Join The Debate!

TRUE TRUE

What Americans should see is a documentary called "What The West needs to Know". There is not one news staion in America that would show it. It documents all about Sharia law and Islam.
It is not a "peaceful religion" as Bush and other politicians have stated. It is violent and there is no room for any tolerancee. What you here them say and what they believe are two different things. This film includes one ex terrorist who said that Muslims actually jumped for glee over 9/11. But thye would not show that face to infidels. Deciet is ok in Islam as long it involves the spreading of the faith. Islam is a political force more than a personal religion.

Islam & global warming

Islamic pigs attempt to scare the world into joining them in their commitment to satan, that they may all join to experience "global warming" in the after life.

(To a true Coservative/constitutionalist, a neo-con is a RINO, while to a liberal/marxist, a neo-con is a true Conservative/constitutionalist.)

Lynne; DavidMac

I'm with Doug -- and you guys. I don't care who wins the nomination as long as he has the mental capacity to understand that we are truly at war. And not just in Iraq. Also, he must be persuasive enough to get all the knuckleheads (like Reid and his ilk) to realize that our enemies are really, truly out to get us. They want our land. They want your house. They want everything they don't destroy in the process of acquiring it.

We need to start remembering that filthy, despicable OBL and henchmen sitting around (in a cave? -- how enchanting!) and laughing about the towers coming down. They succeeded beyond their wildest dreams in creating havoc and changing us into a nation through which a vein of anger is about to pop.

We'd better get our act together, work together, and become a real nation again. One with safe borders, yes. One with safe borders from any madmen (or -women) who wish to do us harm, either physically or monetarily, or both.

Baldy

I used to agree that we needed to seal the borders, but I am rethinking that now. Here's the reason why... a sealed border, while keeping out the illegal aliens, also would serve to keep US in. Just something I have been pondering.

Perhaps a better approach would be to build fences in high traffic areas, so that the border guards could better focus on other areas, and take away the financial incentives for illegal aliens to come here in the first place. In other words, stop all the free handouts, end birthright citizenship, and significantly penalize employers who hire illegal aliens. Don't you think that would solve the vast majority of the problem? And of course, ICE should start doing their jobs and deporting illegals found in our country.

Liberty

There is nothing to prevent our noble representatives in the hallowed halls of the greatest debating society in the world (says them) to deal with the Jihadis and on-coming financial disaster at the same time. From their stanpoint, they are dealing with it. They are insulating themselves from the results of their self-serving misfeasance by protecting their own pensions and perks quite separately from those which we mere voters must deal with.

dillweed:

Newsflash: they have a "turf"; it's called
"the Middle East".

Pay attention, before you and I have to bury
more of our fellow citizens.

Lynne

Thank you for the remark to greg. People like him remind me of that quote from John Stuart MIll about cowards who enjoy freedom only because of the efforts of "better men". Didn't Shakespeare talk about the men who "hold their manhood cheap" in Henry V? Guess "men" like greg have been always with us.

FINAL SOLUTION 2 Muslim Problem

Having successfully avoided the first threat to freedom posed by Communism, with limited conflict, we’re now on a collision course with an ideology that’s been simmering for hundreds of years and is now about to explode. From reading excerpts from the Koran, it’s clear that its teachings allow no room for Moslem and Western culture to coincide peacefully. But for hundreds of years, there was little the Moslem world could do to enforce their beliefs and dominate the technically and militarily superior West. The brief attempt of Moslem incursion into Southern Europe proved ultimately unsuccessful. Over the past 85 years, Western nations have only exacerbated the problem of animosity between these two conflicting cultures with a long series of disastrous foreign policies, including a litany of lies, deceit, political manipulations, and undermining of Mideast governments, fostering corruption, and a host of political intrigues which have incurred Islam’s undying hatred of Western culture. But to say we have only ourselves to blame is only part of the picture. Our betrayal of the Moslem world did not bring about the ultimate conflagration which is about to happen; it only hastened its coming. This is a train wreck which started down the tracks with the first edition of the Koran. But until the 21st Century, the Moslem world, now amounting to almost 2 billion people, lacked the technical and economic power to challenge us. Now, with access to such power, imbued with the teachings of the Koran and instilled with a hatred of the West which can no longer be appeased, and for which we are partially responsible, our fate has been cast. The West has painted itself into a corner. The time for apologies or to correct our misdeeds done to the Moslem world is long past. We are now faced with one undeniable fact. We have created a Frankenstein monster which has but one objective: the destruction of Western Civilization. But unless we take preemptive action, our civilization is at risk and may not survive unless this monster is destroyed. And the longer we wait, the narrower becomes our window of opportunity for its destruction.

So now we must acknowledge the elephant that sits in our living room. We must rethink our priorities and reexamine our moral compass. We must think the Unthinkable. Unless we initiate a war of total annihilation and ethnic cleansing, our civilization is doomed. Moslem philosophy is incompatible with Western culture. Such a war must include the annihilation of all Muslim Nations and the systematic extermination of all individuals who adhere to the Moslem faith. By allowing them to survive, we risk their descendants taking up the holy cause of jihad, and once again threatening our existence. In addition, all books and documents advocating the teachings of Islam must be destroyed. No remnant of this diseased culture must remain to infect future generations. If this sounds similar to the political agenda of The Third Reich, you’re right. I make no apologies for it. The Final Solution for a new would order; cleansed of Semites, was conceived 70 years ago. The only mistake the Nazis made was selecting the wrong tribe of Semites to exterminate. Jews were never the real threat. As extreme as this solution might initially appear, the consequences of doing nothing are unthinkable. We’re faced with a course of action that goes against our Judeo-Christian teachings. But there’s no alternative. We must now acquire a certain moral flexibility to allow us to do what was once thought to be unthinkable. We must act soon before it‘s too late. We must initiate THE FINAL SOULTION TO THE MUSLIM PROBLEM.

Are the "children" scared yet?

"nolongersilent" fears Im scaring the children.

Well, "children" of all ages should be scared if they were aware of what Islamic Fundamentalists have planned for us "Infidels". And I apologize for calling them "Fascists". According to the definition by "Eld", which I agree with, they're not. However, this definition of "Fascism" comes uncomfortably close to describing present conditions in the US.
NOW you're scaring the children.

wow

Here’s a guy who claimed his made up religion and self-serving god came above all else. Now, he’s willing to throw all that aside for protection. It’s funny what fear will do to a man; and he has all those weapons and loves to kill things too. Well, well….

No, seriously, how does Doug’s opinion look now after the latest statement released by the islamo-facists.

Doug's pretty much nailed it - - -

I sometimes worry about those extreme, "professional social conservatives" view as important.

Talk about misplaced priorities -- no, the hard right is so wrapped up in the cloak of anti-choice, anti-gay stuff and wishing to outlaw the Morning After pill while looking into bedroom windows, they fail to see the #1 point -- we need a strong, kick-butt guy who's not afraid to actually WIN, 'n maybe break a few things in the process of making this world a tad safer than it is today.

Pardon the vernacular, but, as usual, their priorities suck! If we fail to get a "take-no-prisoners" kinda guy as president, all those hardline religious types won't matter at all -- they'll be targets for beheadings and stonings just like the rest of us.

In fact, anyone who'd place ANY topic ahead of national security (and our incumbent president has done an absolutely miserable job with his pathetic leaky borders, "Amnesty-Lite," lousy choices of McClellanist generals; not actually winning in Iraq -- caving in to Political Correctness and the like) has gotta be nuts and totally unworthy of my vote. I've read, seen and experienced sufficient wishy-washy Pablum Puke to last several lifetimes, thank you.

And, maybe Rudy Guiliani isn't the guy? But, as of now, he appears to be the only one with the brass cojones necessary to right the wrongs of Dubya, Nancy, Trent, Teddy, Harry and the Blah Bunch presently in Washington.

Reemphasizing, the only thing the bad guys understand and fear is STRENGTH, period. Today, I see no other choice. None.

Just Like A Cop

Can't Afford To Lose A Streetfight,

We can't afford to lose this one. I suspect that due to the limp-wristed perfidy of our quisling brothers on the left it will get bloodier before it's over.

Perhaps when the last raghead terrorist falls, he will fall with his greatest allies, the American Euro-wannabe leftists.

As Alfred E. Newman put it, "With friends like these, who needs enemies?"

So, let me get this straight.

Now we will support a pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage, homosexual, atheist, transvestite, as long as he/she/it promises to wipe out the islamo-facists.

Afsarge: I’m talking about Doug’s religion, of course. He had to form his own church because no one else offered a good enough interpretation of Christianity. Visit his site and check it out. It’s pretty good.

John Konop

Dream on bud. One ex-Bush supporter or even a few leaving Bush, represent themselves and no one else. So who cares. Conservatives back whomever they want to.

Before Obama does anything, he'll have to get by Clinton's political leg-breakers, and I don't think he can do it. Hillary will get the nod.

Then she'll lose the general election by 10 points.

Konop

Please explain exactly what platform a candidate would need to appeal to more than 51% of the population. I can only think of one or two things that would "bring the country together as a whole". What exactly constitutes bringing the country together, is that 55%, 65% or 95% of the population?

I'm sorry, but there is a significant distrust of politicians and I don't see anyone, Obama included, that makes me think, "Wow, that is the most honest person I've ever seen." Now, once we find that person for president, we only have to find another 635 to replace the whacko's in Congress. Do we have 636 honest people in the US that could be elected?

NEOCONMEN AND DEATH OF THE GOP IN 08!!

ctjaeger

I did not post this to get support for Obama, just to point out to the NEOCONMEN that they are killing the GOP!

Back to your question, I think a Lou Dobbs type platform would get more than 51% of the vote. The problem is lobbyist money changers in Washington would not want supprt the platform.And will spend big money to stop it!

Do you not find it strange that both front runner Hillary and Giuliani agree on most issues relative to immigration and trade?

Lynne

Yep. Miller is a pretty astute guy these days.

Re: "POSITIVE ATITUDE"

Maverick/Searcher2 asks the following question:
"do you and/or any of your "ex-staff" members ever dwell on any outcomes or solutions that sane Americans could live with?.....":

Excellent question. And I wish I had a reasonable and "Livable" answer. If you have one, I'd like to hear it. I’ve tried to think of a way out of this depressing scenario, but so far have come up with no reasonable alternatives. I truly wish I could. Suggestions welcome and encouraged.

Hook, line and sinker

PATRIOT11C

Am I to believe you buy Mikes "scenario" in it's totality? You say he is "right on the money"...so I guess you believe that the US will sit this series of events out and do nothing to counter the arm twisting of other nations in the area to join up with the Islam-o-facsists plan? You believe that we have no power left in the area to discourage such actions? We just sit helplessly by and watch it all happen? and then we just drop into the "economic abys" without so much as a whimper.........Well.....if thats the wayn you see it, thats the way you see it...but it's not a scenario I would buy into on my most negative of days......

LYNN

TO WHICH POST DO YOU REFER? CHECK OUT MY POST OF 11:17 ABOVE........in light of that post......I don't understand your post to me......please explain...

RE: SUGESTIONS WELCOME AND ENCOURAGED

MIKE

You have obviously put much time and analysis into your posts......and while I reject both your "final solution" and your analysis of the inevatability of the success of the Islamofacsist "master plan".......I DO share your overiding intense concern with the growing threat of the teachings of Islam...(as interpreted by the "fundamentalists").....

The only thing I have to offer to you along the lines of suggestions is my previous post at 11:17am (above)..........somewhat less draconian in it's scope and, I feel, practical and realistic. Plus, it has the advantage of not requiring that we completely dispense with our moral and ethical values......I tend to not be cavalier when it comes to that........but that's just me.

Perhaps somewhere down the road your solution will meet with a desperate America in the throws of the predicted "fall into the abys" that you forsee, and the administration in power at this time will see no other way........but to suggest that we should hurry along and get started on this course of action now is, I think, both irresponsible and dangerous. You are a great thinker Mike.........please, I know you can do better.......spend some more time on this......THINK POSITIVE.

LYNNE

I think you did misunderstand.....in view of THIS post, let me know.

LYNNE...RE: HELP ME OUT HERE

You know Lynne, I have read many of your posts in the past and have always been pretty much on your side of things........especially that time, sometime back, when you were the target of a bunch of lefties with no one there to take up your side with you......(i was a reader, not a poster at the time and didn't come to your rescue......I regret that) Anyway, I know you to be a stickler on the point of addressing the point of the article......and not getting off on tangents. My apologies......



What I understood as Doug's point in his column is this:

"Primarily, I’m looking for a president who understands how deeply we are hated by radical Islam and what a constant threat they’re going to be to us ‘til Christ returns and one who will effectively mitigate them during his term[s] via diplomacy—and if that doesn’t work, then by death."

And, I agree with this

OK....I AGREE WITH THIS AS WELL........What do you see in any of my posts that would lead you to believe otherwise? I am STILL at a loss.....my original post dealt with a possible way of "mitigating them during his term". the others dealt with what I considered draconian alternatives to same and with a forcast of the future that had Islam winning the war by sending us and the rest of the free world into an induced fall into economic ruin. Where do we disagree? Am I not making myself clear? I'm open to suggestions.......

the old testament is just as violent

If you read the old testament it is just as violent and bloody and calling for killing unbelievers as the koran. Again it depends on who is interperting the message. Extremism is the problem.The so called leaders of these extremists groups are the problem and yes all religions have them. Hence it is always a good thing to question authority especially politicians and religious leaders.

Hate and lies

Your "article" has no substance, no facts, just the usual neocon hate and lies. Maybe you would do better if you wrote about the christian-o-fascist invasion of iraq and the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis for no reason other than being Muslim.

Christain-o-facism practiced by the necons is the DANGER that will sink America.

‘Hijackers of the conservative movement’

‘Hijackers of the conservative movement’

This is a great article about why many of us have lost all faith in the Republican party. Do you think that Richard Viguerie is wrong about Congress selling out our Country to the lobbyist money changers in Washington?

RAW STORY-He didn’t support invading Iraq. He says national security decisions are too often made for political gain. And he maintains that Tom DeLay used “legal plunder” for the “immoral purpose of holding onto power.”

A Democrat? No – His name is Richard Viguerie, a conservative icon and key architect of Ronald Reagan’s 1980 victory. Known to many as the godfather of direct-mail campaign fundraising, his four-decade career has succored scores of conservative candidates and grassroots causes.

A balding grandfather with a wry Texan’s smile, Viguerie is a seasoned conservative who confidently brushes aside accusations that his criticism of Republicans is intended for personal gain. On Monday, he sat down with RAW STORY to talk about his new book, Conservatives Betrayed: How George W. Bush and Other Big Government Republicans Hijacked the Conservative Cause.

Read More
http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/hijackers-of-the-conservative-movement

Obama Osama whats up?

Can no one tell me why the fact that Obama was raised a Muslim ? I shudder at the thought of a Islamist being President of this once great nation. I have not heard a peep from the MSM on this mans religious beliefs. How has this man been able to keep his background from becoming a topic of discussion? A Allah worshiper as President, how insane is that . I feel like I’m living a bad dream every time I hear Obama and President in the same sentence. May God save us all from this perversion in politics.

thank you charleston

Yes the reformation did help to change many things in christianity. Why there needs to be a power struggle among the various faiths in christianity is beyond me. Its like many are saying my god is better than your god or god love us more than you. I come from the belief of one god many paths and no religion has a monopoly on god.

Let It Be!

What is undisputedly right, no comb or sexy appearance but a strong stance against playing even a shadow of any pro-Islamist inclination is to secure next presidency.