Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, April 10, 2008
Diana West :: Townhall.com Columnist
Was Soldier Jailed to Appease Iraqi 'Allies'?
by Diana West
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Recently, I opened an e-mail and read: "I am Sgt. Evan Vela's father. I do no not know if you have followed my son's case but some people have drawn similarities between the Luttrell situation and Evan's."

The father was referring to Marcus Luttrell, whose best-seller "Lone Survivor" tells of four Navy SEALS, Luttrell among them, whose secret mission in Afghanistan was compromised when two Afghan goatherds discovered them hiding deep in Taliban territory. I've written before about the perverse but likely prospect of legal prosecution back home that weighed heavily on the Americans' decision not to save their own lives and their mission by killing the two unarmed Afghans -- a "crime" in PC la-la-land, even when "unarmed" still means deadly. After releasing the Afghans, the SEALS were overwhelmed by the Taliban, and in the ensuing carnage, not only were three of the four Americans killed, but so were 16 more U.S. special forces, shot down in their helicopter by the Taliban during a rescue attempt. In his book, Luttrell has immortalized the battle, which I think of as Death by Rules of Engagement.

The Luttrell story certainly opens like that of Sgt. Evan Vela, who, as part of an elite sniper squad, was in insurgent-controlled territory south of Baghdad last year when the team's "hide" was discovered by an unarmed Iraqi man who made noise and thrashed about after being captured. Did I mention the American soldiers were heat-exhausted and sleep-deprived after three days operating in 120-degree heat?

Instead of letting the man go and, a la Luttrell's team, getting killed by nearby Sunni terrorists, Sgt. Vela's squad leader made the decision Luttrell and his comrades didn't make. He determined the Iraqi man threatened his team's safety, and he ordered Sgt. Vela to kill the man. Sgt. Vela complied. The Americans returned to base alive. And Sgt. Vela is now serving 10 years in prison for murder.

A recent New York Daily News op-ed on the case was called: "American Sniper Hung Out to Dry." That sums up what happened. But why?

This is where pounding outrage over an injustice to an American soldier -- who at least deserves the benefit of the doubt -- turns to a sickening sense that what has gone wrong here is even bigger than Sgt. Vela's personal tragedy. It may well be as big as the entire U.S effort to prevail in Iraq.

Let's go back to the scene of the so-called crime: An area outside Iskandariyah, which as recently as last May was Sunni "Triangle of Death"-central.

And let's go back to the victim of the "crime": Genei Nesir Khudair Al-Jenabi, a member of Babil province's pre-eminent tribe. Come the U.S.-led invasion, the Jenabi, like other Sunnis, joined the Sunni insurgency.

And come "the surge," or shortly thereafter (just revving up around the Vela incident), the Jenabi, like other Sunnis, began, via "awakening" councils, to join the United States. At least they started getting paid to stop shooting Americans and start shooting Al Qaeda. Not that it was always easy to make the transition. Lt. Col. Robert Balcavage -- who just happens to be the commander of Evan Vela's battalion, and is said by Vela's team leader to have pushed for higher kill rates from snipers -- explained it this way last August to the Washington Post: "The Jenabi tribe, the problem they're having is that the Al Qaeda is them."

So let's review. Evan Vela in May 2007 kills a member of "the Al Qaeda is them" tribe who has compromised his squad, and gets convicted of murder in February 2008 in Baghdad.

Baghdad? It was when I heard the court martial was in Baghdad -- not stateside, like other such trials -- that my initial outrage became the queasy feeling mentioned above, which only intensified on learning that Sgt. Vela's division had actually been ordered back to the United States before the trial began. And the smell of a rat grew stronger still when I read that the Iraqi Minister for Human Rights, Wijdan Salim, attended the trial. "I want to be sure that any American soldier who wrongs an Iraqi will go on trial," Ms. Salim told Time magazine. "(Evan Vela) killed an Iraqi man, an unarmed man. He must be punished."

Well, he was. To the question "why," I can only offer more questions: Is it possible that Evan Vela's Baghdad court martial was all for show? And can his punishment be seen as a sacrificial offering to any of our Iraqi "allies"?

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Diana West is a contributing columnist for Townhall.com and author of the new book, The Death of the Grown-up: How America's Arrested Development Is Bringing Down Western Civilization.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Diana West's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Breaker Morant
I'd like to know who at Fathomless Bottom thinks they have to placate? What is the payoff? Seriously. I don't get it.

Sgt. Vela's courts martial
I just read the article about Sgt. Vela's courts martial. I was sickened by what I read. I am sorry that the Iraqi was killed but American lives are more important. What I mean is when you are in enemy territory you need to make harsh decisions. Take the fact that all small groups like the Sniper team knew about the four Navy SEALS (Marcus Luttrell the Lone Survivor) and what happened to them because they were humane and let that Afghan go. How in all 20 US Soldiers were killed. I am sorry but I think they were correct in killing that Iraqi. It’s a shame that our Government has forgotten how important our young men and woman mean to us. The liberal Democrats don’t care and the
Republicans are missing in action again.


David Speckhardt Sr.
US Army Retired

http://idspeck.blogtownhall.com/


imdspeck
Amen. At Khe Sanh, a friend, a marine pilot and his squadron, were ordered not to bomb NVA positions across the border. Those positions nightly rained down mortars on his fellow marines on the ground. The choppers took the dead and wounded out every day. Finally, the higher ups chose to pull the base back beyond the range of the mortars. They never did give the order to attack those positions.

Bitter. Yeah. Should we be bitter about the treatment of this soldier? Absolutely. This decision will kill Americans. In war, you cannot hesitate. You cannot question your orders, nor the support that you need. This sends a wrong signal to every unit. You can't blame the troops if they become increasingly disillusioned with this kind of war. When politics runs the war, as it did at Khe Sanh, the soldiers pay the price. To hell with them all.

Its really painful
To read about these stories like this.
I know it is for most of us too.

Its a blatant moral evil to place men in circumstances they must make life and death decisions for themselves or others and be prosecuted like a common thief after making his best judgment about his and his men's lives.

I would love to see all the Army and Marine Lawyers have to pull this duty before they could bring charges against another man who was faced with such a decision.
Plus every single rotten politician who uses these men like police and then treat them like criminals.

Damn,
now I wonder if we shouldn't pull out of the Middle East altogether. Not because I don't think we can win, I do, But when our own government is so into backstabbing the soldiers I fail to see any good coming out of it.

The jihadis will come to our shores, there will be terror attacks on U.S. citizens, but their preferred target locations are full of the liberal idiots that support this kind of bs. Might help clean up our gene pool a little.


Boutte writes:
Quite right, Diana
End miscarriages of justice in Iraq.

Pull out of Iraq. Now.


This just isn't Iraq. We could leave Iraq tomorrow and the same insane policy would apply in Afgnanistan, Korea, Europe, or Latin America. If the politicains are not gonna defend the troops then the troops need to just say no deal and get out. The "Greatest Generation" didn't win WWII by making nice with the enemy they killed them, period. That one percent of the population who are holding the line for the rest of us deserve better than this.

Is this any way to run a war?
This is what happens when it is all about "winning hearts and minds".

This is a "(conservative)compassionate" strategy...and it may even be the right strategy eventually(though I have my doubts!!!), but get used to lots more Velas getting tossed under the bus, lots more Luttrells having their good judgment tragically clouded by an obsessively insane devotion to winning hearts and minds of the enemy over the personal safety and lives of our own troops.

So our military, whether pressured by the administration or thru its own volition, let this U.S. sergeant fighting in Iraq hang out to dry.

In my humble opinion, pulling out now would take a Bush disaster and turn it into a historic catastrophe, but I understand the sentiments of those who would do just that.

Great points. Very poorly written
Disappointed in this column which could have been so much more had Dianna West not been rushing to meet a deadline. Next time Ms. West, take the time to express yourself coherently!

dorenhagen
Funny, I think the rest of us seem to get the point she was making. They will kill our troops, or their leaders will put them in jail and or kill them with the PC bullsh!t. Wonder how they would feel if troops just stopped re-enlisting?

99.9 out of 100 would make the same call
In reading the excellent article about Sgt. Evan Vela, I asked myself what would I do in the same situation. I truly believe I would have done the same as Sgt. Evan Vela. I think most would make the same decision as Evan did; follow training, obey an order, act in the best interest of his team to protect their safety, carry out a successful mission, and all return back to base alive and well. We are at war the last time I checked. I am going to take action on this to help this brave soldier. It is a disgrace that Evan should spend one minute of an unjust sentence.

First MRSOC Marines to deploy
On Mar 4, 2007, a platoon of SpecOps Marines were hit by a suicide bomber and ambushed in Boti Kot, Afghanistan. Twenty minutes after the attack, the media-savvy enemy began posting and broadcasting stories that the Marines had shot and killed civilians, contrary to the testimony of all the Marines in the convoy.

Within a week, Army Gen. Kearney ordered the entire company of Marines out of Afghanistan. A rare court of inquiry was held in January but the findings are classified.

We have spent an estimated $40 million prosecuting the Haditha Marines. I would like to know what we have spent on the Court of Inquiry.

It's time we cut off funding these out of control prosecutors

Apples and Oranges
Check your facts. These guys were less than 5 minutes from other US units. I feel for Vela and his family but his situation does not come close to the Navy Seals who were miles from help, deep inside enemy territory.

Why not knock the guy unconscious?

Talking about radical islam
Check out the latest entry at my blog.

It's sure to crack a few eggs!

Modus Operandi
This is how the Bush Administration operates. Just ask Ramos and Compean, who were jailed to appease the Mexicans.

Its been said before
But where do we get such men as Sgt Vela?

What sort of system places a man in life and death circumstances, then is ready to pounce on him with all condemnation the law can bring on his head, if some lawyer who sits in an air conditioned office gets to second guess such a situation.

Then where do we find such men who will stay in the Armed Forces under a President, who has sent them there, back and forth for 3 and 4 tours of duty, and remains silent in such a case as this, YET screams bloody murder at the Texas Justice System over it's Due Process of Law in convicting a murder (two youngs girsl)and rapist and GOES to BAT for the most vile murdering scum the Justice System can find?

Not to mention as another already has, remains silent on the Campeon and Ramos distortion of Justice.

I hate this President for his commitment to corruption.

Black and White in a Grey World
The question is not whether what happened was legal or obeying what essentially is the book answer for an illegal order by a superior. The question is what would you have done in the same situation?
It is so easy to say what one should have done during Sunday's football game on Monday. Instead, one should try and put him/herself in the young mans shoes. War is kill or be killed.
Congress will protect the rights of a kidnapper and demand fair treatment, unless their child or spouse is the person kidnapped.
Celebrities demand gun control for the average citizen and yet hire armed bodyguaurds to protect them and their family members.
Simple and utter hypocracy!

James
I seriously doubt units were that close. Even if they were, a 5 minute jump can be the difference between being overrun and staying hidden. Without being in these men's shoes, you cannot comment that they did the wrong thing. Given the situation i believe i would have chosen killing him as well. Its a war, not riot control in L.A.

I think about the Great Americans of the
Past

“The public cannot be too curious concerning the characters of public men.”—Samuel Adams



As he picks and chooses which laws he wants enforced.




As he goes on and on about how important Iraq and Afghanistan is, sending young men to their deaths, he ignores immigration law.
And supports a crime wave of illegals.

And then throws his support to an international court over his own home State of Texas and its Lawfully Legislated Laws.

"Compassionate" Gov. Bush Orders 100 Executions
by Lily Hughes

On September 10, Texas executed Willis Barnes, the 100th person to be murdered by the state since Gov. George W. Bush started his term in 1995.
http://www.nodeathpenalty.org/newab013/govBush.html


And the story that really gets to me:

Father of Murdered Girl Questions Bush's Support to Halt Killer's Execution
FOX News ^ Melissa Underwood

by yorkie

The father of a 14-year-old Texas girl who was raped, sodomized and then strangled with a belt and shoe laces, wants to know why President Bush supports halting the execution of the Mexican national who confessed to killing his daughter and her friend.



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1909877/posts

He rants and raves about protecting Iraq from the killers there, but IGNORES THE MASS OF MURDER GOING ON HERE FROM AN OPEN BORDER BY ILLEGAL ALIENS.
More American Citizens have died by illegal aliens than troops killed in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

And this hypocrite will not obey the laws of the land, the immigration laws.
He will NOT build the fence that was Legislated to build by Due Process of Law by the US Congress.
I could go on and on as this this hypocrites nighmare adminstration defects, but am limited for one post at a time.

I have a prayer
To God

Americans will wake up to Righteousness and get angry.
Day by day we get deluged with news stories and commentary such as this one.

Yet no rage, just take it all in stride as if its a dinner table discussion on etiquette.
Stay calm, speak only sweet sounding words, never offend some ear.

I am sick of tolerance for evil, and I know God is.

Anyone think it matters

To this family and Father if his young daughter was murdered by Al Quieda or a Mexican criminal?
Why are the lives of strangers in Iraq and Afghanistan more important to this Administration than the lives of American Citizens?
This man Bush is an evil and wicked man, he is breaking his oath of office in NOT enforcing the Laws here to STOP THE TERRORISTS FROM MEXICO!
But turns all his energy to fight terrorists across the ocean.
There is no justice in this, it is blatant corruption.




Father of Murdered Girl Questions Bush's Support to Halt Killer's Execution
FOX News ^ Melissa Underwood

by yorkie

The father of a 14-year-old Texas girl who was raped, sodomized and then strangled with a belt and shoe laces, wants to know why President Bush supports halting the execution of the Mexican national who confessed to killing his daughter and her friend.



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1909877/posts

Don't we want an ethical Army?
Realize what you are saying...Do we want our Army to run around lawless and shoot whomever they want? Even unarmed, already detained civilians?
Most of our men are doing absolutley great. When a crime is committed, a crime is committed, should our Army not enforce it?
I think Diana needs examine the facts here; she is either ignorant or purposely leaving facts out to gain an emotional response from the masses. But look, it sells! Most readers are so emotionally driving that the facts no longer matter.
I am proud of our Army; I am proud that they enforce the rules when an innocent man is killed purposely.

No Different than the BP Agents
This is really no different than Border Patrol agents Ramos and Compean were prosecuted (pursecuted) by our government to appease Mexico.

Our government seems to be more interested in political correctness and the interests of foreign governments rather than the interests of the United States.

bc3
Our government isn't even interested in the safety of its citizens. Thousands of foreign nationals pour into our country unimpeded each day. Thousands of Americans have been killed, maimed, raped, beaten, robbed, or at least undercut for employment. All the while the citizens get to pay for the priviledge.

Get a grip James...
This is a war, not a police action. In this same war this same sniper team will blow off an insurgent's head at a mile and the scumbag will never hear the shot. Summary execution period, regardless of intent or lack of imminent danger. Armed or unarmed, a potential combatant that may expose the entire squad to lethal danger must be dealt with.

Read books like Generation Kill and you will read about snipers taking out civilians for holding cell phones. Oh, by the way the phone was being used to call US troop positions into enemy mortar teams but hey, maybe he was ordering a pizza too? Read Luttrell's gut wrenching first person account of his SEAL team's demise in the mountains of Afghanistan as one after another of his close friends and comrades succumb to enemy fire. Not a single man went down with a single shot.

There is no evidence whatsoever of US troops running around lawless, killing whomever they want. Unless you are a committed New Republic reader, and then you should be committed.

Squad leaders and officers need to be able to make gut wrenching field decisions without the threat of constant litigation hanging over their heads. It is a war dammit.

I for one trust the honor and sense of duty that our brave men and women display every day on the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan. Much more than I trust the lying, agenda driven media and politicians.

We have the most ethical Army
And Marine Corps in the world.
And they sure do not need people like you to insinuate otherwise.
Don't even try and compare what the US Forces are up against and have faced to any of the other nations Military over there.
The USA carries the brunt of it all.
How many have lost their lives because they allowed someone too close?
These men are going above the call of duty in how they are being used and under the rules of engagement forced by lawyers and politicians.

---------


James writes: 8:00 PM
Don't we want an ethical Army?
Realize what you are saying...Do we want our Army to run around lawless and shoot whomever they want? Even unarmed, already detained civilians?
--------
You have no right to judge these men until placed in their shoes.

quote:
The Luttrell story, "Lone Survivor", certainly opens like that of Sgt. Evan Vela, who, as part of an elite sniper squad, was in insurgent-controlled territory south of Baghdad last year when the team's "hide" was discovered by an unarmed Iraqi man who made noise and thrashed about after being captured.

Did I mention the American soldiers were heat-exhausted and sleep-deprived after three days operating in 120-degree heat?

Food for thought,
I see the usual crowd of anti-war, anti-Bush posters making their empty rants. Look at past and current media blitzes where politicians from both parties, whether in local, state or federal government are all quick to second guess and scrutinize the actions of law enforcement officers or soldiers who have to react to life threatening situations in split seconds. The media, politicians and lawyers all have the benefit of time when scrutinizing the actions of someone who finds themselves thrust into harms way. Many lives and careers of decent people who act in good faith while carrying out a thankless and dangerous job, have been ruined because of second guessing and political agendas. Until these elite individuals can stand in the shoes of our troops and LEO's, they shouldn't be able to cast aspersions and make judgements against those who felt they were in a kill or be killed situation.

Ahhhh the emotion.
Im sorry that you cant see past your emotion that causes you to ignore facts and disregard law. Support for our troops is not the issue. Our men make the right decisions almost everytime and again, I commend them for it. We are lucky to be living in a Nation that has a military like ours. We are also lucky to be in a nation that enofrces laws based on the moral right thing. Do you really think his commander, LTC Balcavige, made the decision to charge Vela to appease Iraqis? Another hard decision was made by LTC Balcavige who had to chose to enforce the law when putting the rest of his men at greater risk and scrutiny by people like you. Im not in the military but I thank God for what they do. I also thank God that we live in a society that enforces laws even in combat. Go ahead and respond with more accusations about my lack of support for our Soldiers or better yourself and look at the facts of this case.

The "war" in Iraq. What is that?
By historical terms, the war had ended in 3 weeks, a day or two before Dubya landed on that aircraft carrier.

After that point, it was an occupation. A begnin occupation.

Mix the politics inherent in any occupation with the vagaries of Jihad -- and of, thereby, Islam -- and what you get is a benign occupation of a Moslem population rife with activists making Jihad war from admist the local population.

Switching sides daily. Wearing no uniforms. Always an innocent citizen caught out in a nasty situation. The killed Jihadist was a warrior at war, but not as the ignorant politicized JAGs understand war, looking at their precious military law precedents from the military's pre-Jihad days.

It's Evan Vela who got caught out. What he did was a good and moral thing. What the JAGs did was the opposite.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.