Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, November 12, 2007
Doug Wilson :: Townhall.com Columnist
Self-Reliance for the Good of Others
by Doug Wilson
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


At a time of great difficulty for Republicans, one might think that self-reliance, long a hallmark of the Grand Old Party, would fall out of favor with the American people. It would be fair to suspect that Americans might look around and, seeing problem after problem accrue at home and abroad, sit back and wait for government to do something. Fortunately for the most urgent of global concerns—education, health and development, among others—this is not the case. Instead, Americans are taking it upon themselves to make a difference, recognizing that the world’s thorniest problems are often best solved by private citizens and organizations.

Among the signs that self-reliance is alive and well: Wealthy Americans are becoming increasingly interested in donating to global causes. Since 1997, the rate of global giving has increased steadily at an average of 12.5 percent each year. According to a recent Financial Times story, JPMorgan Private Bank has “noted a rise of about 20 percent over the last year in client interest in overseas donations, with high-net-worth individuals looking to support education, health and economic expansion projects in developing countries.”

And they aren’t alone. Financial planners and international banks have seen similar upswings. It all begs the question—why?

Overseas giving has increased for many reasons, but recent global disasters are certainly a major factor. Americans responded to the Asian tsunami in 2004 and the earthquake in Pakistan in 2005 with unprecedented generosity. Americans also remain concerned about the war in Iraq and the struggles of other fledgling democracies in the Middle East, prompting many to get involved with microfinance endeavors that support economic, education, and health-related development. Celebrities and philanthropic businesspeople have raised awareness of HIV/AIDS, cancer, and poverty, among other growing global concerns, and this too spurs more charitable giving.

It seems like a proverbial win-win, doesn’t it? The global economy grows, making Americans wealthier. In turn, Americans share the fruits of their prosperity with those in need.

What does this increased giving tells us about Americans?

First, it speaks to the sort of Main Street conservatism that permeates the culture, despite the popular media-driven assumption that conservative values are old-fashioned or even backward. With increasing frequency, Americans are educating themselves about global issues and working to fix the problems they see in concert with private organizations. In so doing, Americans breed a culture of self-reliance by acknowledging that government cannot fix every problem plaguing the modern world.

Second, it proves once again the power of tax cuts. Federal income tax rates decreased significantly between 2000 and 2007, and this has undoubtedly contributed to the rise in charitable giving. You say no way, but we do know from the experience in Western Europe, that as taxes went up, giving went down. Why? Because the state was going to solve the problem – not individuals. This leads some to contend that tax cuts hurt those in need. The truth is though, that when Americans keep more of their money they will often use it to help those in need—sans any governmental mandate to do so. Moreover, private citizens will consistently make more efficient use of their resources than government would because private giving creates partnerships between individuals and organizations and fosters accountability. For example, my wife and I are directly involved in three charities – two local and one global – where we partner with government but we also oversee the expenditures, have access to the board, and help shape strategy based on what is best for the local community. In our global charity, we support free wheel chairs around the world (www.freewheelchairmission.org), where we partner with NGO’s or government agencies to insure the delivery of free wheelchairs to people who are trapped on dirt floors in some of the poorest parts of the world. Without private aid, the wheelchairs would never be advancing as fast or as efficiently as they would with a centralized planner overseeing a government agency.

It’s easier than you think to become part of this growing group of self-reliant Americans who are reaching out to help their global neighbors.

One important stop, believe it or not, is the IRS website, where you can search the tax-exempt status of any charity. There you’ll find a tool to find the status of a charity registered after the most recent update, too. One private organization that facilitates charitable giving across a range of sectors is the Endeavor Group, a D.C.-based consulting group that organizes national and international philanthropy for high-net-worth individuals. For every particular part of the world you might be interested in aiding, there is a group that specializes in making that happen. Donors wanting to assist Asia should seek out Give2Asia; central and South America, the Resource Foundation; and Europe and sub-Saharan Africa, the King Baudoin Foundation US.

These are just a few suggestions. I encourage you to consider supporting these or other private organizations that strive to put the resources of self-reliant Americans to work for the good of others.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Doug Wilson is the the co-author, with Edwin Feulner, of Getting America Right: The True Conservative Values Our Nation Needs Today.

Be the first to read Doug Wilson's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

The downside of socialism
*You say no way, but we do know from the experience in Western Europe, that as taxes went up, giving went down. Why? Because the state was going to solve the problem – not individuals.*

This is exactly the situation here in Canada. Our local charities are poorly run and organized, save for the Salvation Army, and all the literature any of them put out include whining for *FUNDING* (tax money). Here in the GTA most charitable work is only available between 9 and 5, Monday thru Friday, which means of course that working people cannot participate even when we want to. This includes dropping off donations which are desperately needed -- take off work and bring them by, or forget about it.

Socialism and high government involvement turns people into numbers and doles out untailored gruel in one size only, never checking to see why the need exists and whether anything can be done to assist the Needy out of the hole they are in. Which is fine for socialists, as they prefer people to remain in Herds, not to be individuals. Individuals tend to tear down socialism or flee from it.

But there are people even in the midst of this slump shouldered proletariat who give. Last night during the final Champ Car race of 2007 our local group of fans collected a substantial sum for the Hospital for Sick Children, and this year it will actually get where it is supposed to go.

Hand up versus hand out.....
I commend you Doug for your involvement and for bringing this to our attention. Since I have lived out side the U.S.A. for much of my life, I frequently have had the urge to apply funds to projects that beg for assistance. Governments are only a partial answer to the worlds needs, and the example Americans can set are among the most valuable parts of the actual gift.

The example is at times the most valuable gift as many people have only known takers, not givers. Giving is known in many parts of the world as something done by government or THE church, and people are accustomed to government giving so that politicians can take from that which is given.

Asleep at the wheel in Tx
In Texas, voters just passed a proposition to allocate millions of taxpayer dollars to cancer research.
Think about that folks. So wrong on so many levvels:
The gov decides which disease is worthy of your contribution.
Perhaps people will now decided cancer's got its buck from me and quit donating privately.

Actually I know many people who would prefer to pay higher taxes so they can consider their obligations to society "handled", and not have to get personally involved. That's never a conservative by the way.

I love this article and
believe that it is so true.

This week 20/20 ran a follow-up story on the plight of citizens in Camden, NJ. Diana Sawyer had first brought the story about a year ago. She said that after the story ran there was an outpouring of giving by individuals all over the country.

One of the things that it brought out to me was the fact that most of the people in Camden have not been helped by government welfare and programs, but have instead been further trapped in a system that offers no real help out of poverty and in fact deters and discourages any attempt to become self-reliant.

Last night on "Extreme Home Makeover", the show went to Camden and helped a single father raising 5 sons. This father had also started a support group for the single fathers of Camden and even in their poverty they help one another by sharing their meager resources. The show and all the volunteers that showed up to help not only gave this family a home of their own but also gave a leg up to the local charities and to the single fathers group.

One of the show's spokesmen said that by helping one family at a time the communities of that family are helped and inspired to continue helping people to actually improve their lot in life.

There are so many examples of this kind of giving by not only individuals but in concert with corporations that actually give people a start to climb out of the pit of poverty.

The fraud, waste, and inefficient, ineffectiveness of government run programs is partially due to the inability of government bureaucrats to become involved in the degree necessary to be effective and apply the help where it is most needed.

When more people are willing to give of themselves individually and quit expecting the government to take care of it for them, the sooner more people will have the opportunity to become self-reliant and will because of their own experiences pass the sharing forward.

Please Don't Tell Anyone
Your comments and facts associating charitable contributions are in fact tied to Tax rates are interesting and should be communicated to all the Democrat Supporters, many of whom are depended up assistance programs. Most of these voters believe that a vote for a Democrat will insure their assistance, but as this points out that is not the case. If Democrat voters were aware of the facts, they might not be voting Democrat anymore. Very Interesting!!!!

I'm not seeing what the author is seeing
Sure, Americans are quite generous but even conservatives are happy to have government intervene in many ways, especially law enforcement.

To me, self-reliance means being prepared to depend on nobody but yourself.

Conservatives and even poor people
contribute more to charity than people who consider themselves liberals.

In 2000, when the Gores released their tax records, I donated more than Al and Tipper, and I was teaching and making about $50,000 a year.

Gore comes from a wealthy family, has been in upper-crust politics all of his life, and donated $350 in 1999, waiting, doubltess until he could become pres. and then donate citizen tax money to whatever causes interested him and his lib. buddies in Congress.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.