Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, June 08, 2007
David Limbaugh :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Dem Presidential Candidates' Sojourn to Faithland
by David Limbaugh
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Jim Wallis expressed similar sentiments, saying that abortion and same-sex marriage are not the only Christian issues. "Faith informs policy in other areas as well," wrote Wallis. "What about the biblical imperatives for social justice, the God who lifts up the poor, the Jesus who said, 'blessed are the peacemakers'?"

Yes, but Christian conservatives don't cherry pick the Bible for partisan political benefit. Christian conservatives don't espouse radical secular values, and they aren't at war with Christian principles.

It is undeniable that liberals claim to champion the poor and that Jesus talked tirelessly about the poor. But the myth is that conservatives have less compassion for the poor; they just don't believe the best way to eradicate poverty is through government-coerced redistributions of wealth. Capitalism is squarely in line with Biblical principles. By contrast, one would be hard-pressed to make a biblical case for societal sanction of same-sex marriage or abortion.

Democratic evangelicals also fail to explain liberals' high comfort level with secular values and their unmistakable hostility toward Christians, mainstream Christian values and, sometimes, the very concept of absolute truth. You might recall Democratic Senator (and presidential candidate) Joe Biden confessing, "We have too many elites in our party who look down their nose on people of faith."

Biden is right. The examples of liberal Democrats denigrating Christians are too voluminous to detail (without writing a book about it), from columnist Maureen Dowd and others likening Christian fundamentalists (read: Bible-respecting Christians) to the Taliban, to liberal commentators saying Christian conservatives are "reality challenged," to Clinton's Labor Secretary Robert Reich arguing that "terrorism itself is not the greatest danger we face" and implying that the real threat is from "those who believe that truth is revealed through Scripture and religious dogma."

Liberals likewise reveal their true colors when they lobby for strict "separation of church and state" when it comes to the remotest presence of Christianity in the public square, but promote outright government endorsement of radical secular values that are unambiguously inimical to biblical truth.

Professing evangelical liberals might achieve marginal success in expanding their base this way, but I would hope the overwhelming majority of Christian voters would follow substance over form.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
David Limbaugh, brother of radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh, is an expert in law and politics and author of Bankrupt: The Intellectual and Moral Bankruptcy of Today's Democratic Party.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read David Limbaugh's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Thanks, Cam
I appreciate your response, and I agree that we will have to disagree on this one. I think that we just don't see eye to eye on when an embryo becomes a human being, and I can accept that reason better than any of your others.

Truthfully, none of us know when the soul and body meet, I would rather err on the side of caution on that one. And, to be honest, I was doubtful myself about the humanity of the embryo at one point. But then I acknowledged that killing it would be killing innocent human life no matter how you looked at it. And the pictures of aborted embryos, even at early stages, really impacted me. I appreciate your willingness to consider the issue. I think most people haven't really thought through where they stand on this one.

As far as Republican moral errors go, I agree with you that the Republican party is certainly not the beacon of morality that some make it out to be. I am happy to see Democrats taking on the abortion issue and trying to do something about it. If I had to choose between a pro-choice Republican or a pro-life Democrat, I would probably vote for the Democrat. Faced with two pro-choice candidates, I will write someone in. As I have told many Republicans who accuse me of being a single issue voter, I'm not a single issue voter, I am a bottom line issue voter, and my bottom line is abortion. I just can't vote for someone who supports it.

Anyway, thanks for the dialouge, I appreciate you helping me to understand your position of being both pro-choice and Christian.

Excellent response
Thank you for your very thoughtful response. You take a much more thoughtful approach than at least your partisans on this website.

We may have to agree to disagree on whether it’s OK to prefer not to be born with a birth defect or to an impoverished family. If others made a different decision, I’d be delighted to support them financially. I guess I’m operating under the assumption that if my embryo were terminated at a few weeks, God would find another one for me.

Time magazine had an interesting article several months ago about a married couple who had a mild form of Down syndrome and were supported by their families. When the woman was informed that it was very likely that any child of theirs would also likely have Down syndrome, she chose to get sterilized. Was her decision “insulting” or just better informed than anyone else?

As for my main point of the Republicans being in no position to criticize Democrats from a scriptural basis, I’m still 100% certain of that. It was the Republicans who reduced the tobacco company penalties from $130 billion to $10 billion despite the fact that they were targeting teenagers and manipulating nicotine levels. About 1,000 people die every day prematurely from smoking. It was the Bush Administration that gutted New Source Review regulations, saving power plants billions of dollars in required upgrades. It was the Reagan/Bush National Highway Traffic Safety Administrations that ignored SUV rollovers for years at a cost of 12,000 lives. They justified their inaction based on the public’s “right” to choose vehicles. On the other hand, Bush II appointed former representatives of the pharmaceutical industry to run the FDA. In five years, FDA’s warnings on misleading drug ads were cut in half while the reports of violations stayed the same. FDA also adopted the pharmaceutical companies’ assertion that imported drugs were “unsafe.” That assertion was “discovered” in a focus group formed to determine what would turn Americans off to imported drugs. Now the public had no “right” to choose. In both the SUV and drug issues, Republicans ignored the science in favor of the big bucks. After midnight in 2003 the Republicans gave away billions to the drug industry by forbidding Medicare from negotiating with them. The key sponsors in congress walked away with huge salaries in the industry. The money lost through forbidding negotiations could have been used to provide more services to 47 million uninsured Americans. An estimated 18,000 Americans die each year for lack of health care. During the Iraq/Iran war, the Reagan/Bush Administrations sold anti-aircraft equipment to the Iranians while advising the Iraqis to step up their aerial bombing. Now we’re in the midst of a war that was planned from day 1 of the Bush Administration and substantiated by a series of demonstrably inaccurate statements.

So I’ll take you at your word on all of your facts and figures. As I said, I’d like to see my party do more on abortion. Some in congress are doing so. I’d love to see someone take on the Spring Break phenomenon in our country. But if I have to choose between a party that’s callous with embryos and a party that’s callous with walking, talking, innocent, and genetically distinct people, I’m afraid I’m going to have to go with the former rather than the latter.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.