Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, October 06, 2006
David Strom :: Townhall.com Columnist
Denny Hastert Must Go
by David Strom
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


“What did he know and when did he know it?”

Those are the questions that seem to be on everyone’s lips when discussing the future of Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert.

Yet, in a very real way, those questions are irrelevant to whether he should resign his position as Speaker.

What really matters right now is, can Denny Hastert be the leader and spokesman for his Party in the coming election? For not only is Hastert Speaker of the House, a technically non-partisan position, but also the head of the Republican Party in the House of Representatives.

And it seems clear that the answer to that question is no. For the foreseeable future, Hastert will be involved in cleaning up the mess caused by the Mark Foley scandal, and his handling of the information he received about Foley over the past year or more. It is difficult to imagine that anything Hastert says or does in the coming weeks would not be tainted by that scandal, and impossible to imagine a situation in which he could effectively campaign for Republican House candidates.

Unless Hastert resigns, the Mark Foley scandal will be at the center of political discussion for the rest of the campaign season. It is tempting for Republicans to bemoan the injustice of it all. After all, Mark Foley was just one of the 231 Republicans in the House; and nobody knows for certain how much members of the Republican Leadership knew and when they knew it. There is a lot of dark talk about how the information about Foley was leaked as part of an “October Surprise” to derail Republicans in the key weeks before the election.

All of this is beside the point. Mark Foley’s behavior was inexcusable and indefensible. The leadership either knew or should have known enough to take vigorous action to protect pages and former pages from Foley, rather than just taking his word that he wouldn't do it again. Any attempts by Republicans to excuse or defend their leadership’s response will keep the public focused on the shortcomings of the Republican leadership, rather than on the issues that should decide the election. Anything Republicans do right now, short of a full mea culpa and a sacrifice of their leadership upon the alter of decency, will be seen as trying to defend the indefensible.

Denny Hastert must resign, not because this scandal is necessarily his fault, or even because we know of a specific failure on his part that if corrected could have avoided this scandal. Hastert should resign because it happened on his watch, and somebody has to take responsibility. And because there is no way that he can lead the Republican effort to retain control of Congress as long as this scandal is hanging over his head.

If Republicans are to have any chance at all of keeping their majority—and chances of that look increasingly slim —they need to go back on the offense and take control of the political conversation in last weeks of the campaign. They also need to send a clear message to the public that they understand that the House leadership had its priorities wrong in not taking strong action to deal with Foley's misconduct. Hastert cannot help them do that, and indeed it is probable that nobody in current House Leadership could.

Republicans need to quickly get past the question of what is fair and just, or whose fault this mess is, and focus entirely on the question of what they need to do to remain competitive in the upcoming elections. It doesn’t matter if this mess was an “October Surprise;” it doesn’t matter that many Democrats are being hypocrites when they decry Hastert’s response to Foley’s behavior; it doesn’t even matter if Hastert and other members of leadership really did all they reasonably could have given the information they had about Foley's misconduct.

Republicans are asking the voters to retain them in office because of the party's commitment to important principles, including the principle of personal responsibility. There is simply no way they can make the case unless they wipe the slate clean, elect new leadership, and embrace full responsibility for the failure to do the right thing about Foley. Anything short of this will doom the Republicans to minority status. Replacing the leadership may not be enough to salvage this election, but at least it will let the country know that the Republicans in the House understand that something went terribly wrong.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

David Strom is the President of the Minnesota Free Market Institute. He hosts a weekly radio show on AM-1280 "The Patriot" in Minneapolis-St. Paul, available on podcast at Townhall.com.

Be the first to read David Strom's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

The first question you ask
What did he know hand when did he know it?

Heck just hang him and if you were wrong then say you are sorry. That is righ shoot first ask questions later.

Sorry we throw too many leaders to the dogs starting with Newt.

I say calls for him to step down are out of line. The Democrats don't do this kind of thing.

We have to stop shooting our own wounded and start shooting big mouths who know nothing who are writing articles like this one.

Hastert Should Grow Backbone
Lessee here, once again somebody in Congress who gets mentioned in the pop media with an "R" by his name gets caught with his hand in the cookie jar, and instantly not just (predictably) the Demmies, but spineless wonders within his own party, call for not just the resignation of that Congressperson (who did), but for the party leader to perform hari-kari as well, based on some vague nebulous "should have known" doctrine cooked up for this occasion.

Moreover, letting the matter stew for about 3 days resulted in some interesting revelations that have pretty much knocked the legs out from under any substance the allegations might have had. We're basically left with the knowledge that one male Congressperson exchanged suggestive IM's with another consenting adult male. As the late Miz Clara would bellow: "Where's the beef?"

Calls by Democrats for Republicans to resign for being imperfect or for disagreeing with Demmies, at least since 1994, have been as predictable as sunset and repetitive as a skipping CD. They should be ignored like the mating calls of crickets, albeit large ugly hyprocritical obnoxious crickets. Nothing good, and plenty of bad, can result from pandering to them. Whenever the Demmies get one GOP leader to step down, they are emboldened to go on without missing a beat gunning for the next. Remeber a cat named Newt Gingrich? Pretty soon the whole _majority_ party is gelded and grovelling abjectly, right at a time when it SHOULD be standing tall and stridently proclaiming, & implementing, principles. This bogus scandal need tarnish Mr. Hastert's perceived credibility and effectiveness ONLY TO THE EXTENT WE ALLOW IT TO.

Therefore I dispute mr. Strom's analysis and conclusions. For Hastert to resign the speakership would only dismay and demoralize Republican support, while needless to say not doing one iota to mollify the lefties and the pop media. It would not, once that bunch gets done spinning it, restore the party's perceived moral rectitude, but rather would seem to _confirm_ that the GOP House leadership was grossly negligent if not complicit, resulting in an avalanche domino effect. Hastert's resignation would be as productive as signing peace treaties with Arafat (even when he was alive!), or offering to leave Al Queda alone in return for a "cease fire," or bleeding in front of sharks. It would only embolden our adversaries & invite more of the same sort of scurrilous attack on Hastert's successor. Best to quash the notion right now, and let the Demmies and the naysayers go boo-hoo in front of the mikes&cameras till they wear out the novelty, while he gets back to work.

Mr. Hastert should resign over this after & only after all the Democrats resign and disband their putrid cesspool of a party over their complicity in Chappaquiddick, Waco, the 900 FBI files, Loral/Chinamissile-gate, Barney-Frank's-roomies-escort-service-gate, etc etc, not to mention their idiotic eurosocialist antifamily policy positions.

If Hastert needs to resign over something, let it be the continued inaction over Socialist Insecurity, taxes, border security, or something else of real value and significance.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.