Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Donald Lambro :: Townhall.com Columnist
TARP windfall in the pipeline
by Donald Lambro
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


WASHINGTON -- President Obama will receive a huge deficit-reducing windfall in a few years when the U.S. Treasury recoups about $500 billion from its investment stake in the $700 billon economic bailout.

Who says so? None other than the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), which reported earlier this month that the fiscal 2009 budget deficit will top $1.2 trillion, not including the nearly $1 trillion that the Obama administration intends to spend on its own economic-recovery package.

CBO's staggering deficit projection made headlines, but its report also contained an equally newsworthy finding virtually ignored by the Washington news media because it would have undercut the lead they were peddling: a flat $700 billion giveaway by the Bush White House to Wall Street tycoons.

In fact, the Bush administration's expenditures in the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP), most of which went into huge loans to financially troubled banks, will end up costing taxpayers a fraction of its legislated price tag.

Instead of the full $700 billion when the money is disbursed, CBO's estimate of the "subsidy costs" related to TARP loans and other transactions will cost around $180 billion. Granted, this isn't chopped liver, but it's a far cry from nearly three-quarters of a trillion dollars that has been advertised in all of the financial-bailout stories.

What the news media rarely mention is that the Treasury demanded and got preferred stock, interest and other earnings for the billions it is shelling out to banks and other businesses.

When CBO totaled all of the government's outlays for this fiscal year in its latest budget review, it included $180 billion that it said was the true net cost of the money spent under TARP. "Broadly speaking, that cost is the purchase price minus the present values, adjusted for market risk, of any estimated future earnings from holding purchased assets and the proceeds from the eventual sale of them," CBO said.

How this works: The Treasury effectively bought assets from these banks. CBO projects that these assets after a period of time will be sold and then computes how much this will likely return to the Treasury based on very conservative estimates of their increased value and earnings.

Its estimates were based on all of the $700 billion that it expects will be spent through 2009, even though the Bush administration had only spent about half of that sum, and was headed into the second half with the incoming Obama administration's approval.

In a separate report released last week, the first of its semiannual reports of TARP expenditures, CBO provided additional estimates that showed how much smaller the bailout costs will prove to be. "Through December 31, 2008, the U.S. Treasury disbursed $247 billon to acquire assets under that program. CBO valued those assets using discounted present-value calculations similar to those generally applied to federal loans and loan guarantees, but adjusting for market risk as specified in the legislation that established the TARP," CBO reported.

CBO estimates that the net cost of these transactions (the difference between what Treasury paid for these investments or lent these firms and their market value) amounted to $64 billion in 2008 dollars. In other words, CBO said, "we expect the government to recover about three-quarters of its initial investment."

What this means to Obama's performance on fiscal policy is huge. In a year or two, when the economy has recovered, the Treasury will be able to sell these assets for a tidy sum that will allow him to sharply reduce what is expected to be a monster budget deficit.

If CBO's projections are anywhere near to their estimated market value, his administration could see its budget deficit slashed by more than half a trillion dollars.

If that happens, Obama will have Bush's Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to thank. The former chairman of Wall Street's Goldman Sachs, by making judicious loans that saved some shaky banks from going under, helped stabilize our credit markets at a critical juncture last year that prevented a collapse in the nation's financial system.

Paulson isn't getting much credit now, but when hundreds of billions in asset earnings begin to flow back to the Treasury, it will be the result of his wise investment decisions.

Some other administration might have played fast and loose with the TARP statistics, but Bush's Office of Management and Budget (OMB) account for the expenditures on a cash basis. That is to say, it entered the full amount of the loans "up front and will record future recoveries in the year in which they occur."

That approach "will show more outlays for the TARP this year and then show receipts in future years," CBO said.

Actually, CBO and OMB do not differ significantly in their assessments of the net cost of those (lending) transactions," the congressional fiscal-watchdog agency said.

It's time for the news media to be much more honest and accurate in its reporting on the TARP loans that have thus far been made to major financial institutions. The government is going to get back much, if not most, of this money -- and might even make a bit of a profit to boot.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Donald Lambro is chief political correspondent for The Washington Times.

Be the first to read Donald Lambro's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Play Money
This is just wishful thinking. The full details of these "investments" are still unknown, but what is known is that those receiving the money have continued to declare loses once unthinkable in this industry. The bailout was conceived in a panic and the money has been disbursed as if it were play money. To expect a significant amount to be recovered is naive and in fact dangerous since it could lead to more of such so-called "investments".

I don't buy it

I simply don't buy it. When Sweden Nationalized their banks and bought all their "toxic" mortgages as the Obama administration wishes to do for the 2nd part of TARP, they got a 38% rate of return on their investment.

Get real.. Do you really think the OMB isn't political? Do you really think "sharing" the cost of foolishness fair to Americans?

I don't AND I think it bad for the market at this point.

If folks were allowed to take their loses, housing would be affordable, property values would go down (to their real value) and property tax would fall with them.

Most folks are sheltering in place and hence this is more an advantage than a disadvantage.

The Socialization of risk is DEADLY for market integrity. The spending aside from TARP will drag the economy into a long Depression.

The "governemnt" will report a "victory" when it recoops 40 cents on the dollar and it is still a THEFT of grotesque proportions.


Keep Hallucinating!
It’s the only way to dull the agony short of alcohol or drugs.

The situation is far direr than anyone wants to admit. The large banks are basically insolvent and the government subsidies of them are sucking the life (capital) out of the smaller more responsible banks. Soon, many of them will go bankrupt too, but as they are not “Too big to fail,” there will be no lifeline for them.

Every single thing that the government has done in response to this financial disaster has made the situation worse.

Has no one in Government ever read “Atlas Shrugged?”

The good news is that George Bush will never be President again and, God willing, the criminal mastermind Hank Paulson will never be in government again. Unfortunately, the Messiah will continue the same disastrous policies, albeit with a massive dose of steroids.

If you think that an 8000 Dow is bad, you haven’t seen anything yet.

Coming soon, a nationwide commercial real estate market crash!

An Irrelevancy
Any money recouped will be immediately spent. If the Democrats have more than they thought it means more to spend. They have no understanding of the way money works because they live in a fantasy universe. Reality will hit them when inflation cranks up. Maybe they will just pass a law making inflation illegal.

Wow, Working Well So Far
Maybe David Lambro would be interested in my ocean view lot in Iowa?

odd column
Lambro is pushing the success of TARP because he sees this as a victory of Conservatism over Liberalism. It is not clear exactly why he sees this. Paulson origninally favored more of a give away and was only pushed in this direction by Congress.

On top of that the fact that some of the money will come back has been reported in the MSM but largely ignored in the Conservative press because of their opposition to the program.

So one has the oddity of Lambro trying to attack the liberal press by pointing out something they have not ignored (although they have not bought the optimistic projections as whole heartedly as Lambro does either) but really attacking the conservative position to a conservative forum.

This column is not as likely to be as popular as most columns by conservatives using buzz attack words on liberals.

Do not be deceived
Have anyone ever paid the government back?

Is Lambro pushing success of TARP
He revealed how unlikely we will be reimbursed, especially the money given to Wall Street tycoons. If the article was meant to extol the vrtues of TARP, I didn't see any hope between the lines.

Yeah right Lambro.
The gubmint can't even figure out where the first $350 Billion went or what it's doing but Washington will somehow suddenly become so wise that they will collect hundreds of billions from those clever Wall Street white shirts!

I wonder what color the sky might be in that strange little world where guys like Lambro seem to reside...or how many times they have to get jabbed before they figure out who the "jabbers" really are?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.