Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, April 08, 2008
Dennis Prager :: Townhall.com Columnist
It's a Bad World
by Dennis Prager
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you feel the leaked information from a global warming alarmist organization is meaningful?



In Sri Lanka, the Associated Press reported, "A suicide bomber killed 14 people at an opening ceremony for a Sri Lankan marathon. More than 90 others were wounded."

In Israel, Haaretz reported that an Arab woman has been shot in an attempted honor killing. She was to be the ninth female member of her family to be killed. "Eight women from this family were murdered in the past six years, all in connection with 'family honor.'" Male relatives had murdered them all because they brought shame on their Muslim family by not marrying the men picked for them or otherwise disobeying family religious dictates.

These are only the news items of the last seven days. I purposely chose a period without dramatic headlines. And, of course, no news came out of North Korea, which continues to be the world's largest concentration camp. Cubans continue to have no freedom. Iranians continue to be whipped and killed for sexual improprieties. Saudi women continue to be forced to be invisible in public and live a demeaned status.

The world is filled with evil. Always has been. The biggest difference today is that, thanks to communications, we are far more aware of much of it.

I am convinced that human evil is so great that most people choose either to ignore it or to focus their concerns elsewhere -- like those who believe that human-created carbon dioxide emission, not human evil, poses the greatest threat to mankind. No one will ever get killed for fighting global warming. Fighting evil, on the other hand, is quite dangerous.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Dennis Prager is a radio show host, contributing columnist for Townhall.com, and author of 4 books including Happiness Is a Serious Problem: A Human Nature Repair Manual.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Dennis Prager's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
It's A Bad World--indeed!
The news in this article is very sad. Dennis got it right when he said, "Evil is the greatest threat to mankind". Fighting evil is quite dangerous, but we can't just allow evil to flourish. It is not enough to only feel a sadness in our hearts. We should act and speak out whenever possible.

A question
How do the Israeli authorities allow a family to commit serial murder? No arrests after the first, the second.....?

I thought they had a civilized country of reasonable laws...no?

Thank Goodness for the USA
Just think where this world would be without the United States. Without the USA, these despots and tyrants would not even hesitate to wreak even more havoc.

North Korea is kept in check because they know what we can do to them. Cuba too. Libya found out the hard way that we have a limit to our tolerance.

Israel is in this mix too. Iran knows what will happen if they launch some rogue missile that hits Israel. Only the good guys can keep these people from spreading their 'goodwill' throughout the world.

Are you gathering up the tears...
Thank you for this perspective on what we face in the world today.

The Banality of Evil

I think the extreme forms of evil shown on TV numbs us to the banality of evil in our own backyards. Evil is very good at assuming the language and ideas of good people in order to mask their malfeasance.

Evil can have the kindest face and the most sensible words until you shove them off center then the maggotous foundation they stand on is revealed.

Hmmmm....
I tell you, this is one real reason why we decided to cancel our satellite service, and are giving up most television watching. There is evil out there, and we need to be aware of, yes, but we don't need to be bombarded every day with an endless rampage of all the sick goings-on out there.

There is much good in the world as well, but how often do you see that displayed in the media. No, the media likes to shove all the c**p down your throat in an attempt to show you how awful things are.

Yes, there is evil in the world, but if you rely on the media, you would think that 90% of all the people around you are evil and murderous and sick. The fact is, the good vastly outnumbers all of the evil acts you see in the media, whether by print or by television or by radio.

As another poster has suggested, this numbs us to the presence of evil. It also gives us a jaded view of the world.

When I told the representative of DSL that I wished to discontinue the service and she asked me why, I was straightforward and blunt about the reasons. I let her know when the various channels can clean up their act and quit shoving all of their crap at us, then I will consider watching television again.

This is not a call for censorship, rather a statement that no longer am I going to let the networks try to indoctrinate me in their sick, twisted world view.


And the liberals
keep telling everyone that the USA is the real evil in the world.

Curtal Friar is right. There is more good than evil, but if the media can convince us all that our nation is total evil, then we will stop trying to do good and be good. We will give up and fall into despondency.

Do It Anyway

Mother Theresa wrote a beautiful poem call "Do It Anyway"

People are often unreasonable, illogical and self-centered; Forgive them anyway.

If you are kind, People may accuse you of selfish, ulterior motives; Be kind anyway.

It goes on and all good people should read it when discouraged.

the human body
It is my theory that we evolved with the capacity to deal with the level of evil that occurs in a village. We were not designed to cope with the evil of the entire world on a daily basis. Therefore it is more important than ever to observe the sabbath and turn off the news one day a week at a minimum.

I thank God
that I'm an American. This country IS the greatest in the world. If you don't agree, go live somewhere else and you'll see. I did for a time, and I couldn't wait to come back to the USA. There are lots of evils in the world AND in our own country, but I wouldn't live anywhere else because the founders knew what they were doing when they formed our democratic Republic. We as Americans are TRULY BLESSED. The ABSOLUTE only country I would consider moving to (after some horrible attack on our country, worse than 9/11)would be Australia. God blesses the USA always, and our wonderful free enterprise system, where the ordinary person can become very wealthy. It's happened many times.

Mom in Wisconsin

Curtal
Yes, there is more "good" in the world than "evil" or it would be absolute chaos. However, ignoring it will not make it go away. Those that ignore evil eventually become a victim of it.

Prager's selective outrage
Dennis Prager (aka Mr. Happy) is lamenting the evil done by all of those people out there, but he has no outrage whatsoever for an administration that cherry picked WMD intel and totally fabricated stories about ties between Iraq and al Queda in order to fool the American people into believing that we needed to invade and occupy Iraq; an adventure that has resulted in hundreds of thousands of casualties, millions of refugees, and the destruction of the infrastructure of an entire country.

It's easy to point to all of the evil that other people are doing. It's quite a bit more difficult to look at the evil we ourselves are doing. Prager seems to be only capable of the former.

People like Prager, who only see the evil that others are doing, are the people who cause all of the problems in the world. As we speak, Prager's counterpart in the Islamic world is preaching about all of the evil that America does, without recognizing the evil being perpetrated by his own people. If he and Prager get their way, we're all in big trouble.

Phylo out.

Thank You Police & Military
The USA will not survive unless evil continues to be fought at home and abroad. Police fight evil at home and our military fights evil abroad. I thank God every day those warriors (home and abroad) willing to DIE to protect my family and our way of life.

Lisa
I have read that wonderful poem. Its prominently on the wall in the principal's office at the school where i work part time. Brighten the corner where you are was always my favorite song at Sunday school. Its what keeps chaos from enveloping us.

Tim
"...Police fight evil at home and our military fights evil abroad. I thank God every day those warriors (home and abroad) willing to DIE to protect my family and our way of life. "

Yet all you conservative sheeple refuse to care or maintain them and their families. Classic conservatism

The Evil Men Do
Edmund Burke is supposed to have coined the phrase, "Evil prevails when good men do nothing," but many Americans do not even recognize evil. For example, the liberals who praise Cuba are blind to the Cuban dissidents who are killed, tortured or imprisoned or hounded out of their country.

Another example, according to the WSJ, the U. of Massachusetts and Michigan State U. awarded honorary degrees to Robert Mugabe, dictator of Zimbabwe (formerly Rhodesia), after he massacred thousands of members of another tribe.

It seems many leaders, formal and informal, of civilized countries do not want to look evil in the face because then they would be forced to do something about it.

The dirty little secret: Evil is tolerated because the cost of overcoming it is perceived as too high a price to pay.




Appollo...
...I read your ramblings on "Appollo Speaks".You need some serious help,man.

Dennis
You skip the part where the US actually joined many of the evil doers in the world - torture is a crime against humanity and the US used and uses torture. We were the good guys; now our reputation is very badly damaged. Thank goodness we can begin to repair the damsge in 09

good thesis, poor execution
The overall thesis here seems right. It is not that the world has become more evil of late, but rather that we hear about evil that would never have made the news until recently.

But then Prager's picking and choosing evil according to what fits with his politics is itself a warping effect. Treating children as sexual offenders is idiotic, but it hardly fits as evil. I suppose commenters noticed this since they responded as if Prager was saying evil was everywhere but in the US, so presumably they were ignoring his example from the US.

But in the last week it has been reported that Palestinians are dying because checkpoints prevent them from getting to hospitals due to checkpoints. Somehow Palestinians dying due to Israeli politics didn't make the list. Maybe Prager just ran out of space.

And what is with this idiotic idea that since there are other problems which we are not in a position to deal with, we shouldn't address the threat of global warming. There might be legitimate arguments against dealing with global warming, but the idea that pointing to human evil in the world means we shouldn't deal with issues from nature is silly. To the degree that preventable effects from global warming could case massive suffering, it is more than silly, it is evil.

Typical (pedi) Phylo
Straight from the Hate America First lips of people like Phylo, he/she can never accept that we English speaking nations and the US in particular, albeit imperfect, are far superior in almost every way to every nation in the world. We can do better and would do much better if we could rid ourselves of the plague and shackles of liberalism and its ever striving insanity. While liberals seek utopia they cause the failure of all they intend to help with "unintended consequences" or better said, "ignored understood future outcomes" as understood by all but the neo-libs that is.

These are the last days, good will be called evil and evil good, so we fight the good fight, raise our children well and insulate them from libs with both truth and education. Thank you Mr. Prager!!!


Savage Alum
"...the US in particular, albeit imperfect, are far superior in almost every way to every nation in the world."

That was true

" We can do better and would do much better if we could rid ourselves of the plague and shackles of liberalism and its ever striving insanity."

Liberalism is why we were superior

" While liberals seek utopia they cause the failure of all they intend to help with "unintended consequences" or better said, "ignored understood future outcomes" as understood by all but the neo-libs that is."

It isn't the libs who engineered the TOTAL failure of the Bush Regime and conservatism to rule

"These are the last days, good will be called evil and evil good, so we fight the good fight, raise our children well and insulate them from libs with both truth and education. Thank you Mr. Prager!!! "

One can hope so I really do think your form of virulent conservatism is now dead

dream on hal
I see that Moveon assigned you to troll Prager's column today. By posting here you have provided us with yet another example of the evil in the world today.

Lon
Glow bull warming is the new bastion of communism. There is no evidence that the warming (and that is even now in doubt by many scientists) is even man-made. Mt. Pinatubo shot more cfcs into the air in one day than in the history of anything man-made and it had no net effect on the planet after the solids fell to earth. The neo-libs wanted a new rallying point with the collapse of communism, and since every one recognizes and wants clean air and water and a safe environment in which to live, how better than to say the sky is failing to get people to jump on a socialist agenda and cause than to exploit fears of the uneducated and uninformed.? Biofuels have already caused economic destruction and food shortages around the world and they also pollute at an equal rate to petro based fuels we are now discovering. Just like Clinton's MTSB forced on Coloradans then silently dropped and forgotten when it poisoned ground water there.

Glow Bull warming is political science and the man made element of it is junk science. We need proof and actual/factual research with supporting empirical data more than computer modeling and algore to make any type of rational move on the environment. Knowing libs, their good intentions will result in a worse outcome, which of course they will blame on conservatives, then propose more draconian solutions until they unintentionally destroy the planet. But hey, they cared and that's all that matters...right?

Honoring Mugabe
"Another example, according to the WSJ, the U. of Massachusetts and Michigan State U. awarded honorary degrees to Robert Mugabe, dictator of Zimbabwe (formerly Rhodesia), after he massacred thousands of members of another tribe."
----

This would be OK so long as they honored him with the Third Degree.

Is there a "good" fight?
What does it mean to “fight evil”?

It seems odd to consider “good fighting evil”. I mean, do “good” people fight? If you stand up to an evil tyrant who rapes and murders the people of a country while calling himself their leader and innocent people die or are wounded in the process----that makes you evil, right? Or does it? I know that, personally, it creates doubts. It seems unfathomable that violence would ever be necessary. I think evil likes it that way; getting us to feel terrible about doing the right thing.

Got confusion, derision, chaos? Evil’s job is done. The killing will come later.

Earth's Temperature Is Evil?
Lon's evil (Global Warming) is one "evil" we can just ignore. In fact, if good and sensible men do nothing about the fantasy of AGW we will have more resources to actually help starving Africans.

AGW is being exposed on a daily basis as a gigantic scam.

Environmental wackos belong to that ancient tribe of fanatics who grab hold of one idea and pursue it to idiotic extremes, no matter how much damage they do to fellow rational human beings.

Lon
Congratulations on a civil and thoughtful post. we don't get them very often from the left.

Jerseyvet
The whole AGW flap isn't so bad. Logically, as time shows the fallacy, the sensible people should be able to beat the unthinking lemmings over the head for years with it. Sadly, they will just go on to the next red herring, meanwhile ignoring real problems. Perhaps the most frustrating thing about so many on the left is their short memory and unwillingness to learn. A left wing idea is shown over and over to be false. Does it matter? No, they cling to it to the point of insanity. The very definition of crazy.

Prager's "selective" -? outrage
". . . an administration that cherry picked WMD intel and totally fabricated stories about ties between Iraq and al Queda in order to fool the American people into believing that we needed to invade and occupy Iraq."

Arrg! - The world of the internet . . . Apparently this is now the "Truth" exposing the confusion that was unmasking the fraud --- or something like that?

The truth is virtually every Western Intelligence Service, believed the same things regarding Saddam's development of WMD -- dating back at least to the first President Bush. That would include the Clinton Administration, and likely Jimmy Carter's as well.
Also the truth has been found out that Saddam was sheltering high level al Qaeda operatives - giving them a place to hide out or disappear to for a while, if they needed it.

If one is the U.S. President, the question is, to what degree should you risk the future of the U.S. by betting the Intelligence assessment of everyone you should be listening to, other than your political enemies who don’t like it that you were duly Elected instead of their preferred candidate, are wrong?


Hal D
Hal,
Please keep your inane posts short like you did at the beginning. It takes less time to scroll past it and read something important.

Savage Alum
When Bush took over, this country was in great shape. Conservatives have been running the show for the last eight years and these particular conservatives have demonstrated that they are grossly incompetent at running government. Your guys have made this country less safe and less prosperous. And you still think liberals are the problem?

What will it take to open your eyes? When are you going to realize that our problems can't be boiled down to a left/right dichotomy? The issue isn't left or right, it's good ideas vs bad ideas. And both the left and the right have their fair share of both. The task at hand is to figure out which is which.

Is government regulation a bad thing? It depends. Sometimes it's overly burdensome and other times the lack of it can create situations like our current mortgage crisis.

Is the free market a good thing? Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Should we let other nations grow our food for us and leave our selves vulnerable to a sudden shut off of our food supply?

Is collectivism a bad thing? Sometimes yes, sometimes no. The police and fire departments are collectivist institutions. Schools and roads are collectivist institutions. The military is a collectivist institution. Church's are collectivist institutions.

Look a little deeper dude. Don't think: left/right. Think: works/doesn't work.


Phylo out

Lon
I hadn't heard about Palestinians dying because they can't get to hospitals quick enough due to Israeli checkpoints, but assuming it's true, I still have no sympathy whatever for the Palestinians. This is a consequence they've incurred upon themselves because of their years of slipping suicide bombers into Israel. If they want to wage war upon Israel - well, this is part of the price they pay for that war. To equate this as being on a par of evil as the examples Prager cites is totally ridiculous. The Palestinians are not innocents here; they're active combatants who are feeling part of the results of their campaign of combat. If you want to be a bleeding heart for the Palestinians, that's your prerogative, but don't try pinning it on me.

Hal, Lon, Phylo
Do you ever tire of your endless UPPERCASE exaggeration? For example:
"It isn't the libs who engineered the TOTAL failure of the Bush Regime and conservatism to rule."

Total failure? Okay, lets see . . .

1. Tax cuts that lifted the entire economy and helped 99% of all Americans.
2. No terrorist attacks since 9/11 despite the libs untiring efforts to weaken national defense and and foreign intel programs.
3. Removing a bloodthirsty tyrant from power and giving millions of Iraqis hope for the first time in generations (which hope, with the libs constant encouragement, al-qaeda and other thugs have been trying to squelch)
4. Huge increases in aid given to Africa (don't libs love it when government spends money on the less fortunate?)
5. Appointing 2 justices to the Supreme Court who have actually read the constitution and who understand that they are supposed to interpret existing law, not make up new laws like some pseudo legislature.

These are just a few off of the top of my head. I swear, if the sun were shining outside, it was 80 degrees at your beachfront cottage, and you just won the powerball lottery, you would find something to complain about. If your self-centered lives are so terrible, then why don't you crawl into some hole somewhere and assume the fetal position. But leave the rest of us alone as we try to make things just a bit better for the nation and the world.

Would Mr Prager..
..have considered the actions of Pinochet and Batista evil or are atrocities in pursuit of a free market economy permissable??

Savage99
Savage99 writes:

"A left wing idea is shown over and over to be false. Does it matter? No, they cling to it to the point of insanity. The very definition of crazy."

The repeated failings of the left to come to their senses can be understood in the context of sin, i.e., good versus evil. We understand that sinners (and that would be all of us) tend to slide back into our sinful proclivities, our weaknesses. The leftist thinking is indeed sinful, it appeals to the lazy, the dishonest, and the predatory. It appeals to those who do not want to work, those who would rather accept from others what they have not earned for themselves, and those who have no scruples about taking from those who have accepted the responsibility to provide for themselves and their own. These are clearly sinful pursuits and once embraced are for many impossible to leave. Conservatives need to create a twelve step program for the commies. It would be Christian.

time bomb
time bomb wrote: "Also the truth has been found out that Saddam was sheltering high level al Qaeda operatives - giving them a place to hide out or disappear to for a while, if they needed it."

Did you miss the recent news that the Pentagon came out with a report stating that there was no evidence found in Saddam's papers indicating operational ties to al Queda? It wouldn't surprise me. If you only get your news from right wing outlets, you wouldn't have seen it. Go ahead and google it. You'll soon see that I'm right.

This is also what the CIA said before the war. It's also what the 9/11 Commission report said.

So, we have the Bush administration saying their were ties. Versus the CIA, the Pentagon and the bi-partisan 9/11 Commission saying "no there weren't".

And you're going with the administration?

And as far as WMD goes, the evidence for WMD's was non-existent. They never had any actual proof. And most of the intel pointed away from a conclusion that Saddam had WMD, not towards it. They cherry picked it to suit their agenda. That's a fact. The aluminum tubes story and the Niger story had more hole in them than a sponge. Yet the administration sold them to us as absolute certainties.

This BS that other countries thought there were WMD is irrelevant. They were basing their opinions on supposition and on what our administration told them. They believed it because they trusted us. Their opinions were not based on facts or hard evidence.

get informed time bomb

Phylo out.


Fighting Evil
The biggest problem I have with fighting evil is that it seems that the evil are in power. They want to take away our guns so we cannot fight evil by defending ourselves. England and Australia, for instance, have banned guns and prosecute people for defending themselves against attack. In fact, they have laws that state that self defense is not a valid reason for harming someone else. England has fined a woman for putting barded wire across her windows because 'some burglar might be harmed by it.' And now our own leaders want to do the same for us by banning our own guns.

Evil simply wants to make things easier for itself at the expense of the victims. Unfortunatly, too many people tend to believe the evil people and vote them into office.

Hal Donahue
It isn't the conservatives who don't want to care for and maintain the police and soldiers. Check to see what the liberals are doing to them. Check to see what happened to the military during Clinton's 'reign'.

THradio
1. Tax cuts that lifted the entire economy and helped 99% of all Americans.

The economy has been lifted? This is the worst economy I've seen in my entire life. Bush's economic policies have been a disaster. 81% of Americans think the country is on the wrong track. Do you live in a Potempkin Village?

2. No terrorist attacks since 9/11 despite the libs untiring efforts to weaken national defense and and foreign intel programs.

9/11 happened on George Bush's watch, not on the watch of a liberal.
And the conservatives have shredded the Constitution by allowing the government to spy on it's own citizens and by disregarding laws passed by congress.

3. Removing a bloodthirsty tyrant from power and giving millions of Iraqis hope for the first time in generations (which hope, with the libs constant encouragement, al-qaeda and other thugs have been trying to squelch)

Why don't you go over there yourself and talk to the iraqis and let them tell you how grateful they are to America you fool.

4. Huge increases in aid given to Africa (don't libs love it when government spends money on the less fortunate?)

The one decent thing the administration has done, and it's a fundamentally liberal policy.

5. Appointing 2 justices to the Supreme Court who have actually read the constitution and who understand that they are supposed to interpret existing law, not make up new laws like some pseudo legislature.

Do you know that Antonin Scalia doesn't call himself a strict constructionist? Read Obama's book The Audacity of Hope, if you want a good explanation for why that phrase makes no sense.

Phylo out.

Phylo
If your so disgusted with this country and the way that this administration runs it, feel free to take your sorry pathetic hypocritical racist sorry arse somewhere else. We need less of you racists and hypocrits around here anyway! Have a good day lame duck.

Rob
That's right Rob, just stick with the people who agree with you. Never consider the alternative. Spoken like a true Bush Republican.

SSGT
If John McCain gets elected, you just might get your wish. Eight more years of this administration's policies would doom this country.


Phylo
You appear to be showing some tnedency toward logic and not the typical emotion-only motivation of most libs.

I will therefore address a point about Bush. He is certainly NOT a conservative and where he has failed is when he tries to pander to the left which is all too often the case amongst spinless RINOs in the Republicrat party as it now appears wont to become.

In time, when the ill-chosen left leaning policies of both parties are seen for their vacancy of logic and practicality, then maybe we can find the hybrid benefits you mention although I reject your premise on a few.

By the way on Iraqis Phylo
Since Saddam killed roughly 1 million of his people per year for each year of his reign, although we have perhaps killed "100,000 per year" (a highly inflated number in my view that is not proven, rather alledged by the press (MSM) and not challenged), we have saved millions of their citizens in effect...don't ya think?

Tibet
"In Tibet, according to an Associated Press report, "police opened fire on hundreds of Buddhist monks and lay people who had marched on local government offices to demand the release of two monks detained for possessing photographs of the Dalai Lama, Tibet's exiled Buddhist leader." At least eight died."

But didn't you say last week Dennis, Tibet wasn't covered, so my question is how do you know this? I mean since Tibet isn't covered. Oh I must have been dreaming too when I saw all the reports on the Olympic torch protests as well.

Savage Alum
Phylo is not interested in any good things going on in Iraq. I fear you just wasted muscle strength posting that to him!

Yes
"Just think where this world would be without the United States. Without the USA, these despots and tyrants would not even hesitate to wreak even more havoc."

The leaders in Zhongnanhai are shaking in their boots about what the US will do next over Tibet...I mean they are a nervous wreck. It may get so bad that George Bush might even stay away from the Olympics...no, he said he wouldn't..whew that was a close one. Because heavens know what carnage would befall China if George Bush doesn't show up in Beijing this summer.




Phylo
Please tell me you're running late for the next social studies lecture. You can't be a grown adult in the work force with those warped opinions and attitude...

Woody from Iowa

Phylo (part I)
It appears you are focusing on the symbolism of slime. The answer is in the title of the show where it all started. "You can't do that..." I would say it is anal expulsive if you want to be Freudian, meaning anti-authoritarian. It reminds me of "The Wall",

"Pink chooses to build a mental wall between himself and the rest of the world so that he can live in a constant, alienated equilibrium free from life's physical and emotional troubles. Every incident that causes Pink pain is yet another brick in his ever-growing wall: a fatherless childhood, a domineering mother, a country whose king signs his father's death certificate with a rubber stamp, the superficiality of stardom, an estranged marriage, even the very drugs he turns to in order to find release. As his wall nears completion, each brick further closing him off from the rest of the world, Pink spirals into a void of insanity, cementing in place the final brick in the wall. Yet the minute it is complete, Pink begins to realize the adverse effects of total mental isolation, helplessly watching as his fragmented psyche coalesces into the very dictatorial persona that antagonized the world during World War II, scarred his nation, killed his father, and thereby defiled his own life from birth." -- http://www.thewallanalysis.com/Intro.html


Savage
Saddam did not kill a million Iraqi's per year––not even close. He is accused of killing thousands of Kurd separatists. I'm no fan of Saddam, but some would call that quelling a violent revolution. If liberals were to start a violent revolution in this country, and Bush slaughtered thousands of him, would you think he was as evil as Saddam?

Phylo (part II)
"We don't need no education
We don't need no thought control
No dark sarcasm in the classroom
Teachers leave them kids alone
Hey teacher leave them kids alone
All in all it's just another brick in the wall
All in all you're just another brick in the wall."
-- Pink Floyd, 1979

The three events were all about the green mess.

There were three stunts performed to attract an audiance to the Nickelodeon annual event.

1) Akon crashed a dune buggy into giant containers of Nickelodeon's trademark green slime
2) Usher blasted a sumo wrestler with slime fired from a cannon
3) Supermodel Heidi Klum, attached to a bungee cord and wearing a specially equipped "butt spike belt," flung herself into a wall covered with slime-filled balloons.


Slime:
http://www.nick.com/shows/specials/slime/?_requestid=350924

SLIME from Nickelodeon Studios: apple sauce, green coloring

All that you say is very interesting, but none of it tells what the butt spikes and slime symbolize. Should we be happy if what your butt spikes and slime symbolize take over the world?



Really
"that I'm an American. This country IS the greatest in the world. If you don't agree, go live somewhere else and you'll see."

Really? using what standards? It is not #1 in standards of living, not #1 in education, not #1 in life expectacy, #1 in the levels of infant mortality, not #1 in economic freedom and on and on. To say one country is the greatest is simply stupid, there is no one greatest country. And I have lived someplace else and I disagree, so there.




Presumably Saddam Was..
..killing 'a million Iraqi's a year' (a rather dubious figure but anyways) when he was being supported by the US. Was this evil or are atrocities commited by someone it is in our strategic interest to support permissable?

Standshisground
I am not surprised that there are people who did have no sympathy for the deaths of innocent Palestinians due to occupation. Unfortunately that is part of human nature. It is kind of the point of Prager's column above. That is why it is a shame that he only included the examples that fit with his politics because it gives an inaccurate picture of the banality of evil.

Ssgt
I see Hal ‘The Huffington Hater’ Drunkahue slept it off and is spewing his hate at Conservatives. I wonder how he felt about the HATE spewed about Charlton Heston on Huffington. Phylo is late to The Methadone Clinic.

Oh and Mom
"...and our wonderful free enterprise system, where the ordinary person can become very wealthy. It's happened many times."

Both Singapore and HK are freer economically, in case you were curious. The US is #4 in 2007, but was tied in 9th place in 2006.

Akagi
Dennis's point was that the Tibetan people's genuine plight has tended to not get anywhere near as much coverage as the Palestinian's plight that is self-created due to their own Islamic extremism, and Muslim tendencies to treat other Muslims badly, due to their sectarian religious differences.

Phylo
I must have missed your posting of the democrappers comments on Iraq from 1998 to 2003. I also wonder what the DOW was when Klintoon left office? Do you have those stats?

Of course you don't. You know why?

YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE AND A RACIST! Common, say after me:

HYPOCRITE

RACIST

LIAR TO BOOT. And I can prove all of it!

And they also
"Police fight evil at home."

Serve as revenue agents for the governments that employ them and enforce idiotic laws that should never ever have been passed. How many stupid seat belt check points have you seen set up? So I'd say their record is mixed.

Hey Georgetwin
good day to ya! Personally, me thinks Hal Drunkahue and Phylo both stayed out late last night boozing it up! The only difference is that Phylo (out of his gourd) woke up to early today!

Akagi
Please, if the U.S. does not have the highest standard of living or is not widely perceived to be the best place to live by Intelligent and knowledgeable people such as yourself (everything considered) then why does the U.S. have the kind of illegal immigration problem which it has?
I have traveled some myself. Even back in the mid-1960s, when the youth culture then was doing a lot of hitchhiking, I had never heard of any other country in the world that is as easy to get into as the U.S. -- unless it is some place where in the defacto sense there is no border and one can simply walk in wearing a backpack.

Akagi writes:
Oh and Mom
"...and our wonderful free enterprise system, where the ordinary person can become very wealthy. It's happened many times."

Both Singapore and HK are freer economically, in case you were curious. The US is #4 in 2007, but was tied in 9th place in 2006.

And both have less freedoms and rights, than any democracy.

Holy man claiming not ignoring evil
Yes, while with all holiness for himself listing all the evils of the world, he ignores the fact that this Americaland of his and under God and claims to trust in God, is already the mass grave of 50+ million of unborn babies with the butchers shops open for business murdering daily several thousands more! A very typical American attitude as America's inhumane and horrendous war machinery is all over the world and threatening every other nation to bow low when in reality with not other goal than for the protection of oil. In reality for America oil is more important than human life of any form as even Christians are getting hell more and more in Iraq! While this Prager fellow ignores the millions of American unborn babies, God will not ignore them at last, but most certainly he will have some bad news for individuals who so blatanly insult God right out of America, while ignoring this ever so evil practice in America.

Because
Time Bomb:

Mexico has a much lower standard of living than the US that is why, same reason people from Africa break into Spain and France. Countires with higher standard of livings attract those with lower ones.

Actually Canada and Australia are, they accept more immigrants per capita than does the US as well, but you are correct, the US does have one of the most liberal immigration policies in the world.

And Rob:

"This country has more to offer people coming in than anywhere."

Guess that depends on the standard employed.

Ssgt
Either Way, they are BOTH a waste of Skin and Oxygen!

Akagi -- What "Rob" and "Time Bomb" said
OK, If you've lived other places and they're better than the USA, feel free to leave our horrible country and live somewhere else. As former Australian Prime Minister John Howard said - paraphrased - 'In this country there is freedom to live as one chooses, and if you don't agree with this system, you can take advantage of one more freedom -- the freedom to LEAVE.'

Mom in Wisconsin

Singapore
Due to the Basic Law, HK is pretty free in regards to religion, expression, etc. Where it is less free is the political system where the LegCo seats are basically elected by what are known as constituencies and many of these have ties to Beijing which means that the Executive Officer since 1997 has always been pro-Beijing.

Singapore is much less free politically or socially than either HK or the US. It is a fairly authoritarian regime and basically a one-party state (the PPP).

Mom
Care to point to a post where I said the US was a horrible place to live?

Not a big fan of Australia myself since it is so pro-Beijing and views the "Taiwan issue" as an internal Chinese matter, but to each his own.


Correction
Meant PAP in regards to Singapore, too used to typing DPP I guess.


On war, Lon
When one people makes war on another people, one risk the war-making group runs is that it is subject to having its innocents killed by the people it is making war upon. The solution is for the leaders of a would-be war-making people not to go ahead and make war on another people. Israel ended its occupation of Gaza over two years ago - and the response of its Palestinian inhabitants was promptly to turn it into a warbase against Israel, just like Hezbollah has turned Lebanon into a warbase against Israel. If the Palestinians are going to continue to pursue war against Israel, they're going to continue to see their civilians killed - and they know it. Apparently, that's fine with their leaders, so if you're so upset with supposedly innocent Palestinians being killed, your argument is with the Palestinians' leaders who can stop that killing tomorrow by simply ceasing their combat operations against Israel, not against an Israeli leadership that has every right to protect its own citizens on its own soil from those who want to turn that soil into a killing field.

And I can already see what you and those who think like you are thinking right now: that my line of thinking therefore justifies WHATEVER terrorists have done and are plotting to do to America, because America supposedly have made war on their people. America has never been at war with Egypt, so what justified the actions of the 4 Egyptians who were among the 19 9/11 hijackers? We have also never attacked Pakistan, which is not even part of the Middle East in the first place, so what accounts for the willingness of Pakistanis to take up arms against us with Al Qaeda or to let its territory be used by Al Qaeda as a warbase against America? If you say American policies brought this on, Salman Rushdie had the definitive comment on this when he said that to excuse terrorism by blaming it on American policy is to deny the basic foundation of morality: that individuals are responsible for their actions.

I never said that at all
I never said all countries are the same, I said no country is the greatest--not the same thing.

Please show me where I said all countries are the same, can you read and understand what you have read? This is a serious question, because I never said all countries are the same.

Oh and not everywhere in Japan is that crowded, of course, living in rural Hokkaido or Honshu isn't for everyone and since most jobs are in places like Tokyo, Osaka, etc, most people tend to like living there over say Iwate Prefecture.

Finland, Denmark, Sweden, etc compare quite well to life in the US actually.

Well Rob
"And the conservatives have shredded the Constitution by allowing the government to spy on it's own citizens and by disregarding laws passed by congress.“

Even conservatives have issues with this one, which is one of the reasons why Bob Barr left the GOP and is seeking to run as the LP standard bearer.

Rightmindedmom/Akagi/Rob/Time Bomb
"OK, If you've lived other places and they're better than the USA, feel free to leave our horrible country and live somewhere else."

Everywhere generally has its own enchantments and advantages as well as disadvantages but only one or two generally get called "home". This is my land.

"As former Australian Prime Minister John Howard said - paraphrased - 'In this country there is freedom to live as one chooses, and if you don't agree with this system, you can take advantage of one more freedom -- the freedom to LEAVE.'"

Ahhh see this is the freedom you want to take away. You want to invade our bedrooms and bodies and build walled boarders. You want the country to return to an era that actually existed for a generation or two after the civil war. If you agree with the Australian Prime Minister, I suggest that you LEAVE; it will save you a lot of effort. There are many third world countries that already exist using your politics and economics. You might want to start with Nigeria?


Rob/Akagi
Just a tidbit. The US is number one in hours worked but number seven in productivity

Rob
If you look at the HDI index the US comes in at 12th, Iceland, Norway, Australia, Canada, Ireland, Sweden, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Japan, France and Finland all outpace the US.

Education, health care, crime, on and on are all superior than in the US--now there is a cost for this in the form of high taxes and higher unemployment and on and on.

As for weather and diet though not a big fan of northern European weather or their diet.

But the point remains, in these areas the US is behind these countries. Just look at US k-12, what it ranks like 25th in the world or something--about equal to that of Slovakia?

Evil is everywhere
All we can do is all we can do. I discussed this with the income tax man (who was a Hindu, it actually came up in the conversation so you can imagine how widely it ranged) as he was charging me $103 to get $185 in refund. He said that there is so much poverty and crime and bad feeling in the world, what can we do. And I reminded him of the Jewish saying "Who saves a single life, saves the world entire." Don't do nothing just because you can't do everything.

And learn to discern between those who need your help and those who want your help. Frequently the ones who need your help are quietly going down for the last time because they are too proud to ask for help.

.H D. Schmidt
I agree, as you point out, that Prager missed something significant in his ananlys. Don't you know? Liberals don't mind all the unborn babies. They obviously figure the loss of a little 'fetal tissue' is not significant - compared to the necessity for there not being any loss of the "human right" to indulge in and promote irresponsible sex.

Standshisground
Israel has never ended its crippling control over Gaza's borders. The idea that Israel offered the Gazan's peace is more a reflection of the ignorance with which the subject is discussed in this country.

It is possible to defend Israel's maintaining a continued state of war with the Palestians for the last 40 years. But this suggestion that Israel made a peaceful move towards the Palestinians who shockingly continued fighting anyway is more a reflection of the fact that people in this country do not really think of the Palestinians as human beings. That is repugnant, but not surprising. There are too many sources of evil in the world, so people look for any excuse to rationalize away suffering when they can. Certainly the babies who have died in the occupied territory are to blame for not having convinced their leaders to accept a peace that no human beings would accept. Don't they know how much better it would be for us if they simply accepted a sub-human existence so that we could feel better about ourselves?

Again, this is just a reflection of the degree to which Prager's thesis was correct, but his application of it was self-serving.

Actually
Actually Rob, my plan is to go to a country that lags behind the US. Economic freedom is #25, not on the HDI because not considered a country by the UN, but if listed it would be around 25, 26 (like the ROK and Singapore).

It would outpace the US in crime, education and healthcare (has the second best public health care service in the world, behind Sweden) though.

I am here (meaning the US) but I plan it to be a temporary stay.



akagi
Don't let the door hit you in your pompous a**...

Woody from Iowa

crimes against humanities..
I must have read more into the article. What struck me was the comparison of children in the US who have been marked for life with Sex Offenders and the real atrocities around the world. Did I read it wrong??...

Hal Donahue
You say: "Ahhh see this is the freedom you want to take away. You want to invade our bedrooms and bodies and build walled boarders. You want the country to return to an era that actually existed for a generation or two after the civil war."

Don't you know? Liberals don't mind all the unborn babies. They obviously figure the loss of a little 'fetal tissue' is not significant - compared to the necessity for there not being any loss of the "human right" to indulge and even help out to promote irresponsible sex.


Yes Woody
Such an intelligent response from you, take you all day to think up that retort did you?


Evil?
Hmmm? Sort of interesting and revealing topic, I suppose.

I don't really believe that there is evil beyond human being's actions. There's not some evil cloud that floats around the planet infecting people's minds and making them rape, murder, and steal.

There are evil people and there are people that do evil things, but I don't really believe in "evil" separate from people's actions.

So, yes, there are some really terrible things that people do in this world (and yes, even the United States has evil people who do evil things; I don't think even the most patriotic among us will disagree with that).

But, what's the point of this discussion? Prager ends by saying that for some people evil is so great that they choose to ignore real evil and focus on supposed inventions like carbon emmissions. Sure, I guess that's true. People focus on animal rights or global warming or threats to Christianity or school prayer or any number of issues that are not really that important to human survival and achieving a just and peaceful world.

Hmm . . . I guess my answer or response to this article would be that we should all try to think more critically about what is truly important and worth fighting for. We should not rely on faith or trust to help us determine what acts are evil and what is not. We should rely on our own intelligence, experience and judgment to come to reasoned conclusions and we should act to make the wrold better.

And by wrold
I mean world!

Do it yourself!!!!
OMG

AudiR10 writes: Tuesday, April, 08, 2008 1:40 PM

. . .I discussed this with the income tax man (who was a Hindu, it actually came up in the conversation so you can imagine how widely it ranged) as he was charging me $103 to get $185 in refund. . .

ARGH! Dude your taxes are not that difficult. DO THEM YOURSELF and save that 100 bucks. You can download turbotax or some other program that walks you through the process the same way that tax preparer did.

Signed, Concerned Liberal

Rob
"...invade our bedrooms and bodies and build walled boarders??(sic), You want the country to return to an era that actually existed for a generation or two after the civil war."

Maybe it's me."

Probably me as I am often on the phone or writing, sorry. The raw capitalism urged by the extreme right was only present during the gilded age and didn't last very long at all. Further, the very people, extreme conservatives, who talk about freedom and love it or leave is are the very ones trying to govern every form of personal behavior even in private. Where I come from no one is a big fan of either abortion or homosexuals but we absolutely hate seeing the government moving into our private life

Time bomb
"Don't you know? Liberals don't mind all the unborn babies. They obviously figure the loss of a little 'fetal tissue' is not significant - compared to the necessity for there not being any loss of the "human right" to indulge and even help out to promote irresponsible sex. "

HUH???? All I want is for the government to stay out of my body and my home. Does the Constitution say abortion is illegal? Compromise and be done with it like most of the civilised world. Why is it all you extremists can think about and fret over is sexual?

Existence of Evil proves God
To say something is evil is to make a moral judgment, and moral judgments make absolutely no sense outside of the idea of moral standards. Where did these moral standards come from and why do they apply only to human beings? Could they be merely a product of chance? No, evil does exist and it is only properly understood in light of the presence of a God who has created moral standards for us. Thank you Dennis for clear and relevant examples of evil in our world this week. It does us all good to remember that "all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23), therefore we all desperately need God's forgiveness, just like those who you mentioned in your article.

Lon
Babies who have died in the occupied territory are to not be blamed for no one having convinced their Palestinian leaders to accept a peace that 'no human beings' would accept?

How much better it would have been for us if Arafat had simply accepted a subhuman existence so that there could have been peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians? That was when, under Bill Clinton’s peace efforts, Israel offered Arafat more than 90% of what he was claiming that Palestinians wanted?

Instead of accepting and then working on the remainder Arafat walked away from the deal. Had he accepted, then perhaps could everyone not have felt better about their Selves?

How is it that Palestinians not really wanting peace with Israel but rather to wipe it off the map, is the fault of Palestinians,’ or any other's babies?



Lon
If the Palestinians would cease their rocket attacks on Israel from Gaza, I think they would find Israel would reciprocate this gesture. Frankly, the Palestinians should be grateful that Israel hasn't done what any sensible nation would do with a territory that has made itself a warbase against it when that nation is supplying that territory almost all of its food, water, gas, and electricity: cut off all these commodities to that territory, which is what I think they should have done long ago. And I don't recall Israel demanding any concessions from the Gazans when they withdrew from Gaza; Israel did it unilaterally. You can blame Israel all you want for the deaths of Palestinian civilians, but your reasoning leaves me unmoved; the Palestinians want war with Israel, so they're getting it, end of discussion. By the way, in a thread a couple of months ago on TownHall, W. Thomas Smith said that analysts in Britian's MI-6 agency believe that Hamas and Hezbollah are ready to try again this summer a repeat of their simaltaneous offensive against Israel in the summer of 2006, apparently with more sophisticated weaponry than before. If that happens and rockets start raining down on Tel Aviv or other major Israeli cities from Lebanon or Gaza, I'll be interested to see your posts defending this aggression and blaming Israel for the deaths of Palestinians in their attempt to defend themselves. Given the fact that the Palestinians and much of the rest of the Arab world have no intention of making peace with Israel as long as there IS an Israel, if you believe Israeli "aggression" should stop, do you favor its end by the end of Israel itself? If Israel has a right to exist in your mind, then what do you suggest they should be allowed to do to stop its enemies from turning its soil into killing fields? Clarify, please.

Reply to tubbs
Evil? That's what you begin with and you suggest that it does exist for sure and your conclusion is that "we should act to make the world better"

My question is, how can we do that if we all have a different opinion of what is evil and what is better? It seems to me that the only way we could make a difference was if we agreed upon a standard of good and evil. Where would that standard come from? It could not come from within us because we will always disagree. So, without an objective source from without us, we are at an empass, or are we?

Maybe there is a way to a better world out there. I believe there is, yet none of the comments I'm reading ask the right questions that Dennis's article brings to light. We need to work the problem...the real problem...all this toying with it by saying, "let's just all get together and make a better world" is absurd. We are not intelligent enough t make that a reality. But still, there is a way.

Hal Donahue
Self-regulation and channeling of the human sex drive are what produces citizenship in civilization. If you won't do that for yourself, civilization kicks you out. You prefer to live like a bonobo in the rain forest? They have sex without restraint all the time.

Standshisground/Lon
"....If Israel has a right to exist in your mind, then what do you suggest they should be allowed to do to stop its enemies from turning its soil into killing fields? Clarify, please. "

What is all this about Israel? They are an ally supported by a large portion of all US assistance. Should they be any different than the UK? When the IRA was bombing London we did little.

p.r.
You are very observant!

What would bridge the gap between people's different views of what is good and bad, better and worse etc. are the things the world's major religions have generally agree about in one way or another. In Judeo-Christian tradition, they are known as the Ten Commandments.
But those commandments, in any form whatsoever, are what liberals in general prefer to not have publicly or privately advised or promoted.

Time bomb
"Self-regulation and channeling of the human sex drive are what produces citizenship in civilization. If you won't do that for yourself, civilization kicks you out. You prefer to live like a bonobo in the rain forest? They have sex without restraint all the time. "

SELF regulation not a cop sitting in our bedrooms. What I find totally interesting is you think that sex defines civilization WOW. The Greeks and Romans were not civilised?

So Time Bomb
"But those commandments, in any form whatsoever, are what liberals in general prefer to not have publicly or privately advised or promoted."

So should "we" promote those dealing with idols or other gods (meaning the non-Hebrew one I suppose)? I am sure the Hindus, Buddhists, Daoists, Shintos, etc will be pleased about that.

I have yet to hear anyone complain about privately advised, displayed, etc. Its when done in our name and with our money when we get bent out of shape. Judge Roy "I'm an idiot" Moore can have all the 10 commandment carvings he wants--in his own home--but when he starts hauling in large granite monuments of them into public buildings, then most normal thinking people should have an issue with things like that. I wonder how people like Moore would feel if someone brought in a statue of Guan Yin?


Hal "LMAO®" Donahue writes:
"All I want is for the government to stay out of my body and my home."

Spoken like a true bi-sexual leftist.


I'd like the government to stay out of my wallet. Why is THAT concept so difficult for you leftists?

Primus54
"I'd like the government to stay out of my wallet. Why is THAT concept so difficult for you leftists? "

Well deadbeat you have a lot more paying to do so stop complaining -- all this debt plus the cost to repair and replace all the infrastructure you and your ilk used up,

Akagi
your comments imply that you believe all religions are equally valid, equally invalid, or that the Ten Commandments are offensive to your particular faith.

Which one?

Hal Donahue
No, I said Self-regulation of the human sex drive is what produces civilization. Civilizations which fail to continue in that tend to decline as their citizens become increasingly animalistic like monkeys and apes in the rain forest.

Time bomb
"...Civilizations which fail to continue in that tend to decline as their citizens become increasingly animalistic like monkeys and apes in the rain forest. "

The facts say otherwise the periods of greatest achievement and progress are often the very ones least "structured". But your concept of sexual behavior defining civilised is literally amazing LOL

furthermore Agaki
your comments imply that it is unfair for the Ten Commandments to be prominent in America when the teachings or "idols" of other faiths are not.

What seems fair to you? If the majority of people want them prominently displayed, should the majority of people get their way? Or, should 1 person, or 10% of the people, be able to thwart the will of the majority of the people in any given American community because of some argument about "fairness" or "rightness" that they happen to hold in their particular worldview?

If you are so concerned about the "public," are you at all considering the will of that same "public."

Hal "LMAO®" Donahue replies:
"Well deadbeat you have a lot more paying to do so stop complaining -- all this debt plus the cost to repair and replace all the infrastructure you and your ilk used up,"

Well, Hal. If the government needs more money to cover the things you mentioned, perhaps it could stop throwing money at the "War On Poverty" that you said yesterday ended when LBJ decided not to run for re-election.

Or - better yet, lower taxes even further. That ALWAYS increases real tax revenue.

Hal "LMAO®" Donahue:
I know you couldn't be bothered to "proof read" your comments, but the word is "civilized", not "civilised".

Amazing that a career USAF officer would even NEED to proof read!

"LMAO®"

Agaki, Hal Donahue, et--al
People of the true religions who legally immigrate here to the United States generally recognize the kinship of the Judeo-Christian tradition with what they are familiar with as the Best in their own traditions, from whatever part of the world they came from. When they immigrate here, they don't complain about the judeo-Christian religion having informed the founding documents of the United States, or seek to drive it from public view.

p.r. (Puerto Rico?)
1) your comments imply that you believe all religions are equally valid. Yes, since all believers and non believers support the construction of public buildings via their tax dollars, all religions in this regard are equally valid and I find it offensive to choose one over the other and in the case of Crazy Judge Moore, the courts declared his hunk of stone unconstitutional as well.

2) Well since I don't believe in the Hebrew god, yes, I would suggest that they are offensive to my faith, if we got offended by such things.


Yes, p.r.
There is a concept known as tyranny of the majority, didn't you learn that someplace?


p.r.
A couple of points:

You say: "Existence of Evil proves God
To say something is evil is to make a moral judgment, and moral judgments make absolutely no sense outside of the idea of moral standards. Where did these moral standards come from and why do they apply only to human beings?"

These moral standards came from human beings and they apply only to human beings because we're the only thinking (sentient) beings on this planet.

Proof? When was the last time anyone considered trying a fox for murdering chickens? Is an animal eating its young "evil"?

You also mentioned: "Evil? That's what you begin with and you suggest that it does exist for sure and your conclusion is that "we should act to make the world better""

As I said above, I think people can be evil and commit evil acts, but no I don't think that evil exists "for sure" outside of sentient beings and their acts. Again, there is no force that makes people do evil things. There's just people doing evil things.


Time Bomb
In context, I don't have an issue with the 10 Commandments, and in general being a non-Christian I don't really care all that much if they are displayed or not, but when someone brings in a multi-ton piece of rock, then that is a little much even for someone as permissive as I.

I don't have an issue with the manger scene on the court house during Christmas either as long as it is displayed with other symbols of the season (e.g. Santa Claus).

Not at all
"These moral standards came from human beings and they apply only to human beings because we're the only thinking (sentient) beings on this planet."

Didn't you know that humans are only the third most intelligent creatures on earth? Dolphins are #2 and white mice #1.

If you don't believe me, just wait until the Vogons show up and feed you to the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal, then you'll see.


Hal Donahue
It is a matter of Self-regulation. When you won't do that, civilization steps in to do it for you. Whatever you do in your own bedroom is your business, but if it is perverse, you will pay the price of having a degraded nature if you keep doing it. Then if you bring that degraded nature into your public affairs, Civilization will deal with you according to Law in regard to what you do in public. Those Laws are becoming all too much a matter of politics. The deleterious consequences of that cannot however be Legislated away.

Also p.r.
You stated: "My question is, how can we do that if we all have a different opinion of what is evil and what is better? It seems to me that the only way we could make a difference was if we agreed upon a standard of good and evil. Where would that standard come from? It could not come from within us because we will always disagree. So, without an objective source from without us, we are at an empass, or are we?"

We don't all have different opinions about what is evil and even if we did, why would that matter? We live in a society with pretty elaborate rules dictating what is right and wrong. Where did these standards come from, you ask? Again, people. The fact that some may disagree doesn't leave us at an empass at all.

Almost no one would argue that murder is right or genocide is right. But if they do argue that genocide, for example, is right, there are plenty of people to rebut those arguments and take up arms if they try to impose their idea of morality (see WWII).

uh-oh
Akagi got me. I forgot about those dang Vogons.

Liberals just can't see reality...

Why now is Tibet so important to Liberals? Aren't Liberals the ones who said that Iraqis aren't "ready" for Democracy?

Iraq has a good chance for Democracy. Why do Liberals focus on Tibet, a nation with little chance for Democracy, and then work their little tails off to smother the Democratic dreams of every Iraqi?

Sounds like somebody's blowin' smoke...

tubbs
you say, "there's just people doing evil things."

you say, "I think people can be evil and commit evil acts."

Yes, yes, yes. I agree. My question isn't whether it is real and expressed through human beings. My question is, where did this idea of evil come from? It must have come from somewhere? Or did we just make it up?

Only one answer for the source of morality suffices. Some believe morality is an illusion. Some believe it is a product of chance. The only other option is that it comes from an intelligent designer. Universal moral laws that have genuine incumbency require an author whose proper domain is the universe, and who has the moral authority to enforce such laws, and the power to offer justice in light of such laws.

If you believe that morality (evil vs. good) comes from within the intelligence of human beings and nowhere else...isn't it amazing that even the youngest of children experience ethical pain (true moral guilt) even before we have an opportunity to intelligently teach them right from wrong. How does a child know that lying is wrong, cheating is wrong, and injury to others is wrong?

I respectfully disagree with you. Morality, in this case evil and good, does exist outside the human (sentient) experience. I believe the very presence of the knowledge of good and evil within you and I proves that there is a general revelation of good and evil available to all of us--regardless of our country of origin or religious experience. If it just happened by chance the outcome would certainly not be uniform as it appears to be. This general revelation must have come from somewhere or someone intelligent outside of you and I.

Carlos
Straw man:
–noun
3. a fabricated or conveniently weak or innocuous person, object, matter, etc., used as a seeming adversary or argument: "The issue she railed about was no more than a straw man. "

I'm a liberal and I don't know much about Tibet or argue for or against its Democracy. I'm not focused on Tibet and I don't know many liberals who are.

I was about to try to entertain your weak argument by explaining why someone might support Tibet instead of Iraq, but I can't even get to that point because obviously you can support Tibet's democracy without supporting an INVASION of China or Tibet. I think that's the main problem we liberals have had and continue to have with our involvement with Iraq. It's not that Saddam was a great guy and we think everything was rosy there. But, we could have acted without committing troops to Iraq in perpetuity.

Agaki
Tyranny of the Majority?

Is that really your argument? Next time you read a history book, look very hard for the Tyranny of the Majority. You'll have a hard time finding it if you are honest. Instead, you'll find over and over and over the Tyranny of the minority.

History is cyclical so if you want to fear anything, don't fear the tyranny of the majority...instead, fear the tyranny of one person, or a small group of people who rise up with radical and tyrannical ideas.

Did we fight WWI, WWII, or the current war because of the tyranny of the majority? No.

"tyranny of the majority" what a cop-out?

Tibet
"Why now is Tibet so important to Liberals? Aren't Liberals the ones who said that Iraqis aren't "ready" for Democracy?"

Tibet has been a focus of many on the left for quite sometime. Why now, well the most recent uprising is why.

"Iraq has a good chance for Democracy."

Really? At this point doubtful and elections do not equal democracy. Iraq lacks almost every element that would allow it to become a fully functional democracy.

Is Tibet ready to be a democracy? No, but that isn't their point, the point is that Tibet should be free to decide its fate on its own absent of Chinese interference.

Tibet would probably be a Buddhist-based monarchy, not a democracy like Bhutan has been in the past. Of course China isn't about to let Tibet go, so this is a moot discussion.




Hal Donahue
This business about Israel is that Lon lamented in his post of 9:39 a.m. that Prager didn't mention as one of his examples of evil in the world the fact, according to Lon, that Palestinians are dying because they can't get to hospitals fast enough on account that they are being impeded by Israeli checkpoints. I took issue with Lon's characterization of this as evil, opining that even if I take Lon's facts that this process is really happening at face value, that this is not a consequence of Israeli evil but rather the consequence of the Palestinians war-making effort against Israel and its territory, and therefore one of the ancillary effects of its war against Israel is the suffering of some of its civilians in this way. So Lon and I have been going back and forth on this.

Not at all
The US is not a democracy, it never was meant to be a democracy. The reason why is because the founders and framers rightfully feared what is known in political theory as the tyranny of the majority--such as this quote often attributed (incorrectly to Franklin) that "Democracy must be something more than two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner."

You asked if the majority of people want them prominently displayed, should the majority of people get their way? The answer is no. What other aspects of "majority" rule should we apply this to--slavery? If the majority decide that slavery is a good idea again, should that be allowed? In 1954 the majority felt that Brown v. Board was in error and supported segregation, a majority opposed the ruling in Loving v. Va. Should the majority have been given their way then?

And yes you fought WWI because the majority of the public pushed you into a war you had no need to fight.


Agaki
no, p.r. reside in Texas, not Puerto Rico

p.r.'s metaphysical conundrum
One good argument that p.r. put's forward is in effect, where do ideas come from?

That's a darn tough question that I don't have an answer for. It's probably the best argument (along with what happened before the big bang) that intelligent design advocates have in their quiver.

I'd stick with that line of reasoning in further debates on this topic if I were you.

I watched a long symposium on that question on CSPAN one weekend with doctor's who specialize in brain chemistry and philosophers and many many other experts. At the end of the day, the answer to the question of where do thoughts/ideas come from is: we. don't. know.

There's no good answer for that question and if I were a religious person, that's where my investigation into faith would begin.

I'm not a religious person, though, and as such I'm pretty comfortable with the idea that we just don't know yet. We don't know what happened before the big bang or where thoughts come from or a host of other questions, but (to me) that doesn't mean that we should isnert some all knowing thing in to answer every unknown question.

p.r.

p.r. I hope you are a priest so you can adequetely answer tubbs inability to take the leap.

p.r.

"Tyranny of the minority".

I like your explanation, makes sense to me.

Carlos (but not the Jackal we assume)
"I like your explanation, makes sense to me."

Yes and since you also seem to think "liberals" have all of a sudden discovered Xizang (aka Tibet) and think Iraq is able to substain a democracy, I am sure many things make sense to you...like Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny

Time bomb
"It is a matter of Self-regulation. When you won't do that, civilization steps in to do it for you "

If that is true then why is this true? and it certainly is

"The facts say otherwise the periods of greatest achievement and progress are often the very ones least "structured".

hal...deep breath
Hey hal, take a deep breath,quick sombody put a
plastic bag over his head and handcuff him! smile
Hal....you just a teensy bit off about cons not caring for the vets! The stinking gvmnt. which consists of both parties screwed up and still screwing up!
Now, hal should like this, durn it! A couple of years ago 2 moderate democrats(crap, I didnt know there was such an animal) pushed the state of Illionois to officially admit and recognize the fact that gvmnt. in that state during joseph smith's days acted illegally,terrible,etc. And didnt even allow the mormons protection of the law!! Iam talking basic protection that all citizens should be allowed! It didn't come from conservatives! That was a real eye opener!
Iam against gay marriage,blanket abortion,
illegal immigration, gun control,iam a hawk on military issues(w/in reason),I want less welfare,
politicians income to be reduced, etc. BUT...
sometimes us cons need to take a deep breath...
and look at some needy social matters and not always say tough crap, fellow! Smoking in crowded
areas when 2nd hand smoking was proven dangerous
was pushed by moderats/liberal? Geez, a balance
is needed...isnt it????
Where I fault the liberals...is too many to list
but a hint- every time somebody stubs their toe
oh, gee, the poor soul, lets put 'em on welfare,
or when a murdering rapist goes into this bit about ohhhh gee my daddy was a grouchy guy..so Iam getting back at society,etc.Barf!
elvis

dennis...evil
Geee, dennis I dont know if evil has always been around! Iam not quite that old!
elvis

Much Ado About Nothing
We know about this particular evil, but it is no more or less evil than what has been going on for millenia. Today, we think, because the media dishes it up to us, that we should do something about it. Or some do. Vendetta and honor killings have been around for thousands of years, and there are fewer today than there were, when it was even more widely practiced. The author mentioned a handful of items - out of over 6 billion people. What about the 5.99 billion about which nothing newsworthy was printed, because they did nothing evil? Murders have been around since before Cain and Abel. We kill what, 15,000 or 20,000 or more every year in the US? Do the sobsters cry tears for all of them? Do they also read the obituaries? After all, 10,000 people die every day in this country. My, I could have a permanently broken heart.

The author needs to get a grip and a little perspective. Of course, there's evil. But as a Police Lieutenant pointed out to me once, 3% of the people commit 95% of the crimes. And, through-out the world, that same figure applies. We have what, 156 or more countries, and it seems a dozen or so are always basket cases. Just substitute your favorite name from today, or 10 years ago, or when-ever.

Nothings changed. So, why dwell on it? After all, if it's so upsetting, then by all means grab the next flight to Darfur. Me, I'll pass. And, whereas I certainly don't like the messes some people have, I'm not about to advocate doing something about it, nor do I think America should pretend to be responsible for it.

We didn't seem to have this problem before the media saturated the earth - what's the point today?

Sexual abuse
The story of the little 6 year old being labeled a sexual deviant for slapping the bottom of a six year old girl takes the cake for me! In a country that tolerates the unfettered use of the internet in public places (libraries et al) and God knows where else, where children can easily access this stuff and sexual images permeate the mind on a daily basis in our sexed up society and then to shake the fist at this child is the worst kind of double bind imaginable in an emotional and mental and spiritual sense! Our country is the most schizophrenic country on earth and getting worse by the day. This child will potentially be as confused and confounded by the double messages pounding his young impressionable mind. On the one hand is the shame for his touch coupled with "potentially" the lust of his eyes. We have become a soul destroying culture, confusing our young and poisoning their young minds and emotions. It makes me sick and sad!

elvis
"...smile Hal....you just a teensy bit off about cons not caring for the vets! The stinking gvmnt. which consists of both parties screwed up and still screwing up!"

Actually no for six years at least the true voice of veterans has been the Ds. The cons refuse to fully fund VA or fix military medicine and when it comes to the actives they deliberately worked to prevent properly armoured vehicles reaching the marines because it would hurt favored vendors - nope the last six years the conservatives have treated the troops and vets like Craig's and Vitter's tissues - disposable


Tubbs

Tubbs,

When you try to recreate the world as a scientist, confident that eventually all will be known and all could be understood I think you miss who's in the journey you are taking.

However, since it takes study, practice and faith and those without faith can not understand - I'll leave it and say that most church doors are always "open."




loosen up hal....
Interesting...but..you seem to never lighten up on any issue...maybe Iam wrong because I normally don't read you blogs...just being honest
sorry.
Just remember a little sugar helps the medicine go down..according to mary poppins and me!
I dont even know what those two words are concerning disposables!!?
elvis

Israel
"In Israel, Haaretz reported that an Arab woman has been shot in an attempted honor killing."

So Christians aren't the only religion being attacked by Israelis? Not a very nice country.

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archiv e/200803/CUL20080327a.html

Akaqi
Hey I'm sure we could raise funds to get you a one way ticket to any country of your choice other than the US. Please, go, as soon as possible. Which country have you chosen?




It the culture, stupid


WOW, you have heard of short term memory, right. That means when you have eightyitis you can read the article on TH, then scan the posted comments, but by then you have no idea what the article was about. So I will do it my way.

You know that the word culture means the patterns, and traits, considered as the expression of a particular period, class, community, or population. Now think how a culture is developed, and/or changed over the years.

Sixty or seventy years ago we had no daily news, just a weekly newspaper.

Forty to fifty years ago, the news was 15 minutes a day.

Twenty to thirty years ago, we started getting some 24 hour a day radio news, and ten years ago we started 24 hours per day both radio and TV news, plus the internet.

Now what do they do with all that time? Well, every little bit of nasty activity makes the news program.

So with radio, TV, Sewer Sounds (that replaced music), movies, so-called computer games, and on and on, spewing and praising each nasty action, what do you expect from each new generation. You have told them that look, if you do this or that, you will be famous on TV, and on the internet.

So you wonder why they have learned not only how to do it, but how to publicize it, to become even more famous.

A teenager is made to sit in a hard chair in a drafty room, next to people he doesn’t like, watching a scratchy picture on a small screen, and the teacher’s union will tell you he is learning, learning, learning.

Later that same day, that same person is sitting in a comfortable upholstered chair in an air-conditioned room, eating pop-corn and drinking a coke, sitting next to his girlfriend, watching a technically perfect picture on a huge screen, and we are told he is learning nothing, he is being entertained.



Narcissism...
"Self-preoccupation, lack of empathy, and unconscious deficits in self-esteem."

Sounds like the "typical" Townhall Liberal to me.

Self-absorbed in a text full of famous quotes. Deficit in the concept of human suffering, and a complete inability to see the failure of magical thinking. An Ego crushed and perverted by a disturbed mother who rejected it's image in infancy.

Sad.

Internet soldier for China
Canadian blogger Ezra Levant discusses on the slew of pro-Communist commentators who show up whenever he criticized the regime.

'I've received a spate of pro-Communist China comments in response to my blog entries about Tibet....I can spot Chinese government spin when I see it.

'A year ago, the Western Standard published a story by Kevin Steel about one such Internet soldier for China. Here are some excerpts:

'"He posts his messages everywhere under several different names on Internet blogs and discussion groups.

'"His main message is that...the Epoch Times newspaper that broke that story are spreading propaganda against China's Communist government.

'"And he's not even Chinese. He is Charles Liu, a 40-year-old Taiwanese-born technology consultant who lives in Issaquah, Wash., and does business in China."'


tax cuts in a time of war
"Evil is the greatest threat to mankind. Fighting evil is quite dangerous."

Hopefully, we will be able to endure and hold onto our precious tax cut.

Not for the happiness hour
I know it would be easy to start the depression hour, and just pull up any news site, anytime, anywhere. It would be the easiest thing in the world to do.

I agree with Curtal Friar, 100%. At a certain point, you just remove the service, or make another homepage somewhere.

But each of us, I believe, is caught in the contradiction. We provide a loving, protective, beautiful and orderly home for our young ones. And yet we know that it is a dark and mean sinful world, a Goya world; we repeat sayings to ourselves about being only Pilgrims, bound for somewhere else.

Time for Americans to be thankful
In an age when muslim murder is required of muslims and murder of Tibetians is required of the Chineese military. In a time when europe is fast sinking into an islamic toilet, full of decaying fecal material and europe's desire to atone for decades of murder. In a time when the freed soviet states can barely stay ahead of anarchy. Get on your knees and thank the God of Moses for your fortune. Visit ANY middle eastern or african country and then call me a liar. The leader of islam is a pedophile with a six year old bride. Who do you follow?

Rockhead J. Squirrel Scribbles:
Good by right wing....Good bye right wing...good by/bye right wing...its fun to see you die! LOL

Too bad your career here, posting your usual bovine excrement cannot die.

Hal Donahue
You were quoting with reasonable accuracy what I said, and then asked the following:
“It is a matter of Self-regulation. When you won't do that, civilization steps in to do it for you."
If that is true then why is this true? And it certainly is.
The facts’ say otherwise, the periods of greatest achievement and progress are often the very ones least "structured.”
If you are longing for a return to the garden of An Eden, then having sex all the time will not bring to you the kind of intelligence required to understand why you will need to learn to channel your sex drive into other kinds of creative pursuit necessary to eventually return there.
Bonobos in the rain forest do not have civilizations although they have primitive societies and are ‘getting it on’ almost all of the time.
When I say that civilization steps in to restrain you, it means that if you will not do so for yourself, civilized people will. Civilized people cultivate sexual morality in order to do their part to return again to the garden.
If you don’t want to go along, then you may eventually have the option of going to live in either the rain forest or the Zoo. That is with the bonobos, chimpanzees, or perhaps other of the monkey or ape species that approximate humans DNA by about 99%.
If you choose a Zoo that might be a good place. You could live there happily because those going there to view may throw peanuts and, when they do, you can throw part of your poop back at them.



Lisa
Thanks. That was a nice response. I'm happy with my way of life and beliefs, but it's nice to have someone disagree without hating.

That was very Christian of you.

All the best to you and your family, Tubbs

tubbs...lisa
thanks for the honest dialogue...I enjoyed chatting with you and reading your comments.


tubbs
Lisa was right. The church doors are "open." And, the "leap" she writes about isn't the "blind leap" that so many non-believers describe. My "leap" was faith for sure, but it was faith backed up by a plethera of evidences that cannot be understood (or explained away) in any other way except through the existence of a God who is actively involved in human history.

In a very real sense, my leap was very scientific. I commend you to keep searching for truth...it is out there.

May you and your family be greatly blessed today!

Redlac
"we didn't seem to have this problem before the media saturated the earth."

Not an excuse to ignore evil. With knowledge comes responsiblitiy. It makes much better sense to understand that since the media is so good at informing us of the evils on the earth, we now have a much greater responsibility than ever to do something about it.

Your worldview may be totally in opposition to mine, however, from my perspective, when I stand before God I will be more responsible for my actions, in reference to the needy and oppressed, than previous generations were, simply because I am more informed. With knowledge comes responsibility.

Thanks p.r.
To you and yours as well.

I really believe things do not have to be so acrimonious between our two sides. We all live here in this country. We all want healthy, happy lives.

We can disagree without hating each other and we can respond to hate without being hateful ourselves.

It's tough, for me especially. I get enraged sometimes when people say things I disagree with. But, I've found that arguing in good faith with a sense of humor and honesty really does help all parties involved.

Interesting discussion.

Great article, Dennis.
Regarding “human evil is so great that most people choose either to ignore it or to focus their concerns elsewhere”, you’re right. We simply don’t have time to fix the world up. All we can really do is to fix up our immediate environment by leading by example. That’s really the best we can do. So ignoring evil elsewhere is not “wrong”. We’re not God or superman.

Agree that the “world is filled with evil. Always has been”. And that “thanks to communications, we are far more aware of much of it.” Exactly – it SEEMS like it’s a hell hole. But the good news - I would wager that evil is less than at any time in history, because we are now aware & the law has a greater strectch than at any time before in more places around the globe.

The irony in the “sexual harassment” elementary school kids & “global warming” fighters is oh so true. Well said!


Hitler Would Be Right At Home in the US
It is a bad world, and the suppression of speech and thought in the US is a growing trouble, which, will some day, lead to the violence we are seeing in other countries. I imagine Herr Hitler would be very proud of what this country is becoming. He may have won the war yet. You can't help but think he is smiling on his birthday and having a big dictator party with Mao, Stalin, Castro and the gang.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.