Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, April 03, 2008
David Strom :: Townhall.com Columnist
If Hypocrisy Were an Energy Source We Could Drill in Congress
by David Strom
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


As Congress rakes oil executives over the coals over their profits, I detect the very faint sound of millions of the world's smallest violins playing. After all, who is in the mood to feel sorry for oil company executives, given the pain we all feel when we fill up at the pump? No politician has ever been hurt by going after the big profits of oil companies, and it is unlikely that any ever will.

The truth is that oil companies have a lot less control over their profits than most of us think. The main component in the price of gasoline is the world price of crude oil, which has skyrocketed in recent years. And however large the profit numbers appear to us, the oil companies' return on investment is small compared to banking, making computer chips, or even bottling Coca Cola.

According to the California Energy Commission, which breaks down the components of a price of gasoline, only six cents of the price of a gallon of gasoline went for distribution costs, marketing costs, and profits for the oil companies. That is six cents out of $3.61 cents at the pump. Sixty-three cents, or ten times as much, went directly into government coffers as state and federal taxes. And that doesn't include the income taxes the oil companies paid.

Exxon Mobil, whose profits have earned the ire of Congress, paid $27,000,000 in income taxes on those profits in 2007. That is actually more than all the income taxes paid by the bottom 50% of taxpayers. Exxon Mobil alone paid more in taxes than 65,000,000 individual taxpayers paid as a group. Of course in reality it wasn't the oil companies who paid that tax, but you and I every time we fill up at the pump. Government makes more money off the oil companies than the shareholders do.

So however satisfying it may be to watch oil executives squirm under the tough questioning of Congressmen, the hard fact is that Congress is partly responsible for rising energy prices. Congressional grandstanding is so galling because their own policies are hurting the very consumers they pretend to champion.

Congress does everything it can to drive up the cost of energy every day. Energy companies are among the most highly taxed in the country. Billions of barrels of oil reserves are kept off limits to drilling. It is nearly impossible to build an oil refinery in the United States, meaning that the United States no longer just imports crude oil, but even refined oil products such as gasoline.

But all of these factors will pale in comparison to the next wave of taxes and regulations that will drive up the price of energy in the coming years.

In response to fears about global warming or "climate change" the Congress will soon begin debate about the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act, the main consequence of which is to raise the price of most of the energy you consume. The higher energy prices envisioned by the Act are intended to get consumers and manufacturers to cut back on energy consumption and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Observers give the bill a 90% chance of passage by next year.

According to a study done by the American Council for Capital Formation and the National Association of Manufacturers, the Climate Security Act could raise retail prices for gasoline by 77%-145%, natural gas prices by 108% to 146%, and electricity prices by 101% to 129% by 2030. These price increases won't just hurt consumers directly, but will drive economic growth down as well. By 2030 the economy could be 8.3% to 8.5% smaller than if this bill didn't pass.

That's the equivalent of a pretty severe recession. One much more severe than the current economic problems we face today-and one that won't end until energy prices are allowed to fall.

How much chutzpa does it take for Congress to bash oil companies for energy price increases mostly outside their control at the same time they are working feverishly to raise the cost of energy through laws and regulations?

Energy is the lifeblood of a modern economy, and the only current sources of energy that can feed that economy today are fossil fuels, which emit carbon dioxide when used. And while it makes sense to research and develop renewable fuels, creating and implementing viable alternatives will take decades. Until then, lower greenhouse gas emissions will only come from lower energy use.

Congress should admit that that their policies have and will raise the price of energy. Instead, they are making energy companies the whipping boy for the consequences of their own policy decisions.

Congressmen are pretending to be the sheriff riding to the rescue of consumers, but in reality they are the chief bandits who are shaking us all down.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

David Strom is the President of the Minnesota Free Market Institute. He hosts a weekly radio show on AM-1280 "The Patriot" in Minneapolis-St. Paul, available on podcast at Townhall.com.

Be the first to read David Strom's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Congress is Mostly to Blame
Yes, Congress has a lot to do with high prices at the pump. Restrictions on off-shore drilling, limits on North Slope oil, budget and trade policies that effect the value of the Dollar, and environmental restrictions against new refineries.

But oil companies are not entirely off the hook.

Oil companies own petroleum in the ground, this oil is much cheaper at the well head, than buying oil on the world market -- oil companies pocket the difference. Oil companies inexplicably have closed refineries that were profitable. Exploration was depressed for several years (it can be argued that their profits were too low to spur adequate exploration).

Hedge funds and speculators also have been bidding the price up on the mistaken notion of "Peak" oil. The idea that oil production will shortly begin a decline.

But profit is being plowed back into exploration presently. Deepwater, deep-drilled, off-shore exploration is going forward and having success in the Gulf of Mexico, 180 miles off the coast of Brazil, and in the Nigerian Delta of West Africa. There is huge a amount of virgin oil prospecting territory in this field because it does require large investments that the majors are able to make now.

Oil may simply be more plentiful than imagined due to more places that can be explored and possibly the reality oil is abiotic: Google Oil is Mastery.








I hadn't thought about it this way...
Good article Mr. Strom.

I hope I am alive
The day that the "mob" publicaly strings politicians up and makes displays of their criminal and abusive behaviors.

It will happen....someday......it wil also be televised and the highest rated show in the history of media.

I hope I am there.

Congress not to blame...
Our politicians are just doing apparently what we want them to do. It's we the sheeple who keep sending the same career politicians, who care about nothing other than their power and jobs, back to Washington perpetually that are to blame. How stupid can America be?

Zel Miller (left) and Tom Tancredo (leaving) are gone to name two. Only the scumbags are left for the most part. They drag oil executives and baseball players in front of Congress to grandstand and try to appear that they're doing something. Why not? We the sheeple apparently like the drama.

My old man always said that, "nobody can take advantage of you without your permission".


Go to the harley dealer
Get over to Harley Davidson and buy a motorcycle. Save gas and have some riding fun on the way to work. I do it everyday. Let your cars collect dust for a month and watch the price of gas fall as product backs up at the distribution point.

Big Government
I think we conservatives can agree that government should get out of picking winners and losers in the energy market.

Taking away an energy credit or tax break is not a tax increase, it's getting a teat sucker of the government sow.

It's time to drive a smaller car. On 1/21/2001 a barrel of oil was $21. Now it's over $100. Iran and Hugo Chavez are laughing all the way to the bank.

It's time to drive a smaller car.


Drill in Congress??
If Hypocrisy Were an Energy Source We Could Drill in Congress...............

We wouldn't have to drill, it's an artesian source.

Drilling in Congress...
Deep dry holes if you are looking for any brains...

I Drink Your Milkshake!
I drink it up!

Congress is sucking the life right out of this country while the one of the largest polluters, China, will be allowed to drill off the coast of Cuba and drink our milkshake, that is, the oil, right from under our own land.

I watched Neil Cavuto on FBC earlier this week and he was right, the oil execs don't fight back. They just sit there at take it.

fools like kimberly
ignore facts like:

1. 0.26 cents per barrel profit and 40-45 cents per barrel taxes.
2. 30% of all oil stocks are in mutual funds, this doesn't mean oil executives.
3. 40% of all oil stocks are privately owned, this doesn't mean oil executives.
4. Government keeps the price high by regulating who can drill and who can build refineries. These are called barriers to entry for the economically illiterate.
5. Taxes are *fixed* and not based on the price of oil.

#4 is the biggie and also the reason conservatives and markets are *right* and more taxes and regulation are *wrong*.

1973
OPEC embargoed oil, the ninnyhammers of the day vowed, promised, gave their word..that's why they are called Honorable so and so (take that
after Honorable any way you like), that we'd become energy independent. Then they got on the EnviroWhacko, enviroterrierist payrolls and they backed off so here we are, overrun with illegals
(another payoff) and gas prices going up up and away. BOTH parties are at fault. What are the oil companies supposed to do when they have mandated regulations, that are costly by these same ninnyhammers pontificating like petty satraps on their thrones (notice how all their thrones, taken from the House restrooms of course, are higher than the citizens they interrogate. That's an old ploy, make the person
you are interrogating/interviewing/getting testimony feel diminished by sitting higher than they. Never mind that those being interrogated are the ones these clowns were hired by. That's
the result of incumbancy. They have insulated themselves so that it's nearly impossible for them to be removed and this won't be fixed until the constituents smarten up and realize how they are being ripped off.

hey tea party
wasn't it reagan who tore carter's solar panels off the white house? wasn't it reagan and bush who pushed back the mpg fleet standard? and just who was in that closed energy meeting with cheney?
still top secret stuff... BS just more lies

Oil executives ask Congress for support


Do you think the oil industry will sovle the energy problem?

Politico-Top executives from the nation’s five largest oil companies told the special House global warming committee Tuesday that the companies can’t meet future energy demands unless Congress stops punishing them for their profits.

The House voted last month to remove $18 billion in tax breaks for the oil industry and reinvest the money in solar, wind and other renewable energies.

The move has been lampooned by the business sector and many Republicans, who contend it will push up gasoline prices. Oil executives asked lawmakers Tuesday to support their investments in renewable energy, rather than punishing them for their profits.

READ MORE

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/oil-executives-ask -congress-for-support

hey John Konop
let's ask exxon if they will sue the US if we don't capitulate. let's ask conoco phillips if they are going to dump toxic waste on us. Or, better yet let's ask the american people to change their ways and conserve. Demand efficiency

Profits
Oil companies are not out of sync with most businesses, they make about 8% in profit, but when your product sells on average 350 - 400 million gallons daily it is a lot of cash. Why does the government have it's hands in the pot, it has risked absolutly nothing to bring gasoline to the public. From start to finish government risks nothing. True to Marxist form it takes what another entity has produced.

Why isn't Congress grilling Big University?

So, if Congress is trying...
...to punish oil companies for profits on the sale of fuel, who's going to punish Congress for their record profits on the sale of fuel?

The left is so clueless
and the right doesn't force their hand. i get so ticked off when I read comments like kimberly's. Oil company stocks are owned by retiree, company pension plans, and others who don't have "deep pockets". Government regulation keeps them from drilling for new oil and building new refineries. The price of gasoline is greatly affected by the supply. remember the spike in price after several refineries were damaged or closed by hurricanes. We need more of them to open the bottleneck. We need to be drilling off Florida and in ANWAR that was set aside just for the purpose. Increased supply eases demand and the price goes down.
Your precious alternative fuels (ethanol) reduces the land available to grow food and even if every available acre was used, would only meet a small percentage of the demand. Biodiesel processed from used cooking oil seems to me to be the only alternative fuel that makes any economic sense.

The Lamocrats are following the
bidding of one of their constituencies, the enviro-idiots. They absolutely wish to increase the cost. In keeping with that, the AGW scam is perfect. It allows them to increase the cost via taxation and determine winners and losers through cap and trade so that they can peddle influence. Raising taxes is the natural mantra of the socialists. The eco-idiots want the prices increased so that solar and wind become competitive. In order for that to happen the costs will have to double and triple in some cases.

What us really sad is that the Republicans are also signing on to this fraud. We no longer have a choice.

Supply and Demand
Congressional Democrats and environmentalists are proving they have no idea how the laws of supply and demand work. By prohibiting oil companies from drilling in ANWR and offshore the US, Congress is effectively limiting the amount of supply. It's like farm subsidies - the government is keeping excess off the market and keeping the price high.

Let's face it, if the oil companies really wanted to drill in ANWR or off the Atlantic coast, they would mount a full-scale PR blitz on why it needs to be done. Why should they do that when an unwitting Congress is ensuring that the supply of their much in-demand commodity remains limited. Open up with spigot and the price of oil falls.

I think the oil executives are more than willing to come to Capitol Hill once a year to get a butt-chewing from congressmen, knowing that Congress will keep the supply tight and prices high.

Talking out of both sides
Leave it to the Dims. They say they're going to bring down the price of gasoline at the pump.
Then they say that they want to raise taxes on that gasoline to discourage consumption.

Kimberly
I started in the oil business 30 years ago as a drilling engineer, and have worked (& not worked) through two booms and several busts. The general consensus among us low-level workers is that (1) our upper management are not sharp enough to be robber-barons and (2) even if they were robber-barons, they would not be able to control something as complex as the global oil market.

If there WAS some all-powerful cabal of Texas oilmen, wealthy Sheikhs and corrupt politcos, then they were sure one inept group to have let the price of crude drop below $10 per barrel back in the mid-1980s. And they're still pretty inept to let prices rise to the point that they are now, where it chokes off the buying power of potential customers.

I know it's comforting to figure that there's some Dr. Evil character out there manipulating the energy market, and that if our crsuading Congressment can just catch him everything will be hunky-dory, but that's just not reality.

continued....
In fairness, I should add that most of the people I've met in this business over these 30 years--even upper managers--are honest hard-working folks who have no desire to suck up your life savings or destroy the planet on which they live.

Duh
let's see, Us military keeps supply lines open and who pays for this? Congress taxes then rebates the taxes back. Good ole American capitalism. Who backed reagan bush and bush ?

supply and demand
The bottom line is that we Americans are competing with the rest of the globe for a barrel of oil. So the next time you fill up think of someone in China or India that is filling up his motorbike and competing for the same gallon that you are.
As China and India industrialize they will move from bikes to motor bikes and several billion people wanting to increase their monthly use of gasoline from 4 gallons to 8 will demand a higher price on the world market for the fuel. There simply is not enough production to meet that increased demand. Saudia Arabia can't meet it (Excellent read: "Twilight in the Desert" by Matthew Simmons")
Policy in the US has done everything to cripple the oil industry; the small independents of the 70's that actually did exploration are essentially gone and the majors have simply been buying production during the recent wave of consolidation in the industry.
The risk is on the up-side for oil price. Boone Pickens pegged it right recently when he said it is still a supply and demand problem. World production is capped at 86 million barrels per day...and demand (China/India) is poised for continued increase.
If you want lower oil prices in the US go drill a well yourself. All of the "easy oil" has long ago been found.
Eventually this high price will incentivise risk takers to find new sources of fuel...
Supply and demand.

Kimberly
Who is forcing YOU to rely on oil?

Who is stopping you from inventing your own alternatives to oil?

thru and thru
Good analysis as far as it goes...one other factor to consider is futures trading, which is actually a relatively recent development in the oil business. This takes it beyond simple supply and demand, and into the realm of what people THINK supply and demand will be, say, 6 months from now. Obviously a lot of risk involved, and not a game for the fainthearted.

The real winners in this business are the state and federal governments, who collect the same tax regardless of the product price while assuming none of the risk.

Actually, this is not a bad thing. Would YOU want the same people who oversaw Boston's Big Dig to be making "drill or no drill" decisions in the Gulf of Mexico?

Futures Market and Peak Oil
"Good analysis as far as it goes...one other factor to consider is futures trading, which is actually a relatively recent development in the oil business. This takes it beyond simple supply and demand, and into the realm of what people THINK supply and demand will be, say, 6 months from now. Obviously a lot of risk involved, and not a game for the fainthearted."
Which explains why futures contracts as far ahead as 2015 are selling for less than $100 a barrel.

The problem is that it is difficult to predict when world oil production will peak to the year, or even to the decade. Making a futures trade based on the wrong prediction could lead to financial ruin.

up-side
The risk is clearly on the up-side.
Five years from now we will look at 100$ oil and think it was a bargain.
Unless some very smart people figure out a way to provide the consumer with a cheap(er) source of fuel.
Thank the environmentalist movement for the lack of nuclear power plants (heavens, even the French got that right!)the lack of new refineries and of course the vilification of that dirty coal. Also thank Uncle Sam for the additional 75 cents per gallon that you pay at the pump for a gallon of gasoline.
We are getting exactly what we deserve.
The current 'big three' candidates will be sure to muck it up even more. Unintended consequences...
Great fun!

John Konop
By every estimate I have read, wind and solar power would provide a pathetically meager percentage of our power even if we invested in them full tilt. At a spending increase of ten percent per year, in thirty years these energy sources would account for, at most, eight percent of what we use. And that is assuming our energy consumption remains static.

I am all for alternative energy. Nuclear, because it works and produces the best returns from a cost perspective. Even hydro electric systems are more efficient than solar or wind. I have routinely read articles about wind and solar farms that need-hypothetically-to take up huge tracts of land in order to return a relatively small percentage of the typical grid output. I guess what I am saying is, let us invest in proven forms of power production that work.

As for nuclear waste, the amount produced is dwarfed by the amount of waste produced by carbon based fuels. Yes, it is radioactive, but it can be safely contained in areas away from the water table in vaults that will remain effective for centuries if built correctly.

Congress
Congress should cut the taxes on gasoline and should promote drilling for oil in our own country.
We have enough not to have to buy from anyone else!
Congress is the reason we are in this mess.
The American people ought to call a Citizens Committee on Congress and grill the pathetic jerks on where our tax money is!!!

Has anyone in congess studie ecoomics??
As someone who learned economics from those who learned at the feet of The Master (Milton Friedman) I am amazed everytime I hear the media or congress talk about the energy problem (as well as a whole lot of other things, but they're not gernmane to this).

Rule number 1: To get less of something tax it more, to get more of something tax it less. That is not only fundamental economics, it is common sense. Thats true of everything: energy, labor, housing, etc.

Rule number 2: There are damned few things that government can do better or more efficiently than private enterprise. And supplying energy is NOT one of them. Why is it that the same media and congressmen that complain about the inefficiency of government want it to do more?

Rule number 3: Collusion doesn't last. Even if the oil companies had colluded to keep prices high, all it would take is one greedy capitalist in the group (and they are all gready capitalists - which isn't a bad thing) to drop prices a little to gain market share... the agreement would fall apart. Same thing for the 'secret' technology that is being kept from us so they can get rich selling oil If such technology existed one company could patent it and dominate the energy market. If they could they would, so obviously they can't. That is, the secrets don't exist.

We should require all elected (and appointed) officials to reas Adam Smith's 'Wealth of Nations' (all 1200 +/- pages of it) before assuming office. Then maybe they'd have a clue.


excuse the typos
I'm frustrated and angry... and tend to make typos. Sorry.

More About Patents
" such technology existed one company could patent it and dominate the energy market."
Not to mention that patents EXPIRE.

If Hypocrisy were an Energy Source
Thanks to our politicians inflicting $3.50/gal.
gas and $5 apiece light bulbs on us, my wallet
is CLOSED to all political contributions this
year, and forever after that.
Choke on that, idiots.

Blatant Crapola
"And however large the profit numbers appear to us, the oil companies' return on investment is small compared to banking, making computer chips, or even bottling Coca Cola."

Exxon reported the largest second-quarter profits for ANY American corporation EVER in the history of corporate profit-making. Period. So how can the others be making doing better? Profit is profit.

This must be an attempt to throw the focus off oil and onto other industries. How bad the lie is is revealed by the other claim that has the bottom 50% of taxpayers...that is the vast majority of the US tax-paying population!...contributing no more than 27 million dollars in taxes *collectively*. That breaks down to a tax debt of less than 35 cents apiece we all owe to the Feds come tax time each year. That's just ludicrous, and a good gauge of how stupid the author of the article thinks the average conservative must be.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.