'This Is Where the Systematic Killing Took Place': 200 Days of War From...
Hamas Publishes Proof of Life Video for American Hostage
Watch Biden Lose the Battle With His Teleprompter Again
Thanks, Biden! Here's How Iran Is Still Making Billions to Fund Terrorism
Trump Not Sending His Best
DeSantis May Not be Facing Biden in November, but Still Offers Perfect Response...
Lawmakers in One State Pass Legislation to Allow Teachers to Carry Guns in...
UnitedHealth Has Too Much Power
Former Democratic Rep. Who Lost to John Fetterman Sure Doesn't Like the Senator...
Biden Rewrote Title IX to Protect 'Trans' People. Here's How Somes States Responded.
Watch: Joe Biden's Latest Flub Is Laugh-Out-Loud Funny
Hundreds of Athletes Urge the NCAA to Allow Men to Compete Against Women
‘Net Neutrality’ Would Give Biden Wartime Powers to Censor Online Speech
Lefty Journalist Deceptively Edits Clip of Fox News Legal Expert
Is the Marist Poll a Cause for Concern?
OPINION

"McBush" - A Strategy of a Losing Campaign

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Back in 1996, President Bill Clinton's re-election campaign spot-welded the highly unpopular Newt Gingrich to Mr. Clinton's Republican challenger, Sen. Bob Dole. From television commercials to radio ads to speeches, the Darth Vader of the House of Representatives was continually morphed into any image or mention of Mr. Dole - to the point where some Americans actually thought Mr. Gingrich was Mr. Dole's running mate, or at the very least his Svengali. Was a strategy that basically ignored policy and the pressing issues of the time in lieu of a superficial and misleading attack effective? Bob Dole thought it was.

Advertisement

Less than two years after he lost to Mr. Clinton, I went to work for Mr. Dole as his director of communications, a position I held for the next five years. Mr. Dole and I spoke of that Clinton campaign strategy from time to time.

Although frustrated by the Clinton tactic, Mr. Dole saw the value in slipping the Gingrich anchor around his neck. In large measure because of the Gingrich shutdown of the government in November of 1995 - carried out in part, according to Tom DeLay and others, as a petty revenge against President Clinton for shunting him to the back of Air Force One - the former speaker of the House was lampooned from coast to coast and became the poster boy for all that was wrong with Congress in the mid-1990s. After that incident, the highly qualified and decent Mr. Dole knew the Clinton campaign was about to marry him to Mr. Gingrich - and he was powerless to stop this impending political death by association.

Twelve years later, we are seeing the same strategy from Sen. Barack Obama's campaign. By November, the Obama strategists will have labored mightily to have most Americans believe that John McCain is an older and more evil clone of George W. Bush.

Advertisement

Will the Clinton strategy of 1996 work this time? I suspect not.

Many political realities speak to why the Obama campaign better have something more tangible and relevant up its sleeve than the specter of a "third Bush term." Reality one is that as talented a campaigner as he is, experience-wise, Barack Obama is far from Bill Clinton - and even further from John McCain. Mr. Obama and his staff understand this and have taken the expected swipes at Mr. McCain over his age. Better to try to negatively define Mr. McCain before his life story - military career, torture as a POW, independent thinker, service in Congress - resonates with voters just tuning into this campaign.

Reality two: When Mr. Dole was running in 1996, Mr. Gingrich was the powerful speaker of the majority party who was not going anywhere anytime soon. It was relatively easy for the Clinton machine to infer that if Mr. Dole got elected, Mr. Gingrich would be lurking behind him, pulling some strings. But come Jan. 20, the American people have every expectation that President Bush is going to fade completely from the political landscape.

Reality three: While the Obama campaign is counting on its "third Bush term" line to be popular with the fringe left, it knows it's a gimmick that fails to address two serious problems: "Hillary Clinton/Ronald Reagan" Democrats and a number of Hispanic voters.

Advertisement

If nothing else, the Democratic primary has proved that political correctness and the truth do not always go hand in hand. The vote in Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Kentucky has undeniably demonstrated that Mr. Obama is not going to win a significant number of white "working-class" votes.

But there are serious warning flags on the horizon for Mr. Obama with regard to the Hispanic-American vote. As a Republican married to a Hispanic-American, I have endeavored of late to speak to as many Hispanics as possible. What I have learned is that a number of Hispanics are not going to vote for Mr. Obama - period. When history is made and a minority becomes president or vice president, they want that person to be Hispanic. To those who would claim that this observation is false, petty or even racist, I would suggest they bury their partisanship or ignorance and start asking some off-the-record questions.

As Barack Obama and his campaign continue the transition into general-election mode, they will utilize their expanded stage to continue to loudly, predictably, and breathlessly warn of a "third Bush term" under a President McCain. As they do this, they may find themselves in a blind panic as they try to bridge what may be a fatal schism in their own party.

Advertisement

Hackneyed slogans aside, the mathematical obstacles facing Mr. Obama are formidable. Without large numbers of working-class whites and Hispanics in his corner, it's going to be tough indeed to get to 270 electoral votes.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos