Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Dennis Prager :: Townhall.com Columnist
Obama’s Inaugural Address Short on Inspiration
by Dennis Prager
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you feel the leaked information from a global warming alarmist organization is meaningful?



The night Barack Obama won the election, he gave one of the most inspiring victory addresses I ever heard.

The day Barack Obama was inaugurated president of the United States, he gave one of the least inspiring inaugural addresses I have ever heard.

Even the estimated 2 million people who came to see the man they revere and to celebrate the inauguration of the first black president of the United States, cheered few times. There was almost nothing to cheer. The address was largely a downer. Even if America is in as desperate a condition as the new president believes it is, the moment called for something uplifting.

As a politically moderate friend of mine said to me, the speech was joyless.

And when it wasn’t joyless, it was often either incoherent or disjointed or factually wrong.

That is not to say nothing good was said. There were some fine thoughts, delivered in Barack Obama’s effective manner.

So let’s honor the good:

“In reaffirming the greatness of our nation, we understand that greatness is never a given. It must be earned.” We may differ on how greatness is earned but this point cannot be stated too often.

“For us, they fought and died, in places like Concord and Gettysburg; Normandy and Khe Sanh.” It is a joy to hear, finally, a man of the left include the Vietnam War in the list of the good wars America has fought.

“…to all other peoples and governments…know that America is…ready to lead once more.” You have to wonder how the Democratic Left reacts to a call to America to lead -- isn’t that American exceptionalism?

“…for those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents, we say to you now that our spirit is stronger and cannot be broken; you cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you.” Hurrah! Given that the “T-word” was not mentioned in the Democratic presidential debates, it was nice to hear it in the inaugural address.

Now to some platitudes:

“On this day, we gather because we have chosen hope over fear …” It is time to retire this Democratic Party platitude. No one invokes fear as much as the left does. Beyond Islamic terror, it’s hard to identify a right-wing fear. But the left’s list has been almost endless: racism, homophobia, Islamophobia, xenophobia, heterosexual AIDS, secondhand smoke, global warming, just to name a few.

“On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn out dogmas, that for far too long have strangled our politics.” No matter how many times I read this line, I had little idea what Mr. Obama was referring to.

And onto some problematic lines:

“We will restore science to its rightful place.” I assume this is liberal code for pushing, among other things, embryonic stem cell research. But that is not the problem with this statement. There are two other problems. First, science’s “rightful place” is a notch beneath moral values, but one suspects that those who agreed with Mr. Obama’s statement did not hear it that way. Second, if science is so important to Mr. Obama how does he so cavalierly announce that global warming is a major threat to humanity’s future in the light of current global cooling and the number of scientists who dissent from the man-made-carbon-dioxide-global-warming hysteria? Is the global warming steamroller really driven by science? Or by politics?

“The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works...” If in Obama’s America, we will no longer ask, “Is government too big?” we will be in big trouble.

“(The market’s) power to generate wealth and expand freedom is unmatched, but this crisis has reminded us that … a nation cannot prosper long when it favors only the prosperous.” Precisely because too many Democrats (and Republicans) were disturbed by the fact that the prosperous were buying homes more easily than the poor, the government cajoled banks into giving loans to too many people who should not have had been given them. Now the poor and just about everyone else are suffering.

“We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals.” It is only a “false choice” among those who deem the Patriot Act a rejection of our ideals. Most Americans believe that the Bush administration kept us safe and preserved our ideals.

“We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end of this Earth …” We are? What religion has shaped America as much as Judaism and Christianity have? What language has shaped America as much as English? The President’s point is either untrue or meaningless. Why did he make it?

“We cannot help but believe that the old hatreds shall someday pass; that the lines of tribe shall soon dissolve; that as the world grows smaller, our common humanity shall reveal itself.” Unfortunately, there isn’t a shred of evidence that most of the old hatreds are passing. And there are even some new ones. And “common humanity” means little outside of biology. People who treat others decently do so out of common values, not “common humanity.”

“To those leaders around the globe who seek to sow conflict, or blame their society’s ills on the West -- know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what you destroy.” Really? Who exactly? Ruthless tyrants who only destroy have had hundreds of millions of followers. The president’s claim is more wishful thinking.

And, finally, a platitude that is actually dangerous:

“Our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint.” Only the very, very naive could say something so wrong. It is hard to identify a time in history when any people’s security emanated from the justness of their cause. That is a fairy tale. Did the justness of the Jews’ cause give the Jews security in Hitler’s Europe? Or the Ukrainians or Armenians or Cambodians or anyone else? Powerful armies give decent peoples their security, not the justness of their cause. If President Obama believes that in this world good people are secure thanks to the goodness of their cause, America is in trouble.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Dennis Prager is a radio show host, contributing columnist for Townhall.com, and author of 4 books including Happiness Is a Serious Problem: A Human Nature Repair Manual.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Dennis Prager's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Did we hear the same speech?
I was very moved by the president's speech (I'm a Republican). It was stirring. Your comments continually miss the mark. I've not read your columns before; I don't know if I will again. It seems like you are one of the many conservatives who instead of thinking clearly and independently just move lock-step with his brethren Rush-ites. And him I cannot stand.

Gestell's Conservative Principles
I applaud Gestell's honesty on conservative principles. Reply #58 And much of it is factually correct.

Basically, conservative principles are not for racial equality.

So what?
Really, so what? These speeches are generic boilerplate, no matter who gives them.

But you know what really makes me sick, Dennis Prager.

"It is a joy to hear, finally, a man of the left include the Vietnam War in the list of the good wars America has fought."

Yeah, very easy for a man to say this who wasn't on the receiving end of this grotesque violence. From either side. Sick really sick.

Obama's inagural speech
I did not vote for B. Hussain Obama, but I recognize that he is one of the finests orators I have heard. This man can deliver a powerful,passionate,inspiring and moving speech; however,his inagural speech was somber and plainly boring.

I was waiting for his finest speech ever and even when I knew he would be cautios with promises I almost knew it would be a great speech. Well, it was dissapointing to say the least. I think he is begining to shrink and honestly I believe the office of president is way above his pay grade. Those who voted for him will be sadly dissapointed. Perhaps he will go back to his great speeches to maintain popularity since he doesn't fit the bill as a leader.

jerseyvet
Your insignificance shows each time you speak. It appears that your only access to value comes via war. How does it feel to live outside your humanity? Don't answer it's rhetorical...

Ed in CA
Don't know what any of that means but a hearty HILE OBAMA to you just the same. Oh and, a very solemn, AH-SALAMI,I-LIKE-UM as well.

alu akbar,
Haji

Islam faith unexposed
It is a fact that Islam believes and teaches that prophet JESUS was NEVER crucified. Thus, Christians remain "infidels" as do the Jews. A muslim who commits suicide to kill infidels gains heaven and sends infidels to Hell. Thus, the Pope is also for Hell. It was a Muslim who shot at Pope John Paul II. The 9-11 zealots also were devoted by faith in suicide. The press does not reveal these facts. Fatima was favorite daughter of Mohammed, 2nd to Mary who is virgin mother of prophet Jesus, who WAS NEVER CRUCIFIED. Truth deserves confession.

Obama's Learning Curve
Some of the comments on this page reflect views that liberals everywhere hold--that words and good intentions are all you need to survive and lead the world. It sounds great...in a song.

But the real world, especially the totalitarian regimes, respect only force. The world today is a result of the tremendous power of the United States. We stopped Communist aggression and led, and are still leading, the fight against Islamic Jihad.

Liberals, listen carefully, the only thing that counts in this world is power. Read a little history and you will see that good intentions and altruism are meaningless in Darwin's universe.

I heard in Obama's inaugural address that sad 60s' plaint summarized by the expression "Can't we all just get along?" Remember Obama's mother was a flower child of the Sixties and his father a bigamist idealist who ended up an alcoholic in a fatal car accident. Great role models for our new president!

Despite a Harvard education I wonder if Obama really understands how the world works. Certainly his Weatherman and Communist friends didn't know.

I think we're in a drama titled, "The Education of Barack Obama." Unfortunately we can't get up and leave but have to suffer the world's blows along with the Anointed One.

reply to M Sederoff
I note a singular lack of specifics in your comment. Can you refute what I said? Or do you just sling mud?

Al
Thanx fer tha insiteful respons!

Gestell
You need to stop playing in the sand box and get a real education.

You might begin by reading some history books written before 1980.

Thanks for a good laugh!


Inspiration
I thought it was very inspirational. Compared to W, this was great oratory.


Getting down to principles
It's about time that conservatives dusted off their principles and starting thinking with them again in connection with President Obama.

Obama's presidency is possible because the civil rights movement happened and both Supreme Court decisions and legislation encouraged it and endorsed its goals. The inspiration for the civil rights movement came from the ideological left. Genuine conservatives in the 1950s and 60s opposed the goals and the tactics of the civil rights movement, as well as the laws that cemented those goals into American society. Bill Buckley said that the "South must prevail" against civil rights and Barry Goldwater voted against the 1964 civil rights act. Strom Thurmond, Jesse Helms, and other southerners beloved by real conservatives opposed every major piece of legislation that followed in this area.

The dismantling of segregation, which had always been justfied under the pro-Constitutional doctrine of states' rights, was an immense leftist piece of social engineering that paved the way for many other such efforts.

The ending of slavery was accomplished by an aggressive act of big government by Abraham Lincoln. There was, after all, no genuine Constiutional argument against either the morality or the legality of slavery in the first place. Force brought it to an end, just as force was brought against the citizens of states who sought to retain their traditional way of life against liberal social engineers.

From this history, it is clera to me that no conservative who understands conservative principles can possibly accept Barack Obama as our president. His candidacy and his election would have been unimaginable to the American founders, as well as to the vast majority of Americans for most of our country's history.


Dennis
A man wakes up in the middle of the night, only to find his home on fire. Query; How much inspiration does he need to put the fire out,knowing that his family is inside? Americans have to be inspired to saved their own country? How stupid of them? I will not exercise a thought about your mental status!!!

Lee
"Prager the High Minded Phony
Did he ever put Bush's inaugural under a microscope? I doubt it. How about ANY Bush speech? The warm and fuzzy fascist strikes again!"

I bet you have never listened to Dennis Prager. The important speeches former President Bush gave were ALWAYS analyzed by Dennis . . . ALWAYS! Some he liked; some he didn't. Dennis has always been honest in his critique of the speeches he chooses to critique.

GET A LIFE!

Vlad
You are a typical liberal POS. Who goes to Iraq is not the issue, dumbasss. But your replies demonstrate the consistency of not having the facts or the wherewithall to know when something sucks, royally. You just keep wearing the rose-colored glasses, because when reality hits home, you are gonna need them.

Kal
Again, I will ask you what was inspiring about any of that? There is one thing clear about those who voted for Obama.

They do not like it when the man is called on his actions.

What goes around comes around! For eight years we have listened while there was nothing that GWB did that was beneficial for our Country. For eight years he was bashed and disrespected.

And, now the new President has given a non-inspiring doom and gloom speech and WE are wrong, racists, and intolerant for saying so.

The PResident is hiring someone who evaded paying taxes to run the IRS!!! (How many of Geittner's friends do you think might get "overlooked" because he made a "mistake?") The law is not partisan.

The President is also hiring someone who has used a not- for profit foundation's money to pay his mortgage and his kids Private tuition to an IL school. What is right about that? Any one of us laypeeps who did it would be in jail.

The President wants to waste taxpayer money on programs that already exist in these tight economic times. Do you not see anything wrong with that picture?

You think hope and change is going to be all good. I wish it were. You are all going to be disappointed in the end. But at least I have reality on my side.

Prager so eager to condemn
Kaos Kleric, here's a few examples of facism under Bush: warrantless wiretaps, gulags, Blackwater, torture. I have more if those aren't enough to concern you.

Brent in CA, Hi. Your Mom says hi, too.

Sometimes I wonder if Dennis isn't paid (a la Armstrong Williams) to carry the Neocon water. I mean, Obama's speech wasn't 10 minutes old before Dennis began condemning it on his radio show.

Dennis tends to write without the benefit of research, passing off generalities as some form of absolute truth when they seam more like the ramblings of a conceited man. "I thought it, therefore it must be so."

Knowing Dennis, as I do, research rarely concerns him.

But if you like him, well...enjoy.

3rd marriage? And he boasts of being an expert on male/female relations? Weddings and divorce, maybe, but I doubt he knows much at all about women.

Hey Dennis, what about Israel's use of banned white phosphorus on women and children in Gaza? Where's the "moral neccessity" in that?

And when are your kids going to Iraq?

humanum est errare
Like Dennis, I am concerned at Obama's trust in "our common humanity shall reveal itself." Our common humanity reveals itself everywhere, every day, and has throughout history.

Our humanity is what requires that we recognize our state of being, our humility. Obama began his address stating his humility. That was, I thought, a good beginning. I began to question his sincerity when he promised to harness the sun.

I will continue to hope that it is our common values, ideals, heritage, and faith driving our nation.

"We are all in the gutter; some of us are looking at the stars" - Oscar Wilde

laborlawyer
Respectfully...turn on spell check.

Glad to Hear You Say it.
That was pretty much my knee jerk reaction when I heard his speech. How did atheism and various eastern religions contribute to the formulation of the United States?

Far more interesting....
...than Prager's predictable column are the comments which follow and appear above this one. The continuing references to "Barry" and "Hussein" and "the One"...the continuing questioning of Obama's birth certificate....the "magic negro" reference...it all goes to show why Democrats has ascended to power: The right has nothing to offer but condemnations of the other guy (and silly ones at that).

"The other guy is bad" is not a winning campaign slogan. Keep it up and conservatism will be consined to the dustbin of history.

Viking
You are a pathetic racist pig

Obviously This Is True
We have no government that is capable to deal with the passions of its citizens unbridled by morality and religion. It is wholly inadequate for any other.

Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast views beyond the comprehension of the weak.

The happiness of society is the end of government. John Adams

The moral and religious base of America is weak. Therefore the second quote is now our lot. The definition of "facism" should be something of an alarm bell for all of us. Canada is just north of us and well down the road ahead of us.


To Greg in England
When I go to your listed web address this is the link I get, which does work:

http://stores.dennisprager.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc

Hope you have success!

Mr. Philo writes....
"Generally speaking, Nations of good will are not attacked by other nations. Sure, it happens. But it's far more common that just nations are not attacked, than are"

So When the US was attacked by Islamists, Georgia by the RUssians, when the arabs lob misslies at Jewish civilians, poland and the rest of Europe get devoured by Gemrnay, All of the Soviet satelitles who were taken over (remember Hungary?) , the attacked nations do not have good will? ANd this is a just a small smapling of world coflict in history. (Genghis Khan, anyone? Crusaders? the French in ALgiers last year? RomanEmpire? Greek conquests? Babylon? Assyria? Oh, if only I were ignorant, I oculd be bliss too)

Your comment betrays a crude and dangerously naive ignorance of the world. Even if it might be true and it certainly is that there are wars fought where niether side has good will, too many times in history (likely >75% of the time and I am being conservative cuz I have not done meticulous research to give exact numbers here), has one agressor trampled on someone else to be so complacent about this as if it is nothing to wory about is dangerously naive and foolish.

especially in the year 2009 where Islamists have in fact declared Jihad on the whole world.

And Iran has threatened what it has threathened.

If the average american is as foolish as you, the country is in big trouble.

But the good news is - like Jim Jones hypnotized kooks - you will al die happy, believing in the justness of your cause.

Look - russians lived with ommunism for 70 years and thoguth they were happy too. The Venezuelans love Chavez. Many Iraquis loved Hussein. Many Chinese loved Mao.

Ever heard of Lenin's usefull yutzes?

Since I am not a Jonesfreak like you and much of the US, I am glad I no longer live in the US cuz the future there does not look pretty from the point of view of us 'evil' dissenters who will go down unhappy as seeing the world they held dear destroyed.

Great Article
Dennis - another great article. BO is completely unqualified. Even Hillary noted that all he is is a good speech. BO is not my president until he proves his birth place AND explains where the 30%+ of foreign campaign funds originated from.
Yesterday was a day of mourning for me and my family.

A little picky perhaps but...
The bottom line is there was nothing great about the speech, it was simply good. There were no "ask not what your country can do for you" or "government is the problem" moments that will resonate throughout the generations. It was fine for what it was but an inspirational speech touches people who are not predisposed to hear what you have to say. The general response to this speech has been polite golf-clapping.

Knows only how to smear
Barack Obama whole compaign is based on the crying the "failed policies of the Bush Administration".
I do not see any vision or leadership. I just see a guy over his head and grabbing for people with experience to tell him what to do. I suggest he call Newt...someone who has experience rescuing a president.

I know better than to do this
but Robert/Ranger/fighter pilot, whatever you are:

56,000,000 did not vote for the Great O. We are nearly 48% of the nation and entitled to our 1/2 of it:

Truman left office with a 22% pop. rating and disappointment and regret from his wonderful Dem. Party. Now he's considered one of the best pres. ever. They want to add him to Mt. Rushmore. Shows what Dems. know.

FDR has occupied a place next to the angels for decades for *saving* us from the Grt. Dep. New ec. anaylyses shows FDR actually simply enlarged on ideas Hoover had started (and they hadn't worked for Hoover) and added years and years to unemployment and degradation that only was relieved by WW II.

Dems. are slow learners. 60 years of Ponzi schemes like Soc. Sec., Medicare/Medicard, debilitating programs like welfare and public assistance, concoctions like Freddie/Fannie/and the CRAs have given us $9 trillion in debt and a new depression that will probably bury the fabulous O--altho' no one will ever read it as the press will never print anything negatory about the magic black man in DC.




O is a big nothing
I hope he proves otherwise.

But his writing, such as we know it from his self-praising books, as he never published in the Harvard Law Review he 8edited,* is platitudinous whining and PC hash. So, no wonder his inauguration speech was pedestrian. He has nothing much but the *hope* and *change* he mouths emptily forever.

He hasn't led a Cub Scout troop.

is afraid to release his birth certificate and his college records (I noticed the media got a hold of *Joe the Plumbner"'s motor veh. records quick enough),

voted *present* over a hundred times in the IL leg. and represented his district there so well it is now full of uninhabitable *projects-the liberal *solutions* of the 60s,

spent millions a day in earmarks in the mere 143 days he decided to grace the Sen. with,

and when the Sec. of Treasury was pleading with Cong. for $850 billion to save the nation (the Fed. and Treasury had their own $trillion resources to drsaw on), the big O drifted into DC just long enough to vote and then returned to the necessity of getting his narcisstic self anointed--

he didn't hang around to debate any world crisis or interrupt his campaign.

We're in for bad times as the Dems. for 60 years concocted Freddie4/Fannie/the CRAs and the Ponzi schemes of Soc. Sec. and Medicare/Medicaid and running up a $9 trillion debt, to which the savior Obama plans to add trillions more.

We will all be lucky not to end up beggars trying to earn enough for our annual pilgrimmage to Mecca by the time it's 2012.

Oh,
..that was, t - i - n - G - le for all of you smart alecs. Tingle filled, I say, I say boy, that's TINGLE filled pants!

Prager says,
"The night Barack Obama won the election, he gave one of the most inspiring victory addresses I ever heard."

Sorry, couldn't read through the puke on the screen after that opening salvo so I had to give my one star on faith that what followed was more of the same.

Hey, Mr. Prager, (off the top of your head now) can you name one "inspiring" part of The Ones' victory speech ? Yeah, neither can anyone else. But they sure feel good. By the by, how DO you and Mr. Matthews manage to share the same tingle filled trousers ?

Prager = Crybaby
How incredibly trite and predictable for Prager to deem Obama's speech as joyless and uninspired.

Talk about uninspired - what on earth do you bring to the table, Dennis - besides your incessant whining?

Prager and his ilk here at TH are nothing short of crying wittle sore losers and yesterdays news.

Dennis is right, as usual
" We sleep safely in our beds only because strong men stand ready in the night to wreck violence on those who would harm us."

----George Orwell

Inspiration got Obama elected President
It was only the inauguration. The beginning of a Presidency. It was a time for the people to celebrate the election of a new President. President Obama's speech wasn't meant to get him elected President all over again. If President Obama had published his speech days ahead in the papers for all to read, the people still would have come to the inauguration and the parade. Everyone seems to have their own concept on how President Obama should have presented his speech. It seems many haven't gotten over telling President Obama since his campaign days on how to act and how to talk. President Obama's speech was just an introductory into his Presidency, just for the inauguration. The election of President Obama is the inspiration the people already have.

Powerful vs Inept
"cheered few times. There was almost nothing to cheer. The address was largely a downer."

Here, Prager must be talking about some previous preznit. I was in DC at the Mall, and the cheers were often and almost deafening. What President Obama would not do is claim "our economy is strong" like some lesser would claim. If you want to hear some meaningless fluff designed to fool the people into thinking everything is OK, look to Bush's "speeches".

What an incredible crowd! Polite (even to Bush... there were very few almost inaudible boos for Bush when he appeared). Even when trapped for two hours waiting in line for the subway the hot, tired crowd was well behaved.

TH readers
did not like Obama's speech. Who would have thought.

And the whining, wailing, gnashing of teeth begins.

jimmy carter wrote his speech!
it was a old speech from jimmy carter with a new age twist!barry says, and to the muslim world we seek a new way forward,based on mutual interest and mutual respect!folks its going to be a rough ride!

Joyless?

My employer set up several T.V.'s for viewing the inauguration... Most were wired to the internet via laptops, and set to CNN Live. Several hundred employees shouldered up to watch.

But... Right at the beginning of Obama's speech - all of the internet connections jammed and the TV's went dead.

What a Great Speech :-)

Website question
I am in the UK, and I can't access the following website:

http://www.dennisprager.com

Does anyone know what is going on here?
Are you able to access this site from the US?

Has someone hacked into the DNS servers?

Curious
Curious that Prager didn;t like these quotes much:

Curious that Prager doesn't like these parts:

"The success of our economy has always depended not just on the size of our gross domestic product, but on the reach of our prosperity; on the ability to extend opportunity to every willing heart -- not out of charity, but because it is the surest route to our common good."



"Recall that earlier generations faced down fascism and communism not just with missiles and tanks, but with the sturdy alliances and enduring convictions."


"And for those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents, we say to you now that, "Our spirit is stronger and cannot be broken. You cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you."



"To the Muslim world, we seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect.

To those leaders around the globe who seek to sow conflict or blame their society's ills on the West, know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what you destroy.

To those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you are on the wrong side of history, but that we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist."

Anyone see anything not to like about these parts of the speech?

Phylo out.

Helping Prager understand
Obama: “…to all other peoples and governments…know that America is…ready to lead once more.”

Prager: "You have to wonder how the Democratic Left reacts to a call to America to lead -- isn’t that American exceptionalism?"

First, note that this is supposed to be one of the good things Obama said. Yet it is greeted by Prager with snark and sarcasm.

Second, the left believes America's greatness shines brightest when we lead by example. The right seems to believe that American Exceptionalism means that we are the only good and decent people in the world, so we must dominate every corner of the earth militarily.

Do you understand that, Prager?

Inaugural Address Quote
“Our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint.” Barack H. Obama (2009)

It sure doesn't ring like:

"Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure the survival and the success of liberty." John F. Kennedy (1961)

In fact it seems to say quite the opposite.

Let me help you out Prager
Prager quotes Obama “On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn out dogmas, that for far too long have strangled our politics.”

Then he writes: "No matter how many times I read this line, I had little idea what Mr. Obama was referring to."

Let me help you out here Prager.

He's saying that things like gotcha politics, and trying to find the tiniest of faults in the other side, and the "You did it! No, you did it!" back and forth, and the dogmas about left and right aren't going to be a part of his politics. He knows that we, as Americans, agree on many more issues than we disagree on, and he is going to focus on the areas where we agree instead.

No wonder this is hard for you to understand. Who was it that said "It's difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on him not understanding it."?

That quote applies perfectly to Prager. It's his job to focus on what divides us as a nation. That's what drives ratings. If he wasn't trying to stir up anger and fear of the left, he would be out of a job.

Phylo out.

Line By Line
Mr. Prager has just given a good, detailed, line-by-line analyis of a few points from the Obama speech. He was fair enough to note some of its strengths, and fair enough to point out some of its weaknesses.

Bare assertions and insults do not take away any of the truth of his analysis.

Prager's pathological partisanship
All day today, Prager ranted on and on about the part of the speech where Obama talked about security. He says Obama was wrong to say that our security emanates from the justness of our cause.

Prager is being intentionally obtuse if he believes that Obama believes that a strong army isn't a necessary component of national security. Just before that comment he said, it's not JUST missiles and tanks that helped us defeat Communism and Fascism. And he has actually proposed increasing the size of the military.

Obviously Obama is saying that the justness of our cause HELPs to keep the nation secure. Generally speaking, Nations of good will are not attacked by other nations. Sure, it happens. But it's far more common that just nations are not attacked, than are.

Prager writes: "Powerful armies give decent peoples their security, not the justness of their cause. If President Obama believes that in this world good people are secure thanks to the goodness of their cause, America is in trouble."

If Obama thinks that? What evidence is there that that is what he thinks? This is all made up in Prager's scrambled brain.

I guess if I were as hyper-partisan as Prager, I could be intentionally obtuse and say something like: Prager is simply wrong. We have the strongest military in the world, by far, but that didn't keep us from being attacked on 9/11. Israel has a much stronger army than anyone in the region and is backed by us. Are they secure?

But that's the difference between me and Prager. I find such unfair attacks to be morally repulsive, and he doesn't.

Phylo out.

chloe
The pres. job is not to fix a broken nation. His job is to lead. Please read the constitution, and check out the pres. powers. I do not think the nation is broken. This resesion is not even the worst we have ever been in. I do beleave that Pres. Obama has to much expectation put on him, he will be like other pres., and make mistakes. He is only humane after all, he can't make the sun shine, or heal the earth. I do hope he keeps us safe from islamo terrorests, as that is his primairy job.
Kirk

I suspect...
... that Barry is trying to dampen expectations, and knew that, if he just showed up and nodded, the media would still cream itself over his brilliance. Thus, he just gave a quick rehash of his stump speech, and left it at that.


Denin Right on Much, Wrong on Some - pt2
On prospering the prosperous and genuine safety:
Unfortunately your responses to
Are these two statements not on their face quite simply and unarguably true?
1) “(The market’s) power to generate wealth and expand freedom is unmatched, but this crisis has reminded us that … a nation cannot prosper long when it favors only the prosperous.” And 2) “We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals.” You seem to agree with these by not disagreeing with them, but pointing out liberal failures. While what you mention indeed may be liberal failures, it doesn't make the statements, for the left or right, untrue.

On Influence:
You said this statement was either untrue or meaningless: “We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end of this Earth …” Of course the universal absolute "every end of this Earth" is sheer rhetoric. We haven't exactly been influenced by the language of Papua New Guinea or the culture of village Manchuria. But the point is quite simply that we are that proverbial melting pot – who could deny it? Who would want to? Yes, you are profoundly right when you point out the Judeo-Christian groundwork of our nation. In the context it's that we are a people famously absorbent, welcoming to most, and will take any word, idea, or style that works for us and shape it into our own. So if the statement is true in this sense, I think you'd agree. But meaningful in the sense of actually adding anything to what we already know, what is already a lazy Hallmark kind of platitude – now that you'd right on!

Keep up the great work Dennis of being thoughtful and articulate.

Dennis Right on Much, Wrong on Some
Dennis, your clarity is certainly in full shine in your keen observation about mere just cause versus actual security in a dangerous world. You are quite right: goodness, sadly, has never preserved the good, only the strength to resist the forces that will to destroy it.

On Science:
Obama's statement about returning science to its rightful place was an implicit but undisguised refutation of the anti-science positions of the Bush-Cheney administration. He may be wrong to take the fairly compelling scientific conclusions on global warming seriously, but he can't be accused of not relying on science to do so. Global warming, like many dissenting scientists certainly support, may be hyper-fatalized, and sound reasoning may suggest more moderation in approach. But it can't be argued that it is not a solid view based on consensus science. Nevertheless your truth-alert is well placed. History is bulging with reasonable science gone completely off-track until time and effort corrects it.

On the question of Big Government:
You are right that asking if government is just too big is always, and always will be, fundamental. It's in the nature of government to grow to fit the size of greed, self-interest, knuckleheaded policy, and the political cool factor of the day. But in order to answer the question of Too Big we first ask the question: does it work? Is it truly effective or just boondoggle? And even if an element does work, within its little world, where does it lead? Essential question, yes, but Obama was in fact rightly putting the first question first.


Here's what I wanted to hear
I wish Obama had said,
"I have 2 predominant challenges that will be my highest priorities. To keep this nation as safe as it has been since 9/11, and to get our economic engine running as powerfully as we know it can run, for the benefit of all Americans."

Who could argue with that?

Inaugural Address
I did not watch nor did I listen to the Presidents address. I respect the office but I do not feel this is the right man for this country. Unfortunately million's feel he can do no wrong and would walk off the cliff like the pied-pipers lambs if he wanted them too. I heard excerpts of the speech and as I did I like many others was so disappointed. As Dennis has pointed out I expected this President whom has been a very good orator to present something that would literally set us all back in awe. He didn't and in many ways he appeared to me that he was one of those people who got something they wanted and now he is so frightened by what he has before him now. I feel that many of this nation's people are in grave danger of believing anything he and his administration say and propose and not being willing to look deeper into what he says and the effects of what it will do to us in the end. He gave me nothing of substance in his speech! He brought disappointment. And the final benediction was so inappropriate, White has gotten it right; if we haven't he would not be taking the oath of President of the United States. Shame on him.

Hey Bleeding Heart Liberal....
I see you made sure to pluck your point making quote without context. For those who like context, here's the whole paragraph:

"As a speech, it was the best inaugural address since Ronald Reagan. This is not to judge the substantive merits or demerits of what he said. Anyone who judges any political speech by its substance-- much less by what actions follow-- is likely to be disappointed."

And I see you forgot the parts where Dennis praised the speech.

I knew a self proclaimed bleeding heart liberal couldn't be 100% truthful nor thorough because doing so would disprove the original point.

But readers are to consider you thoughtful and inciteful.....PUH-LEEZE!

Obama's Speech
If any other presidential candidate had given this speech, the media would have howled at its insipidity. "Hope instead of fear." I hope what I fear will fail to occur under Obama's administration.

grab th' plunder!!
arrrggghh
'oo needs inspiration when there's lotsa plunder and coin t' grab!
Ever' man fer 'imself - "Barry th' Plunderer's" first mate Rahm Emanuel says why waste a good crisis!
Shiver me timbers!
Dis 'ere's a pirate's dream!
Jus' reach in t' th' treasury o' th' realm 'n take what e'er ye kin carry!!
I luv th' good ship "Democrat"!!
aarrrggghhh

What is a Facist?
Hey Vlad,

Define facism as you understand it.


Merriam Webster calls it this:

...a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.

Exalting your nation is not a bad thing.

When has Dennis EVER advocated for exalting any race, a centralized government, a dictator, economic regimentation, social regimentation, and/or wanted any opposition suppressed?

I didn't
watch or listen to any of the coronation activities. And given the excerpts I've read:
Good Grief! And Dennis is correct in his analysis of the last..it was a Kumbayah ending, or to put it another way, Obama's Rodney King moment.."Cain't we all just git along???" Yeah, I'm sure Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Q, Iran and other assorted fanatics are shaking in their boots.
I took note of that "omission," here he is sworn in and CIC of our current military fighting and dying for US and he completely
ignores them and their sacrifice. That's telling, it's good he remembered our past heros and included VietNam however we have young men and women putting their lives on the line and he
didn't even acknowledge them.

Hey, Vlad....
...what grade are you in, "bud"? YOUR arrogance is almost in the same league as Obama's and that's saying something!

Look what others say
As a speech, it was the best inaugural address since Ronald Reagan.
Thomas Sowell TH 1-21-09

I think Town Hall "journalists" need to get the daily spin correct.

nitpicking
Dennis is really nitpicking in his criticism.
For a much fairer, more balanced view, read
WSJ's editorial "A 'Responsibility' Era":

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123249757558600395.html?mod =djemEditorialPage

or even Noonan's "Meet President Obama":

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123248758908299555.html?mod =djemEditorialPage

First cogent analysis
of the President's speech that I've read today. Thank you, Mr. Pager, for not drinking the liberal kool-aid...yet.

yeah
I was half listening half reading some comics during the speech.


pretty back and forth, not much substance

No Thank You to President Bush?
Dennis: Couldn't Obama at least have thanked President Bush in his inauguration speech before he ripped him apart? What a horrible excuse for an inaugural address - Obama was so proud he wrote it himself, too.

Also, When Obama mentioned the brave heroes who fought our wars, there was no mention of Iraq or Afghanistan, let alone any mention of victory. What a depressing speech - it gave me NO hope, just despair....the racist benediction was uncalled for, too.

SHORT OF SUBSTANCE
Obama was fully aware his speech would be disected so he took no direction on anything. Every president except Grover Cleveland was inexperienced at the office of the presidency during his speech replacing another administration. President Obama have shown time after time he is a great orator, noone denies this fact, ask Rush Limbaugh. President Obama chose to write his own speech I pray he will leave the speech writing to the professionals and he govern better than he can write. It will be a long four years if that is his best.

REASON FOR OBAMA'S LACK OF SPIRIT
Excerpt from Barack Obama, Lincoln and the Image of Greatness

You will notice that Obama's poor speech lacked passion, vigor and energy, that it was uneven and unsteady, rising and falling, ebbing and flowing with no stirring moment or grace. Indeed, the man who impatiently and enthusiastically ran for the presidency, who raised hopes to the sky promising transformational change, has lost much of his fire now that he's there; now that he sees the enormity of the task, the cross he must bear he fears it will crush him and that he will fail. The new President who spoke today isn't rising to the occassion as his ignorance and inexperience are now overtaking him........

Click Apollospeaks to read the rest of the piece

REASON FOR OBAMA'S LACK OF SPIRIT
Excerpt from Barack Obama, Lincoln and the Image of Greatness

You will notice that Obama's poor speech lacked passion, vigor and energy, that it was uneven and unsteady, rising and falling, ebbing and flowing with no stirring moment or grace. Indeed, the man who impatiently and enthusiastically ran for the presidency, who raised hopes to the sky promising transformational change, has lost much of his fire now that he's there; now that he sees the enormity of the task, the cross he must bear he fears it will crush him and that he will fail. The new President who spoke today isn't rising to the occassion as his ignorance and inexperience are now overtaking him.

Click Apollospeaks to read the rest of the piece

AMEN
Dennis, i doubt anyone could have said it any better. Thank you.

This is The Leader of The Free World?
A Leader sets goals, chooses the methods to be employed to reach these goals and quite frankly LEADS!

This was more of the same Flowery Platitudes of Hope and Change that he has been spouting all along.

TODAY The Unraveling BEGINS! LMAO! HIC!

REMEMBER to refer to IHOP Hopey McChange by his proper title or acronym:

Barack Hussein Obama

Supreme
Commanding
Ruler
Of
The
United States
Military
Headquartered
Exclusively
At
DC
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.