Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, April 27, 2007
David Limbaugh :: Townhall.com Columnist
There Are “Lies,” and Then There Are Lies
by David Limbaugh
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Cheney noted that in just five months Reid has taken three distinctly different positions on the war: “from pledging full funding for the military, then full funding but with conditions, and then a cutoff of funding … on the most important foreign policy question facing the nation and our troops.” Are you with me on this? We're not talking about sex here, but “the most important foreign policy question facing the nation and our troops.” Reid has not only changed his position on the pivotal issue of Iraq, but flagrantly lied about it -- and Cheney caught him dead to rights.

Cheney pointed out that Reid falsely stated the troop surge was against the recommendations of the Iraq Surrender Group (ISG), which is “plainly false.” The ISG report “was explicitly favorable toward a troop surge to secure Baghdad.” This surge, in the opinion of the general in command, is critical to our victory in Iraq, and Reid is lying about the ISG's recommendation on it. So this lie conceivably could affect the very outcome of the war and, thus, our national security.

Cheney said that Reid chided Bush for not participating in a regional conference on Iraq, yet we're scheduled to participate in one next week. Reid said Democrats aren't given the opportunity for real substantive meetings with the White House. But just last week, said Cheney, Reid emerged from a meeting at the White House and said, “It was a good exchange; everyone voiced their considered opinion about the war in Iraq.”

Checkmate!

If Reid is going to continue this pattern of prevarication, he’s going to have to cover his tracks better.

Call Cheney a counterattack dog if you wish. But at least he's counterattacking on behalf of truth and America's national security. More power to him.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
David Limbaugh, brother of radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh, is an expert in law and politics and author of Bankrupt: The Intellectual and Moral Bankruptcy of Today's Democratic Party.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read David Limbaugh's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
itreeye
Did Bush lie? Let's just say that he made a decision to go to war as the case for war had collapsed. What many do not understand if that we knew the intelligence was wrong before the war began, so there shouldn't not have been this feigned surprise of "what happened to all the weapons?"

The motivation for Iraq wasn't oil or even Bush's, but the Neocons who have had designs on Iraq for years, and 9/11 was the crisis that gave them the opportunity to invade the country. Now we are building permanent military installations and are showing no signs of evacuating anytime soon. US soldiers will continue to die over the irrelevant Sunni Shia conflict -- to Bush and the Neocons their deaths are just an afterthought.


Is red tooth correct? Also motivation...
Red Tooth, you suggest that the available intelligence on Iraq's WMD's was that the weapons he had in 1991 were no longer a threat and Sadamm did not have or make any more in the decade or so since than. Therefore Bush did lie.

I am wondering if you have any theories on his motivation?

I personally do not believe it was for more oil resources so he could make more money. I would like to think that he honestly believed, after 911, that leaving Saddam in power was too much of a National threat and so had to be removed. This at least was his initial stance, remember? He brought up WMD's *after* the UN (and especially France, Germany, Russia and the left) were so vehemently opposed to taking out Sadamm and kept pushing him for more justifiction. I remember thinking that the whole WMD issue was brought up only to try and avert their self interests from monetary issues to a matters of self preservation! haha :)

Have you ever wondered how this dethroning and subsequent, eventual pullout would have gone if the whole world had been behind the US liberation of Iraq instead of against it? It's a perception thing. I mean, for just one example, imagine if it had been Clinton doing this. All the papers would be saying "Liberation of Iraq" instead of "Occupation" or "Invasion of Iraq". Words, as you know Red Tooth, are very powerful.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.