Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, May 18, 2007
David Limbaugh :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Paradoxical Hatred of Christopher Hitchens
by David Limbaugh
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


As intelligent as Hitchens is, he manifests woeful ignorance about basic Christian doctrine in mischaracterizing Falwell as believing that people he didn't like were going to hell, just as he has, elsewhere, in describing the evangelical's concept of salvation as works-based. While I can't readily prove a negative, I would be shocked to discover that Falwell preached that "people he didn't like were going to hell."

Christians are commanded to love everyone, including those they believe are "lost." They do not believe that those they don't like are doomed for hell. Rather, they believe the Bible teaches we are all doomed unless we have saving faith in Jesus Christ, who died for our sins. Christians are not the ones pronouncing judgment on their fellow man in this regard, but believe God has revealed, through Scripture, his plan for divine judgment.

Apart from Hitchens' recklessly sloppy error in lumping Christians with Islamofascists and his implied indictment of Christians across the board, to say nothing of his indictment of those of other religions, I was struck by the irony of his viciousness, meanness and hatefulness in attacking Falwell essentially for being vicious, mean and hateful.

Many liberals, like Hitchens, rail against "hate" as the worst imaginable sin, yet exude a magnitude of hatred that the conservatives they condemn as hateful couldn't begin to possess. Hitchens refused to back down from his excoriation of Falwell on the very day of his death, saying, "I don't care whether his family's feelings are hurt or not. But if they are, they can take comfort from the extraordinary piety and stupidity, and generally speaking, uniformity of the coverage of the man's death."

Even more revolting was Hitchens' response to CNN's Anderson Cooper's question of whether he believed in heaven and whether "you think Jerry Falwell is in it." Hitchens said he did not believe in it, but "I think it's a pity there isn't a hell for him to go to."

It would take an extraordinarily warped perspective for someone as mean-spirited as Christopher Hitchens to believe he is entitled to righteous indignation at those -- like Christians or conservatives -- he presumably believes to be mean-spirited.

But Hitchens will get a pass for his abominable behavior from the liberal media because he is a liberal -- notwithstanding his heresy on the war -- and liberals are not to be condemned for their hatred because the objects of their hatred deserve to be hated.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
David Limbaugh, brother of radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh, is an expert in law and politics and author of Bankrupt: The Intellectual and Moral Bankruptcy of Today's Democratic Party.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read David Limbaugh's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
I guess the thread is over
I will say this on an optimistic note.

The logic should be easy to understand; if everything exists at the whim of God, everything is God's to remake or rescind. The logical conclusion is that even our own lives don't really belong to ourselves, there's an authority higher than us who holds the deed. And humans have no power or legal standing to change that.

But do not be lost to what we have in common. Those of us who beleive in the ideals of the Declaration of Independence agree on who **doesn't** own an individual's life, thoughts, or honestly-gained property. Whether or not those things are ultimately deeded to God, they are **not** deeded to some human entity aside from the individual in question. Government can bill us for services rendered (as a business does), but it doesn't own our stuff. Parental authority is near-absolute, but even that has limits (which could make up a whole new comments thread). Disagreement on the God-human relationship doesn't preclude lots of agreement on the human-human relationship.

You don't get it
Genocide, murder:

What have I said earlier? God owns everything, God is the highest authority of existence. With no higher level of government above him, he certainly has the authority to implement capital punishment.

Israel teaches us an important lesson: God delegates only a smidgeon of that authority, even under a theocracy. Sins fall in two caregories; man-vs-man-and-God, and man-vs-God-alone. Only God can authorize criminalization of the latter - he is the sole plaintiff - only God can write a constitution that criminalizes such sins. He has not authorized any more theocracies after rescinding the first, so human governments are authorized to prosecute only the former.

The principle of equitable punishment - "eye for an eye" - places this restriction: human punishment must be assessed on the basis of the level of injury inflicted ON THE HUMAN PARTY. All sins grieve God equally, on the basis of what they do to the relationship between the sinner and God, but all sins do not harm humans equally. Human capital punishment is thus severely restricted. Assuming this principle is followed, capital punishment is not murder, any more than a fine is theft.

Hitler and Stalin make my point. They stole authority that didn't belong to them. They murdered because they believed that some lives were less valuable than others, and becuase they rooted the value of a life to be gauged by the individual's conformity to the totalitarian ideal in question. Christianty teaches that we are *not* God, that only God owns a person's life, that we better damn well be careful that we don't let Caesar take what isn't Caesar's.

Incest and polygamy:

Abraham was not above the law. Right and wrong never changed. God has implemented varying degrees of leniency over time with direct enforcement. One sign of that leniency is the fact that he doesn't kill us all for our man-vs-God-alone crimes, starting from scratch without so much as a few refugees in an ark.

You fail to consider the possibility that God regards divorce as a greater ill than Abraham's (or Jacob's) marital arrangements. You also fail to note that God never picked prophets on the basis of moral perfection - considering that humans aren't morally perfect. The prophets didn't earn their offices - they were chosen because God had specific missions for them.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.