Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, July 27, 2008
David R. Stokes :: Townhall.com Columnist
Moscow Rules
by David R. Stokes
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


The International Spy Museum in Washington, D.C. displays a list of what are called Moscow Rules – commonly accepted guidelines for the good guys during the Cold War.  Basically, they are based on a through-the-looking-glass approach to reality, where nothing is as it appears to be. 

Some directories note as many as forty of these espionage nuggets, including things like, “float like a butterfly; sting like a bee” (guess who inspired that?), or “Murphy is right,” or “technology will always let you down” (actually, I think that one’s true).  But ten are in the commonly accepted list:

Assume nothing.

Never go against your gut.

Everyone is potentially under opposition control.

Don’t look back; you are never completely alone.

Go with the flow; blend in.

Vary your pattern and stay within your cover.

Lull them into a sense of complacency.

Don’t harass the opposition.

Pick the time and place for action.

Keep your options open.

Author Daniel Silva has brought these deep-background precepts to life in his latest novel that bears the actual name, Moscow Rules.  His eleventh book is a bit of a departure from recent ones because it shifts from using the Middle East as a backdrop in favor of the intriguing world of present-day Russia. 

The spy novel has come back home.

With the feel of a Cold War story, and a pace unmatched by most war-on-terror thrillers, this book is likely Silva’s best to date.  Spy-Mystery-Thriller writers all have their favorite characters.  John Le Carré gave us George Smiley, William F. Buckley introduced us to Blackford Oakes, Jack Higgins writes about Sean Dillon, and, of course, there’s Vince Flynn’s creation, Mitch Rapp.  But in art restorer-Israeli top spy Gabriel Allon, Silva has a hero for all seasons, shapes, and sizes - a man who is intensely human, fiercely intelligent, and quite good at what he does. 

In Moscow Rules, Allon finds himself moving with ease between worlds of religion, politics, and history.  From the Vatican, to a CIA house in Georgetown, to the dark and dank inner-sanctum of old Soviet-style brutality in the Lubyanka, he’s a hero for everyone who still believes that there are good guys and bad guys. 

Mr. Silva’s style matches the prose gold standard of Mr. Le Carré.  He then, however, leaves the Brit far behind to wallow in his well-worn and historically inaccurate arguments about Cold War moral equivalency between east and west.  Moscow Rules reminds us that the U.S. and Israel, though far from perfect, provide the world a vital strategic partnership against enemies of freedom.  And it’s especially important to have such a relationship up and running when nations like Russia and Iran draw close to each other for their own ends and agendas.

In a sense, Daniel Silva has written a new Cold War novel.  By that I mean, a story that’s very much about how an old enemy has come back from the abyss to taunt and haunt us once again.  History is repeating itself.  This time, however, the weapon we ultimately used to defeat that old “evil empire” – our economic strength – is no longer completely available to us.  And it’s very available to them.

Today’s Russia is vastly different from the empire we tried to contain fifty years ago.  It’s a place no longer marked by colorless uniformity and severe deprivation.  Quite the contrary, today we find a land of great contrasts and contradictions.  And we also find a nation recently flooded with petro-dollars.

If the Soviets of old had been able to tap into that kind of resource-driven wealth, the Cold War would have never ended.  And the rules of engagement, even history itself, would have been very different.

The fact is that Russia today represents a greater threat to the security of the world than it ever did in the days of Cold War bipolarity.  And our old adversaries are taking great pains to reconstruct an empire, one that would include their strong presence, as was once the case, in the Middle East. 

Daniel Silva’s story is told against this backdrop, and it has a ripped-from-the-headlines feel.  Readers encounter stories that are reminiscent of recent real-life dramas such as the intriguing murder of former FSB Colonel Aleksandr Litvinenko, who died while investigating the death of Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya.  The new Russia is starting to strongly resemble the old Soviet Union - only with nicer cars. 

Along the way, the novel takes the reader on a jet-set paced ride to places like Saint-Tropez, Courchevel, Paris, London – but back time and again to Moscow.  All the while it tells a cautionary tale, one that should be widely heard these days.  It’s not just the Islamists we should be watching – and watching out for – we need to keep our eye on that big old bear roaming once again in the global woods.

As Russia becomes stronger and stronger, and as its leaders tighten the reins more and more on all aspects of national and international life, the world becomes a more dangerous place with each passing day.  Vladimir Putin and his puppet, Dmitry Medvedev, have an agenda.  They have empires in their brains.  And, if the past is any indicator of the future (of course it is!), they will also play by a sinister set of rules - the most important one being: the ends justify the means.

When it comes to characters out of Cold War literature and media, I can’t help but resonate with something said by Boris Badenov.  No, he wasn’t a KGB leader.  Nor was he ever on the wall overlooking Red Square as the missiles rode by on May Day. 

Boris was a diminutive fellow with a distinct accent who, along with his wife and side-kick, Natasha, tried to foil the good guys, Rocket J. Squirrel and Bullwinkle the Moose.  He had a memorable saying I thought about as I read Daniel Silva’s book, Moscow Rules.  It came to mind every time one of the bad guys did something rotten.  In fact, what Mr. Badenov had to say should be heeded by both candidates for the presidency this year.

He said: “Never underestimate the power of a schnook.” 
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
David R. Stokes is a minister, writer, and broadcaster. His weekly talks at Fair Oaks Church in Fairfax, Virginia and host of Loud on Purpose, heard Monday to Friday in Washington, D.C. on WAVA 105.1 fm.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
A real life Spy Story

In 1951 I was a secret spy for the FBI, looking for members of the Julius and Ethel Rosenberg spy ring.

My Commanding Officer told me to report to a certain building at a certain time. He very gruffly told me to tell him what it was all about, when I returned.

Several high-ranking officers said we were forbidden to tell anyone that this meeting even took place. They gave me a telephone number to memorize, for the Major to call.

He had the “screaming mimis” when I would not tell him what I was doing, but he dialed the number and firmly demanded they tell him what was going on. His face turned to stone, he came to attention in his chair, and said, “Yes sir! Yes sir!” and hung up. He had no more questions, that was the end of his involvement.

All my weekly reports mailed to the secret PO Box number in a phony town name, said, “Nothing to Report.”


I disagree concerning Moscow's danger
David,

I'm an American who has spent a lot of time in Russia in the past 10 years. I disagree with your conclusions concerning Moscow's danger. In contrast to the Soviet system, today's Russia offers a lot of personal freedom to the country's citizens. While political freedom is still somewhat limited, I think that over time the Russian government is becoming responsive to the will of the people. That is, the government is intent on pleasing its constituents on the domestic level.

After WW II, France was authoritarian and Italy corrupt. Today, both are normal European nations. Russia today is both corrupt and authoritarian, but the government is popular and becoming responsive to the people. I think in time, Russia will follow the path of France and Italy and be a normal democratic country.

In the meantime, our best bet is not to appease Russia where its interests differ from ours, but to work with that nation in areas where we have parallel interests.

hooray for russia
thank you god for bringing back the russians as enemies. i was getting so tired of the Koran and muslims and shiites etc. russians are so familiar and comfortable.like meeting an old girlfriend and sleping with her. killing them is something i got used to long ago and so i wont have to go throught the difficulty that change always brings . in this case there are even enough muslims in russia so that on a small scale i can imagine killing thmem also. two for one. good deal.. we need someone to make the cold war oficial again. ,. perhaps ol busho will do it before he departs. hes stupid enough not to though. perfect way to insure his place in history. what a chance to say "Mr__----- (whoever is in charge ) put back that wall. a newer enemny , or at last a revived one. thank you god we will do youir biding and hate them completely./ by giving us back the russians you satisfy so many deep dark urges which so many of our "good christians" have.

Putin's pedigree
Putin used to be a high ranking KGB operative ie part of the old Soviet aparatus. It's not surprising to see him revert to the paranoid nationalism that permeated that government. It won't be until the cohort of ex-Soviet officials dies off that Cold War rivalries will dissipate.

What side of the fence are you on Obama?
So he tells the American public one thing to extort money from them for his campaign and then goes to other countries and tells them something else to extort money from them.

What a clown he is, does he think he is running for World Order President (well just maybe he is)?

How dare we return to a bipolar world.
At the end of the Cold War, the U.S. reigned supreme.

That development was exploited by the neocons to have this nation assert a far more robust and aggressive foreign policy.

Not only did it manifest itself in the grotesque belief we had a divine right to militarily intervene and reorder Muslim societies to more nearly comport with our notions of what constituted proper governance, but it also was reflected in our relations with Russia.

From lecturing Russians on democracy, to placing missile batteries on her border(including enlarging NATO to her frontier out of the remnants of the old Warsaw pact), we now are enraged Russia seeks to reassert her power in the world and meddle in our hemisphere by selling arms to the Venezuelans.

I am no apologist for Russia.

She will do what is in her interests. And with oil receipts at these levels, she has the economic wherewithal to do just that.

What we need is a little less sanctimonious lecturing to Putin and Medvedev(including at least some appreciation of Russian sensitivity to our placement of military hardware on her border), and more agreement in areas of mutual benefit, such as our shared interest in combating radical Islamism and accounting for Soviet-era nuclear weapons.

NEVER UNDERESTIMATE...
... THE POWER OF A SCHNOOK.

Sounds like something that goes hand in glove with one of Murphy's Laws:

NOTHING IS FOOLPROOF AGAINST A SUFFICIENTLY TALENTED FOOL.

Take ANYTHING for granted and you'll have fools and schnooks walking all over you... every time.

KGB IS BACK AS IS Stalin replacement
Putin is Stalin's replacement and former head man of the hated KGBhim self . Russia this time with lots of money is dead headed straight to the COLD WAR Tactics of 1917- 45 . And Then 1945 until 1991 ......... and now again today sadly .
Russia is far more Dangerous today than it was in 1950 !!!
PUTIN IS EVERYTHING STALIN WAS NOT ....... VERY SMART AND CUNNING !

Prodding the Bear
Why is that every article about Russia lately connects any disagreement with the U.S. to 'an influx of petrodollars'. Our economy has expanded plenty in the past twenty years but you don't hear inane comments like "flush with financial service sector funds, the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003."
As jerabaub points out, we've done plenty to give Russia valid security concerns.
Try to imagine that the Warsaw Pact still existed. Imagine further that the Soviets asked Cuba and Mexico to join, then installed ABM systems on our border. We'd be apoplectic, yet in a sense this is what we've done to Russia.
They have no more reason to accept U.S. hegemony in Eastern Europe than we would to accept theirs in Latin America.

recon-usmc
sorry, buddy,

I agree with your sentiments, but don't write off Stalin as an ijit. I think history will show him to be a shrewd, if warped, global leader. Putin is in the same mold. If we belittle the current leadership of Russia the way we have in the past, we may repeat the same mistakes we made before. I agree with the opinions of this writer in this article. The Russkies are not to be trifled with- we need to have a plan- BHO is not the guy, and I'm not sure that McC is either, but at least HE'll understand the threat.

BTW: Jerabaub is the worst sort of moral relativist. He'll sell us all down the river in search of his "purity of essence".

Oil
It is amazing how many problems would be solved by just drilling for our own oil. Prices would go down - removing that source of money from the Russians and the Saudis. It would alleviate the problem of people close to losing their homes because of increasing expenses. Farmland would again be devoted to food stuff - instead of petrol. Starvation would lessen in the world. Why cannot the Liberals get behind this? = Answer - because it is not their solution!

Russian threat
The fact is that Russia today represents a greater threat to the security of the world than it ever did in the days of Cold War bipolarity.

Greater than when it had almost 300 million people, an army on the inner German border, and a vast blue water navy? Russia is just acting like the great power that it has been for 300 years.

Le Carre
The, 'moral equivalancy' of john le Carre is a nother way of saying that, when you are absolutely 100% certain you are right and they are wrong, you may not be; right that is.
Le Carre, and his refusal to judge, remains the gold standard. Even though we can agree on the evils of fascism, communism, to say that their operatives were equally evil is absurd.
They were as sincere as our operatives, as Le Carre noted, merely sincerely wrong.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.