Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, December 19, 2008
Donald Lambro :: Townhall.com Columnist
History Points to GOP Gains in 2010
by Donald Lambro
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


WASHINGTON -- Signing the Republican Party's post-election death certificate is risky business, but Democratic strategist Simon Rosenberg did so last month -- predicting the GOP will remain in the political graveyard for many years to come.

Perhaps one can forgive the head of the New Democrat Network (NDN) a moment of irrational exuberance when you consider that until Barack Obama's decisive victory, Democrats had won just three of the previous 10 presidential elections. Simon has suffered a lot of Democratic defeats, so when his party scored big on Nov. 4, well, let's just say his euphoria flowed over the top.

"Absent huge Democratic mistakes in the next few years, the Republican Party's road back could very well be a long one," he wrote in the GOP's obituary.

"Their coalition no longer works in the changing demography of the day, and is dangerously old; their Southern strategy, so critical to their ascension, has become a relic of the past; their tech and media tools have not kept up with the times; their ideas have become spent and discredited; their leaders, particularly in Washington, seem content to ankle bite rather than lead. They are an aging and frayed bunch, living off the fumes of a day and politics gone by," he said. Phew! That's quite a mouthful. But the wish may be father to the thought. As Winston Churchill once said, "In war, you can be killed only once, but in politics, you can be killed many times."

Many Democrats have predicted the Republicans were finished after some devastating defeats, only to see them quickly recover and win again.

No one gave the Republicans a snowball's chance in hell after Lyndon Johnson crushed Barry Goldwater in a landslide in 1964. Democrats said the GOP was finished, perhaps for a generation. But the Democrats' archenemy, Richard Nixon, took back the White House in 1968 and won re-election in a landslide four years later.

Then came the Watergate scandals that pundits said would sweep the Democrats into power by a landslide in 1976, but Jimmy Carter defeated Gerald Ford by an eyelash, though the elections swept an army of Watergate Democrats into Congress.

Democrats said the Watergate scandals had consigned the Republicans to the wilderness for many years to come. In their dreams. Ronald Reagan rode out of the West four years later to easily beat Carter and recapture the White House for the GOP, which made significant gains in Congress.

But Rosenberg and his fellow Democrats think this time it's going different. "I really believe there is a strong argument to be made that the GOP is further from power, more discredited and more out of touch with the American people than any time since the days of FDR and Truman," he wrote in his coroner's report.

Well, maybe not. In politics, timing is everything. It can work for you or against you. Barack Obama was running in a perfect storm that gave his candidacy three things that would have swept any challenger to power: a deeply unpopular president, an unpopular war in Iraq and an economic catastrophe of a very high order.

But his presidency still remains a high-risk work in progress. He is one of the most inexperienced presidents in U.S. history. Economists say his Old Deal, pump-priming, big-spending prescriptions for economic recovery haven't worked anywhere. He is about to enter the White House at a time when global terrorism is flexing its muscles and plotting to strike again.

The Republicans, meanwhile, are going back to square one, focusing on controlling spending, reducing the size of government, and cutting tax rates to get the engine of the economy running again.

The 2008 election resulted in a change in administrations, but recent polls show it didn't change the nation's ideological balance, which is still very much right of center.

A post-election Pew poll finds that while the Democrats' advantage in party identification has risen, "the share of Americans who describe their political views as liberal, conservative or moderate has remained stable."

Pew says that just one of five Americans say they are liberal (21 percent), while 38 percent call themselves conservative, and 36 percent say they are moderates -- a ratio that has remained unchanged over the past eight years. "For the GOP, it sure looks like a long road back," Rosenberg said in his celebratory analysis.

But it may not be as long as he thinks. About a year from now, we will be in the beginning stages of the midterm-election cycle when the political history books tell us that the party in power almost always loses seats in Congress. That record has been broken only twice in our history. The last time was in 2002 when President Bush was riding high, the Republicans had cut tax rates across the board, and the GOP made substantial gains in Congress.

The chances are extremely high that the GOP will gain congressional seats in November 2010, dealing Barack Obama the first political defeat of his presidency.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Donald Lambro is chief political correspondent for The Washington Times.

Be the first to read Donald Lambro's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Neal
You really must be prescient. You already know:

1. What Obama will do in 2009.
2. What will happen in 2010.
3. What will happen in 2011.
4. What will happen in 2012.

Not that I doubt your predicting skill and ability , but please tell us something:

A few months ago, who did you think was going to win the 2008 Presidential election?

Remember the '92 election?
In 1992, when Slick Willie won the White House and Democrats retained control of Congress, all the liberal pundits predicted that the Republican party was finished. They were saying that unless the Republicans adopted a liberal agenda, they would be out of power for years to come.

Two years later, Republicans took control of both houses of Congress for the first time in forty years, and a sitting Speaker of the House was voted out of office for the first time since 1860.

Even Slick Willie was forced to move to the right. Before the '94 election, he attacked the Republicans' "Contract With America." After the election, he acted as though it were his own idea from the beginning.

Don't despair, conservatives. Voters seem to need a good dose of liberalism every few years to remind them just how awful it is. People are already starting to learn that Obama can't really walk on water, so this will be a good opportunity for Republicans to come back.

Political Defeats...

By November 2010, Obama will already have at least two political defeats. November 2010 will be his third, followed by a few more before November 2012. And most certainly if we get hit again I do not see Obama getting a second term.

The GOP can come back but they have to
1. Fiscally Conservative
2. Lower Taxes
3. Smaller Government
4. Strong National security
5. Strong Border Security
6. Energy Indapendence
7. America First

AND REALLY MEAN IT THIS TIME

Maybe...
"The chances are extremely high that the GOP will gain congressional seats in November 2010, dealing Barack Obama the first political defeat of his presidency."

It will only be because of Obama himself. His policies will continue economic decline in this country. There's nothing to recommend putting Republicans back in power. Democrats won because Republicans alienated voters; Republican will win only because Democrats will alienate voters.

Republican Party...Who Cares?
There is virtually NO difference between these parties and the only strategy the GOP has is to become even more like the Dems.

ALL of our problems result from abandonment of two documents: the Holy Bible and the US Constitution. Any political party that ignores the ancient wisdom of our fathers is a ruse, and only fools put their faith in such things.

Taking the current economic crisis as an example, we have lived on borrowed money for decades until the credit bubble burst. This was possible only because the geniuses in Washington kept expanding the fiat money supply and lending it out at bargain interest rates. The Constitution specifically prohibits "letters of credit" (paper money)and pegs the currency to gold.

We ignore our founding fathers and their wisdom at our own peril.

Seawolf
About that money thing you mentioned: No doubt that the "blacks and other minorites" must bear their share of the blame for the meltdown.

But could you give us some names of those blacks and other minorities who might match what the Wall Street white shirts removed from the money pool such as:

Richard Fuld...Lehman Bros...removed $480 million since 2000 while Lehman went bankrupt.

AIG...Christian Milton, Martin Sullivan, Robert Willumstad, Mautice Greenbeg (and others) received almost $900 million in pay while AIG was burning $152 BILLION.

Anthony Mozila...Countrywide Financial...removed over $470 million while directing a loss of over $19 BILLION.

Freddie Mac...Franklin Raines, Daniel Mudd, Richard Syron...recieved hundreds of millions while overseeing tens of BILLIONS of losses.

Citicorp...John Reed, Vikram Pandit, (and others) had compensation of over $700 million while guiding Citicorp to require a 306 BILLION gaurantee using our tax dollars.

And there are many, many more.

But my question to you is: Can you list the "blacks and minorities" who have "removed" (stolen might be a better word) that much money from our system and caused the financial meltdown?

P.S. Anne, since you agreed so heartily with Seawolf you can take a shot at replying also.

Anne
You say that "President Bush could not spend one penny WITHOUT Congress' approval" but I'm just trying to recall...who controlled Congress until 2006?


Voting Democratic is cultural not geneti
kbTexan

Blacks, Hispanics, Jews all vote overwhelmingly for Democrats because they live in a cultures that almost forces them to do it. Most blacks have probably never for a Republican. '

Hispanics and Blacks are two of the most liberal groups in the U.S. even the few Hispanics who are Republicans are much more liberal than the rest of the party.

That is why it is stupid to have quota minorities in positions of powerin the Republican Party. They are not conservatives and will stab conservatives in the back given the chance (See Colin Powell).

drfixit
Please do not ignore us conservatives in the coastal areas! OHB so called win was by a mere 2% and it would be nice to see electoral votes be devided by the popular votes instead of the state winner take all. Perhaps then the informed voters who are not koolaid drinkers nor slackers would have a real voice and our votes would again count.

Barry O will be a one-termer
It's "baked into the cake" as they say. The economy will not rebound at a fast enough clip to save the dems in 2010 or B. Hussein Obama in '12. All of this wishful speculation on the part of the media and liberals (is that a redundancy or what??) about the end of conservatism sounds hauntingly familiar. We heard it in 1993 when slick willie came in. But there's nothing quite like having a democrat actually in office and governing to quickly dispel that notion. When they're in power they fall. And when they fall they fall HARD.

Same Old Liberal Routine
Lambro is a liberal pinko Bushbot. And he is merely entering phase three of the standard liberal republican response for why they led us to yet another humiliating defeat. just like they did in 92 and 96.

Phase 1: Blame conservatives for offening people (Sarah Palin hurt McCain)

Phase 2: Make excuses (It was just bad luck that the economy tanked when it did)

Phase 3: Its all cyclical we will be back in power sooner or later so we don't need to change anything.

Sadly he is right. By 2000 most republicans were so disgusted with 8 yrs of Clinton that they totally forgot about what a liberal gun banning, tax raising weasel Bush I had been and blindly elected his son on the premise that anything would be better than Gore.

Anne
I was including the Republicans in my comment. I draw a distinction between Republicans and conservatives of which there are few in government. It seems to me until 2006 the Republicans had enough of a handle on things to fix a bunch of stuff if they had had better leadership. The leadership in congress and Bush all let the country down and set us up for worse to come.

Republican Party Doomed?
I refuse to believe that a person's skin color or ethnicity determine whether they are conservative or socialist. I do believe however, that the GOP has been branded as racist and that instead of fighting it, they pander to minorities and make things even worse by looking pathetic. The only way around this may be to dismantle the GOP and start fresh. Conservatives need to buy and operate media so they can hammer their message as well as the liberal media do. In the end, though, it may not matter, because democracies are inevitably doomed by the fact that the parasites can vote themselves free money , and politicians will always soak the rich to buy votes. So, instead of wasting effort trying to save a doomed political party, I think conservative European Americans should be looking to create a homeland on the North American Continent. Otherwise they will be doomed in the coming race wars being promoted by the liberal fascists in the Democrat party. The heartland states and the South are natural candidates for this homeland. In fact, it is only small slices of coastal areas that are liberal fascist. I think if the major coastal cities were surrounded, cut off and sieged, the liberal facsists could be starved out and annihilated.

Overconfidence is a losing strategy
While Obama has four years (possibly eight, but I doubt it) to play with, the entire House has to face reelection every two years. Plus, 19 senate seats will be open in '10.

Obviously, The One could campaign with no experience, but can he *govern*? One suspects that his cabinet's butt-kissing will be perfected over the first few months, so that he can enjoy the vicarious "experience" of his advisors, while taking the credit...where successful.

However, if he does a tenth of what he has promised (having already dropped more campaign promises than Bill Clinton in '92), dems face a real challenge, as one of their strategies has been to find GOP lite candidates, dems with guns and Bibles, while the GOP has become DNC lite, which has been a disastrous failure for them. Idiots!

The One has talked the talk. Now, can he walk the walk? Maybe...if he keeps his mouth shut and those big ears open. He must stay interesting and relevant while avoiding becoming entertaining.

Plus, he's saddled with that obnoxious wife of his.

Lon, it is obvious you are a liberal.
Bush did about as well as any president in his shoes could have been expected to. Remember, he had high support for the war from BOTH sides of the aisle. When the war became unpopular, he still stuck at it, and I believe history will treat him more gently in that area.

He is by no means perfect, but the mainstream media have maligned him like no other president in recent history has been maligned. His approval ratings are as low as they are because of imbalanced media reporting, not because he is actually the worst president ever.

Republicans are not attacking states like Michigan. They are attacking the thuggishness of the auto unions, which do happen to be located in Michigan, but are by no means representative of the state.

In addition, no Republican I know is xenophobic. They love immigration. LEGAL immigration. As to how attitudes toward ILLEGAL immigration go, McCain was completely for amnesty, and got less of the Hispanic vote than Bush. Could it be that being strong on criminal aliens is a good thing politically as well as morally?

And as to the Republicans having a narrow support band, did you read the article and see that the Democrat's support band is only about half the size? Appealing to your base is important for the Republicans. It helped Reagan become the best president of the 20th century, and it can help whoever runs in 2012 on the Republican ticket.

What types of Republicans lose presidential elections? Moderates ones. Bob Dole. John McCain. Conservatism is the way to go.

maybe
Lambro is right that Republicans could pick up seats in 2010 if the economy is bad or some foreign policy issue makes Obama unpopular. (Although after 8 years of Bush, Obama has a fairly low bar to climb).

The long term look for the Republicans is not good. In recent elections the balance of power has been thought to be in places like Ohio, Michigan, (along with Florida) and Republicans in the Senate, who are mostly Southern, have lately been declaring war on those states in the name of their in state foreign automaking plants.

Demographics don't help. Tapping into xenophobia may be a good short term strategy, but it is a bad long term one. Immigrant bashing has made republicans uncompetitive in states like California, Illinois, and New Jersey.

And so far the Republican response has been to note that since their support is in this narrow band they should appeal more strongly to the narrow band. Not a great strategy for winning national elections.

Recent history
suggests that the GOP will not get back into power until the present crop running the GOP dies off.

Grassroots efforts
Are minorities genetically predisposed to voting for Democrats? I think not. Most immigrants to this country came because of opportunity, not handouts.

The problem is, our RINO Republican leadership would rather pander than teach minorities (or majorities, for that matter) that individual liberty and personal responsibility is the pathway to the greatest financial achievement for all.

I think, like most people, our minorities would work hard and be productive, if they believed that it would be to their benefit. We just need Republican leadership that believes that as well.

Changing Demographics Will Doom the GOP
Superdestroyer is exactly right about demographics. According to the US Census, whites are 67% of the population and declining because of low birth rates and immigration.

The states with large Hispanic populations like California are referred to as Minority-Majority states. Contrary to what that idiot Karl Rove thinks, these people will not be voting Republican.

People like Lambro are whistling past the graveyard if they think history will repeat itself like in '64, '76, and '94.

PLUS there are very few REAL conservatives in the GOP anyway. Sarah Palin and Bobby Jindal are being promoted for 2012?????? Please, enough of the gender/ethnic political image crap.

Just Hold On
There were a ton of people who voted for Obama because he was black, not fully knowing or understanding anything about him. Everyone is going to get slapped by him in one way or another and they will be the most shocked when it happens because they think he will get everyone else but not them. What Obama wants to do will affect everyone and that is when he will remind them that he told them they will need to sacrifice. I can only hope that after a few slaps the sleeping will wake up.

The economy will decide
If all this Bush and Bernanke money printing results in an economic rebound, Barack Obama will be a big hero and win extra Senate seats in 2010. The hyperinflation will come later.

And the cause is lost anyway, since Franken won. With 59 Senators (+ Specter), they have the votes to pass Card Check, which is the only piece of legislation that they need a fillibuster-proof Democratic majority for.

Seawolf: You are SPOT ON!

And while I really want to believe that Lambro is right... we'll start a comeback in 2010, I fear that by then too much damage may be done.

I thought I was the only one who feared the next presidential election ballot would look like:

Barack Hussein Obama- ____ YES __No


But apparently there are others who fear the same thing.... at least according to some posts I've seen lately.



Superdestroyer is correct in post # 6
The blacks and other minorities believe there was a finite amount of money and those who got to it first must be made to give it back.

When the productive are outnumbered by the un-productive who have the idea they are entitled to someone elses money, the country cannot survive.

Democrat politicians are only in it for themselves, they are corrupt and elitist clowns who play one group against the other to remain in power. They have no core values and will sacrifice the country rather than see their power over us lessen.

We had a perfect opportunity last month to set things right, we had 2 people with proven track records of accomplishment looking out for the taxpayers, but we were overwhelmed by the greedy and ignorant in their zeal to get more of our money.

The country is lost, they elected a man who will dismantle everything that was good about this country and replace it with marxism clothed in lofty rhetoric and the majority will swoon, pat themselves on the back and our enemies will prevail as we all walk to the slaughterhouse.

We comitted national suicide last month and it sickens me to think that so many were so unbelievably stupid.

Entrenched power is subject to challemg
Ambitous men go where the op;p;ortunity is, That is one thing Rahm seems to have built into his stratgy. We need to ionsist that the old men retire before they find someone to oust them. Or, we can do turn about such as putting some money behind the Murtha challenger. I suspect that the RNC uses its money to help incumbants while the Dems have generously supported challengers.

TruLib: Of course, by "These guys" you

mean the democRATS, right???

The demoRATS were the ones responsible (ooops, I know that word "responsible" isn't a word they're familiar with) for the mortgage meltdown, which of course started this whole mess.

And you want to talk about the "entitlement" spending? Okay, how about this. Bozo Obama's intended ENTITLEMENT SPENDING will be like Pres. Bush spending on STEROIDS.

And of course, you forget, Pres. Bush couldn't spend one penny WITHOUT Congress' approval....


Demogrpahics have killed conservatives
When one considers that less than half the children in kindergarten are white, it is reasonable to assume that the Repubican's days are numbers. Given that virtually every non-white group in the U.S. hates Republicans have loves the idea of taxing whites and transferring the money to themsleves, how can the Republicans survive.

If you look at the 2010 U.S. Senate races, there is not one vulnerable DEmocratic seat but there are several seats that will go to the Democrats. The Repubican Party is not irrelevant on the west coast and in New England. As the Hispanic voters grow in ARizona and TExas, the Democrats will regain control of those states.

There is no way the Republicans can survive when their best states are Utah, Alabama, and Nebraska.

We Are Screwed
Won't matter who is in DC in a couple of years. These guys have driven the economy into the ground by playing games with the money and hamstringing business with regulations. The bunch coming in now are even more clueless than the bunch leaving.

Couple the mess they have created with the coming wave of mandated entitlement spending and you have a situation that no one will be able to manage. Money will become worthless as they print more to pay their bills. This is what government does. Human beings are incapable of learning this lesson and will always suffer because of it.

No Longer Your Father's Country
I'm not so sure anymore. Times have changed. The MS media has now officially become the TASS Soviet News agency (spewing left-wing idealogue propaganda) and is now in the bidness of destroying political candidates they disagree with! (Saul Alinsky, anyone?) Also, a sense of entitlement seems rampant--gimme gimme gimme mine!

Low Whisper
Sssh. Let them assume we are dead.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.