Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
Dick Morris and  Eileen McGann :: Townhall.com Columnist
McCain's Campaign Collapses
by Dick Morris and Eileen McGann
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


The John McCain candidacy, launched amid much hope, fanfare, and high expectations, may be dying before our eyes.

Even worse, it may go out with a whimper instead of a bang.

It may not end in an Armageddon style primary defeat, but just dry up from lack of support, money, or interest.

Throughout all of 2006, McCain sat atop the polls right next to Rudy Giuliani. In the Fox News survey of December, 2006, he was getting 27 percent of the Republican primary vote to Rudy's 31 percent. But, after Giuliani announced that he was running, the Arizona senator fell to 24 percent while Rudy soared into the stratosphere at 41 percent of the primary voters. But even when McCain was polling well, he wasn't raising the money he needs for this campaign.

In the last quarter of 2006, during a time when he was tied for front-runner status in the GOP and doing well in general election matchups against likely Democratic rivals like Hillary Clinton, he raised only $1.7 million according to his filing with the Federal Elections Commission.

Even worse, he had less than $500,000 on hand, pocket change in a presidential race and barely adequate for a run for Congress.

Part of McCain's problem was that he wasn't raising money. But the other part has been that he is spending money too rapidly — and not on reaching voters but on paying political consultants. One top Republican operative from the old Reagan campaign commented, "McCain has hired every consultant he can find. He has all the top names, but no money."

What is McCain's problem?

Why did he go from the most exciting candidate in the race a year ago to the verge of oblivion today?

Fundamentally, he failed to heed the Shakespeare's admonition "to thine own self be true." The John McCain of the 2000 campaign is nowhere in evidence in 2007.

Instead of challenging the party establishment, he pathetically waits at its door, hoping to be invited. Where he used to challenge the religious right, he now panders to them. Once he led the battle against big tobacco, for corporate governance reform, in favor of campaign financing changes, and in support of action against global warming.

Now he has been identified with two issues, neither popular in the Republican Party: The Iraqi troop surge and amnesty for illegal aliens.

Rather than stake out an independent voice apart from the Bush administration, he has become the last survivor at Custer's Last Stand in its support of its policies.

Republican strategist and Reagan campaign manager Ed Rollins makes an interesting point about McCain: He has switched roles. He has gone from being the McCain of the 2000 race, challenging the party orthodoxy, offering new ideas, and demanding reforms and changes to the Bush of the 2000, toeing the party line and only timidly venturing different ideas if he advances them at all. And this is no way to win the presidency or even the Republican nomination. But where it has counted, on the two core issues that move Republican voters these days — tax cuts and immigration — McCain is badly out of step with the GOP base.

He voted against the Bush tax cuts, the only real success of the administration and the main accomplishment of the president's first term. On immigration, his bill, cosponsored by Ted Kennedy, permits illegal aliens to become citizens without returning to their native lands and seeking legal entry.

Both positions run afoul of the deepest views of the Republican primary electorate. But beyond the substantive problems with the McCain candidacy, he has simply failed to impress the American public with his performance on the television talk shows that are the core of this year's pre-primary nominating process.

He looks small, shrunken, weak, cowed, and timid. He shows all of his 70 years of age including the roughly lived period at the hands of the tender mercies of the North Vietnamese. It is hard to imagine him as a strong leader as he meekly answers questions from the likes of Tim Russert and George Stephanopoulos.

other problem can be summed up in one word: Rudy.

Giuliani, with extensive management experience and a track record of heroism on 9/11, projects a strong image of leadership and a kind of charisma that McCain has trouble matching.

The excitement Rudy's candidacy has generated has swelled his poll numbers at a time when McCain, who announced too early and campaigned for too long, was fading. As Rudy surged in January 2007, it was clear that McCain had peaked too soon.

Has Giuliani, too, peaked too soon?

Perhaps he has. But the nominating process for the 2008 election seems destined to be a very early one.

With many major states advancing their primaries to early February, 2008, and the 24/7 cable talk shows and Internet Web sites focusing full time on the race, the evaluation of the candidates may be complete before the first votes are cast.

Since only the front-runner in the autumn of 2007 is likely to be able to generate the campaign cash to afford to advertise and campaign simultaneously in all the big states that are advancing their primary dates, it is probable that whoever is ahead at the end of 2007 in each party will be the nominee.

In view of this early calendar, Rudy seems to have peaked at the right time while McCain is fading badly.

Rudy also surges at a time when the other candidates are disappearing from the Republican nominating process. In addition to McCain's swoon, the other possible top contender, Mitt Romney has stalled and is falling backwards. His flip-flop-flip from pro-life to pro-choice and back to pro-life again is not winning him any converts.

Before he ran for senator against Kennedy in Massachusetts, he was pro-life. Then, as he ventured into America's most liberal state as a Republican candidate, he said that his experience with a relative who died after an illegal abortion led him to reconsider his stand on the issue. "I will protect and defend a woman's right to choose" he said as he campaigned for the governorship after losing his Senate bid against Kennedy. But after he had been re-elected as governor and began to focus on a possible presidential race, Romney rediscovered his roots and began to "evolve" on the issue back to a pro-life position, a change which isn't fooling anybody or satisfying either side.

On the issue of homosexuality, Romney promised during their debates to be a better friend of gay rights than Kennedy had been. But now he is campaigning on an anti-gay marriage platform.

Beyond these two legitimate issues, Romney is, unfortunately, paying a steep price for his Mormon faith, something that should not be an issue in this campaign . . . but is.

If Newt Gingrich doesn't enter the race, who is there who can challenge Rudy Giuliani?

If Hillary Clinton wins the Democratic nomination, it will be Hillary vs. Rudy in the battle of the giants. And poor John McCain will go back to the Senate.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Dick Morris, a former political adviser to Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.) and President Bill Clinton, is the author of Condi vs. Hillary: The Next Great Presidential Race. To get all of Dick Morris’s and Eileen McGann’s columns for free by email, go to www.dickmorris.com
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Dick Morris' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Didn't he write this yesterday...
It seems like Hugh and Kevin both wrote about it...

http://kevinmccullough.townhall.com/g/b3fc765b-db2a-427f-8956-5918888f4bcb

Staying home
McCain - nah. Rudy - nah. Chillary - nah.

Looks like the next election day is a good time to stay at home - unless Newt or Tancredo run b/c there are only two items on my MUST-DO list - combat Islamofascists and stem the invasion of illegal aliens.

Open-borders/amnesty McCain/Rudy/Chillary fail completely on one of my MUST-DOs. And there's no point to fighting Islamofascists if all we're saving is AmeXica. Australia is sounding better all the time, isn't it?

It doesn't matter
McCain the maverick turned off the very people he needed to get the nomination when he went after Christians and conservatives in general when he ran against Bush in 2000. The base will not forget hoe he attacked them and their beliefs, and no amount of brown-nosing can change that fact.

Guiliani may win votes from the media, and the country clubbers...but the bas will not support him either. He is is not a conservative in any way, shape, form or fashion! And being able to handle a crisis in NYC after 9/11 and realizing that terrorism is a problem does not make you Commander-in Chief material.

The only viable candidate of the Big Three right now is Romney, his Mormon faith notwithstanding. He is the closest thing to a conservative in the race right now among the frontrunners.

It's gonna be Newt!
Keeping his powder dry, and waiting for Rudy to lose momentum. I cannot believe peaking in February a year before the first primaries is good for Rudy. Same problem as McCain. Newt's observation that this extended campaign is nothing more than a full employment act for political consultants rings true. Go Newt in '08!!

Scottie
Agreed. Newt works for me. With Tancredo or Hunter as his running mate!

Good riddance
Morris is no conservative, and is himself out-of-touch with the right. That's why he's got this whole thing backwards.

He says, "Instead of challenging the party establishment, he pathetically waits at its door, hoping to be invited. Where he used to challenge the religious right, he now panders to them. Once he led the battle against big tobacco, for corporate governance reform, in favor of campaign financing changes, and in support of action against global warming."

Sorry, Dick, but you're 0 for 5 in this paragraph. NONE of these positions previously taken by McCain are likely to impress Republicans, especially conservative Republicans.

Morris then writes

"Now he has been identified with two issues, neither popular in the Republican Party: The Iraqi troop surge and amnesty for illegal aliens. "

and

"But where it has counted, on the two core issues that move Republican voters these days — tax cuts and immigration — McCain is badly out of step with the GOP base.

Morris would get 2 for 3 on this if he hadn't relegated Iraq to 2nd class status. So give him a 2 for 4 instead.

Morris also gets 0 for 2 for failing completely to mention the "Gang of 14" and McCain's support of speedy trials in civilian courts for Gitmo terrorists.

Totalling Morris' score he gets a 2 for 11, or 18% on the article with respect to correctly identifying McCain's problems with the Republican base that actually makes campaign donations (as opposed to whinos and RINO's who offer opinions and 'advice' but don't do anything to help).

This is what happens when you have a lib/mod/independent presuming to tell us what conservatives think and/or want.

Morris was the Clintons' pollster. Becoming disenchanted with them in the post-Clinton era does not make him a conservative insider, or even a Republican insider.

TH should restrict this guy to writing about libs, which is the political species he knows best.

And if McCain is really out of it I say "Good riddance."


What is McCain's problem?
It's a good question you ask.
The basic answer is that anyone who has watched McCain for more than fifteen mjnutes knows you can't trust him. You never know what the voices inside his head will tell him to do next.

Maybe he'll run as a Centrist Democrat
With the Democrats seeming to conclude that both Hillary and Obama can't win a national race...

From POW to DOA
MCLame cut his own throat with his participation in "The Gang of 14.” The Republicans had the Liberalcrats between a rock and a hard place. The GOP was within range of shaping Judicial Philosophy in America for A GENERATION! McLame scuttled them for the sake of his own presidential ambition. He is a grandstander, a crybaby and THE BIGGEST RINO in Congress.

Morris is little better, he is not so much a RINO as he is Anti-Hillary. Whoever looks like they can beat Hillary is his Golden Boy.

my 2 cents
The Senator would serve his counttry and party better were he just to get out of the way. In the unlikely event that he did win, he would enter the White House at the age of 72, and that's too old.

Dick,
Regards to Waste Matter,

Matter's it, that not that long ago it was the
McCain/Kennedy "Am-nasty".

Real History does not like little men who look just like Al Gore telling untruths of the real History.

Get a new mug shot,this one looks just like Al Gore, and we know you do not understand, but that is not a good thing.

But then you belive in "global lies" so the look alike fits, wear it.

Scottie
Newt is a RINO too.

McCain"t
Senator McCain's "Cain't Pain Finaglin" act and his use of it in his favor; His Gang of 14 mutiny at the behest of Democrat's againt standing up and voting, and his waking again in Ted's bed along with 12 million pospective "new" voters, are the reasons his run has governed itself to a crawl.

He went to his knees in 2000 and remains there, growling and snarling at the hands that have fed him for so long.

Mystery of mysteries is his interim re-election to his Senate seat.

I suspect that "in the faces" of his constituents, regarding the Kenedy imigration plan, rests the end of his carreer.

Unless of course the Democrat party decides to let him go on over to them officially.
No giant step for him.

If true to character he will entertain any and all "bipartisan" offerings. He is such a centrist, and so good at compromise.

Is/is that Right? Or is/is it Left?
Or, is/is it just me?
Just Jer

I agree with wiseone, et al.
I have often wondered why the Republican party does the things it does, and if it's because folks like Morris are advising it or (heaven help us) making decisions for it then this explains a lot.

McCain is Melting
John McCain has distanced himself from the party base on so many issues that it is not surprising that he has fallen so far in the polls. He voted against tax cuts and most Republicans must realize that taxes would never be cut under a McCain presidency. He has teamed with Ted Kennedy to give eventual amnesty to 20,000,000 + Third World illegal immigrants and this issue raises its ugly head once again very soon. He cut the rug out from under Bill Frist on the vital fight to end filibustering of judges. On other issues important to the Republican base- gun rights, abortion, moral issues, gay marriage-McCain is indifferent to the point of being diffident.

Rudy Guiliani is probably worse on the issues than McCain but has done such a fantastic job ingratiating himself with professional Republican politicians that he has risen as McCain has fallen. Can it last? Can a liberal Republican more to the left than 90 % of the Republican base get nominated by the Republican Party? Would the normative Republican platform largely in place since Ronald Reagan's takeover of the party in 1980 be fundamentally altered? Is Guiliani's current support a public relations phenomenom based on September 11 that will not withstand a withering barrage of attacks on fundamental issues where he plainly is out of step with his party? How deep is Guiliani's support?

With two very imperfect candidates at the top of the heap, both at odds with large amounts of the conservative base of the GOP, there should be room for a conservative contender. But Mitt Romney has made major flip-flops on several cultural/moral issues that will be difficult to explain. On top of that, Romney's Mormonism is viewed as a non-Christian cult by millions of religious Republicans. Newt Gingrich could become the conservative champion for the Republican nomination by default if Romney fails to get traction. Yet Gingrich has two dastardly divorces to his credit and is universally disliked by almost all non-Republicans. Pragmatism dictates that the Republican elite would use all its energy to derail a Gingrich nomination in much the same way it did to Patrick Buchanan in 1992 and 1996. None of the dozen or so lesser candidates, from Tommy Thompson to Tom Tancredo and many in between, seem plausible to go very far- the upper tier candidates have monopolized the oxygen.

What Now?
Last week the toesucker says that Americans can and should get behind an "earned path to citizenship" (AKA amnesty). This week he correctly points out the absurdity of McCain's support of amnesty that has put him out of step with the Republican electorate. What will it be next week Mr. Morris?

Dear Sammy
Morris is a chameleon and probably schizo. What can you expect from a man who sucks a woman's dirty toes?

Hillary v Condi 2008
Ah yes such words of wisdom from the author of Hillary v Condi 2008! (which is ironically even included in his bio at the bottom of the article) As a republican who donates money to candidates, I have to say I'd vote a write-in for president if McCain is on the ticket. Wouldn't vote for the gang of 14 ringleader if there was a gun to my head.

Don't Worry, Paul
Guns will probably be illegal by '08, anyway.

NEWT
If my memory serves me correctly Newt was the mover and shaker of the Contract With America and headed the Republican takeover of congress. Shortly after he became the Speaker he led a Republican controlled congress and a spending binge, and goverment expanding which was exactly what he had campaigned against.
Do the Republicans have anyone in the front running position that is not a RINO ???
The only Republican that I can vote for at this time is Tancredo.

??????????
DOES ANYONE THINK THAT MCCAIN
WOULD BE GOOD AT SNIPEHUNTING
----------- HOLDING THE BAG ???
IF NOT, WHY NOT ?

One Less RINO
McCain's demise is great news indeed. Since the people of Arizona won't vote this RINO out of office, maybe this latest setback will retire him for good. Just go away, John!

karoden, PJ
Tancredo would be great but what is your plan to help him win?
What is your problem with Newt? I don't believe that Newt is responsible for big spending. Don't speculate here, you sound like a NYT journalist.
I would vote for Newt in a heartbeat. Guliani is closer to Hillary in his views than to a true conservative.

Good!
Good!
Publius

Wiseone posts a good one
Wiseone you posted it exactly right. I read Morris's article and couldn't believe it and initially thought it was satire.

Does Morris actually believe Republicans cheered McCain's efforts to silence our right to free speech with "campaign finance reform"? That we applaud McCain's efforts to allow illegals to easily become citizens?

I greatly respect Senator McCain's service to our country, but I am glad he will never be president.

Newt was not a big spender
karoden correctly credited Newt for leadership in the Contract with America that regained control of Congress for the GOP after something like 40 years of being a minority party.

However, Newt did NOT turn into a big spender as alleged. The budgets enacted while Newt was Speaker were balanced (although there a lot lacking in the execution, since the National Debt continued to rise during all 8 years of the Clinton Presidency.

Newt even came up with a plan to make Social Security solvent and self-sustaining, but the MSM ignored it.

Newt's only real blunder (aside from accepting royalties on his books and speaking fees) was to take the item in the Contract with America about balancing the budget too seriously. The CwA called only for a vote to balance the budget, not for it to balance every year. Newt insisted, in his first budget as Speaker, that it had to balance. He painted himself into a corner and when Clinton refused to cut entitlements the cuts had to come out of Defense instead.

Newt never bragged about only increasing "discretionary spending" by "less than 4%" like GWB has, expecting conservatives and other budget hawks to be impressed.

Attractive couples
Newt Gingrich & Duncan Hunter
Newt & Tancredo
Newt & Buchanan
I don't know enough about Brownback. He's a dancer without a partner.
Morris was on Clinton's first term staff. He makes no secret of his affiliation so there is no point in wondering whose side he is on. He's just writing a column for a living. He blasts Hillary more often and with greater intenstiy of any writer I have seen and he worked for her husband. And besides, all he has written is that McCain is going to crash and burn.

Newt and Hunter can get nominated if Newt gets off his arse and announces.

McLame
Well, this Arizonan voted for him only once; when he ran as a representative.

I quit believing in the 'POW hero' when: 1) he assisted in giving away strategic real estate (Panama Canal), and, 2) when I learned about the end of his first marriage, and the connections of his current wife.

Kerry doesn't have a corner on the rich wife commodity.

From what I have seen recently, he looks too old to survive one term of heavy responsibility (much less two).

His only hope would be to play the Dick Cheney role. But I wouldn't trust him to 'back his man' as does Dick.

Was last year a 'gang of 14'? McBlame's 'gang of seven' must have been back in the 90's, and had to do with financial collapses.

The man has too much baggage. The best for John to do is select an heir and enjoy his pasture.

Amnesty
Does it not seem reasonable to start the 'path to citizenship' at the border?

What I suggest is that in order to get an application for this great boon, one would be required to start from the other side of the border. He could there pick up the application (and a 'green card') and then return to wherever he is now working and progress from there.

This procedure would not put the illegals behind those who are trying to obey the laws (that would be discouraging, and they would not try to be legal).

It would not penalize them (a pardon, if you will).

It would require:
proof of birth nationality,
proof of having been in the United States,
seven years of 'servitude' before being eligible for all of the privileges of citizenship.

It would enable our law enforcement personnel:
to identify and make photo ID of all those who want citizenship,
be selective of who is allowed into our country,
more easily identify who is here legally.

There is only one hitch. All US citizens would also be required to have a photo ID. This is not unlike that which is required in many countries of Europe (liberals should be cheering for this).

Before you begin to howl about personal rights, consider this in another way:

I AM PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN, AND I HAVE PROOF THAT I BELONG TO THE GREATEST, STRONGEST NATION ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH.

think about it

HUNTER 2008
Good posts everyone. Dick can't always remember which side of his mouth he's talking from. If it comes down to two New York liberals, there will either be a third party challenge or a largely ignored election with less than 50% turnout. My hope is Republican primary voters don't act like sheep and get herded into nominating Democrat-lite.

Rudy: Hillary Killer McCain:ButtKisser
It's time to lay in cases of champagne in anticipation of the day that Amnesty McCain's political career goes swirling down the toilet. Anyone who does business with Ted Kennedy deserves a seat on an ice floe somewhere along the Labrador current. McCain/Feingold's Incumbent Protection laws hint at the uncharted depth of his ignorance of the US Constitution, and they enabled the execrable John Kerry to come within striking distance of the presidency, a horror that was avoided only by the diligence of the Swift Boat Heroes. McCain's meddling in Supreme Court nominations for his own ego gratification (as in everything he does) destroyed any chance of reforming the Court (did he say he was against abortion??) What a phony. What a liberal butt-kisser. What an obnoxious egotist. What a RINO. Get rid of him.

DAREK
I am not speculating and your opinion of what I sound like means nothing to me. I have heard numerous interviews of the freshmen class of the House who went in on the Contract with America and all including Joe Scarboro stated that they were taken to task by the leader Newt Gingrich for trying to cut back on spending and goverment. You are entitled to your opinion and me to mine and I'll refrain from passing judgement on you and calling you a name or referring to you as sounding like someone I do not particularly like.
And for yes I have supported Tom Tancredo with financial donations and will continue to do so. He has not stated that he supports any sort of amnesty for illegals and I personally heard newt in an interview on TV state that he supported some sort of revisions in the current immigration laws to help pave the way for eventual citizenship for illegals.
I will not vote for any candidate that gives me the least bit of feeling that they may be another RINO.
Now please take note Darek I said that I feel and did not accuse but I retain the right to judge for myself and if ever I am in doubt I'll certainly seek your advice.

so good, worth a reprise!

Very well analyzed and expressed here!:

***********************************************
doctorfixit writes: Thursday, March, 01, 2007 12:16 AM
Rudy: Hillary Killer McCain:ButtKisser
It's time to lay in cases of champagne in anticipation of the day that Amnesty McCain's political career goes swirling down the toilet. Anyone who does business with Ted Kennedy deserves a seat on an ice floe somewhere along the Labrador current. McCain/Feingold's Incumbent Protection laws hint at the uncharted depth of his ignorance of the US Constitution, and they enabled the execrable John Kerry to come within striking distance of the presidency, a horror that was avoided only by the diligence of the Swift Boat Heroes. McCain's meddling in Supreme Court nominations for his own ego gratification (as in everything he does) destroyed any chance of reforming the Court (did he say he was against abortion??) What a phony. What a liberal butt-kisser. What an obnoxious egotist. What a RINO. Get rid of him.
************************************************

The MM seem perplexed that conservatives do not like McCain... great Caesar's Ghost! He is a RINO AT BEST. If you run with dogs, you get fleas-- he cannot buddy up with Kennedy and Feingold on HORRIBLE legislation and not have thinking people notice. Kennedy-McQuisling Scamnesty (which might still happen) would give us 60-100 MILLION new indigent, undereducated American citizens who would assure the permanent welfare state and the inexorable demise of America socio-economically and culturally. That damm thing was written entirely by Teddy's immigration lawyer staff.

If you want to stop RINOS like Sen. Juan McQuisling from selling out America, please reference my concurrent post transferred below:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

stopping the ILLEGAL alien horde...
Most national pols are owned by the business lobby, which is selling out America for cheap labor at immense and egregious costs all-in to society, especially to the CITIZEN taxpayers who are forced to pay for their welfare services, crimes, gang violence, drugs, school decimation, and community erosion. "Comprehensive immigration reform" is simply a pig with lipstick-- Scamnesty disguised as a desirable goal.

It is NOT our immigration system which is broken-- it is nonfeasance, indeed malfeasance, by Presidente Jorge and the feds to aid and abet ILLEGAL behavior that is the crisis! We simply need to enforce EXISTING laws-- just like IKE did. It is NOT simply a case of border transgression-- these people become serial lawbreakers. We MUST stanch the invasion SOON, or America will be lost, morphing irreversibly into a third world entitlement state.
http://www.amren.com/Reports/Hispanics/HispanicsReport.htm

In case you have not heard yet, the Justice Dept. has effectively admitted that it lied about the facts to incriminate the two border guards in a kangaroo court witch-hunt. According to Congressman Ted Poe, a long-time Texas judge, among other Congressmen familiar with the details, U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton's case
was a scam, perhaps really intended to show that America is interminably friendly toward Mexico and ILLEGAL aliens, partly to help assure the election of Vicente Fox's man in the fall Mexican election-- afterall, the Bushies want to keep the goals of the North American Union on track! [read: the Mexification/Reconquista of America so miscreant businesses can have dirt cheap labor subsidized by CITIZEN taxpayers, and the power "elites" can get numerous new entitlement voters to assure that Big Brother will control traditional America-- and DESTROY it!]

WHAT CAN BE DONE?
Middle Americans JUST LIKE YOU derailed Kennedy-McQuisling Scamnesty in 2006... following are some links where you can get engaged to learn more and join the SACRED fight to save America... first, one that will take you to all official contact info for your reps in Congress:

http://www.congressmerge.com/onlinedb/index.htm

Bookmark it, and CONTACT THEM RELENTLESSLY! Some folks get discouraged when they get only formulaic replies from Congressmen, but know that they have staffers who track the humor and tenor of feedback.

When Kennedy-McQuisling Scamnesty was pending last year, it was Middle Americans just like YOU who stopped it! Peter King and other long-time Congressmen said they had NEVER SEEN such a visceral and consistent righteously indignant reaction from the hustings, bayous, boondocks, prairies, etc. in Middle America.

The money, organization [La Raza, LULAC, ACLU, labor leaders, Chamber and miscreant employer ilk, Catholic Church hierarchy], and power is on the other side of the ILLEGAL alien crisis, BUT the voters (68%) are on AMERICA'S side for
now!-- until so many of the invaders flood in here that they out-vote us... http://www.cis.org/articles/2006/back906.html

GET INVOLVED IN THE FIGHT TO SAVE AMERICA NOW! It was not raining when Noah began construction of his ark! The disingenuous sophistry and con games on the other side are myriad and omnipresent-- WE MUST fight back vigorously and unrelentingly with truth, justice, and the AMERICAN way!

http://www.teamamericapac.org/
http://www.numbersusa.com/index
http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=research_links
http://www.amren.com/Reports/Hispanics/HispanicsReport.htm
http://www.heritage.org/research/immigration/
http://www.cis.org/articles/2006/back906.html
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200701/NAT20070110a.h
tml
http://www.grassfire.org/
http://www.immigrationwatchdog.com/
http://www.minutemanhq.com/pet_hr1986/
http://www.americanpatrol.com/
http://www.eagleforum.org/psr/2003/feb03/psrfeb03.shtml
http://www.city-journal.org/html/14_1_the_illegal_alien.html
http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54132
http://www.vdare.com/malkin/060426_illegal.htm
http://www.vdare.com/bevens/060323_immigration.htm
http://search.atomz.com/search/?sp-a=000a298a-sp00000000&sp-q=illegal+immigratio
n&sp-p=all
http://www.vdare.com/guzzardi/060331_vfl.htm

MOST FEASIBLE SOLUTION:
What is the solution besides enforcing existing laws? THIS IS-- FAR AND AWAY-- THE MOST ESSENTIAL STEP!!!-- REQUIRE ABSOLUTELY an INVIOLATE, TAMPER-PROOF I.D. CARD for ANY NON-citizen to work, receive public assistance, get licenses, rent apartments, attend college, request emergency services, pass go, etc.-- in short, TO FUNCTION PERIOD while visiting AMERICA. This technique would make it MUCH TOUGHER for miscreant employers to break the law by winking at fraudulent docs, AND would cut down on welfare fraud, tax dodging, etc. ILLEGALS should be made to repatriate to apply for the card, subject to a thorough vetting by US. It will also readily allow us to track crime records, taxes paid, and social services used. It is horsepuckey sophistry that this would "violate their rights"-- someone here ILLEGALLY has NO citizenship rights !!! And "a path to citizenship" called for by apologists for ILLEGALS is PATENTLY ABSURD!

FURTHERMORE, American citizens have to prove who THEY are all the time!!! This solution destroys the red herring straw man disingenuous drivel that, "We cannot round up and deport 12 million ILLEGALS"-- they would go home to apply for the card at THEIR expense and trouble, the very same way they got here!!! This will also simultaneously allow us to get a handle on those who overstay their visas (perhaps for nefarious reasons such as plotting terrorism), because it will hinder their ability to sustain themselves in America to take flying lessons, etc. Also, the Bushies claim that we are fighting a world-wide WOT, but we know that potential terrorists are dancin' across the border posing as Mexicans-- the tamper-proof I.D. card can check those bad boys!

May God bless America and save her from the Conspiracy Of Evil which seeks to eliminate her border with Mexico to create the North American Union so businesses can milk the cheap labor and the PC "elites" can control us with Big Brother entitlement government that the tsunami of ethnocentric, undereducated, indigent third worlders will ineluctably insist on.

not bad commentary for DM
Dick Morris can be all over the place with his insights... he keeps talkin' about Shrillary versus Condi eventuating-- ain't no way! But he nails Sen. Juan McQuisling here pretty well. Middle America IS sick of the Iraq quagmire (engendered via deception by the neoCONS), and is realizing that it is being sold out for ILLEGAL alien labor and votes/influence.

I just heard that 60% of the electorate would be wary of voting for a guy as old as McQuisling... we did for Reagan, BUT he LOOKED more vibrant, especially standing across from the limp noodle, feckless Jimma'. Juan McQuisling does look like death warmed over. Mitt looks SO nice, but he flip-flops so fast that it is impossible to know what, if any, core convictions he has. Rudy troubles with his embracing of ILLEGAL aliens, but the electorate loves a Washington outsider who at least suggests competence-- see the great Reagan and trend to elect governors versus senators as President period... and he IS NOT Shrillary! The pundits considerably overestimate Rudy's limitations w/conservatives about social values. Like, uh, the socialist Hildabeest would be better on those issues?!

Mccain
This guy completely ran against his party and expected to get the Republican base to support him. He is nothing but a Rino and a Illegal Alien Panderer. there is a lot better candidates in the Running such as Tancredo,Ron Paul and Hunter.

Rooster
Exactly. Guilaini and McShame will not get my vote.

McCain is not a Republican anymore
I am glad to see people mentioning Newt, Hunter and Tancredo - these are people who are more conservative and don't seem to be the media hounds and panders that McCain, Giuliani,and all the dems running seem to be.

I don't want someone who looks 'good', someone who answers the questions with 'flair' or who gives good 'face'.

The President should have values, conviction and a true concern for the Constitution and America and American citizens.

And I don't care what Mexico or the rest of the World think or say about the US. The rest of the World is rendering itself so useless that other than attacking each other (and the US)and the oil - there is little that they don't come to the US with their hand out for.


Real choices
Forget the so called front runners. They just the get the media attention which should raise your suspicions from the beginning. There are a few real choices..Duncan Hunter, Rick Santorum, George Allen. Hunter has not yet gotten much attention, Santorum and Allen are not running. Any of these three gentlemen, patriots, conservatives, are far better choices than any of those who are jumping the gun so early. These are men who can be trusted and isn't that the real issue? In the beginning, I trusted President Bush, but he is not a conservative. I am most concerned about the huge effort to bring illegals into our nation. GWB is part of that problem which is more than disappointing. We need real leadership at a very critical time in our history. Hunter, Santorum, Allen...all great men with integrity and consistency. Not qualities found in politicians, generally.

Sad
It is sad that I would happily trade McCain for Lieberman. Even more sad that such a trade would move the Senate Republicans to the right.

Truthserum
I am putting in the bubly for the big celebration as McCain goes down in flames. One bag of ice oughta do it because McCain will be gone before the ice melts.

Juan McCain will NOT be our President
Juan the illegal Alien sellout will NOT be elected by Legal US Citizens. We have had enough, first he trashes his own state, then let the illegals infest the rest of the nation.
1. Have they asked us if we want people who use fake documents, and stolen ID's to be our neighbors? In the last 15 years there have been 9 million Illegal Aliens using SS# 000-00-0000, NOW who in their right mind would even THINK that was a legal number?
2. Have they asked US legal Citizens if we want to pay out $10,000.00 for EVERY ONE of their Anchor babies, OR IF we want those anchor babies to have legal status. It would seem to me, if the parents are Illegal, so is the child.
3. Have they asked US legal Citizens if we want to subsidize Illegals with their rent, schooling, health care? We spend BILLIONS on them, and they send BILLIONS back to Mexico.
4. Have they asked US legal Citizens if we want 90% of the Illegals who are of Latino descent to come into our communities and take over entire sections of our small towns, NOT speaking ENGLISH, which is our national language, having to listen push 1 for english, 2 for Espanol, well excuse, but you would have to be pretty $tupid to NOT get the gist here. They are telling us that the majority are Latino, after all, they aren't telling us to push 3. for Swahili, 4. for Arabic, etc. Got the picture. They are NOT ASSIMILATING.
5. They have not told us what "comprehensive" means, according to the dictionary it is broad.
They are telling us that we will only take the GOOD ones, well excuse me again, you are BREAKING THE LAW, when you steal someone's ID, don't pay Income Tax, or Use false Documents, HERE'S THE DILEMA. If you aren't here Legally, you would need to use one of the above items to work here, correct??? THEN WHAT ARE KENNEDY (swimmer boy), and Juan McCain, the Kennedy sidekick telling us, that we have to take them all, because we can't deport them??? YES WE CAN!!

I would like people from Arizona tell me HOW this stooge keeps getting re-elected, also how does Kennedy get re-elected and pass the smell test, in my book he is an idiot. Of course it could be like my home state of Michigan, all the Liberals in the college towns, and Detroit, the bloodsucking welfare city of the nation.

See my on-topic blog essay
Click on my name.

Constitutional Conservatism on the Rise
Ron Paul even though shunned by the Liberal MSM, and the NeoCon leaders of the Repub Party, messages of Constitutional Rule of Law is gaining ground.

A 2008 straw poll by Pajamas Media, mysteriously removed Dr. Ron Paul's name from ballot after trouncing Rudy 43% to 20 something %.

Again I plead to the Conservative base don't let the liberal media pick your candidates for you.
Their hope, is you will listen to their choices for you in 08, to ultimately get Demos in WH.

GOP's Problem
1)It is a Right-Center Party. It's most involved members are conservatives (both social and economic).

2)Since the 80s most RHINOs have fled to the Democratic Party and the DLC. Some economic conservative/social liberals remain, but they are a dieing breed.

3)Yet, the RNC and the party leadership can only support Center-Left and Left-Center presidential candidates.

4)Turn out is key in elections. Unless the GOP can field a candidate that will attract conservatives, 2008 will go to the Democrats no matter who in the Democratic Party runs.

Guiliani, Romney, and McCain? That is the best we can do?

Jeb will be a Write-In Candidate
The news will be so bad come the GOP Convention that something starteling will be done. By Convention time, America will tire of McCain Guilliani, Romney, Hillary, and Obama. Twenty-two months of non-stop campaigning will sap the electorates ability to pay attention. Things will be so bad that no candidate will be a front runner. That is, until...

Jeb gets written into the Convention. He will immediately garner conservative support from all contenders, as well as attract the so called moderates. The MSM will go spastic as will the DNC and RNC. It will be the biggest coup in modern election history.

A Reagan Republican Says...
McCain: The Manchurian Candidate, not "war hero" (war heros fly more than three missions and don't cry, "My daddy is the admiral" when shot down in order to insure your own good treatment).

Guilani: The laws that apply to other Americans don't apply to Rudy. In fact, he lost his battle to keep NYC as an illegal invader "sanctuary city" when he fought all the way to the Supreme Court. He lost and immediately flipped us all "the bird" and said he wouldn't obey the law against invading terrorists, drug cartels and black-market neo-slave labor. We already have two presidents who think that they were/are above the law, we don't need another.

Romney: Please! We don't need another northeast liberal running the country. The Bushes have shown us what Conneticut Yankees can do to a country when they seize power, we don't need another of this type -- but from Kennedy Country, no less. Note that the Bush Cabal is backing this guy.

Newt: Who wants a president names after a salamander? And, if your wife can't trust you, why should anyone else? As to the "Contract With America" -- Newt stole that idea from the Reform Party's platform of 1992 and took credit for their great work. Newt, the philandering cheat and thief, right, presidential material if you happen to be a liberal.

Brownback: Or, shouldn't that be "Wetb@ck" since he panders to them and their neo-slaver employers? Note: @=a, I hate censorship, don't you?

Duncan Hunter: Maybe.

Tancredo: Okay by me. At least he worked for Ronald Reagan.

Paul: Maybe.

National ID cards --- NO Thank You
Thanks to the REAL ID Act, our driver's licenses will be transformed into a national ID in 2008, complete with biometrics. There will be a national database with your personal information. More and more states are rebelling and justly so.

A national Id card is totally aberrant to a free society.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Yates/steven25.htm
http://www.spychips.com/




Tascha
Did McCain really do that? How funny. ;-)

why I.D. cards for ILLEGALS
Liberty--
Whether or not you have a national I.D. card for all, we can kiss Ameica goodbye if we do not require one for any NON-citizen to function while VISITING in America. It is the ONLY feasible way to regain control over NON-citizens. If you are going to stanch a cancer threatening the whole body, it does no good to pounce on specific cells-- you have to check the danger at the source. We require them to repatriate to apply for the tamper-proof card-- then, and only then, can we screen them for crimes, etc. and then be able to assure payment of taxes, proper visiting status, etc. while they visit on terms that WE establish.

The powers that be will NOT build a real wall, nor will they crack down on employers. That is why I favor something straightforward that will stanch them at the source-- What, no tamper-proof I.D. card (absent traditional I.D. that the rest of us must show)? Then NO job, No apartment, NO college, NO driver's license, NO flying licenses, NO social services, no pass go, etc.

It would seem that the only real alternatives will be to learn spanish, and accept the realities of a permanent welfare entitlement state and the dissolution of America as we have known it as it is morphed ineluctably into a third world balkanized barrio. Any form of Scamnesty will GUARANTEE this dreadful scenario-- we cannot naturalize the ethnocentric hispanic indigent with an average 7th grade education and not have such a catastrophic result. America is NOT the socio-economy it was 100 years ago... we can ONLY BENEFIT from educated, skilled immigrants seeking to assimilate fully.

Please see my long post below [7:11 a.m.] for web sites to get involved to save America and learn more.

mimimary
I did live in a neighborhood full of illegals. They do NOT WANT to become citizens or, if they do, it is only to keep employed. They would still show allegiance to Mexico. They would still send their money to Mexico. They WILL NOT learn English. They do not want to learn English. They don't give a damn about American customs, laws or people. They are ALL serial lawbrakers.

1. They broke the law entering the United States illegally;
2. They broke the law obtaining stolen/forged social security numbers;
3. They broke the law when they lied on W-2 forms for tax purposes;
4. They broke the law when they purchased that 9mm pistola. And, believe me, every frikkin one of them has armed himself;
5. They break the law every time they get into their pickup truck because they do not purchase insurance.
6. They break the law every time they drive that pickup truck away from the Cantina. Just ask the police what percent of DUI's are illegals and, while you are at it, ask them what percent of traffic related deaths are caused by illegals.

They are NOT here for "...jobs no American will take.." They are here for YOUR job.

These are the people Senator McCain wants to GIVE citizenship?

Arizona, please quit foisting this azzhole on the rest of us.

Hunter and
So Hunter should play second fiddle to suggested second raters? NOT. So Hunter should team up with proven double-dealers? I think not. Duncan Hunter and Sarah Palin? Perhaps. Duncan Hunter and someone from New York or Pennsylvania,perhaps, but none of those mentioned so far. Make election night 2008 The Night Of The Hunter, but give us a clean Vice-President, too.

Freedom of Speech
McCain put his name on the unconstitutional "McCain Feingold Bipartisan Act of 2002 to Limit Our Freedom of Speech in Political Areas", so why does he think he can get my vote? Just because at least five Supreme Court Justices decided to amend the Constitution and allow the act, it is still unconstitutional. That "living document" written in invisible ink on Silly Putty does not provide for amendments just because five key judges want one, and all of their amendments are unconstitutional too.

2008 republican ticket
newt gingrich and the man everyone for got about
FRED DALTON THOMPSON

WHAT?
Did somebody say the Newt was a RINO? Someone has gastrointestinitis of the brain.

How about a Newt/Thompson ticket?

How about a Tancredo/Newt ticket?

McCain is a has-been ever since he RINOd out to Feingold and that communist sympathizing Kennedy quack...
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.