Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, March 07, 2007
Debra J. Saunders :: Townhall.com Columnist
Questionable Prosecution, Sure Verdict
by Debra J. Saunders
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


When Joseph Wilson returned from Niger, officials who debriefed him thought that Wilson's information supported the belief that Iraq had sought uranium in Africa. As The Washington Post editorialized, "Wilson was the one guilty of twisting the truth" in saying he debunked the Niger story. The United Kingdom's Butler Commission also found the Niger story to be "well-founded."

Besides, while there were doubts about Iraq's nuclear intentions, the intelligence community and Saddam Hussein's top brass were convinced that Iraq had chemical and-or biological weapons. The experts turned out to be wrong -- but at the time, Bush had strong reason to believe they were right.

Cheney comes across as the albatross of this administration. If Cheney had stuck to simply debunking the he-sent-Wilson story, Wilson would have faded away. And you have to wonder why Cheney, who is supposed to be so smart, didn't sit down with Libby to make sure that Libby gave a true and credible account. Instead, Cheney was doodling about Libby being a fall guy.

Following the trial from my desk, I was hoping that there was enough to Libby's faulty-memory defense to instill jurors with reasonable doubt. I also believe that Fitzgerald should not have gone after Libby when he knew Armitage and Bush strategist Karl Rove were the leakers to Robert Novak, whose column outed Wilson as a CIA agent and spawned this investigation.

But I have to figure that jurors got it right. In the end, there is no denying that Scooter Libby did this to himself. And there's no defending any official who willfully lied under oath.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Debra Saunders' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
i don't have to prove she was covert
the federal prosecutor says she was and he had access to the classified information.
you have to prove that she wasn't. you give me one source who has direct knowledge of plames status that says she was not covert.

you cannot do it.

here is your statement.
"Libby was found guilty by a jury who, by their own words, wasn't comfortable with the verdict(but, apparently, they forced themselves to find him guilty). That still doesn't make him guilty of any of the charges. Without concrete evidence, it was a battle of the memories. His just wasn't trusted. Why?

it wasn't a battle of memories, 9 people said they discussed it with libby a month before he says he found out about it.

but the most astounding statment you make and which is typical of conservatives who live in another world than the majority of americans is
"that still doesn't make him guilty"

so if any criminal is found guilty in america by a jury, you say they are actually not guilty?
i mean read your own statement again and ask yourself if that sounds logical and rational to you.
sheesh

sell that logic to other conservatives who don't base their ideas on facts but feelings because the fact is he was found guilty but you FEEL he wasn't.

hypocrisy thy name is republican

oh, religiouslib...
Rule of law? Libby was found guilty by a jury who, by their own words, wasn't comfortable with the verdict(but, apparently, they forced themselves to find him guilty). That still doesn't make him guilty of any of the charges. Without concrete evidence, it was a battle of the memories. His just wasn't trusted. Why?

V. Plame was not a covert agent (prove it, if she was). Re-read Novak's article. Whoever it was, said she worked for the CIA and she pulled strings to get her husband the trip to Niger to check out the attempted plutonium purchase story (which, by golly, was true). No one ever said she was covert or secret......in Washington, her employment was probably the worst kept "secret".

If she wasn't covert, it's not a leak, and no one "leaked it" or "outed her". Who, where, and when was it proved that Rove spilled the beans about a non-covert CIA agent? Of course, for many of you, the accusation IS the proof.

Leftists complain about the secretive nature of this "fascist" administration. And, yet, it's going to take the chance of outing a "secret" CIA agent to embarrass her agenda-driven husband? I have laughingly though the administration was the probably the last to know who she worked for. Armitage admitted to being the one who divulged her employment. Considering how she and her husband sought and found the limelight in D.C., her position in the CIA couldn't have been a big secret.

And, if the NY Times can print an article about truly secret, classified documents (and get away with it), who's to say some cretin there didn't leak it? Her own husband could have leaked it. If she WAS truly a covert agent, Robert Novak would have backed off at the CIA's request, and it would have stopped there.

Give me a break. When "news" agencies, and even government officials, can spread lies and leak secrets to undermine our people in danger (all with impunity), then don't tell me Mr. Libby is some felon with an agenda to ruin our country (well, maybe your country).

I'm sure you assume I am some right-wing zealot, and an apologist for the administration. I am neither. But, I would rather be that than an apologist for the far left who would rather see this country go down in flames than have this president be victorious in anything. I read yours and many other postings, and find that you get an idea, and then find blogs, "news" articles from the right newspapers, and commentators to back you up. If you paid attention to half the opposing postings in this article alone, you would have to rethink your myopic view.

You and your kind are so very tiresome. Maybe that's why I don't post too often. It's an excercise in futility with people who can't see beyond their hatred of someone. Oh, that sounds a lot like the Islamic Jihadists some of us are trying to defeat.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.