough what a hypocrite Jeb is, just as was his brother, George W. What pathetic "leaders" they have proven themselves to be.

I mean, this is so hilarious . . .
Everybody in FL knows the schools are awful. The Bush gang really has a publicity thing going. From his Read my Lips Father to George "Cowboy" new Prescription Drug Bill, raise my skirts borrow more money "W." -- these folks are absolutely pathetic examples of political leadership. The schools here are SO bad, well, words really cannot describe the abuse suffered by the children who really want to learn. What a crock.

WOW! From just a normal reader
I thought that maybe finally something good had happened to our public school systems. But, I guess that the jury is still out on the success of the Jeb Bush led school reform in Florida. Did anyone else notice the rather odd tendency to not capitalize the singular "i" in any of the above comments? Nickel

FL schools, part 2 the sequel
As a general rule FL public schools do suck canal water. However, some schools are better than others and in every school some teachers are better than others. If you volunteer at the school enough so that the principal gets to know you pretty decently and the teachers get to know you, you have a reasonable chance of getting the better teachers for your kids.

That philosophy has worked for us. We moved into an area based on the caliber of schools. My wife and I have probably averaged about 1,000 hours together per year of school work (PTA, field trips, guest lectuers, school events, etc) With our 2 kids only one year did we get less than ideal teachers.

To paraphrase Tom Lehrer: School is like a sewer, what yoo get out of it depends on what yuo put into it.

A Few Reactions
Religiouslib: it sounds like what you are describing is an open enrollment policy rather than vouchers. If there is a district that provided parents vouchers to attend private schools, this is the first I've heard of it.

Deep Thought 42: the data cited is from the NAEP, not the FCAT. The NAEP is not a high stakes test, and is only given to a representative sample of students in each state. No one is teaching to the NAEP, and reading comprehension is a part of the test.

You can see the trend in the NAEP data here:

http://www.goldwaterinstitute.org/AboutUs/ArticleView.aspx? id=2036

Most Florida district schools are still a long way from being internationally competitive. The progress they've made however is quite remarkable.

If Florida's schools "suck canal water" than pity the poor people of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma,Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee and West Virginia who get outscored by Florida's low-income and minority students.

Dr. Ladner
i am surprised you are not more aware of the trend.

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

The Milwaukee voucher program is among the most explicit in allowing state money to be used specifically for religious schools. The program provides vouchers for up to $5000 - the estimated cost of educating a child for one year in the public schools - to as many as 15,000 of the district's 100,000 students. The grants are given to the poorest students. This year, they have been used at 122 private schools in the city, 89 of which are parochial. The Wisconsin State Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Milwaukee program. In response, voucher opponents brought the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the high court to declare the program unconstitutional and overrule the Wisconsin State Court decision. In November, 1998, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to take the case and sidestepped, for the time, the national debate over whether taxpayer-financed vouchers may be used to send children to parochial schools.

Dr. Ladner
here is another example.
we did alot of homework before we instituted a voucher program.

unfortuately, both milwaukee and cleveland are not having as much success with their system as many thought there would be.

in fact, a 5 year study in milwaukee found no improvement in reading and math scores between public schools and voucher schools.

More than 4,000 students from kindergarten through sixth grade have signed up for as much as $2500 in tuition vouchers for private schools in Cleveland's program. 96 percent of the 56 schools involved in the program are religious institutions. The Cleveland voucher program was ruled unconstitutional by both state and federal courts, and on September 24, 2001 the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. A ruling is expected in May 2002.


http://www.allianceforqualityed.org/Milwaukee%20report.pdf

Dr. Ladner
by the way i appreciate your response.

one last comment.
there are numerous privately funded voucher systems, some of which are in conjunction with public education (with a state education waiver) and some separate from public education altogether.

Milwaukee and Cleveland
religiouslib-

Okay, you had me confused. The Milwaukee Parental Choice Program was established by the Wisconsin legislature. I had taken what you wrote to mean that it had been created by the district. The program also did not cease after 5 years, but continues to this day.

Multiple evaluations from scholars at Harvard, Princeton and other places found that participants scored significantly better than children who had applied for the program but did not win lottery admission. Even John Witte, who is the source of the 5 year evaluation you cite, came to endorse the program in a later book he wrote on the subject.

The "expected ruling" in 2002 came down in favor of the Cleveland program in the Zelman decision, that found so long as parents chose between religious and non-religious options, there was no violation of the 1st Amendment. The 1st Amendment calls for neutrality towards religion and religious institutions, not hostility and discrimination.

By the way, the suburban public districts around Cleveland can receive vouchers twice as large as those received by private schools, and mysteriously, none of them have ever had a single empty seat for inner city Cleveland kids.

Florida's NAEP score improvement among disadvantaged children speak for themselves. You don't need to trust me, look them up on the NAEP website.

Florida data contradicts
While Mr. ladner may choose to downplay the role of demographics in Florida's A+ plan, data
contradicts such a stance. The work of Dr. Charles Morris of Okaloosa County and Professor Tschinkel are each authors whose work would contradict Mr. Ladner. Since the A+ plan places so much emphasis ona single indicator, an
absolute FCAT score, it is susceptible to the correlation between achievement and socioeconomic status. One can only wonder if the true purpose of the A+ plan is to cahieve political motives since it appears not to be
to measure instructional effectiveness.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.