Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, March 14, 2008
Diana West :: Townhall.com Columnist
Middle East 'Bright Side' Blinding Us To Costly U.S. Reality
by Diana West
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


This argument rests on two main points. First, there was the absence of Iraqi crowds cheering for Ahmadinejad, and the presence of protestors in Iraqi cities -- largely, but not exclusively, in Sunni enclaves, which are unsurprisingly hostile to the Iranian Shiite president. (No protest was very large -- infinitesimal next to the 100,000-plus Iraqis who in 2006 demonstrated in support of Iranian proxy Hezbollah.) The other main point concerns Ahmadinejad's failure to arrange face-time with the Grand Ayatollah Al Sistani, the leading Shiite in Iraq.

The first point might be more telling if Iraq were not, as we all surely know by now, a democracy. It was Iraq's democratically elected leaders -- including the Kurdish president and Shiite prime minister -- who welcomed the genocidal terror master with fanfare, regardless of whether some Iraqis took to the streets (or not). For years now, these same elected leaders have been effectively intertwining Iraq's economy with Iran's to the point where Radio Free Liberty analyst Kathleen Ridolfo recently noted that "observers say Iraq is becoming economically, if not politically, subordinate to Iran." Little wonder, then, that the Iraqi government put out the red carpet for the Thug of Tehran.

This bilateral relationship -- the energy accords, export market (Iraq is Iran's largest), oil trade, cooperation in education, customs, insurance, transportation, industrial projects, tourism, Iran's billion-dollar loan (interest free), and, to cap it off, the joint statement condemning Israel for taking action in Gaza to stop Hamas rockets -- presents a conflict as the U.S. combats the very terrorism Iran exports. For example, last year, the U.S. Treasury blacklisted Iran's Bank Melli for its involvement in terrorism and the pursuit of nuclear weaponry. Last year, Ridolfo reported, Bank Melli opened a branch in Baghdad. (No word on whether Ahmadinejad opened an account during his visit.)

As for Point No. 2, who can claim to know the inside skinny on the Sistani meeting? One possibility, reported by Stratfor.com, was that domestic Iranian opposition -- not Sistanian opposition -- might have been a factor. Perhaps more to the point is the fact that Sistani, who retains Iranian citizenship, has met with every other Iranian government officials to visit Iraq before Ahmadinejad. And that includes Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki, national security official Ali Larijani and, shortly before Ahmadinejad arrived, Tehran Mayor Mohammed-Baqer Qalibaf. Sounds to me as if Iran is too close to Iraq for U.S. comfort.

I try to look on the bright side -- really. Just not when the brightness is blinding.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Diana West is a contributing columnist for Townhall.com and author of the new book, The Death of the Grown-up: How America's Arrested Development Is Bringing Down Western Civilization.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Diana West's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Iraq – Five Years and Reflections
Five years later. An interesting set of reflections on the Iraq War and the aftermath by Bremmer, Perle and others. Well worth the read at http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/16/opinion/16intro.html .

The legacy of this invasion will certainly need to be addressed by Bush et al as history begins to write about the reasons for the invasion and attempts at nation-building. How will America approach future wars with our understanding of the hundreds of billions in cost and thousands of lives lost versus the threat posed by any nation-state or individual?

An interesting economics question arises. Which is less costly (in dollars, lives, international diplomacy and leadership, etc.); invasion and occupation or homeland security and the occasional terrorist attempt on the homeland?

Thoughts
As I read these comments I'm often reminded that the issue isn't so much the ancient hatred and divisions in the Middle East, it is equally the ancient hatreds and divisions between Islam and the West. Even though the various sects and tribes that make up the Middle East may be ancient enemies within the region, the issue becomes who do they hate or distrust more, the West or each other? The Shia's in Iraq may have ancient grudges against the Persians, yet they have elected clerical leadership that is allied in many fundamental ways with the clerics in Iran. Those clerics, and the political parties that they control, mistrust and dislike the West and all it represents more than they dislike or mistrust the Persians. By adopting the Koran as the basis for civil law, the Iraqi's have codified a system that ensures that justice is not even-handed. It is not merely that women, Christians, Jews and other sects are treated as second class citizens, but that the ballot box is used to reinforce the power of the majority over the minority as the voting population votes first for it's Sect, not for democracy.

The West, in turn, has been confronted for a thousand years with the issue of what its response should be. As long as religion is the primary determinate of power, then, the very act of eliminating dicators guarantees only that we are substituting one form of tyranny for another. Under dictators, there are few political rights, but minority sects, christians, woman and the like often have more civil rights than is the case under Sectarian states. Hence, the 1.5 million Chaldean Christians and other minority Sects in Iraq were protected, whereas now they are being decimated as no one will protect them.

The certain reality of invading and eliminating dictators is that we will endanger the minority sects, as well as women. The end result is that you can kill the dictator, but do you then kill the clerics?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.