Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, April 17, 2007
Debra J. Saunders :: Townhall.com Columnist
Green Giant's Big Carbon Footprint
by Debra J. Saunders
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


When President Jimmy Carter wanted Americans to conserve energy in 1979, he set an example by wearing a sweater and turning down the White House thermostat. Today, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger boasts that he is a world leader in the fight against global warming -- but his advocacy shouldn't keep him from flying in private jets or driving a Hummer.

The gas-guzzling governator is on the cover of Newsweek. The Austrian Oak is now global warming's jolly green giant. Last week at Georgetown University, Schwarzenegger explained how he was making environmentalism more attractive. The problem with enviros, he said, was that people thought they "were no fun" -- "like prohibitionists at a fraternity party."

Plan Arnold is to turn environmentalism from a phenomenon based on guilt to a successful movement "built on passion." Call it You-Can-Have-It-All Environmentalism.

Sure, the Republican governor told Georgetown students, enviros used to criticize (real) men like him for "powering my private airplanes. So it is too bad, of course, that we can't all live simple lives like the Buddhist monks in Tibet. But you know something. That's not going to happen."

Translation: Schwarzenegger can boast about signing a bill that calls for California to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 25 percent by the year 2020 -- but don't expect him to curb his own super-size emissions.

It was not that long ago that your average politician did not want to be seen owning a few big SUVs while pushing for more stringent federal fuel-efficiency standards for American cars. They did not want to be branded as hypocrites.

Now Al Gore, who hyper-consumes energy in his Tennessee home, and Schwarzenegger, who is always jumping on a private jet after eco-friendly media events, can burn energy like the most flagrant energy hogs.

As long as they say they believe in global warming, they personally don't have to do much about global warming.

Spokesman Aaron McLear told me that the governor is looking into solar panels for his home and buys credits to offset his carbon footprint. Schwarzenegger also converted one of his four Hummers to hydrogen power -- actually GM converted the car and lets Schwarzenegger drive it when he wants -- and another to biodiesel.

"It's not the car," McLear explained, "it's the engine."

Also, Schwarzenegger does not drive much these days -- the California Highway Patrol drives him.

That's not enough. I do not expect Schwarzenegger to ride the bus. But he should not hype his GM-converted Hummer as "environmentally muscular." He should show some respect for fuel-efficient cars -- those we mere mortals can afford -- and try flying commercial. Get out some, and meet a few real folk -- in first class.

Because, while Schwarzenegger boasted at Georgetown that California is "sending the world a message" on global warming, his behavior and his rhetoric send a different signal: Conserving energy is for girlie men.

I will receive many e-mails defending Schwarzenegger -- all along the lines that at least he believes in global warming. And he has signed bills to force other people to conserve in the future.

After all, no one really expects stars or rich people to sacrifice. All the glitterati have to do is really believe in global warming, maybe ride in a hybrid to the Oscars -- and then their carbon trails (which are much larger than those of people who take the bus every day) won't stink.

It's laughable. Those who believe that global warming is caused by man -- I am agnostic on that score -- claim that they are on the side of Science. That's Science with a capital S.

Yet they applaud when a so-called leader on global warming speaks as if "environmentally muscular" technologies and carbon offsets can manufacture a 25-percent reduction in greenhouse gases by 2020. They have this odd belief that the key to fighting global warming is not by cutting energy use, but by believing in global warming. They embrace wishful thinking -- and call it science.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Debra Saunders' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
I Believe in Global

Warming ! So what Al, Arnold? Your feet prints are twenty to fifty times bigger than the average American !

Tell you what, when you get your own foot print to the average, then we can talk about draconian measures to reverse the irreversible.

Until then, shut up !

Amen Pappy!
The Panderator needs to zip it. He should watch "The Great Global Warming Swindle," available on utube or hire Thomas Sowell as a tutor.

It reminds me of when Bush the first signed the Americans With Disability Act. Anything to be popular. A restaurant in my area went bankrupt after a pinhead bureaucrat declared their first attempt at compliance "not good enough." The rail on the ramp was a fingertip too close to the wall.


ALL
Swing by my blog and check the photo I posted of The Goreacle, guru of the gloBULL warming circuit!

Rogue Historian
PANDERATOR! I frigging spewed my coffee reading that! CLASSIC!

Figured it out yet
The Liberal slogan should be: DO AS I SAY, NOT SAY I DO. Examples: Al Gore/Arnold Schwarznegger (California got fooled) can produce as much CO2 as they want, but the proletariat cannot; NJ Gov. Corzine doesn't have to wear a seat belt or obey the speed limit - but the proletariat better; Rosie O'Donnell can say anything she wants about Christians or Conservatives because she has free speech, but the proletariat better not say anything about Negroes or queers; Rosie O'Donnell's bodyguards are allowed to protect her family with guns, but the proletariat cannot be trusted with self-protection; hip-hop "artists" can call their own women bitches and whores, but the (white)proletariat dare not; Al Sharpton can accuse any white person of anything he wants, but the white proletariat dare not. Think of your own examples,I know there are tons.







GunnyG
You mean the Boreacle, right?

Let's all understand
Please let's all understand we are going to have mandated all sorts of supposed global warming solutions by the Democratically lead Congress. With one of the significant legs of their base been a deep shaded of green and the rest pure politically Leftists, command and control will soon be coming from on high.

Appreciate to meet Kyoto Treaty goals will require significant limitations on our way of life YET that is not near enough soon enough for those that follow Albert on the global warming road. Take the time to read carefully and understand what they are demanding because it will soon come to us all.

Joke is that according to the computer models they are misreporting even if we ceased all carbon dioxide emissions on Earth today we would still would see global warming into the next several century. We could stop all emissions tomorrow but China would make up for all our emissions in less than a decade.

Global warming hype
These people are crazy...They take no thought to the future in what they do. They want to ban all regular light bulbs, and use the flouresant bulbs, which are made with mercury, which are made in China only in factories using coal fuel. The bulbs must be disposed of in special areas, not in regular trash dumps. I wonder if anyone ever thought of what happens when we all are using these bulbs by the thousands, and a tornado, hurricane, or some other natural disaster occurs, and thousands of these bulbs are broken, spilling mercury into the land, and streams. No they don't think ahead on anything. They all follow like sheep, in lock step, looking neither right nor left, all repeating the same garbage. None using their God given reason.

PANDERATOR!!!
I don't cuss, smoke, or drink. Damnit I left my smokes at the bar!!! I wonder how much carbon Leotardo Decrappio discharges when he takes his trips to the glaciers along with a film crew to make sure he shows up on E? Does John Edwards add to the CO2 problem with all that hair spray he uses? I am John Doe and I will never park my car!!!

Gunny G writes: Rogue Historian
PANDERATOR! I frigging spewed my coffee reading that! CLASSIC!

Hey Rouge, you haven't laughed till you've blown coffee out your nose.

hypocrits
These guys are hypocritical, narcissistic, and arrogant schmucks! There's a sucker born every minute and they prove it. What I really cannot abide is the "Let'em Eat Cake!" attitude. They want to cut emissions they should go first. Anybody catch the stupid SUV tax they are trying to pass in CA? I can't wait to retire and jump ship! The glory days of California are over and since my great, great grandfather is one of the original settlers of the Central Valley it pains me to say it! He's probably rolling over in his grave right now.

LaughingBoy
I am with you.

Exxon, Texas. Just look on the map, Main Street isn't Main Street, it's Bush Avenue. And all the Buildings are called Cheney Towers and none of the streets are made from concrete they are all asphalt. Asphalt is made from what? Oil thats what. You're right, how could we have all been so blind.

2000 people out of the entire population of the planet. Who can argue with a majority like that.

You make me call you an idiot...
Knock it off with your 2000 scientist crap. Many of those scientists have disavowed their involvement in any GW studies. And remind me, what percentage of the earth's scientists is 2000? 1%? Less than that?

And if you think the domain location of a website means anything you are a conspiracy nut! Yuo have no credible arguments at all, and while your childish banter was humerous to us at first, we are sick of hearing your baseless prattle. Contribute an argument or stay away.

2000 bought and paid for scientests
2000 scientests in the world say this is a fact folks, 2000 of them. Everyone in his right, or excuse me, in their proper mind knows there are only 2002 scientests in the entire world. There's the 2000 that make their living preaching global warming and there are the 2 who get beat up saying it ain't so.

Now who are you gonna believe, 2000 really smart fellars or your liein' eyes?

On Cousin Jimmy
Mrs. Saunders does bring up a good point. For all his faults, and they are/were too many to count, when he asked the country to conserve he did try to set an example. Granted it was probably more show than substance but Al and Arnie and all the others don't even pretend they are trying to do anything. Carbon offsets you say? That is simply another way of saying "I have enough money to buy my way out of something I want others to sacrifice to".

Elephant dung
They've just discovered that elephant dung may help with global warming:
http://www.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUSKUA84990720070418

If I keep a couple of these in cages in my garage, can I get paid in carbon credits?

Redhead
Get yourself a big bucket and stand under LaughingBoy's posts. He shovels enough elephant dung to cool down two planets.

Here is the punchline to Carbon Credits.

LaughingInTheWind
My deepest apologies, evidently I over estimated the total number of scientists in the world. I had it at 2002 but it seems there are only your 2000 Global Warming Experts and 1 Shell Answer Man. You would have thought on a planet this large we would have more scientists. I wonder if Cheney is having them all rouded up and shipped too....

DALLAS...EVIL DALLAS.....EVIL EVIL DALLAS

HIDE YOUR CHILDREN AND WOMEN FOLK FROM EVIL DALLAS

CO2 Global Warming
All of these comments are really irrelevant because there is really only one issue to be resolved and no one ever even mentions it.
The basic issue is: "Does CO2 cause Global Warming?" There currently is NO factual scientific evidence that is does. Scientists' consensus, comments, and computer models are not scientific factual evidence.
If anyone has any factual evidence to enlighten us on, let's read it; without links. One cannot say that it is factually true and then let it to another to PROVE that it is not; that is not the way science works. Something is not true unless it can be proved to be true.

LaughingBoy
If I can find 2000 people who believe in UFOs does that make it true?

How about 2000 folks who believe we never went to the moon?

Or 2000 people who would say Jimmy Carter was a good president (this one might be tough I can probably count on you but then there's that other 1999 we would have to dig up).

I'll bet there's 2000 fans who will swear Elvis is still alive (for the record, I'm on board with this before Goreable Warming)

Then there's gotta be 2000 "Experts" who will tell you space aliens built the pyramids.

Koco
Real Science should never be mistaken for Global Warming Science.

In Real Science what you said is true.

In Global Warming Science you first develop a theory then amass only the information that supports your theory, groom it to fit only your theory and discard anything that does not support your theory. Then you sell your theory to some easily duped crowd say like a washed up politician with no future and a bunch of rich actors with no clue or grasp of reality. Then you just sit back and wait for the money to roll in.


From the home of the Jolly Green Giant
Your title grabbed my attention since I'm from the home of the Jolly Green Giant. :)

More seriously, the whole global warming scam is a money scam. The Evil Leftists are out to steal trillions (yes I said trillions) of dollars from us for the establishment and expansion of government programs designed to "solve" a non-existent problem.

Follow the money. This advice isn't just for tracking past misdeeds; it also helps those who are interested in finding out who would gain the most from the commission of future misdeeds.

How to own and SUV happily
The secret to owning a SUV is to publicly say that you hate it, while driving it anywhere you want to. Robert Redford does this, he owns a Ford F-350, quad cab, long bed 4 X 4 with a 400 cubic inch plus engine. And as long as he says that he hates it and blames Ford for not producing an Electric Truck or a even a Hybrid, he gets away with it. And he says that he needs the truck to pull his Giant Horse trailer.


jolly giant,,,
ever hear of piltdown man?,,,, in the early1900's an "explorer" discovered the missing link (between man and ape) that proved beyond any doubt that Darwin's theory was correct and all creationism was gone.
Guess where he found his proof for this link?
Piltdown,,, ENGLAND. "amazing discovery"
# of scientists, professors or anybody else of veracity that backed him up...ALL OF THEM.

I'm guessing thats more than 2000,,,,maybe not this was back in the early 1900's.

Back to our story,
This discovery was a skull that mixed the 2 thus giving us the missing link....
#of years that this "amazing discovery" lasted 40 some,,,,,, thats right folks not till the 1950's when some other scientist FINALLY decided to check out this skull was it finally proven that the Missing Link did not happen in England. Apparently the find was a modified monkey skull. And a very bad forgery at that.
Now the discoverer was like any other person looking for fame/fortune/whatever. But what made this fraud last for 40 years was the political leanings of almost all scientists.
Creationism=bad Evolutionism=good
Free Market,Capitalism,Prosperity=bad
Higher Taxes,World Government,Francophile growth (this means none, look at Euro growth rates last 40 years)=good.

It's all about control folks..... it was then and it is now...

koco and leroy
Global warming "science" is indeed, to paraphrase the Coneheads, mass quantities of male bovine waste material and the "green" claim that CO2 is causing it is fraudulent. CO2 is heavier than air and settles to earth (I have witnessed experiments confirming that) so there is no way that CO2 can cause a "greenhouse" in the upper atmosphere.

A greenhouse gas must be lighter than air; methane, which was Earth's original atmosphere, would qualify except that it is not generated fast enough to keep pace with consumption -- even with utility boilers rhar are required to use natural gas as their only fuel -- so methane is not in short supply.

"Carbon footprint" is a hoax.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.