Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
Dick Morris and  Eileen McGann :: Townhall.com Columnist
Oil Prices: '08's Defining Issue
by Dick Morris and Eileen McGann
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Gas prices are the first important issue in the 2008 elections. But both parties have been pathetic in their solutions and, one suspects, in their understanding of what is going on.

Democrats call for windfall profits taxes. Bad idea. How can you get oil companies to explore and drill if you tax away their profits? Republicans focus on a gas tax “holiday,” an 18-cent palliative to gas prices that now top $4.50.

Fadel Gheit, managing director of oil and gas research for Oppenheimer and Co., and Jim Norman, author of the book The Oil Card, coming out next month, say that speculation is responsible for a huge part of the run-up in prices.

The growing demand for oil by India and China and the instability of oil supplies certainly account for much of the increase. But the recent spike, they say, is equally due to the weakness of the dollar and massive speculation.

They argue that oil prices are, indeed, determined by supply and demand — not only the supply and demand for oil, but also the supply and demand for oil futures. (Oil futures are a commitment to buy 1,000 barrels of oil at a certain date at a certain price.)

Formerly, most of the investments in oil futures came from energy companies. The federal Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) sharply limited investments by those outside the business, to prevent precisely the kind of speculation now gripping the market.

But when the stock market slowed down in 2000–2002, outside investors decided to speculate in oil futures.

The new players were institutional investors like corporate and government pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, university endowments and other investors, guided by brokerage firms like Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs.

To avoid the CFTC caps, these investors moved their operations to London, setting up the International Commodities Exchange. Now they can buy all the oil futures they want.

Michael W. Masters, of Masters Capital Management, told Congress that the volume of investment in commodities futures soared from $13 billion at the end of 2003 to $260 billion by March of 2008.

After a while, the CFTC rescinded its limits on how much speculators could buy as long as they went through special “swap” desks at the major brokerage houses.

You can buy oil futures for only 5 percent down on margin, a bargain considering the 50 percent margin requirement for stock market equity investments. Because the margin requirement on oil futures rises as the due date approaches, few investors actually end up buying the oil; they just roll over their investments.

So the willingness of sellers to unload their oil futures, and of buyers to acquire them, sets up its own market of supply and demand that has more to do with determining the actual price of oil than even the global demand and supply for the product itself.

On May 20 of this year, Masters told Congress: “Commodities futures prices are the benchmark for the prices of actual physical commodities, so when index speculators drive futures prices higher, the effects are felt immediately in spot prices and the real economy. So there is a direct link between commodities futures prices and the prices your constituents are paying for essential goods.”

Gheit and Norman suggest that the CFTC regulate the domestic oil futures market (NYMEX) and the participation of U.S. companies in the ICE, restoring the caps on the amount of oil futures speculators can buy. Gheit also urges raising margin requirements for them.

Both worry that the oil futures bubble is going to burst and cost a lot of investors — particularly pension funds who channel their investments through the swap desks of the brokerage houses. We don’t need another sub-prime or savings-and-loan crisis on our hands right now.

The Senate recently tried to force CFTC regulation of all commodities speculators, but the bill was loaded down with a windfall profits tax, so the Republicans killed it.

John McCain needs to get with this program. In his town hall meeting in New York City last Thursday night, he attacked speculators for driving up oil prices but didn’t propose remedies or really explain the problem.

Americans will pay close attention if he does. For McCain, this is the issue and now is the time to use it.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Dick Morris, a former political adviser to Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.) and President Bill Clinton, is the author of Condi vs. Hillary: The Next Great Presidential Race. To get all of Dick Morris’s and Eileen McGann’s columns for free by email, go to www.dickmorris.com
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Dick Morris' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.

News Articles On This Topic
 

Pop it!
Frankly I'd like to see these investors get burned. They've caused the entire economy a lot of unnecessary pain. Of course they are only part of the problem. If we didn't knee cap ourselves by prohibiting access to our own supplies the run up would never have occurred. Stupid legislators with little or no economic training are the root cause of this problem.

How about this scenario....
2009- President Obama, after unilateral visits with trade reprentatives of the Peoples Republic of China and with Hugo Chavez of Venezuala, announces that "these discussions have been a great success. Mr. Chavez is a friend I can work with. China is no longer our competitor, part a global business partner".

Jan 1, 2010 - The Associated Press confirms that a Chinese business consortium, in partnership with the Venezuelan National Oil Company has brough into production, 100 miles off the coast of northern Virginia and just 140 miles from Washington, D.C, the largest oilfield in the world.

Jan. 2, 2010 - Obama to Chinese and Chavez..."hey, what are you guys doing?...I thought you liked me!".

Jan. 3, 2010 - Chinese and Chavez to Obama..."s**** you, you skinny little pin-headed fool...go back to Chicago and do some 'community organizing' before you get hurt...we're taking the oil".

Selah...

Your Most Obedient, etc.

George Washington

Do you think
The futures investors will be for or against new drilling, nuke plants etc. Hmmm....hard to figure that one out. It will be interesting to see the sparks fly. Since McCain and Bush are openly for more drilling and McCain is for Nuke plants, keep your eyes open to see if all the futures people 'mysteriously' begin supporting Obama.

THANK YOU MR. MORRIS
I find it refreshing for a person known in political circles to be a great source of information. Unfortunately for us, our paid congress has a 6 month lag to start trying to solve problems. I was actually pleasantly surprised to read in the newspaper today of how democrats, including one from my state, Jim Matheson, has a bill to curtail speculative influence on commodities. Hopefully, they won't encumber is with provisions (I call them poison pills) to make a good bill bad.

Could we arrange for more wake up calls for the GOP before they become irrelevant? Dems will gain more and more influence by actually demonstrating action and getting media coverage as advertising while republicans make excuses.

Dick & Eileen
Liars are pathetic individuals and it appears, that those fitting this description are growing in number!The "Windfall Tax" being proposed by Mr.Obama, will tax the "Excess" profits, that Oil companies fail to re-invest,in it's effort to supply more energy.Have you ever noticed, that Wind BLOWS unimpeded?If you are going to tell a story,tell the WHOLE story.Also,ABC news is looking for their papers,which appear to be your article.IDENTICAL....

Drilling.
Another political pandering gone berserk!

Oil For A Song
McCain must address the oil crisis with the emotion the citizens feel it deserves. Now listening to McCain talk about oil is like pulling up a chair to watch someone get a hair cut. I'd rather not do either. There is a building frustration (among the electorate) with the notion we are helpless to fix or even attempt to influence our own oil problem. We have coal; we have shale oil; we have off shore oil; we have oil in Alaska and not just in ANWR. We have more oil than Saudi Arabia but we use the flimsy excuse of wildlife as our reason not to recover our own resource. From 1941 to 1945 we sunk every oil tanker we could possibly sink in the Pacific and as far as I know everything recovered from that ocean of oil. We will spill virtually nothing using current procedures to extract our oil, the old movie oil geyser when oil is struck is not how it happens in this modern era. We need to drill and our politicians need to get the hell out of our way.

McCain plays with fire on offshore drill

Is this a smart move by McCain and Bush?

Politico-By calling for an end to the federal ban on offshore oil drilling, John McCain is placing a risky bet. He is wagering that skyrocketing gas prices have finally reached a tipping point, a threshold moment that has led voters to rethink their strong and long-held opinions against coastal oil exploration.

The stakes couldn’t be higher: If he is wrong, McCain will have seriously damaged his chances in two key states with thousands of miles of coastline — California and Florida — and where opposition to offshore oil drilling has been unwavering. And he will have undermined some of his closest political allies in those states and others, including potential fall battlegrounds such as Virginia and North Carolina.

“Before $4.25-per-gallon gas, this would have been like pulling a pin on a grenade and rolling it into the state,” said David Johnson, the former executive director of the Florida Republican Party. “It would have been a fool’s errand to recommend it. It was never, ever a thing that a smart politician would have done in Florida.”

In California, the drilling issue is just as volatile, said Sal Russo, a veteran Sacramento, Calif.-based Republican consultant.

“California got really sensitive about these issues since the 1969 Santa Barbara oil spill. And I don’t think it’s changed much since then,” he said. “There are strong feelings on the issue.”

read more

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/mccain-plays-with- fire-on-offshore-drilling

Oil 2.0: bacteria that excrete crude oil

These genetically-modified bacteria eat wood chips and grass and excrete oil. The process is carbon negative (meaning that burning the resulting oil releases less carbon than the plants pulled in from the environment) and neither cars nor our distribution system has to be modified in any way. This is an exciting potential solution to the Middle East oil dependency.

BTW, does anybody actually believe that there are terrific mpg-increasing technologies available, but that the auto/energy industry bought up the patents and is sitting on them? That always sounded like urban legend to me.

UK Times: “Ten years ago I could never have imagined I’d be doing this,” says Greg Pal, 33, a former software executive, as he squints into the late afternoon Californian sun. “I mean, this is essentially agriculture, right? But the people I talk to – especially the ones coming out of business school – this is the one hot area everyone wants to get into.”

read more

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/oil-20-bacteria-th at-excrete-crude-oil

No Choice
While there's no doubt that the speculators are responsible for a large part of this oil price runup, we're not going to be able to regulate our way out of the situation. CFTC can only control commodities trading in the U.S. If we try to restrict trading here, they'll just move their activities to London or the new exchange in Dubai.

While there are several promising technologies, such as oil-producing algae and bacteria, to help alleviate the shortage of petroleum, they won't be available on a commercial scale for years, or even decades.

For now, we have no choice. We absolutely must proceed full speed ahead on drilling offshore and in Alaska, extracting oil from shale, and learning how to tap the enormous reserves of the Bakken formation. In addition, we need to build refineries and nuclear power plants as fast as we can responsibly do so.

Even our announced intention to begin an all-out effort to increase domestic oil production will burst the speculative oil futures bubble. Once the traders decide that we're serious, the prices of those oil futures contracts will drop with surprising speed, and our pump prices will follow.

Questions
What are "excess" profits?

Who decides how much profit is acceptable for a company to make?

If you were going to go into business--ANY business--why would you do it unless you could make a greater percent of profit than you make from parking your money in an investment account?
The oil companies profit percents are not out of line with what any business large or small would try to attain.

John
There was a guy in Ft.Lauderdale,Florida.He invented an engine that was to get 75 miles to the gallon of gas.This was almost 15 years ago,and it was publicized. The "Excess Profit" can be defined by a Formula.In accounting they have a "First in Last Out" approach, that allows them to properly assess tax liability.

Change is coming…
HOUSE DEMOCRATS CALL FOR NATIONALIZATION OF REFINERIES
FOX NEWS Wednesday, Jun. 18 2008
”Among other things, the Democrats called for the government to own refineries so it could better control the flow of the oil supply.”

Change is coming…

The oppressive compassion is coming…

Your future United States will be changed by…

All the Soros sucklings…
All the KGB like ACLU…
All the neo-Marxists…

The Democrats are well on their way to applauding a revolution in the US…

Exactly like Cuba applauded Castro into power fifty years ago…

Change is coming…


Why do they speculate
For all the blather from the root causes crowd - they don't seem to curious why the speculators speculate universally that the price of oil will go up. Airlines do it to stay in business - AKA hedging - and nobody is complaining about relatively low ticket prices. Of course, they don't want to stop that speculation or they are not smart enough to realize that it is indeed speculation.

But why would they speculate that oil will cost more? Do they possibly see future supply not keeping with demand - rising demand driving it - does anyone not see this? No, it must be just pure greed - that at least is a morality play that progressives can tell.

An oil speculator "bets" that today's oil is cheaper than tomorrow's oil. Why would you want to stop that? Is it not a safe bet?

You cannot stop speculation anyway - not without very bad unintended consequences - we all speculate somewhat. For example - a Roth IRA is a speculation of higher taxes in the future. Why on earth would you do such speculation without a reason (you could also argue that Roth IRA investing is holding the market share price artificially high)? There is a reason to speculate that demand will be exceeding supply in oil, just like there is reason to believe that taxes will be higher in the future. It has little to do with greed, and much to do with simple mathematics.

75 mpg engine is B.S.
inoculate128 at 7:21 and SunThe1 at 7:52 have it right.

At 8:24 Killer told us that some guy invented a 75 mpg engine. I'm calling B.S. - show me the link or data or whatever.

Anyone claiming to get more than 50 mpg is either mistaken, lying, cheating, or talking about a car no one wants to drive.

Cheating includes charging a battery from another power source, driving a few miles on that battery power, then switching to gasoline, but including the whole trip in the "miles" but only the gasoline burned in the car in "gallons".

"No one wants to drive" means in the engine is putting out less than 80 horsepower, the car is either way too small or way too slow. Or the car has less than 100 miles of range between fueling.

Re: Roopsag
I believe in free markets...

But I also think we can keep a list, that is frequently updated, with the names of people and groups that are in this speculative bubble...

We can all have a big public laugh at them when it collapses like the dot.com and the housing bubbles did...

We can remind them every day that we know exactly who is causing us so much pain at the pump...

Generally speaking business people don't like that kind of negative attention...



Morris seldom correct
Thanks to Morris’s prediction, the price of gas will drop to $2 a gallon by November. He has no credibility. He was positive that Hillary would become the next president with the single-women vote. What he ignored was the racist black vote, which was big in primaries because only the Democrats voted, thereby doubling the effectiveness of the black vote. In other words, Obama automatically got 24% of the primary votes by the all the racist blacks voting for him in mass. So, Obama only needed 26% of the white vote to win. Morris, the genius, did not see that coming.

speculators
they can make money betting a commodity up and DOWN...

This country's irrational non-drilling policy guaranteed them a profit by betting oil UP...

Change our drilling policies and watch speculators bid oil DOWN...


Re: Gambler...
I really have no reason to defend Morris...

But I will point out he is not an economist. He is a political strategist. I think the point of the article is how the two political parties will make oil prices an issue in the upcoming election...

I think Morris was sort of Bill Clinton's Carl Rove...

It drives me nuts....
whenever I hear some democrat congressman on TV saying it's useless to drill for of-shore oil since the U.S. has less than 2% of the world's oil. They will lie and sell their mothers to stangle this country. What gives here? Who puts these people in office? I'm fed up!!!

ENERGY IS FREEDOM
I so happy that the GOP is starting to get its act together and that McCain is opening his eyes to the battle before him.

The only way to win this election will be to get bloodied and never stop fighting for what is right.

McCain and the GOP need to equate energy independence to Freedom and not money. Saving money is great and the by product of a good energy policy, but that argument can be diminished by the "environment" scare tactic..."don't you want to leave a beautiful beach for your children?...ummm?"

If they frame the argument correctly and squarely on freedom...they (and America) will win the debate.

Chris
If you want to know the "Facts" and are not like many who use this sight,"Tied to Your Own Ignorance".Please contact any Ft. Lauderdale news source.I don't do research for other people.I am always "Amazed" by Americans who think, that they understand this economy.Yes,I am talking to you,"ROOPSAG".Speculators are having a "Field Day" because they know, that the Dollar will remain weak.Take a few minutes from your busy schedule and do a Historical map of your economy.Also, all speculation is like a game of "Musical Chairs".The group that get caught without a Chair, goes to Congress and "Bribes" them to get their money back.Speculators are ALLOWED to exist in this economy because it is a "Debt Based Economy".Anything that does not produce "Real Value",will eventually have a negative impact on this type of economy.I "Hope" McCain is smarter than some of his supporters.I thought America had SCHOOLS,somewhere!

Mealy Mouth McCain
McCain now says he favors drilling off shore, but he still opposes drilling in ANWR, I suspect to appease the greenies. He's obviously never seen a photo of the actual site where the drilling will occur: it looks like the dark side of the moon.

On the other hand, Bob Barr says we should remove all restrictions on developing domestic energy:

http://www.bobbarr2008.com/press/press-releases/24/john-mcc ain-and-the-democrats-hobble-america%e2%80%99s-energy-devel opment-says-bob-barr/

Nuke China & India...
...and no more demand. Gas goes back to $1.50/gal.

killer - high mpg car claims
I don't doubt your claim that some guy said he invented a 75 mpg car.

I am:

1. calling B.S. on that guy.

2. saying that if you want to claim that such an engine exists, you should be able to back it up. If I challenge your "fact" it's up to you to defend it, not me.

The problem with researching this one is that there are too many other bogus claims to sort through. And since I'm saying this claim is also bogus, I'd probably blow right past it.

I've learned a great deal doing research for posts to sites like this, so this is not a matter of being tied to anything.

Support your claims. Until then, my call stands.

innoculate & chris
Both of your posts make solid points.

I'll add:
There are people who stand to make billions in profit if they could actually come up with a car that gets the kind of mileage that would make a difference. Someday they will. People act as if nobody's trying to do that. Hello?

Mr. Obama has said that if the government just throws money at the problem, that invention will happen, implying that it would happen very quickly, since he contrasts it with the length of time it would take to bring drilled domestic oil online. Suddenly we'll all be driving around in brand new cars that run on water.
He is so naive. Or else, like his compatriots, he wants us all under the thumb.

I agree with innoculate that if we had an aggressive plan for independence, the speculation would slow, and prices would ease.

We need to drill, and we need nuclear program (which would also create jobs!)

I expect about as much help
from John McCain regarding our economy as I would if Jimmy Carter were running things.

Killer
Your inability to construct a sentence is proof positive that you are a student of one of those American schools.

I don't pay any attention to someone who does not know how to punctuate. I have found it a pretty good yardstick for measuring other areas of intelligence/competence.

NO MORE BABY STEPS


.....Up until now the Democrats (Socialist/Marxists) have been content to nudge us gently toward Socialism, the boiled frog theory, one day we wake up under a Socialist Government without knowing how we got there ...

....Apparenty no more, ...in response to our energy crunch, which they created, some Democrats are now calling for outright Nationalization of American Oil and Energy companies ...the scary part is that these announcements were met with stoney silence instead of the panic in the streets they deserved ...

.....This is one giant step into Socialism and the death of our Representative Republic and our free market Capitalist Economy ...this is Nanny State Big Brother Government where a small cadre of elitists control the proletariat who are all equally poor ...

.....This is the change Obama is talking about and there should be panic in the streets .....COLOSSUS

ANWR Oil to Gas Pumps in 2 or 3 Years
If ANWAR were open to exploration and production of oil, today, experts say oil could be flowing down the Trans-Alaskan Pipeline in two to three years time, ultimately to American consumers, and would break the psychology of limited supplies of oil, today.

Democrats are hurting the little guy with their "NO DRILL" policies.

The Russians are #1 in oil production in the world, more than Saudi Arabia. How do the Russians do it? Simple, the Russians apply Abiotic Oil principles in their exploration and discovery practices. Don't laugh, remember, Russia is number one in the world and laughing all the way to the Bank.

Google the website Oil Is Mastery for the hard science the Russians used to get to #1.

Oil Is Mastery

Ronald Reagan saying of the day
'Government is like a baby: An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other.'
- Ronald Reagan

another oil shill
what is not being said is that with the dollar tanking, the oil prices will go up.
what is not being said is that the u.s. imports 12% from overseas. much more of u.s. oil goes over seas. it's a global market kiddies.

where is the oil from alaska going?
asia, mostly japan some to china for a profit.

do you think more drilling will bring the prices down to a reasonable level? no

do you trust the petro cos. that gouge you now?
no.
then build nuclear power plants and replace oil with nukes.
the greenies are directly and indirectly given petro dollars to protest any other form of energy that competes with oil.
wind turbines?
kills birds.
thermal energy?
cause natural disaster.
nuclear energy plants?
china syndrome.

and who is speculating in dollars?
soros?
traitors?
foreigners?
put em in box cars.

adios,
Harvey
Lancaster, Mexifornia
dial 1 for english

to: Jim from Oregon
where is the oil from the alaska pipe line going now?
not to the u.s.
when the oil companies extract it, it goes on the global market and is not destined to the u.s.
oil drilled from off shore is not necessarily destined to the u.s.
the u.s. motorist doesn't own the oil.
we are being played the shell sucker gamer over and over by the petro crowd.

go nuclear power plants.
they only heat water to steam to drive electrical generators, just like OIL fired elect. plants.

adios,
Harvey
Lancaster, Taxifornia
dial 1 for english
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.