Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, March 24, 2008
Donald Lambro :: Townhall.com Columnist
Presidential 'Race' Begins to Matter
by Donald Lambro
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


WASHINGTON -- The 2008 presidential election is about seven months away, the Democrats' nomination process faces a deadlock that threatens to split the party, and both its candidates are trailing John McCain.

It wasn't supposed to be this way. With the Republicans presiding over an unpopular war, the economy in turmoil, the housing and credit markets in a slump, skyrocketing gas prices and the legislative agenda in gridlock, the conventional wisdom holds that the GOP stands little chance of retaining the White House in such a bleak political environment.

But in an unexpected turn of events, the Democratic candidates are on the defensive, and McCain is leading them in the latest Reuters news poll by six to eight points. Freshman Sen. Barack Obama has been reluctantly forced to explain a 20-year relationship with Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the pastor of his church whose hateful racial condemnation of white America threatens to seriously damage his presidential bid. Indeed, his downturn in the polls suggests this damage has already been done.

Sen. Hillary Clinton has been forced to release over 11,000 pages of her White House schedules, which suggest her claim to have played a major policy role in the Clinton years was wildly exaggerated. The schedules show the first lady, especially after the collapse of her failed health care plan, in largely ceremonial activities that had little if anything to do with presidential-level responsibilities.

Worse, the documents serve to remind voters of those scandal-ridden years, the nonstop investigations, sworn depositions and even the fact that she was in the White House during Bill Clinton's sexual shenanigans with intern Monica Lewinsky. Not the kind of memories a presidential candidate wants dredged up in the midst of a problematic, floundering campaign.

Meanwhile, the bickering between the two Democratic candidates over Florida and Michigan, which have been stripped of their convention delegates by Democratic officials for violating party rules, continued -- feeding an image of a party that couldn't organize a two-car funeral, let alone run the country.

On the other side of the Atlantic, McCain was on a fact-finding foreign policy trip to meet with overseas leaders, assessing the situation in Iraq and burnishing his defense and foreign policy credentials to be commander-in-chief.

The contrast couldn't have been sharper: Democrats doing what they are known for -- fighting with one another, while McCain takes care of business.

The Rev. Wright story seems to have receded since Obama's high-risk speech in Philadelphia last week, but it is unlikely to fully disappear for long. Strategists in both parties say that the man Barack Obama has called a mentor harbors a long history of racist remarks that will be rediscovered as the Democratic presidential campaign continues.

Obama's speech on the whole won raves for its eloquence and for his attempt to thread the needle between holding on to the core of his black base and his legions of white supporters. But some Democrats cautioned that the jury was still out on how the speech plays to a larger electorate.

"It was a risky speech," Democratic strategist Donna Brazile told me. But the legendary minority outreach adviser, who managed Al Gore's 2000 campaign, says the speech may not have put the matter to rest. "What Obama did was to give one of the broadest explanations of the politics of racism in America. Some people may walk away, unsure of Obama's message. But some will see it as an olive branch, a sincere attempt to get beyond race in America," she said. "I don't know if this puts the controversy to bed. Is it a sticking point in the elections? We don't know yet. We'll see what the voters say in the Pennsylvania primary next month."

Until last week, Obama had avoided framing his candidacy in racial terms, believing he could transcend race in a campaign for reconciliation, unity and change that cut across all demographic and political lines. To a significant degree, he had succeeded in doing that -- though it was blurred by the overwhelmingly black vote he won in primaries across the South and the Northern urban centers.

In fact, a large share of his vote total comes from states with few if any blacks, including Iowa, New Hampshire, Vermont, Wisconsin, Idaho, North Dakota, Wyoming, Maine and Utah, among others. In Wisconsin and Vermont, for example, he drew 54 percent and 60 percent respectively of the white vote.

But last week, race intruded itself into a Democratic nomination contest beset with more problems than it was ever expected to have at this point in the 2008 presidential sweepstakes.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Donald Lambro is chief political correspondent for The Washington Times.

Be the first to read Donald Lambro's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

NativeAmericaneyes
J. Wright has proselytized to a bunch of people who, apparently, have the IQ's of turnips. And this bunch of gullible people detest the United States and a majority of its population. No parishioner/victim of this raving maniac is going to be doing anything about all of the problems you present for a number of reasons. Probably the main reason, however, is that the poor stupid white sheep are not stupid enough to elect an American-hating black racist to the Presidency.

Race becomes matter if your losing
It was early on the campaign trail when race was thrown in. Race didn't surface with Reverend Wrights tapes. Obama had to make the speech about race, because it was being used to upset his chances for the nomination. Who was it that reminded Obama, that another black candidate tried what Obama was trying to do. Bill Clinton. Who was it, that was in the news for making racial comments about Obama in front of black voters. Bill Clinton. Race, is the ace card Hillary expected to use in case she happened to be losing. How else could Hillary explain to herself, her staff, the voters, and the media the reason for her losing and Obama winning. In Hillary's mind, there could be no other political reason she should be losing if not because of race. With all of the experience and issues, it can't be because the voters don't want Hillary. It must be because of race. When the buyers remorse didn't turn out like it was suppose to, race again was the issue. It wasn't because the voters didn't want Hillary. At every turn, Hillary's supporters uses the race card. Ferraro used it. So, when all else fails, like the popular vote and the Super Delegates, Hillary can also rely on the race card to be used by her staff or her supporters, so Hillary can keep her hands clean. Who's throwing who under the bus?

maverick, Michelle Obama made race an
issue way before Bill Clinton did. Remember before Oprah's marketing machine packaged Obama as one of her favorite things, blacks were supporting Hillary in larger numbers. When Michelle as asked about this fact, she said she believed that black americans would wake up, get it and begin supporting Barak. When black americans "woke up" Barak begun beating Hillary handily. Imagine if a white said this about Hillary's campaign, this would have been news for 4 straight weeks. Now who made race an issue? Michelle was also the first to get up close personal and dirty by saying "if a person can not run her home, how can she run a country?". Talk about change from "old politics of personal destruction" to "new mud slinging from Obama's camp? Bringing Bill's adulterous life into the campaign was dirty and below the belt. The Obama's have used pessimism as a premise for "hope and change" unfortunately they got caught in their hypocrisy when americans found out that Michelle believes in racism and Obama's mentor teaches it every day of the week. SERIOUSLY!

Thank God for "Typical White People"
As a non-white american, I am glad that the "typical white" person Obama is describing will not be voting for him this fall. That makes me one proud and happy american. More power to the "typical white person" who sees scum and knows it!

NativeAmericaneyes
should be ignored. He is another of those posters who creates a huge rant that has nothing to do with the topic being discussed and then cuts and pasts his rants on every thread at Town Hall and probably other sites as well.

He has his own blog. If people are interested in what he has to say, they can go there.

Ignore him.

The Dem Party Has
Overplayed its hand. Finally.
After years of playing the game with one card up one sleeve or another, pulling out the needed wild card to satisfy whichever "ism" needed to be appeased their dirty dealings have caught up with them and, not a moment too soon.

Somehow, after doing everything in their power during the 60's to derail LBJ's "Great Society" the dems convinced the black community that it was they who brought about the 'change' just by climbing onto the coat-tails of the President they fought so hard against! Go figure.

Soon enough there were programs specifically designed to keep the black community reliant on their new friends, the Democrats, thereby assuring re-election year after year as they promised the world to their newly created constituency.

This year the time to pay the true tithe has arrived for the DNC with the emergence of a black, African-American candidate who wasn't about to wait for the Dem leadership to tell him when he could challenge the powers that be inside the party.

Enter Barak Hussein Obama - exit the 75% of the black vote the Dems have forever relied upon to elect their white candidate, the Dem version of the plantation owner.

Too bad for the Dem elites that Obama has already made a play for the Hispanic voting bloc (the DNC had been counting on the Mexicans, legal & otherwise to replace the increasingly independent black votes they knew they would be losing sooner or later, just not this soon) catching them unprepared and unable to cope with what is now shaping up to be a bloodbath inside the Party and a sure loss in November.

Justice happens when bad things happen to bad people.

W/O=

Whistling in the dark
--
The last time there was any sort of real split among the Democrats was in 1968, when McCarthy mobilized the anti-war faction against LBJ (forcing him to withdraw from the race after the New Hampshire primaries) and George Wallace took the Dixiecrats out of the party over the "civil rights" issue, paving the way for Nixon.

There is *NO* such split today. What we're seeing is merely two equally socialist, equally godawful "Liberals" voicing the same, sad, stale, stupid statist formula for "change" that makes things worse and "hope" that has less power to convince than do stories about the Tooth Fairy.

Hillary and Hussein are just scrambling for the lead in a race where each only supposedly represents constituencies that are essentially interchangeable.

Apart from a genitourinary exam and a check of melanin content, there's not enough of a difference between 'em to consider.

Equally horrible.

And therefore equally amenable to the typical "Liberal" voter.

The chatterers who worship Republican Party power far more than they stand for American conservative principle are just trying to maintain the illusion that something has gone so far wrong with the Evil Party that the Stupid Party can keep its greasy grip on the White House in spite of the fact that the RNC has engineered the nomination of the one worst RINO in the whole damned GOP field of candidates.

Not bloody likely.

And if it *DOES* happen - if Hillary gets nominated, for example, and begins having to dodge subpoenas a couple of weeks into October - what do conservatives and Republicans wind up with after January 2009?

Four years of McCain's "Maverick" ineptitude and disaster - blamed on conservatism and the GOP.

--

Time For Some Truth
The real racist in this story is not Rev Wright but Hillary Clinton. A desperate, losing campaign with a flawed and uninspiring candidate has tried to exploit the racial antagonism between blacks and blue-collar whites to steal the nomination she had seemingly already lost. This is one of the lowest and most vile political dirty tricks in American history. Its damaged the Democratic Party and the nation. For the Dems to reward the ruthless and sickening Clintons with the nomination should be unthinkable but the Party Of Global Warming, negotiations with psychotic terror leaders and Federal Health Care is capable of any sort of deranged idiocy.

Presidential 'Race' Begins to Matter
I think any person with an ounce of discernment must see that the Democrat party has been taken over by the far left. There are some in the party that are center of even conservative and love this nation and what it is supposed to stand for. But these people have no voice at all.

It would thrill me to no end if the Democrats ended up in a brokered convention in which Hillary steels the nomination. The results would be frightening but the nation would see the results of hatred that has been sown.

The conscience of a nation could be aroused and maybe someone with some sense would pick up the pieces of that party and do some good old fashioned house cleaning.

One does not have to be a Ronald Reagan to make us proud to be Americans. Any Democrat or Republican of the center of conservative vein could do the same.

Obama stated the...
Obama stated the obvious, which needs to the said, again and again. However, Obama reminds me of others throughout history, with their ability to so quietly and enchantingly say one thing and mean another; and people will shake their heads in approval of the very things they oppose. What is amazing is they believe they have agreed with him. What is scary is that history has also proven time and again; that those willing to agree without questioning are the first to die by the millions.

Slavery and discrimination against one’s color, religion, ethnicity, age and sex are wrong. The slavery issue was settled more than a hundred and forty years ago. Why is it that after all this time we are still punishing ourselves for what our ancestors were responsible for? Slavery ended, but discrimination replaced slavery and is the most menacing disease of today.

The “Equal Rights” and “Affirmative Action” Laws only helped those that could take advantage of them. The laws themselves are discriminatory; due to the fact they discriminated by giving preferential treatment to specific categories and groups of people. Two wrongs…do not equal…right; they only facilitate more wrongs. I believe that most people have experienced some forms of discrimination during their life-time; I know I have. Some forms of discrimination are worse than others. But you adapt and move forward, not looking back and regretting what you have no control over and cannot prove.

I do not feel I own anyone anything more than what we all have; life, liberty, freedom and the choices and opportunities this great Nation provides. Get over it…stop these cycles of grudge and quilt.

Reason and logic dictates that until we are able to get above and beyond the “grudge and quilt”; no African-American will ever become POTUS.


McCain, Commander-in-Chief
I would agree that McCain has been taking care of business like a good Republican. He made a thinly-disguised campaign trip on the taxpayer dollar and didn't reimburse until publicity forced him too (there you go, those nasty liberal media are at it again). The purpose of the trip was to show how gung-ho McCain is for more war, a very Republican leaning. McCain then appeared with all official bells and whistles but revealed his utter lack of understanding of the situation when he confused Sunnis, Shiites, and Al Quaeda until prompted by a whisper in the ear, and this wasn't one slip of the tongue but a repeated misunderstanding of reality. With everything but a band playing "Hail to the Chief" and a gaff that could indicate either age (a la Reagan) or lack of information (a la Bush II), we all had a sudden attack of deja vu. Yes, that's definitely good old Republican know-how.

Maverick
Any day now I expect to see a political cartoon---maybe it already exists and I just haven't seen it---of Hillary Clinton campaigning on the slogan "Vote For Me Because I Am White".

Obamanation - A Poem To Make One Shudder
Obamanation - A Poem To Make One Shudder This presidential campaign is anything but presidential.
It is -- an Obam-a-nation.

O- Bomb-A-Nation?

Obama goes to church for twenty years
And sits and listens with those huge ears
Yet, expects us to believe he doesn't hear?
That's an Obamanation.

And have you noticed how close a name
Can be to a person's lifetime game?
Like Hitler's name's a clue - A. Hit.
And that's an Obamanation.

I get a bad feeling when I hear
The name that goes with those big deaf ears,
That pray upon our racial fears,
I hear an Obamanation.

Goodbye to hope and peace and change
Obama's sainthood is most profane
Please do not laugh at my explanation
Obama is an Obamanation.

It seems like God is sending us a clue
To protect our red, white and blue
From false prophets, the likes of who
Bear clues - It's Obama, Nation!

His preacher-monster, hateful bigot,
Spews death and blood like an open spigot
Don't join the ranks of foolish exaltation
I believe he'll lead us to O', say it, Bomb A Nation.

The devil assumes a pleasing shape
While teaching hatred of whites, that is spiritual rape,
What's in his name that excites my imagination?
I believe he wants to O', say it, Bomb Our Nation.

He wants to bomb America, that's right, with "change"
Whatever that means, it is horrifyingly strange
To preach hatred of whites should bring condemnation
Especially when the name's an Obamanation.

Re: Nativeamericaneyes
Aside from your evident inability to keep up with current events how has either of your posts contributed to the discussion here? I would suggest you might find a more receptive audience for your hate-o-gram over on the DailyKOS where the people there hate themselves and everybody else as well.

Racism is wrong.
Racism is wrong. You can try to parse that idea with all sorts of nuanced words, but it is simply wrong.

If it is wrong for a white person to be a racist; it is wrong for a black person to be a racist.

Glossing over this idea, changing the topic, trying to explain what is really meant, etc., etc., etc. won't work.

No one who is fit to walk into the White House would join a church with a racist pastor. That's a fact.

There has to be one set of rules for everyone. Nothing else is acceptable. And nothing else will bring us together.

Anyone but Obama

On my drive home tonight I listened to the darkside again(Air America). A reporter was on that wrote a piece on the Obama's Doctrine. This would be Obama's foreign policy.
First off Obama believes theirs too much disparity between the poor and the rich in the world. This is what causes all the hate and resentment. So Obama going to go about fixing the world problems. This would include taking from the rich and giving to the poor. I think this is called Marxist socialism.
All you working class blue collar people who think this might be a good idea. Keep in mind he will want all your taxes for the rest of the world. America's too rich. But you probably won't have to worry about that because you'll no longer have jobs. Those rich bourgeois capitalist pigs will just fold their companies. Sounds like I've heard this plan before. Fidel Castro. That's working real good.

Race, racial speech and Obama
You know.... The flap about Wright, sound though it is, will go away. Obama can't afford to be seen doing Whitey's bidding re: Wright's "church." Liberals will have all of us thinking people moving on soon. The MSM will go on to something else. And no matter what else it is, it's a racial issue, which none of us needs.

So why not a real story: How, precisely, can a man desire to be President of the United States if he refuses to pledge allegiance to the United States and the Republic for which it stands? I don't get that - at all, nor do I get why no one is beating him up over this. The guy doesn't even have any allegiance to a country he wants to lead?

How's that again?

Hillary can't be the first Women
We need a woman for a first presidential candidate that will not hurt the woman’s cause for the future. Hillary’s personality is not presidential, whether that personality is male or female. Our first woman presidential candidate should be compassionate caring person, not prone to lying or should I say bending the truth, and have an unquestionable love for America and its people not just speeches about how she cares. I am convinced that in the long run, Hillary would hurt the cause for women for future positions of responsibility at the highest levels and possibly set that cause back a few years,if she were to gain the presidency.

We need to look more at the person that Hillary is, and not the fact that she is a woman; does she really have the right qualities for our first example of a woman president?
Hillary is good at being a senator, I guess although her voting record is the same as Obama’s and she has been in the Senator much longer. In the long line of president’s wives, I think she wasn’t the best of them, nor the worst. I don’t think those skills necessarily means she has the full qualifications to be president. Our first woman candidate needs to have full qualifications and we need to be willing to wait for that woman, so that our cause is not harmed.

We need a younger cleaner woman
We need the first women candidate for the presidency to be not only passionate but also caring and honoring both in word and actions. Hillary gives the impression that she has one thing only on her mind which is, ‘I will have my way and if I don't get my way, someone is going to get hurt. Look at all of the people who have lost their jobs because they angered Hillary. Do you really want our first example of a woman candidate for the presidency with the great power that position holds, exhibiting that kind of vindictiveness and tendencies to rush to judgment and punishment for the smallest of mistakes?

We don't need another four to eight years of the old way of running things. Hillary has 'old ways written all over her’. We want a fresh candidate for our first women president, who doesn’t have a questionable past and is full of new and innovative ideas.

I also don't want Bill there again running around loose with nothing to do. Now I know Hillary has said she will take care of that. But do you want the vision of Hillary keeping Bill on a leash for an image of our first woman president. We sure don't need a high visible demonstration of what would be construed as being male bashing played out every day in the nation’s highest office.


Her Reputation is poor in Europe
Hillary is a past master at turning things in such a way that the issues are obscured. She does this by attacking the person and dishonoring them to win, the ends supposedly justifying the means. These tactics are probably good for a candidate for CEO of some highly competitive company, but not a candidate for the presidency; we need a diplomat for that position. Diplomacy is what we desperately need in the presidency no matter the gender.

I remember when I lived in Europe how our European friends laughed and said really crude things about Hillary, saying that she was the one who wore the pants in the family and that Bill didn't dare do anything without Hillary's permission. If there was talk like that about her then, what is their opinion of her now, or will be I doubt that has changed much?

I watch all of the news channels as I work at home, and I see Hillary slightly change Obama's and other's words until they are presented incorrectly. We already have people accusing President Bush of those exact things. I would hate to see someone in the highest office of the United States wielding that skill and establishing that skill as an example for our next generation.

Our first woman candidate for the presidency must not have questionable baggage.

Chelsea's mean remark
Please give us a break. If you choose to run for the highest office of the United States of American, there is no question, that a potential voter can ask that is none of their business, particularly when the subject matter was played out in our white house while Bill was supposedly working in service to the American people. Especially when many of us are concerned about that same stuff happening again if Hillary should bring Bill back into the White House.

And incidentally, Chelsea being a spokes person for her mother also needs to be open to scrutiny. When Hillary takes her out of the role of ‘protected daughter’ and makes her a spokes person working for the campaign Chelsea becomes accountable to the people for the words she says on behalf of her mother and the manner in which she says them.

Hillary and Bill do not hesitate to dig up dirt on everyone who opposes her, so we have two standards it seems. We are not allowed to ask about the facts, which are not rumors but are the truth. So does that mean, us simple voters have no right to ask about certain things, because someone is elite and above our scrutiny? I disagree, their behavior while in public office, note 'Public Office', has to be made public and explained to all. How unkind of Chelsea to say what she said in the snobbish mean way to a voter. It is a legitimate question should have been answered in such a way to not dishonor the person who asked.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.