Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, August 10, 2007
Donald Lambro :: Townhall.com Columnist
A window of opportunity opens for GOP
by Donald Lambro
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


WASHINGTON -- Worsening disapproval scores for the Democrats in Congress have spawned party-wide fears that voter alienation could give Republicans a chance to make a comeback in 2008.

The Democrats' tumbling voter-approval numbers haven't drawn much attention on the nightly news shows, but they have stirred warnings in the party's inner circles and raised hopes among GOP strategists for the first time since last year's election rout drove them from power.

A string of independent polls in the past two weeks tells the story: -- A nationwide Pew Research Center poll found that barely 33 percent of Americans surveyed "approve of the job performance of the Democratic Congress." Equally disturbing to Democrats, their party's leadership "can claim just a 62 percent approval score among Democrats."

-- The Gallup Poll reported "that 55 percent of Americans disapprove of Democrats in Congress."

These and other internal polls have sent tremors through Democratic ranks, and campaign strategists are warning their party to start taking them seriously before it's too late.

"Democrats should not be for complacency in the face of lost trust in Congress and perceptions that the new Congress is not effective or honoring its pledges," party advisers James Carville and Stan Greenberg warned in a midyear strategy memo to Democratic leaders.

Republican numbers are not any better. But the "Democrats should not relish an increasingly alienated electorate on any grounds; increasing alienation from both parties can drive down turnout and create protest voters looking for other vehicles for change," the two strategists said.

That points to fear of a third-party presidential candidacy that could hurt Democratic chances to win back the White House and undermine their tenuous hold on Congress -- a fear no longer dismissed by party leaders.

The testy political climate can hurt both parties, they said. "The mood of the country grows uglier ... and the Democratic Congress and leaders have lost some of the earlier glow; a 55 percent majority believes Democrats have not made progress on their election pledges," the memo said.

Up until now, Democrats have blamed their declining poll ratings on the party's failure to legislate a troop-withdrawal deadline in the Iraq war. "The Democrats are frustrated. They want the war to end quicker than it appears it will," a senior party official told me. But the finer polling data and reports from the party's grassroots base suggest that voter angst runs deeper than that. They see a party engaged in vengeful inquisitions against the Bush administration that have yielded no evidence of wrongdoing, while poisoning the political atmosphere and sinking Congress deeper into legislative gridlock.

A wave of Democratic investigations "creates the perception they are launching witch-hunts," said David Wasserman, House elections analyst at the Cook Political Report.

A Greenberg poll accompanying the Carville-Greenberg memo noted ominously "that, faced with the current gridlock, 12 percent want to vote for an independent candidate for president or Congress, a fairly impressive base for an independent candidacy." Worse, they added, "almost a third of independents are ready to respond in this way. The situation in Washington does have consequences, which is why Democrats have an obligation to address the mood" that has alienated voters.

The Democrats' mediocre approval ratings and restive political base have clearly buoyed GOP spirits, particularly at the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC).

"Such widespread dissatisfaction is creating a palpable sense of panic among Democrats," the NRCC crowed in a memo last week in response to the Carville-Greenberg warnings.

An NRCC internal poll of likely voters in 50 targeted districts held by Democrats is fueling GOP hopes they will benefit from the Democrats' troubles. It showed, among other things, that "voters are not only frustrated with the new majority's inability to get things done but that voters are not at all loyal to their current Democrat member and are in a firing mood."

Notably, the poll found that "only 35 percent of the voters say they will vote to re-elect their current Democratic congressman in these districts. Half -- 50 percent -- prefer someone new."

Another bullish sign for the GOP, House candidate recruitment "is way up," officials told me.

Carville and Greenberg disagreed, pointing to their own polling of 1,451 likely voters July 25-30 in 35 key congressional districts that show their incumbents holding "dramatic leads" over any Republican challenger. But none of the polls may mean much until one can match real live candidates against one another in the general election.

Clearly, congressional Democrats and their leaders have failed to meet the minimum expectations of the voters who elected them, as the latest poll numbers attest. This opens a window of opportunity for Republicans and the White House to sharpen issues that will help strengthen their grassroots support and boost their share of independent swing voters who are up for grabs.

Still, Wasserman thinks a lot will depend on how the Iraq war plays out and whether it will dwindle as an issue if, as administration officials have been saying, preliminary troop withdrawals begin next year.

"We could see anything from a handful of small gains for Republicans in the House or a handful of Democratic gains," he said.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Donald Lambro is chief political correspondent for The Washington Times.

Be the first to read Donald Lambro's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

The party has always had opportunties
We're on the right side of the issues. Unfortunately, the factions that make up the conservative movement can't get along. Social conservatives run the show now, and they won't accomodate the rest of the movement. That's why we're spending like drunken sailors and banning Internet poker insead of reducing the size and scope of the federal government. The fact that social conservatives actually like big government, so long as they control it, doesn't help.

Republicans are always in the majority when we have our priorities right. When we don't, we're usually on the sidelines as Democrats grow government exponentially.

Window of opportunity for "RON PAUL"
Ron Paul is the candidate that is emerging in the polls.

Vote for Ron Paul. in 2008.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Glfw5iXE0uU

Engineer
'The fact that social conservatives actually like big government, so long as they control it, doesn't help.'

I doubt if you can a make a case for this statement. That doesn't mean republican politicians who've chucked the Contract with America into the trash haven't, with GW's hearty approval, grown gov't and spent like democrats over the past decade particularly after 9/11.

Under the Rove strategy, social conservatives haven't controlled the gov't under Bush. More accurately, it's been Bush who's controlled and manipulated the conservatives according to the Rovian formula, contemptuously expressed as 'where else will they go'.

That's why several key republicans lost in '06 - many of the social conservatives, out of disgust, just didn't show up.

vandamn
while your at it- wish yourself a brain

Come Now
Fellow conservatives where is that Reagan optimism our greatest president left? This is no time to be down in the dumps, we have the chance for victory in 2008. Imagine it, we beat Hillary ending her threat to the American people and we take back the House of Representatives. Its possible but we can't get depressed just because we don't always agree.

The Republican party is a party of ideas and thought and debate. We are a broad coalition of the American people and our in-fighting breeds new ideas and dialog. We are not mind-numb robots that vote in marxist lock step like the Democrats. So lets get it together and throw out these socialists bums.

Turn
Even Gallup is saying the Bush is getting a turn for the better. The moving average for Bush of all of the polls has turn up at Pollster.com, he may have bottomed unless he does something to kill his rally (like immigration). Congressional approval ratings are still headed down.

Other thing going wrong for the Dems
The other thing going wrong for the Dems is Iraq is improving, and the best they can come up with is to call General Petraeus "General Betrayus." They've had no vision for improving Iraq, couldn't even stick to their guns on getting out of there, and despite constant protestations about civil liberties, voted to renew and expand Bush's wiretapping powers. Were this not bad enough, the Democrats also are on the wrong side of immigration, and the Republicans have finally woken up and smelled the coffee on this issue. Despite the lingering bad mood about the evils of "big business," Democrats once again just seem they're on a witch hunt, and for all their protests against moral holier-than-thou pontificating, are the most guilty party in doing so when it comes to "going green."

The Democrats now have 1 final issue onto which they can latch all their hopes and prayers: healthcare. If the Republicans can nominate someone who can adequately defend against the socialist push for a single-payer system, or even God forbid, nominates someone who supports such a system, the Democrats will lose the 2008 election.

What do Republicans stand for?
What do Republicans stand for?

Does the military/terrorist threat in the Middle East undermine the Nation’s security? Are our major cities, foreign embassies, general business interests, support of Israel, oil supplies threatened?

Does the homosexual agenda threaten the cultural and moral fabric of the nation? Are legal entitlements (including marriage and hate crimes legislation), required for homosexuals in the name of “fixed sexual orientation”?

The majority of Americans believe both the terrorist and the homosexual cultural threats are real, that they undermine the security and societal fabric of the United States.

Regarding the terrorist threat, is the Republican Party line not to attack the Democrats for their politicization of the Iraq War to gain the Whitehouse -- so not to offend Republicans and independents who may be opposed to the war?

Are Republicans taking a “politically correct” position in not exposing the cultural threat posed by the Homosexual Agenda -- so not to offend homosexuals?

If these are the Republican positions, the Party is wrong and dishonest!

Dems didn't win, GOP lost
The Democrats didn't win the 2006 election; the Republicans lost it. The Republicans got in in 1994 becuase people were fed up w/ the big-gov Left. The GOP threw away their majority because instead of restoring the country's principles & dismantling Big Sugar Daddy Pork Barrel Welfare State, they went "moderate" & morphed into Johnson Democrats.

The 2006 election was NOT a referendum on the Iraq war, much less an affirmation of any other Demmie agenda. The Democrat base wants socialist totalitarianism. The Demmies just want to try to frame the debate that way now, but in 06 they basically stood there not being Repubs. It was really about Republican abandonment of conservatives & conservatism. IMO the Meiers appointmt to SCOTUS was the last straw cuz till then consrvatives had hung in hoping for originalist strict constructionist justices.

The fear of 3rd parties could be well founded if someone doesn't wake up & see a lot of conservatives are disaffected & politically homeless! Big opportunity here!

Nobody's interested in "centrist" me-too Democrat Lite; conservatives are looking for champions of conservative principles who will defend us, national soveriegnty, & limited Constitutional gvmt, & the Republicrats haven't offered such.

my2cents
Most of the Dems I know do not care if we become socialist. They have no idea what that means. Many of them would be happy as clams for the government to make all of their decisions for them so that they don't have to shake themselves out of a stupor and put either their brains or their bodies to work. If Repubs can explain in plain terms what we're looking at urgently enough to be totally honest about it, we just might come out ahead. Not all mothers even in the Dim party want Hillary to be in charge of raising their children. Many won't want Rudy either, so we somehow have to find concensus on who the party CAN nominate.

fredo1659
You took the words right out of my mouth :)!
The same to eddred!

The Silence is Deafening!
Something is up! Reid, Pelosi, Murtha and Hoyer have all but disappeared! Durbin is still in public view, but he is stupider than most. Could it be that The DNC told them to collectively SHUT UP! If your enenmy gives you a club, BEAT HIM TO DEATH WITH IT!

Also, I received an Email from a Liberal who posted regularly on TownHall (karennkc aka incognito aka kcincognito aka Not So Incognito) who reamed me out as a TownHall Conservative. She said mine was the only Email she could find, so she picked me to unload on. She is a prime example of the Loony Left. Let me know if you want to read it!


eddred
I suggest you re-read the article. Obviously you missed a few important facts the first time around. Such as, "Notably, the poll found that "only 35 percent of the voters say they will vote to re-elect their current Democratic congressman in these districts. Half -- 50 percent -- prefer someone new."


Republicans Will Win
Republicans, and America will win in 2008, only if one candidate is our nominee: Duncan Hunter.
The rest are brockle-faced calves in the political corral. Their narcissism is matched only by their ineptitude.

Duncan Hunter Is A straight Shooter.
Duncan Hunter Walks The Walk

I have noted
that one of my closest friends (with whom we don't talk politics because of his fervent democrat views) is now saying that he is very worried because the dems don't stand for anything except hatred for Bush, vengeful hearings, and abandoning Iraq. This from a former 60's professor of English whose daughter is a big time dem fund raiser in Washington. This is anecdotal, but I never thought I would hear it. Is this a trend?

Mitt?
Romney could galvanize the country based on his non-government experience as a successful builder of businesses, rescue of the Olympics, and so on. The complete outsider, he can run against politics as usual, throw-out-the-bums.

He seems to be a born-again conservative, repenting of his liberal sins.

The Pharasees on the religious right would have a tough time with him. But if it were Romney or Clinton, I'd hope they'd vote in big numbers.

Dems. have no ideas or programs
Dem. ideas were born and died with FDR in the '30a. And they were 19th C. socialist ideas from Europe. The impetus to tax and spend and make gov't the big daddy of all citizens is still a European idea, although in Eur.--esp. in Ger. and Fr. and Sweden and Finland and the UK--there are movements to curtail the nanny state and rely more on the priv. sector. The last elections from Can. to Aus. to Ger. to Fr. have all been cons. If the cons. in the US can't take inspiration and build on the worldwide trend, they're simply not smart.

For all Bush's problems. his promotion of an "ownership society" is the best the Reps. can offer. People with pensions and IRAs and stocks save more and produce more than those without savings. People who own homes of whatever kind are more invovled in communities than those that don't. If it can ever get off the ground, ownership of our personal med. investment will go far to solve today's health ins. difficulties.

Reps. and cons. should keep hammering at low taxes--revenues are higher daily and have reduced the def. to c. 2% of the GNP; more priv. ownership, less gov't interference (Schumer knows downtown NYC is still suffering from 911 because in NYC, opening a bus. takes 5-7 years of bureacratic hurdles), stressing personal responsibility that includes legal immigration, and supporting business because that is where wealth is generated. Not the gov't.

The only people really supporting the Dems. are the "netroots" and "progressives" who make up about 15% of politics, not enough to elect anyone. The unions are dead, except in rare local contests. The Catholics are no longer a part of the Dem. coalition. There aren't enough radical profs to sway a pres. election. These facts offer the Reps. a tremendous opportunity. They need to take it.

The Republicans
should concentrate on low taxes, immigration enforcement and no universal health care...things that make a difference in the average citizen's life.

And PLEASE VOTE! Don't stay home - look at where that got us last November! It may not be your candidate of choice, but a Republican president will be 1,000% better than a Democrat!

Duncan Hunter 2nd suprise in IOWA
Duncan Hunter may be the 2nd surprise along with Ron Paul. Duncan Hunter has far superior credentials when compared to Fred Thompson, Guiliani, or Romney.

One thing that nobody talks about D. Hunter is the massive reduction of taxes in the United States for small business and manufacturing businesses. This is a somewhat similar agenda of what Ron Paul has. Duncan Hunter should talk more about this in his campaign. This is where he would really strike good with voters.

If Americans embraced Republican ideas such as Hunter, Tancreado, and Paul Republicans would be a clear majority hands down. They would not need money from corporations.

Ya' know
it's getting very tiring reading the same old canards by posters such as Engineer and DonJ.
Engineer: where did you get your information re:
social conservatives and who wrote the book? I'm a social conservative, if I and other s. cons
were as you describe, we'd be RINO's...duhhh.
DonJ I'm what you call "religious right", a born again, Full Gospel Christian and I just love it when people like you just know how I/we think.. Mitt's religion while I
don't agree with the doctrine, if he's on the same conservative page as I am I don't have a problem..what's yours?
BG: Oh he'll kill it in a couple of weeks when he meets in Canada with the other two Globalist Ghouls from that country and Mexico, to confirm
the "framework" for the SPP/Nafta Highway/North American Union.
Zeb Hardy: Re Duncan Hunter...Yep!

An Alternative?
Just musing......

Is it possible for someone - say Fred Thompson - to say that he wants to tap into the Independent movement in this country, and solicit a running mate - say Joe Libermann - who would join him and run as an independent ticket?

Is something like that even possible in this day and age?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.