Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, April 13, 2007
David Limbaugh :: Townhall.com Columnist
Iraq Burns While Dems Fiddle
by David Limbaugh
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


It is hard to overstate the arrogance and bellicosity of the congressional Democratic leadership. When they're not playing footsie with our enemies, they're savaging President Bush, gleefully naysaying every aspect of the Iraq war and harming the troops they pretend to protect.

Everywhere you turn, Democrats are working their partisan destruction.

Turn to the Washington Post and read about Sen. Joe Biden contradicting the administration and the military's claims that the "surge" in Iraq is producing dividends. Don't be misled, chides Biden. Don't dare focus on any good news coming out of Iraq that doesn't fit into our anti-Bush, anti-war template. Talk all you want about increased security in Baghdad, but the chaos on the city's periphery more than outweighs any gains we've made. The surge, says Biden, is doomed to fail.

Is it too harsh to infer that Biden and his ilk are rooting for failure in Iraq? If bad news doesn't immediately jump out at them, they redouble their efforts to find it, because bad news is their currency. It is their ticket to political power.

Next, turn to an entry from The Crypt's Blog on Politico.com, which reports that Sen. Harry Reid compared President Bush to the most vilified 20th century American president: Richard M. Nixon. Bush, said the quintessentially pugnacious Reid, is "as isolated" over the Iraq war as Nixon was over Watergate.

Note that this is in keeping with the Dems' template on the Iraq issue. To them, it's not just a policy dispute over the prosecution and conduct of the war, but a scandal. To them, Bush's entire initiation and management of the war is criminal. That's the point Reid is attempting to reinforce with his Nixon reference. Nixon became isolated on Watergate because of his own misconduct. Bush is hunkered down in his White House bunker alone because of his supposed misconduct. Don't miss the intended imagery.

Yet there is no evidence of misconduct by Bush on the war -- no amount of shouting and repetition can change that. And he is not isolated, though at times it seems he is the only one with the requisite courage to make the difficult calls on Iraq. Don't forget that the appeasement party still lacks the votes to outright eliminate funding for the war.

Though Bush isn't isolated, he has been ceaselessly slandered and rebuffed by this militant opposition party. Recently, he invited these obstructionists to the White House to discuss their gamesmanship over the supplemental funding bill to support our troops in Iraq. Trying to be cute, they snubbed him and demanded he come to their turf instead.

Their puerile petulance is one thing, but we are talking about an area over which the president is primarily in charge: foreign policy. This means it is incumbent on them to come to the White House to discuss the matter. Chief Justice John Marshall wrote, "The President is the sole organ of the nation in its external affairs, and its sole representative with foreign nations. The [executive] department is entrusted with the whole foreign intercourse of the nation."

But these Democrats will not honor protocol, will not play by the rules and will not respect their constitutional role, even though their abominable behavior guarantees negative consequences to our national security and fighting forces.

If you doubt the welfare of the troops depends on this funding, read Defense Secretary Robert Gates' letter to Sen. Robert Byrd -- courtesy of Jed Babbin at Human Events -- addressing the indispensability of congressional action on the supplemental funding bill.

Without the supplemental, according to Gates, the Army will soon begin: "reducing Army quality of life initiatives reducing the repair and maintenance of equipment necessary for deployment training [and] curtailing the training of Army Guard and Reserve units within the U.S., reducing their readiness levels."

Gates says the Army will also begin "reducing the pace of equipment overhaul work at Army depots curtailing training rotations for Brigade Combat Teams currently scheduled for overseas deployment, [which] would likely require the further extension of currently deployed forces [and delay] acceleration of additional modularized Army brigades necessary to expand the Army unit rotational pool and reduce the stress on existing units."

Meanwhile, Harry Reid fiddles, the globe-trotting Nancy Pelosi flouts presidential authority and the Logan Act, Sen. Biden waxes negative and Sen. Byrd exhorts all of these charlatans to ratchet up their mischief.

If I were not actually witnessing this spectacle unfold before our eyes, I wouldn't believe it.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
David Limbaugh, brother of radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh, is an expert in law and politics and author of Bankrupt: The Intellectual and Moral Bankruptcy of Today's Democratic Party.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read David Limbaugh's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Defund
Dems, if you choose to defund the war, stand up and do it. The blood of our soilders will be on your hands.
If this is your example of supporting the troops by denying them the required training or hurting there families really shows how much you care.
I still noticed that none of you Libs have the balls to comment of Elder's column on April 12th.

tanabear
I think "David" will leaave fairy-tale land when you take off your foil hat.

"Imus"
.

RickJ
Don't pick on tanabear, she was dropping on her gourd repeatedly as an infant and force fed PABLUM until she was in her 20's! haha.


Oops.
dropping = dropped.

BTW, swing by my blog (click on my handle) for an AWESOME video of a Marine DI chowing down on a recruit (check the recruit's dazed look near the end).

Also, two stories on the librats attacking freedom in America...again.

Sloo
They'll just keep beating around the bush, they don;t have the balls to do anything of value, just b*tch and moan.

The Doom and Gloom Party.

From an Independent prospective…
“The months-old Iraq was already in open revolt…stirred by old tribal and religious hatreds and new aspirations to Arab independence. Shiite holy leaders called for jihad from belief that we could not prevent a general [uprising] until the arrival of reinforcements now on their way. Karbala and Najaf, local sheiks were threatened with death for cooperating with the occupiers.

If we could hold on, and maintain the facade of civil administration in their respective districts, while the army dealt with the areas in open revolt…The Sunni nationalists want an Arab kingdom; the Shiites want an Islamic state; the Kurds in the north seek an independent Kurdish entity; the business community that had prospered wanted a return to the Turks. But the region's various peoples have never considered themselves a nation.

I said in Baghdad that I believe that we, and we alone, have it in our power to enable the peoples of the Middle East to attain a civic and cultural unity more beneficial and greater than any reached by the Great Empires of their romantic past,"

1920 Sir Arnold Wilson, a military officer who was Britain's acting civil commissioner in the newly created nation after the postwar crumbling of the Ottoman Empire.

Been there done that:

Strengthen the Kurds in the north and aid them in negotiating a lasting peace with Turkey. Remove Hezbullah from Lebanon and rebuild a democracy, stop telling Israel to trade land for peace, precede full speed in Afghanistan and give our troops whatever they need.

Negotiate the tempered intervention of the Saudi’s with the Sunni populace and the Iranian’s with the Shia (both are already there). The only way for both to stabilize their own strategic interests is to allocate massive financial resources to the area. How…by increasing oil production, driving down prices and disrupting OPEC.

Divert all federal and state gasoline taxes to a “Superfund” for the express purpose of development of alternate fuels. No portion of the federal government produces nor innovates much of anything, they’re simply massive consumers. Turn loose the American mind, if we can put a man on the moon, we can certainly find independence in fuel sources.

The American people: Ride a bike, walk, use mass transit, stop voting for Republicans and Democrats and elect some conservatives for a change.

Diplomacy…”The art of letting the other guy have your way”…



usual antiamerican attitude of libs
As a proud VietNam veteran, I thought I had seen
the end of the anti-american,anti-defense,anti-
national security back then. I got spit on by
one of their"heroes"with long hair,love beads
and desperately in need of a bath. I beat the
daylights out of his pantyhose wearing pansy
ugly butt. Unfortunately, the dhimmiCRAPS still
have the same negative attitude(with the exception of Joe Lieberman).One solution:revoke
the citizenship of RedNancyPelosiGalore and
the others who share her viewpoint permanently,
then deport them all to some undesirable where
the crime of dissent against government is
immediately punishable by death without a trial
needed and see how they like being beheaded or
shot.

Where are the "War for Oil" libdolts?
Wasn't the primary reason for Bush to have "lied" us into this war was to take their oil?? Gee, I guess we must have made as much as we could off of it?? I'm sure I remember the MSM writing story after story about all the oil we are stealing from Iraq. Oops, my bad, there were no stories about us stealing their oil, perhaps because it was just another in a long line of lies perpetrated by the oh-so-tolerant libdolts that gets repeated ad-naseum as it it were the truth. Typical liberal lying scumbags!

Bill
Since you're a Vietnam veteran, I can certainly understand your tendency to compare Vietnam to our current Middle East foreign policy. Vietnam vets were treated horribly and there simply was no excuse for it. Just like now, if people have a problem with the current foreign policy, they should take their issue to the government who came up with the policy, instead of in any way, blaming the soldiers whose job it is to follow orders.

One question though Bill. Do you really want to send all Americans to death who disagree with their public servants on the current foreign policy? Because our right to "dissent", I thought, was one of the things that soldiers are fighting to defend. Since when have we become a country where we are not to watch government and DISSENT at the top of our voices if what they are doing is unconstitutional and/or a threat to our liberty? Isn't this the very crux of everything for which our country has always stood? What good is it to "fight" for America, if we allow the very foundation of this country to be nullified.

Dems Fiddle
They are doing what they're best at, obstructing Justice. Why can't we do something to protect our Rights? They apparently are able to erode our Military, cease our forward movement in Iraq, verbally attack our President much to the liking of the Terrorists. We appear to be only a fragment of what the US once was. Our Government doesn't agree. There are no set boundaries for what can or cannot be blasted on the media for the world to see. We aren't the strong US, we're falling apart.

sloo
I agree with sloo. If the democrats want to defund the war, they should have the intestinal fortitude to stand up and do it. What they are doing now is an attempt to micromanage the war. Plus, when they had the opportunity to take back their constitutional duty to declare war that they so stupidly ceded to the President after 9-11, they didn't do it.

Rich...
While certainly neither liberal, Democrat nor Republican, in fact a registered independent for approximately a decade and a half, I thought you might find the link below useful.

In essence, perhaps not the only motivation for incursion into Iraq, the proposed legislation currently being debated in the Iraqi parliament may best be encapsulated as follows:

“This law legalizes PSAs (production sharing agreements) in Iraq. Iraq will be the only country in the middle east with such contracts privatising Iraqi oil and giving foreign companies (at this stage limited to American owned companies) rates of profit that may reach to more than three fourth of the general revenue (proposals for US tax law would allow approximately 80% of these profits to be tax-free for over a decade).

In addition to the financial aspects of this law, it can be considered the funding tool for splitting Iraq into three states. It undermines the central government and distributes oil revenues directly to the three regions, which sets the foundations for what Iraq's enemies are trying to achieve in terms of establishing three independent states. Privatizing Iraq's oil and splitting Iraq into three regions are just two negative features of this 29 pages law.”

You can download the actual translated draft proposal here: http://www.box.net/public/2y7kkf4tzn

This is the current reason for “grid-lock” in the Iraqi Parliament (may be the primary motivation for yesterday's bombing within parliment) and just another reason to vote neither Republican nor Democrat but for true conservatives.

after the surge, let's get out
I keep saying there's a simple solution to this whole thing.

General Petraeus said that by the end of the summer, we will have a good idea whether the surge is succeeding or failing.

OK, then let's all WAIT AND SEE till the autumn. If by October, the surge has either fizzled out or has not accomplished its objective of stabilizing Baghdad, then Congress *should* set a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq by January 2009, giving the new President (whoever he or she is) a clean slate to restart the War on Terror anew.

Because if the surge is not successful, and Petraeus is not successful, we will have truly played OUR LAST CARD and then as far as I can tell, all those who have supported this war will be completely out of arguments.

On the other hand, if the surge is successful, then there is a chance that the American people will accept a continued presence in Iraq.

It seems to me it's that simple: Give Petraeus the time he asked for and then if he still hasn't succeeded, we're outta there!

One more thing: When Petraeus said "end of the summer," I'm going to hold him to his commitment. I will NOT accept a plea for any significant extensions past that point. I will consider such a plea as evidence of failure. That means this will NOT turn into a one-year surge or a two-year surge or a permanent surge. Not going to buy THAT ploy!


Today Biden said

"It's time to put force on the table and use it... it's a moral imperative."

Of course Biden was speaking of Darfur, the war ALL the beautiful people want us involved in.

To Biden & the Dems it would just be called a "redeployment" of the troops they've been saying are "stretched too thin"...

Considering the UN has a "robust" force already on the ground in Sudan and are failing WHY should we get involved there?

Where is our national interest more in peril... the OIL RICH Persian Gulf, or Sudan?

Biden and the rest of the Dems are hypocrites!!

Let General Clooney and Admiral Angelina buy their own army & navy and fight it themselves. Maybe Angie can adopt the country.

So
Get it through your heads...the troops won't be coming home after the Dems destroy our effort in Iraq.

Liberty - Let's make a distinction
Let's make a distinction between those who merely disagree with the president, state so openly and work to prevent the president from pushing forth his policies and those who openly interfere with these policies by usurping the power of the presidency as Nancy Pelosi has and provide aid and comfort to the enemy by publicly predicting defeat and attempting to place unconstitutional limits on the power of the president as many other democrats have. There is a very big difference between Joe Biden telling us the president is wrong and his attempt to prevent the president from being successful at the policy he is determined to promote. Democrats are invested in defeat and far too many have taken the side of the enemy to allow themselves to be truly considered Americans.

Democrats are the Guilty Party?
Observing that the house is on fire doesn't make you an arsonist. Yesterday Al Quaeda blew up a bridge in Baghdad and penetrated the so-called impermeable security of the Green Zone, exploding some legislators in the cafeteria of the Parliament. Here's a bulletin: Democrats didn't do it, Al Quaeda did it. The New York Times didn't do it, Al Quaeda did it. Al Quaeda even admits they did it.

Those of us who are not swooning under the Neoconservative spell still have our powers of vision, comprehension, and analysis intact. Best of all, we have functioning reality-testing. Here is what we see: our presence in Iraq has made matters much worse. The longer we stay, the worse they seem to get. For noticing this, we Democrats are called traitors and defeatists and terrorists and Communists and are told, "This is just a few dead-enders...the insurgency is in its last throes...these troubles are signs that we are really winning."

You folks who keep wanting to send more soldiers, guns, tanks, Marines, planes, and bombs into the Iraq meat-grinder sound like the compulsive gambler husband who says to his wife, "What's the matter with you, telling me not to spend any more money at the Casino. Yes, I've lost my entire paycheck every month for four years. Yes, I've lost the children's college fund and my IRA and the money my father left us. And I borrowed another $500,000 and lost that too. But I just know I'm going to win this time! YOU are the problem---you just don't have faith in me."

lilly
It hardly takes a mental giant to notice a burning building and if you are willing to man the bucket brigade stop threatening to pass only half buckets of water.

A bomb went off in Iraq. Again. Here's a bulletin, nobody said the Democrats did it. Although it seems people such as yourself take great joy when something like this happens so that you can point it out.

And just to complete your sickening tirade you compare what is happening in Iraq to some game of chance in a casino. This is no game, some very real people, and not just Americans, are dieing and suffering and all you can do is call it some type of dice game. It is entirely idiotic for you to say our presence in Iraq has made things worse. An army's presence on any battle field has made things worse, wars are not fought in the peaceful bliss of a picnic in the park, wars are violent, messy and deadly and nothing will change that.

Dems Fiddle America under attack
Radical Islam has declared war on the United States and committed acts of war against the United States, WTC '93, Magadishu Somalia, Khobar Towers. American Embassy(2)East Africa, USS Cole to name only a few during the 90s. Radical Islam concluded its OK to attack the US without fear of retribution because of the feckless response by the Bill Clinton administration. This resulted in the atrocities of 9/11. The current libdemo surrender team in Congress is waving the white flag to our enemies and turning its back on our courageous troops. Can you imagine the joy in our enemies heart(black that is) if one of the libdemo surrender team ever became America's Commander-in-Chief?

Joe
I don't recall service in the National Guard to be a cushy job. I also do not recall anyone with the courage and the skill to fly jet fighters to be cushy either. Your diatribe against Bush for joining the Guard is old and tired. I will personally honor anyone who has served his country in any capacity and I find it reprehensible for you or anyone else to disparage the service of any young man or woman who performs service in the National Guard.

Contrary to popular belief I regard Iraq as a magnet for every fundamentalist Islamic malcontent and I consider this to be good. You are probably equally tired of folks like me saying we would rather fight them over there than fight them over here. The only difference between my phrase and your phrase is that mine is rational, yours is not.

Conservative Ron & Joe
To Con. Ron, thanks for your comments, a voice of reason and truth as compared to JOE's vitriol and personal attacks. Sadly, it appears the truth will have little impact on the "JOEs"("my mind is made up, dont confuse me with the facts), but being of generous heart we must keep trying.

For the record we are engaged in a long and difficult war brought on by Radical Islam in Afghanistan, Iraq, at home and around the globe. The libdemo surrender team of "summer soldiers" is only making our ultimate victory longer, more difficult and more costly in lives and treasure.

I urge these "summer soldiers" to refer to the 9/11 Comm. Report page 362, "The catastrophic threat in history is ISLAMIST terrorism. Islamist terrorists acts "over there" should be regarded the same as terrorists atacks "over here".

The Radical Islamist were commiting acts of war against the U. S. thruout the 90s, they also were training, recruiting, planning the atrocity of 9/11. Fortunately homeland America has not been attacked since 9/11(watch your back).

Our President/CIC, his team and our troops are conducting a courageous and effective global war against Radical Islam. As Churchill said, "Never have so many owed so much to so few." We now have the libdemos turning their backs not only on this global war(which most of them voted for) but on our troops by treasonously denying funding.

Gen. Petraeus said at his confirmation, "War is a battle of wills". Churchill, "In war resolution". George Washington spoke often of "perseverance and spirit". The libdemo surrender team fails on all counts.






Cowboy
Nice job of being selective in the use of facts for the debate. I don't know if you're a lib or not - based on your handle I would think not, but you left out the fact that this not only what the NIE says - much as a lib would do. The NIE does say that our involvement in the ME is "cultivating supporters for the global jihadist movement." but it also says that "should jihadists leaving Iraq percieve themselves, and be perceived, to have failed, we judge fewer fighters will be inspired to carry on the fight." That of course was GWBs plan though it has been executed poorly.

Go here to see it for yourelf: http://www.dni.gov/press_releases/Declassified_NIE_Key_Judgments.pdf

Joe
What a pathetic argument. Is that the best you've got? Following your reasoning you can have nothing to say about abortion because you've never been pregnant. You've got nothing to say about term limits because you've never held an elected office. You can't comment on illegal immigration because you're not one (are you?)Etc., etc., etc.,etc. BLAH. BLAH. BLAH.In fact how can you comment on how cushy GWB had it while flying an F-103 (I think) when you yourself have never flown one? Hypocrisy thy name is Joe.

I'll tell you what Joe: how about we take your advise and only allow active duty and veterans to have a voice on all matters military OK? That way I am certain all decisions to get into wars or military actions will be supported almost unanamously and we won't have to hear all of you whiny, scardey-cat libs crying all the time about war not being the answer, war for oil, and all the other BS you spew.

gutless Republicans
The Limbaughs' stock in trade is railing against the Democrats when the real fault lies with the Republicans who won't stand up to them. This is getting ridiculous. Who is writing their playbook?

IRAQ WAR
Bush could have successfully ended our involvement in Iraq nearly two years ago by embracing The Delphi
Strategy. Many, many lives would have been saved, many times that maimings would have been avoided and many billions saved.

Whether Bush really doesn't care about the wasted lives and bodies, or Karl Rove has prevented him from knowing about it, the blame the president's desk is where the buck stops!

Eugene L. Notkin
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.