Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, January 03, 2008
Donald Lambro :: Townhall.com Columnist
Lame Duck? Bush is the Comeback Kid
by Donald Lambro
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


WASHINGTON -- Well, 2007 was the year when people predicted the economy would be in a recession, the Iraq war was lost and Democrats would be dictating policy to a weak, lame-duck president.

But the U.S. economy is still expanding, racking up nearly 5 percent growth in the third quarter, violence has plummeted in Iraq as a result of President Bush's military surge, the first of American troops are coming home and the Democrats lost all of the major legislative fights of the year. So much for those predictions.

Let's take these one at a time, because rarely has a minority party shown so much unity or beaten an incoming majority so soundly, or a lame-duck president shown more resilience on so many big showdown battles.

Iraq: The Democrats tried repeatedly to tack a troop-withdrawal deadline onto military-spending measures, but could not muster the votes needed to override Bush's veto. Despite the doom-and-gloom forecasts that Iraq was plunging into the abyss, the surge strategy has been a spectacular success.

Last month, the Democratic majority made one more attempt to restrict or even to deny war funding, only to cave in to Bush's demands for a full $70 billion more for Iraq and Afghanistan.

The economy: The naysayers repeatedly predicted throughout the year that we were heading into a recession if we were not in one already. But the economy grew in each quarter, turning in a solid 4.9 percent spurt in July, August and September. The people who saw recession just around the corner never told us how the county could be in a near-recession with the nation at full employment.

We've produced 8.3 million jobs since August 2003 as a result of a record 51 consecutive months of net new-job creation.

The deficit: The people who said if you cut income-tax rates, you reduce tax revenue and enlarge the deficit were wrong again. The Bush tax cuts have stimulated the economy, put more people to work and boosted revenues.

The result is a deficit that plunged $250 billion in the past three years. It fell further last year as a result of $161 billion in unexpectedly higher tax revenues. The American people are not undertaxed as Democrats keep telling us, but that didn't stop them from trying to raise taxes last year.

Tax battles: House and Senate Democrats came up with an energy bill that would have slapped significantly higher taxes on energy companies, driving up energy costs beyond what they are now. After Bush threatened to veto any legislation that raised taxes, Democrats dropped the idea, and the result was a compromise measure the president signed into law.

But Democrats tried to raise taxes again in a bill to keep millions of taxpayers from being hit by the alternative-minimum tax that also included a higher tax on investors. They abandoned that tax, too, in the face of a certain presidential veto, and the bill sailed through.

Terror surveillance: Seeing civil-liberty abuses where there were none, Democrats sought restrictions on a program to intercept communications between terrorists abroad that are routed through the United States. Administration pressure forced Speaker Nancy Pelosi this summer to allow a temporary extension while a compromise could be worked out.

Then there was the Democrats' push to enact an expanded Children's Health Insurance Program, originally targeting lower-income families, which would have made the benefits plan available to upper-income people. The administration pushed back, saying the program should remain focused on the poor and that the bill was a thinly disguised attempt to nationalize health care.

After Bush vetoed their bill, Democrats mounted an override campaign with TV ads, rallies and phone banks that targeted 15 House Republicans in swing districts to force them to change their vote. They didn't, and Bush won that round, too.

The president finished the year by slugging it out with Democrats on the budget. They wanted to boost spending by nearly $25 billion, but the final bill held spending to a smaller increase, and included war funding to boot.

It was a remarkable record of achievement by a president who was all but written off by the pundits as an irrelevant chief executive in the twilight of his last term. But Bush reinvented himself as a veto-happy gunslinger who was not going to be pushed around by Congress -- mounting a nonstop counteroffensive that kept the Democrats in retreat.

By year's end, even his reduced GOP forces in Congress -- who stuck with him through thick and thin -- were surprised by their success.

"A year into 'the wilderness,' our Republican team has scored legislative and political victories that no one -- no one -- could have predicted a year ago," House Republican leader John Boehner said in a memorandum to his GOP troops.

This come-from-behind performance reminiscent of a Rocky movie must have many Democrats thinking, "These guys are going to be harder to beat in 2008 than we thought."

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Donald Lambro is chief political correspondent for The Washington Times.

Be the first to read Donald Lambro's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Yes,
it will be a close election so you Democrats better start ramping up the lies, predicting doom and gloom, and acting as if you're conservatives to sway the ignorant portion of the masses. The rest of us will vote Republican.

Here we go, rev up the engines
Is Lambro warming up for a repeat of 2006? Remember, Lambro is the one who treated us with the "Republican Rebound" columns every couple of weeks. After it was clear that he misread the mood of the electorate he went on to other things. Oh, he didn't admit he was wrong, he just changed the subject... only to return to it a couple weeks later when one poll in four showed an uptick of 5 points for the Repub Party.

CT: the country has never been in love with the Repub Party. They had a string of 51/49 elections. That's about it. "The rest of us" isn't a big enough group for conservatives to feel confident about anything. If things remain as they are today, I don't think 2008 will be different than 2006.

Reagan was hated too
Now he is considered one of the greatest presidents ever.

Yet more obsequious pap from Lambro
Doesn't this Lambro guy ever tire of being Monica's blue dress for Bush? Here's the reality Lambro:

1) Open borders
2) 1.36 billion dollars increase in debt Every DAY since he took office
3)A fool's war that is the equivalent of invading China after Pearl Harbor.
4) Harriet Myers for SCOTUS
5)Dollar Collapse in spite of his stated goal of having a strong dollar
7) MASSIVE fraud waste and abuse
8)100 dollar a barrel oil
9) Russian resurgence under a an ex-KGB agent that Bush's legendary lack of intuition told him was a really swell guy
10) the Department of Education's ANNUAL budget has grown 50 billion dollars under his watch.

It would be easy to run this list out to 75 or so. But it's been a long day and I got another ten hour shift tomorrow.

This line, however, rings true: "This come-from-behind performance reminiscent of a Rocky movie..."

That would be Rocky 1...in which he gets beat in the end.



Fraud Robert, aka "Frobusto"...
... writes Thursday, January, 03, 2008 2:13 AM

"Arbusto will simply leave the Presidency more or less hated."

Wow! Another searing comment from Townhall's most BDS-afflicted Lefty.

Yawn... ZZzzzzzz...

Primus54
Go easy on "Frobusto!"

Yesterday he admitted that some University kingpin came to talk to his father-in-law but we cracked the code to find out that it was the manager of the petting zoo who caught "Frobusto" wandering around behind the little animals.

Not to mention rumor has it that the helo machine at the Walmart near his house is busted!

Primus54
Also, check my blog for a call-to-arms on BUsh issuing an EO on earmarks.

He does that, he cripples the tax and spend liberal skivvie-stains.

http://noliberalspin.townhall.com/

Looking at America
Bill of Rights vs The Patriot Act

WATCH VIDEO

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/looking-at-america

I love it
I wish Bush could serve another term. It is such a hoot to watch the libs blame everything (including the price of tea in China) on him. I am sure if your kids fail to do their chores or paint on your car fades it is Bush's fault. he,he.

Isn't it amazing how well Bush does
when he returns to conservative principles? Perhaps some of the Reps looking for his job will pay attention.


campagnolo
You must lean like a CHOLO.

Open borders YEA you LIBS need the Votes.
A Fools War, Yea and by the way its a shame that you Libs were elected in 06 to do WHAT, because you sure didnt get the TROOPS to SURRENDER and RETREAT like NANCY P and HARRY REID. Wow that really PATRIATIC of them. 82 tries attempts at trying to make the TROOPS do WHAT
Massive Fraud Waste and Abuse, Hell you LIBS are much to blame for that In Palm Beach Fla where LIBS rule they just busted the LIBS on 200Million dollars of frauding who,(MEDICARE) THE PEOPLE.\
Education hum the NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND PRogram is working where I live sorry that you LIBS cant manage to make it work where you LIVE More Minorities Graduate today in my area than ever before.

And best of all THERES A NEW DO NOTHING DE#M LED CONGRESS IN TOWN.

But I will give you LIBS and E for EFFORT. Nice TRY.


As chicken little clucks...
...disaster is soon to follow. The left wears their colors well, as they cluck about their individual perceptions. Whether feigned facts, created from the limited facts the public has knowledge of, which skews the publics perception. Or by actual facts which they perceive could be used to strengthen their base of factions, and special interest causes. The sky is always threatening to fall on individuals who rely on one source of prosperity. The left has built such a machine, in segments of our population, throughout the nation. This, in turn, has created growing segments of individuals speculating on that one source of power to meet their needs. We have watched the dims play their cards according to that segment, as they try to stop the recession their factions are feeling.

__Within those various segments are individuals which America responsibly acted to assist, and protect. Individuals truly feeling the effects of recession, has the left squeezes every dollar to keep their factious leaders fed. There is a huge cottage industry, in America, that requires the frantic cluck of chicken little, to bring their needs to the forefront. Their one source of energy is secured in the left, and the left ideology in power. A tightrope walk they've been walking for years that requires a balance of half truths, surrounding facts.

Bush Greatest President EVER!
Well only to partisan fools. I respect the office of the President of The United States of America, but I don't respect Bush. Enough incompetence, hubris, lies, criminality and politicizing the Gov against the Constitution.

Comeback kid? No, the obstructionist child?

What? 10 Iraqis blown up yesterday, 30 plus the day before. Yep its a HUGE success in Iraq. $1.5 trillion, 4000 soldiers dead, 10's of thousands soldiers grievously wounded, millions of refuges and who knows how many innocent Iraqi children, woman and men have died....80,000? Who cares about them right. War is heck.

Who is to blame? Facts where made to fit the decision. Afghanistan, Pakistan, than Iran/Syria, should have been the focus. Why Iraq? Oh yea Oil. I'm all for taking their oil, but they screwed that up as well. Gas $4/gal, oil $100 barrel, Exxon making billions profit, oil execs getting 500 mil bonus, Haliburton stock up 10 fold; moved their office to mid-east to avoid investigation, YEA for the USA. What side is Cheney is on? Black Water?

The most secretive, hostile & uncooperative administration in history. Calling Americans nazis, unpatriotic who did not agree. Disgusting.

The GOP will be punished in '08 as they should.

The truth is out about the GOP:

Morals? GOP full of perverts, pedophiles, prostitute lovers and serial adultery experts.

Government? GOP loves big Gov, grew it more than anyone since 1940. "Brownie doing a heck of a job" Katrina travesty is what we got.

Budget? Earmarks, deficit spending and borrowing money from China to fight a war we can't afford.

Law & Order? This GOP administration has had so many criminal scandals it makes Clinton's dalliance look quaint and boy scout like.

Religion? GOP used religions right for votes, but don't want a Christian in office, evident by attacks of right wing media against Huckabee. He's not beholding to the GOP but to GOD. THE TRUTH IS OUT. The GOP is full of heathens and frauds.

Bush is to blame
Bush IS to blame for the unprecendented INVASION of Illegal invaders as well as "legal" immigration from terrorist countries. The stupidity or greed of this man is unrivaled. His refusal to pardon Ramos and Compean while pardoning drug dealers and other criminals as well as his pal Scooter prove just how contemptible this man really is.
I voted for him twice and have never felt so betrayed by a politician in my lifetime. His relentless push to allow the infiltration of this country by Mexico, and the abdication of his role as protector of this country is the biggest shame of his presidency and will earn him a prominent place in history as the man who single handedly brought about the end of the United States of America.

JET PILOT
Earmarks(PORK) you mean DO NOTHING DEM LED CONGRESS couldnt stop this GREAT DICTATOR. Well I thought you LIBS where in charge. Couldnt persuade your Party to defeat him huh.

But what is so funny is that you LIBS are upset becuase you COULNT DEFEAT THE OBSTRUCTIONIST CHILD not only ONCE BUT TWICE I bet that just makes your DAY doesnt it. HA HA HA

Calling Americans Nazis WOW do you have the NERVE I think that it was one of your own congressmen who called our TROOPS NAZIS and STALINIST. Come on you can do better than that.

One thing is for sure is that you guys supported the TROOPS so much that you wanted them TO SURRENDER AND RETREAT from IRAQ and you could not make that happen.

Hallitburton and EXXON , better do your research on those because AL GLOBULL WARMING DAD got and passed is STOCK MONEY from EXXON to his son. and Haliburton, now thats another story that came out after the 06 election that you libs wont be able to use in 08. More LIBS own stock in HALLIBURTON than the REPS.

Pork or like you LIBS like to say EARMARKS. You just showed America that there is a new PARTY IN TOWN by passing the largest PORK spending by far. Boy I bet that makes the LIB voters happy.

jetpilot, you seem like numbers,
...so calculate this. Add up the numbers of leftist whining about our energy problems, environmental problems, etc., etc. Now divide that by the number of whining leftist who invented, or developed, a more efficient machine, or process, to fix the problem. Zero times anything is zero, you dimwit, just like the left mentality is zero-ing out America.

Bush made some fundamental mistakes
and was punished roundly for them. He learned from some mistakes(Iraq strategy, Scotus nominations, immigration (presumably).

These are the lessons from which he did not learn:

1. He thought he could deal with Dems in an open way. Everyone but Bush knew this was an effort that would hurt him badly. This includes his expectaions that Dems would stand behind their '03 votes for victory in the Mid East. It is unforgiveable that he continues to treat Dems as the 'loyal' opposition rather than as lying political opportunists.

2. He still thinks that 'compassionate conservatism' works on any level. His base considers it an abandonment of conservative principles and the Dems condemn him for not doing enough. The result is uncontrolled spending and no accountability, and not a lick of appreciation.

3. Despite his abysmal public speaking skills, he thought he would get a fair shake from the press. We all know those results.

4. He did not exert forceful leadership on party mavericks.

I, like so many others, have a great deal of anger over these last four, not because of his initial naivety, but by his persistent misunderstanding of his political environment.


aint over
until it's over! and i hope the democrats..find that out the hard way!
i heard a candidate say last night..and we love our president who has kept us safe for 6 years!
nobody is complaining that we havent been attacked since 9/11..are they?hmmmm? nobody is complaining that he succesfully got two good supreme court justices, and got a tax reduction!
iam not in awe of bush....but give credit where credit is due..if your honest!? who was that candidate..that made that statement about being grateful to the president for our safety for the last 6 years? MITT ROMNEY!
ELVIS

rocky?
dont you mean 'nightmare on pennsylvania ave'

jetpilot writes:
On Thursday, January, 03, 2008 9:22 AM

"...but I don't respect Bush. Enough incompetence, hubris, lies, criminality and politicizing the Gov against the Constitution."

This from the Townhall's second most BDS-afflicted Lefty.

When I read jetpilot's rants, all I can think about is Mindy Sterling's "Frau Farbissina" character in Austin Powers shouting:

"lies, LIES... ALL LIES!!!!"

MORE LIBERAL LIES
Reason (sic) writes: Thursday, January, 03, 2008 1:18 AM
Here we go, rev up the engines
/

CT: the country has never been in love with the Repub Party. They had a string of 51/49 elections. That's about it. "The rest of us" isn't a big enough group for conservatives to feel confident about anything. If things remain as they are today, I don't think 2008 will be different than 2006.
=================

Paucorem Hominem points out this Big Lie:

1. What, precisely, IS "the country"?
2. The Democrat Party embraces
A. Homosexuality
B. Radical environmentalism, which has gotten us Earth First and Earth Liberation Front and Animal Liberation Front and other terrorist organizations who go around setting ski resorts, animal laboratories, new housing construction, and SUV dealerships on fire
C. Radical socialist organizations led by such America haters as George Soros and Michael Moore
3. Democrat leaders pass out poison Kool Aid and millions of uneducated drink it down to become little Marxists.

Now on to more lies by another liberal:
==================================

campagnolo writes: Thursday, January, 03, 2008 3:27 AM
Yet more obsequious pap from Lambro
Doesn't this Lambro guy ever tire of being Monica's blue dress for Bush? Here's the reality Lambro:

1) Open borders
2) 1.36 billion dollars increase in debt Every DAY since he took office
3)A fool's war that is the equivalent of invading China after Pearl Harbor.
================

PAUCOREM HOMINEM INTERJECTS:
NOT EXACTLY. "SADDAM HUSSEIN MUST GO." - BILL "LOATHING THE MILITARY" CLINTON

MOREOVER, THE U.S. SENATE DEBATED AND AGREED TO INVADE IRAQ IF HUSSEIN DID NOT COMPLY.





More muddy liberal thinking....
...largely due to Bush Derangement Syndrome....
Campagnolo, at least half of your list are moot, or paper tigers.
Get a grip.

Don Lambro, You've Got to Be Kidding
Dear Mr. Lambro:

George W. Bush "Comback Kid of the Year?" It's obvious you haven't been reading the words of your fellow Town Hall columnists.
,
For openers, Town Hall columnist and National Review editor Rich Lowry on Oct. 8, 2007, was moved to write that

'"THE U.S. GOVERNMENT HAS NEVER BROUGHT TO BEAR ITS RESOURCES IN A TRULY NATIONAL EFFORT TO WIN (THE IRAQ WAR)."

Which is a harsh indictment of Pres. Bush inasmuch as Mr. Bush on Oct. 7, 2002, in selling War in Iraq to the American people, promised to employ THE FULL MIGHT of the American military in a war the President assured us was vital to the security and survival of the United States.

Town Hall columnist Dinesh D'Souza on Dec. 17, 2007, criticized Pres. Bush for surrounding himself with "cronies and sycophants." And compared Mr. Bush to a "toy soldier who runs into the wall and keeps going."

Town Hall columnist Patrick Buchanan has agreed with those who call the Iraq War the worst strategic blunder in our nation's history.

On Sept. 29, 2007, Town Hall columnist Kathryn Jean Lopez' article contained the following severe criticism of Pres. Bush:

"Pete Hegseth, the articulate head of Veterans for Freedom -- folks who know true wartime sacrifice -- shares my opinion. 'I don't understand why he wouldn't call on Americans to serve their country, in uniform, in this extremely important war. President Bush understands the stakes of the fight in Iraq and should call on the best and brightest to serve on the battlefield. That message, to me, seems like a no-brainer.''"

Why didn't Pres. Bush employ the talents of the "Best and the Brightest" instead of relying on incompetent "cronies and sycophants" to conduct this "very important war"?

DaveF




DaveF

To poster "activated"
I don't know where you got the idea that Reagan was hated, but you're dead wrong.

He had incredibly high approval ratings throughout his presidency, left office with record-high numbers, was elected twice in crushing landslides.

I don't know whether or not you're trying to rewrite history, but you couldn't have been more wrong.

BrianR
Perhaps "activated" was referring to liberals - they certainly hated Reagan - until it became un-PC after his death.

I'll never forget a very flummoxed Tip O'Neal being interviewed after one of Reagan's appeals to the public to call their congress critters about lowering taxes. O'Neal knew Reagan would get what he wanted and it just drove him NUTS!

Maybe so, Primus
But he sure didn't qualify the comment, or limit its applicability.


BDS
BDS sufferers,

One more year and THE MAN RESPONSIBLE FOR EVERY BAD THING IN THE WORLD will be gone. You should be so happy! No more hurricanes, no more 9/11 attacks, no more spending by Congress, no more global warming...because BAD BAD BUSH will be gone. Yeaahhh for you guys! The only downside is now all 250 or Keith Olbermann's viewers will need a new hobby...

I never hated Reagan
I just thought it was insane to have a Super Power leader with Alzheimer's. It retroactively explained many of his idiotic actions.

BHL
Like winning the Cold War, cutting taxes, getting the Berlin Wall torn down, presiding over a huge economic boom, and bombing Libya?

Creative writing
That was a column is imaginative to say the least. "The people who said if you cut income-tax rates, you reduce tax revenue and enlarge the deficit were wrong again. " Oh so the 9 trillion debt is fine fiscal management. It drains money out of our treasury to pay the interest to those countries that bought our bonds to keep us from going defunct. Now China and Abudabi owns us. Boy is that good leadership.

An economy that is charging ahead. Again we owe Abudabi and other internationals. They bought up the debt that our banks plunged into swallowed up the housing loan crises. Sure hope they, who now own our assets continue to be friendly to us and don't dump our worthless dollars for the Euros. As long as the internationals help to pour money into the hole we're in we might get by with only a mild recession. That is if the oil prices don't go up again. Aren't you really really thankful that Bush didn't push for alternative fuels or use some of that money squandered in Iraq to develop electric cars? Shucks i could be charging up my electric car with a little generator and commuting to work every day by now. No he chose to squander all that money on an invasion Iraq. and what a successful venture that has been! Donald duck would have done a better job.





LOL, AZPhil and BHL!
Yeah, if Reagan's Alzheimer's (which set in YEARS after he left office) was the key to such successes, let's make Alzheimer's a constitutional requirement for a candidate.


AZPhil
Was never briefed on the Iran Contra scandal, nearly caused WW III when he made the crack on an open mike "The cold war is over, the bombers have taken off!"

His bombing of Libya precipitated the Lockerbie retaliation. His cut and run in Lebanon. We became a world power again by defeating the mega army of Grenada. Also, didn't we have the S&L scandal at that time, with George's son and GW's brother being bailed out?

While these are numerous reasons to hate Reagan, How can you hate someone with diminished capacity? What good does it do?

BrianR
FYI: Alzheimer's is a 20 year disease, i.e. it starts 20 years before it kills you.

BHL
"His cut and run in Lebanon."

Granted, that was an embarrassment. Nobody's perfect.

"How can you hate someone with diminished capacity? What good does it do?"

This is exactly why I don't hate you.

Sorry, BHL
If you're stating that as a fact, then you have better knowledge than the medical profession.

Your posit was pretty absurd on its face.

However, it also doesn't negate what I wrote. If Reagan had Alazheimer's while Prez, then we should consider making it a constitutional requirement for eligibility for the office.

He was one of the greatest Presidents in our nation's entire history.


BrianR
I think Alzheimer's is variable, like cancer. Saying it starts "20 years before it kills you", to the day, I think is oversimplifying.

So,
the Reps had a president with Alzheimers who won three landslide elections (counting Bush Sr.) and a buffoon prep boy who won two more. What does that say about the Dems?

You libs can deny or obfuscate all you wish, but results is results.

Yes, B-2 is roundly unpopular, partially because 40% of the population suffer from BDS and will always disapprove. The other 30% are unhappy that B-2 began to govern like liberal.




BrianR
Well said. No President, including those now on our currency, was right 100% of the time. Reagan was just right more than most, and the right combination of firm leadership and optimism this country needed after the Carter debacle. You can pick nits with anyone. Maybe Lincoln wouldn't have been so great in the absence of a Civil War, either. But yes, I'd say the guys on Mt Rushmore, plus arguably Monroe, A. Jackson, and Reagan, were way up there on the list of great presidents.

Bleeding Feart Liberal
Congratulations on earning your medical degree!

Huh... I know of four cases of Alzheimer's that were diagnosed upon the onset of symptoms - none of whom lived longer than 7 years.

Maybe it's a 20 year disease in liberal San Francisco. I assume that's where you "practice"?

Accept Reality
You are right - Bush Jr. is unpopular because he has alienated true conservatives by appeasing liberals, just like his old man tried to do. RR had approval ratings in the 60s because half of those were diehard Republicans, and the other half saw that he got results. The remaining third of the country were the Alec Baldwin crowd who would have hated him if he had won the Cold War while curing cancer and lowering taxes to 6%.


Yep, Phil, I agree
Even Lincoln, if one wants to pick nits, had his setbacks during the Civil War. His early picks for General, particularly McClellan, left a lot to be desired.


Primus
The Alzheimer's diagnoses get murky in San Fran, because most of those people are delusional so early in life, it's hard to separate the liberalism from the Alzheimer's. Both are debilitating diseases, but only one is fatal.

Brian
Yes, if Lincoln had a weakness, it was picking terrible generals. Then again, most of the really good ones were ineligible, like red-shirt freshmen, because they had been "gray-shirted".

AZ, BR
The support group I attended for my mother in law stated Alzheimer's as a 20 year progressive disease. If you want to argue the time line fine. If you wish to think it just took over Ronnie right before it was announced publicly, fine. I can hate the fool.

I think it wonderful you can gloss over Lockerbie, Grenada, the S&L fiasco, Iran-Contra, not to mention Lebanon. BTW, was his administration that sold Missles to Iran so they can shoot down our planes when Dub decides to go to war?

Lambro's Inside Move
In the fierce competition as Bush sycophant-in-chief, Donny "Ugh, Ugh" Lambro has puckered his lips on Bush's backside just ahead of Fred "Beetle" Barnes and Sean "Unbelievable" Hannity. Who will win the next round?

Bush needs to be sent packing to his "ranch" in Crawford and forgotten by conservatives as a bad nightmare.

bLEEDING hEART lib
Damn we know exactly where you are coming from since we are in the AZHEIMER STAGE OF YOUR DO NOTHING DEM LED CONGRESS boy that sure helps. It retroactively explains many of their idiotic actions. Wow Im glad you got us on track about your pParty.

Sure, BHL, go ahead and hate Reagan
That's your absolute right.

But don't try and couch it in some absurd crock about Alzheimer's; you only make yourself look foolish.

Reagan wasn't loved by everybody. Though hugely popular, those who hated him did so with a passion. The MSM absolutely DESPISED him, because no matter how hard they tried to destroy him, the peeps still loved him (in general).

Bush The Comeback Kid?
Only career Bush cheerleader Donald Lambro could
come up with such a lame assessment on lame duck Bush...ah Mr. D. Lambro..please put down the pom poms and review these numbers..If your hero is doing so well why these?



PollingReport.com


PRESIDENT BUSH – Overall Job Rating in recent national polls

Approve Disapprove
.

FOX/Opinion Dynamics RV 12/18-19/07 36 57 6 -21
.

NBC/Wall Street Journal
12/14-17/07 34 60 6 -26
.

USA Today/Gallup 12/14-16/07 32 65 3 -33
.

Diageo/Hotline RV 12/10-14/07 33 62 4 -29
.

ABC/Washington Post 12/6-9/07 33 64 3 -31
.

CNN/Opinion Research 12/6-9/07 32 66 2 -34
.

Gallup 12/6-9/07 37 57 5 -20
.

CBS/New York Times 12/5-9/07 28 65 7 -37
.

AP-Ipsos 12/3-5/07 36 61 * -25

BHL
I think the 20 years is a generality, that's all.

I'm not glossing over Lebanon - that was stupid. It's hard to "gloss over" Grenada, a decisive victory. Lockerbie was tragic, but the West German disco was blown up prior to the Tripoli bombing. Meaning, the Libyans were blowing us up anyway.

I never said RR was perfect - just that he accomplished a lot. If you think the mistakes he made outweigh the massive economic growth and the eradication of the Soviet Union, you are certainly entitled to your opinion.

PS, BHL
As Phil and I discussed a sec ago, if you want to point to errors in a presidency, you'll find them in every single one.

Shall we discuss Carter, since you seem to like Iran? How HIS abortion of a presidency created the problems in the ME, and Iran in particular? How about Clinton's refusal to do anything about the Cole, or bin Laden? Or all his other "blunders"?

Stop being ridiculous.

Left Angle
Happy New Year! As I say above, you all only have one more year and a few days left. Then, the man responsible for everything bad that's ever happened will be gone. After Jan 21, 2009, there will be no more hurricanes, no more tornadoes, and no more war. Just sweet, unpolluted air, beautiful flowers everywhere, peace in the Middle East, and everyone loving each other. In fact, instead of 2009, maybe we can call it the year 1 A.B. -after Bush.

AZPhil
Wow... that's quite a list of bad things that won't happen anymore after Jan 21, 2009!

Please tell me that also means "Robert" won't have anything to write about and he'll be gone, too!

Leave Left Dangle alone.
He is upset that Bush has nearly triple the approval rating of the Dem congress. He is going to be even more upset tomorrow.

AZPhil: a response..
Happy New Year to you also!!

Make any New Years resolutions?
I did and I think I broke it already..lol

thats pretty funny that you think dems/libs think
Bush is responsible for every thing bad...you got it wrong dude..Its his incompetence in dealing with matters WHEN things go bad and the arrogance and stubborness he displays even when its apparent that what he is doing isnt working that is so galling.

hey it may be the year after but, it just may be a continuation of the bush clinton bush clinton hiearchy..lol

accept reality: a question..
you keep calling it the democratic congress...
sure dems are the majority..but isnt that congress split about 51% to $9%?

if congress is rated so lowly, you saying the repubs there dont get any of the credit for it?

get real dude..lol

correction:
51% to 49%

The legacy of W
The notion that Bush has “made a few mistakes just like other presidents” is nauseating. He has undermined nearly all of the basic tenets of conservative philosophy under his watch. Bush and his clingers-on represent everything that is wrong with the political scene today. Principles are subverted for political gain and maintenance of power. When they controlled all three branches of Government they had no excuses not to do the will of those who voted for them. Instead we got out of control spending (not a single utterance of the word veto all the while), waste fraud and abuse on a brobdingnagian scale, a complete lack of enforcement of immigration laws already on the books, and so much more.

If Democrats did half of what Bush managed to get away with, Republicans would be howling bloody murder. Therein lies the fundamental flaw of the two party system. Neither party is willing to hold their leaders accountable to their own stated principles.

Bush’s legacy to conservatism reminds me of Ambrose Bierce’s definition of a Christian: One who follows the teachings of Christ in so far as they are not inconsistent with a life of sin.

All that aside, I really do believe Bush is easily one of the most effective and greatest political leaders of the past seventy five years...of Mexico.


Left
I resolved not to make any resolutions:)

I may exaggerate a little (which is hereditary), but come on...Olbermann et al blamed Bush for Katrina (not just the aftermath, the actual hurricane caused by global warming), they say the economy is horrible when unemployment is as low as the '90s, they blamed 9/11 entirely on him (some say he actually planned it).

They criticized the surge, then when it worked, they criticized that he didn't do it soon enough. Then there is this sort of reporting:

The Washington bureau of McClatchy Newspapers, which infamously headlined an October story, “As Violence Falls in Iraq, Cemetery Workers Feel the Pinch,” headlined a Tuesday story: “Despite drop in violence, Pentagon finds little long-term progress in Iraq.”

azphil: where does it say..
that these people or entities that you speak of or quote speak for anyone other than themselves?
they are no more "official" spokesmen for the left than Ann Coulter or Rush Limbaugh are "official" spokespersons of the right.

youre using an awful wide brush to paint "the left" with everything these few people have to say.

A Government Lexicon
A Government Lexicon:

"The most secretive administration", translation: The secrets are not leaking like a sieve to journalists who rely on "unnamed sources". The Bush administration actually believes we should not divulge certain info to the public but only to those in select oversight committees. Democrats can then leak the info or claim that they don't remember they were briefed years before.

"Tax cuts for the rich", Translatiion: The rich are paying more in taxes to the federal treasury on a percentage and absolute basis than before the tax cuts.

"Runaway Deficits", Translation: We are taking in record levels of tax monies into the Treasury but we can't control our spending because we have to buy more votes with earmarks and pork in our home district. After all it is free money !

"Stubborn, uncompromising", Translation: Bush believes in his oath of office to "preserve, protect and defend". The man actually has principles. This is not recognized by the beltway crowd because it is seen so
seldom.

"Cutting programs", Translation: We have reduced the rate of increase in spending on a program. Only in Washington when you spend more money but not as much as you originally planned to increase spending is it called a "cut". If my boss originally planned to increase my pay by 5% and then later decides on a 4% raise then my pay was "cut". What an outrage !!

Tibby

Left Dangle
There are certainly Reps who share the responsibility for Congress's low approval rating. But surely you know that the Dems trumpeted how much they were going to change everything. They certainly did; least amount of accomplishment and the lowest approval rating. Do you think it a coincidence?

BTW I do not recall your ilk being so condemning of the minority party from '95-2006. And I certainly do not hear it now that your team controls the ball.

Left Dangle,
But I forget; you guys always have an excuse. It's Bush's fault.

Angle Iron
My wide brush is only because lots of people believe the people I mentioned above. People actually believe the swill that Michael Moore, Owlgore, and KO spew.

azpHIL..back at you..
My wide brush is only because lots of people believe the people I mentioned above. People actually believe the swill that Ann Coulter,
Rush Limbaugh, Michelle Malkin and Fox News
spew.

accept reality: dont you think it's odd
that republicans in the minority are using the EXACT parliamentary tacktics that democrats used
when they were to thwart the opposition?

only difference then was you called what the dems were doing "obstructionism" now you call it
"principled oppostion"..good grief charley brown lmao

if you know anything about how congress works you can get anything done in the senate unless you have 60 votes (supermajority), house of repubs is simple majority. bush still holds the veto pen and dems dont have the votes to overide.
so how realistically could dems "change" anything, other than slow it down?

acceptreality
I second that motion, I recall everyday the DRIVE BYS had the DEMS on the steps of congress complaining that the REPS want play with them and still the REPS had to deal with them. What is funny if you say one of the DEMS is unpatriatic of LORD they would have sissy fits.

Now my best show on the steps OF CONGRESS WAS THE MOST UNPATRIATIC SEN of them all HARRY REID saying WE HAVE KILLED THE PATRIAT ACT. But we REPS were in charge of Congress so now that they are in Charge of Congress how many times have you seen the DRIVE BY MEDIA showing any REPS on the steps of Congress crying that they want play with us. NONE But like her Majesty stated THERES A NEW CONGRESS IN TOWN only problem is its THE LOWEST RATED CONGRESS IN AMERICAN HISTORY. Also they didnt lose to an imcompetent PRESIDENT not only ONCE BUT TWICE boy that ought to say allot about the DO NOTHING DEMS. The DEMS lied to their PEEPS and they dont care for they voted for them to get us out of IRAQ. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPPPPPPPPPPPSSSSSSSSSSS
Didnt work did it. But we will still let you raise the white flag if you want.

BrianR-GunnyG
Donald Lambro is an excellent columnist, but the comments to his column usually don’t crack double digits. There are 69 comments at last count. When Liberal Girly men start whining and crying, YOU KNOW YOU HAVE HIT THE TARGET!

Don’t worry about Robert. If the helicopter in front of Wal-Mart is broken, he can go inside and buy a tire patch kit. He can then go home, patch up Wonder Woman and play Pearl Harbor. He can BLOW HER UP!

Left ANKLE
You mean you already forgot. You LIBS were the ones who pushed for the 60 majority way back now that you got it you are a bunch of WHINING ARSE HOLES lost in the your own pride and joy.

But most of all you DEMS could do what you always claim the REPS wouldnt, I think that was called REACH ACROSS THE ISLE and do things Bi-Partisan. But your last escapades taught the REPS one thing that you dont take a DEMS by their WORDS. Hell they cant even keep their promise to their own voters. Bush has went out of his way Honoring likes of TED(HICK-UP)Kennedy and of all people BILL(THE SCUDSTER) CLINTON by putting him on committees with his DAD. But best of all and I blame him for this, He kept all them CLINTONEEESTAS on after he was elected and what happened? They turned on him and most made allot of money(RICH) writing lies about him. So dont blame REPS for our actions fore you LIBS taught us well.

chuck: its all good...
the odds a very good that after 2008 elections come 2009 there will be a dem in the whitehouse and dems will retain control of congress while gaining more seats in the majority...

all dems have to do is keep throwing red meat to the base to show that at least they are trying to
"change" things in lieu of republican "obstructionsism"...just tell em to be patient..our day WILL come..


Left Dangle
If a nobody like you understands how congress works, how come the Dem leadership gloated and pronounced that they had a mandate for change? What happened to all the progress they were going to accomplish in the first 100 days?

Let' see, with no real opposition they have passed an increase in the minimum wage(a bill that affects less than 5% of the population)and.................

Everything else has been ineffective bluffing and posturing. Bush has his Iraq funding and the war is proceeding at his direction, not that of para-Pelosi and Harry Screech.

And you say Bush is dumb and ineffective. What does that say about our Dem saviors?

Left Ankle
I would rather be an obstuctionist than a SOCIALIST and you LIBS hold that title DEARLY.

Trying want get it this time because you where elected in 06 to get us out of IRAQ and as usual you have shown the American People that you dont have the B@LLS to even do that. But you
want have Iraq to help you this time for the SURGE is working and the American people are not blinded by you hypicrics no more. Remember RETREAT AND SURRENDER want happen.

I think the American people can see that YOUR DO NOTHING DEM CONGRESS with its LOWEST RATINGS IN AMERICAN HISTORY will even lower than our incomptent President like you LIBS call him will not be able to obstain the VOTERS like you did in 06. But we will see want we.


Left Angle opines:
"all dems have to do is keep throwing red meat to the base to show that at least they are trying to "change" things in lieu of republican "obstructionsism"...just tell em to be patient..our day WILL come.."

Won't work - Republicans already tried this same approach - and we ended up with a Dem Congress.

And the government will still be split after '08 elections - either a Dem POTUS or Congress, but not both.

Most middle-of-the-roaders like obstructionism - it limits the number of new laws and helps to preserve our liberties as a consequence - not that I am an advocate.

accept reality: a response
you stated:

"And you say Bush is dumb and ineffective. What does that say about our Dem saviors?"

cant you read?

it says, THEY DONT HAVE THE VOTES IDIOT.

Primus: If you think Iraq
is a popular issue for republicans, surge sucess or not, you are sadly mistaken..

the vast majority of americans want this calamity in Iraq to be done and over with without a doubt.

As long as you repubs and your prez candidates continue to "stay the course" in Iraq you can forget about it in 08.

the people you have to worry about are the independents and they are clearly leaning democrat...that is the only way to end the war in iraq..elect a dem prez and maintain a dem
congress..odds are most definitely in our favor.

Angle Iron
Point taken earlier.

I forgot who set up the rule of 60. Both parties obstruct when they are in the minority; that is just a fact of life.

I believe you are mistaken about having the majority in all three places come 2009. One reason Clinton couldn't raise taxes is because the Republican-controlled Congress hated him and wouldn't give in to him...and the budget ended up pretty well thanks to Gingrich et al. Now with Bush Jr, this has been a rubber-stamp Congress (for the first six years) and what do you have? Out of control spending. As a true conservative who wants a smaller government, I hope that the Congress is the opposite of the white house as a rule. It balances the budget better. "I'm from the givernment and I'm here to help you" is the first big lie for a reason.

Left Ankle
If they dont have the votes IDIOT then why did NANCY P stand on the PODIUM of CONGRESS and tell the American People that THERES A NEW CONGRESS IN TOWN . What she should have said is there is a new congress in town but a DO NOTHING CONGRESS. Then like you said maybe the American peeps would be ok with that. NOT NOT NOT

Im still waiting for Nancy P first 100 day Program too kick in and where are my TROOPS at that she promised to bring home. DUH IDIOT

accept reality
Whoa! You really punched Lef Angle's ticket with that one!

Now he's mad at you, accused you of blindness and has called you an "idiot".

Sure signs that you scored on a Liberal!

Funny - I don't remember Pelosi and Reid saying after the '06 election that, while now in the majority, they still didn't have the votes to really enact all they promised. I heard a bunch of chest-thumping and "America has spoken" nonsense.

It really IS tough to explain how unpopular Pres. Bush is when you have to explain that the Dem led congress is even less popular.

Primus 54...come up to the year 08
youre still stuck in 54..lol

I'm not mad at all...I'm just trying to point out that idiot friend of yours that he should
take the advice of his own name...ACCEPT REALITY.

because in victory, you can say whatever the heck you want to say...where pelosi and reid miscalculated is they thought they could get the more liberal/moderate repubs in the senate like chafee/snowe and others to come over to their side to get those 60 votes. I give credit to the dude who took over for karl rove for keeping the lib/moderate repubs in the fold and not embarrassing bush.

bottom line, they know the score NOW... so the atrategy is to keep feeding red meat to the base and tell them to be patient in the process and keep blaming the lack of action of repub "obstrutionism"...our time will come.


Angle
I must disagree about ending the war ONLY with a Democrat. Why can't the Republican nominee run and pledge to end the war, then do it? This is a unique election in that there's not siting Pres or VP running, for the first time in a half-century or so. The Republican nominee can easily divorce himself from GWB's policies, and especially from his foreign policy. McCain hates him, Huckabee jabs at him, etc. This isn't 1988, when Bush Sr had to (sort of) agree with Reagan, or 2000, with Owlgore in the same situation.

Left Ankle
Please you need to quit listening to MOVEON.ORG and DAILY KOS and HALD,ROBERT and MLD for all of your talking points come out the same.

Go play somewhere else and quit wasting our time

I D I O T

AZphiL: that could happen..
isnt Ron Paul pledging to do just that?
but his chances of winning the repub nomination
are slim and none. as far as I know all the others are "stay the course" in Iraq. I just dont think the independents are gonna go for that.

you know i saw Huckabee on Jay Leno last night and he comes across as very intelligent, personable and with a good sense of humor.

watch out for this guy...lol

one more thing on huckabee...
he plays the electric bass...so do i..

Left Angle
I respectfully disagree about more "red meat" bringing about the needed changes.

You need to remember the moderate and conservative Blue Dog Dems that won seats by campaigning to the right of their Republican opponents.

Without them, there wouldn't BE a Dem Congress!

Look at Gore and Kerry. Did they campaign to the left of Bill Clinton?

Yes.

Did they win?

Primus: read meat...
by that i mean pelosi and reid should keep trying to pass legislation to kill the iraq war, even though they know they dont have the votes
to do it..as long as they try it keeps the dem anti-war base happy and attracts like minded independents, who will vote against stay the course repubs in 08.
comprende?

Angle
So does Michael Anthony, but it doesn't mean I'll vote for him.

If you want to know the Democrat most likely to "stay the course" in Iraq, it is Senator Rodham.

Without meaning to, I think I have resolved to be more polite online. I can respectfully disagree with people. Now Robert is just delusional, but you, I can debate with in a good way. My favorite aunt is over 70 and a lifelong democrat, and I debate with her in a nice way all the time.

I have to pack for a business trip, but part of that packing is this laptop...so I'll be in touch. stay safe in '08!


Left Angle
Comprende...

It would be entertaining - I'll give you that!

Gotta run for now. Will check back later.

Fortunately...
the comeback kid is about to ride off into the sunset. Good riddance.

Comeback Kid
That is my worst nightmare.

To activated: "Reagan was hated too
Now he is considered one of the greatest presidents ever."

Reagan was probably never hated. And by the same
token, he was not one of the greatest presidents
ever. He was very well liked. And that goes a
long way.

vast majority?
A majority is 51-49, what is a vast majority? 52-48? Dude, you sound like TV news bite.
Bush's biggest mistake was in reaching across the "aisle", hoping that people could put aside their political ambitions and do the best for the "good" of the nation. That worked real well? Leaving Iraq now or in 2 years from now would be the biggest mistake of our Middle East policy, ever!
The posters' that refer to $100 oil as GWB'S doing needs to bone up on current events, ever hear of supply and demand, China and India? Even if we sucked up every drop of Iraqi oil, we would have overpaid by several $100's of dollars per barrel. Yea, Bush is the comeback kid, for sure, I'm glad he was my President!

nmi...
You took that quote out of context from D'Souza, 12/17/07 he also said "Bush's weaknesses, however, are more than compensated for by his one great strength...a man with unbelievable tenacity. No American president in my lifetime, not even Reagan, had Bush's guts. Perhaps one would have to go all the way back to Franklin or Teddy Roosevelt to find comparable determination. On the international stage, Bush's stamina recalls that of Churchill."

He ended by saying "As for Bush, he will go down in history as the president who refused to back down, and if staying the course in Iraq proves to be the right move, then Bush could be remembered as one of America's great presidents."

Put that in whatever pipe you're pulling on and smoke it, it must contain something that has skewed your reading ability!

Zena P, examples please
Give us some real examples of a law Bush has broken or a right you've lost since he was elected.

Str8tTalk:
Re Pres. Bush, you did not address the quote by Town Hall columnist Rich Lowry:

'"THE U.S. GOVERNMENT HAS NEVER BROUGHT TO BEAR ITS RESOURCES IN A TRULY NATIONAL EFFORT TO WIN (THE IRAQ WAR)."

Nor did you address Pres. Bush's promise to utilize THE FULL MIGHT of the American military in sellling the Iraq War to the American people back in 2002.

If Mr. Bush used the "full might" of the U.S. military, why did Town Hall columnist William F. Buckley, Jr. in 2006 call the Iraq War "Pres. Bush's failure?" and why has Sen. John McCain repeatedly call the Iraq War, for which Pres. Bush has called the shots, "a terribly mismnaged war"?

If Pres. Bush used the "full might" of our military, why would the powerful nation on earth have to rely on "surges" five years into the war?



Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.