Talk Radio:
Bill Bennett
Mike Gallagher
Dennis Prager
Michael Medved
Hugh Hewitt
BREAKING NEWS
Register
|
Sign In
Search
SIGN UP NOW!
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Login
|
What's Hot
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
White House & Capitol Report
Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
Daily Conservative Cartoon
Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Columnists
|
News
|
Video
|
Podcasts
|
Photos
|
Cartoons
|
Blog
|
Your Blogs
|
Issues
|
Get Magazine
|
Finance
Mike Gallagher
|
Mary Katharine Ham
|
Hugh Hewitt
|
Michael Medved
|
Michael Barone
|
Thomas Sowell
|
Tony Blankley
|
Ann Coulter
|
Dennis Prager
|
More
Wednesday, October 09, 2002
Politics' proper role
by
David Limbaugh
0
David Limbaugh's Email
|
David Limbaugh
|
Author Biography
Read Comments
|
Post Comments
Forward
Print
Share
Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+]
Text
[-]
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?
Yes
No
Maybe/ Don't Know
Yes (57 %)
No (23 %)
Maybe/ Don't Know (20 %)
How can Democratic leaders with a straight face accuse Republicans of politicizing Iraq, or any other issue? It is not enough for Republicans to deny this phony charge; they need to throw it back in the Democrats' faces. It is the job of political parties to engage in politics; it is their function to elect their candidates. But in the Clinton-Carville era, the Democratic Party took politics to a new level by inaugurating the perpetual campaign. Nearly every action was preceded by focus groups and sophisticated polling to gauge the public's likely reaction. Whatever statesmanship used to inhabit the party's leadership was thoroughly abandoned. You would hope, however, that when our national security was threatened Democrats would give it a rest. Some are, but others are ratcheting up the politics, despite consequences to our national interests. Their latest gambit has been to politicize the upcoming war against Iraq while accusing Bush of politicizing it. Al Gore, in his incoherent speech to the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco, charged Bush with politicizing the war by "pushing for a vote in this Congress immediately before the election" and publicly taunting Democrats with the political consequences of a 'no' vote." Gore had it exactly backward. How is pushing for an immediate vote for authority to deal with an imminent threat political? What responsible leader would allow elections to interfere with the timing of such a grave decision? Besides, if Democrats are unashamed of their position on Iraq they shouldn't fear a public airing of it before an election. If they extend bipartisan support to President Bush, they remove the war as an issue. It's only if they oppose him that it becomes political. And even then, it's only if they are out of step with public sentiment that their opposition hurts them politically. Of course it's their prerogative to oppose him, but they ought to own up to their position, (BEGIN ITAL) before the election. But as has also been their custom since the advent of the Clinton period, Democrats are playing word games again. By saying that Bush is "politicizing" the war, they mean to imply that political considerations are guiding his decision on Iraq rather than following it. That would be the case, for example, if he initiated bombing to divert attention from impeachment proceedings against himself. But there's a big difference in instituting military action for political gain, which is reprehensible, and informing the voters about the opposition party's stance on a necessary war, which is obligatory. If Bush were planning an attack on Iraq for the purposes of acquiring more Republican seats in the House and Senate, he should be condemned in the strongest terms. But if he is convinced that it is in our national interests to attack Iraq and the Democrats are opposing him, he and the Republican Party would be irresponsible not to bring that to the attention of voters in the starkest of terms. What in the world are elections supposed to be about, if not to afford voters an opportunity to elect representatives who will, in general, carry out their collective will? But Democrats, by trying to intimidate Republicans from discussing Iraq in the elections, seek to disenfranchise voters on the most important issue confronting this nation in over a decade. This, from the party that insists that "every vote must count." You see, it is Democrats who are politicizing the war in the pejorative sense of that term by causing partisan calculations to interfere with policy decisions on Iraq. Outrageously, they want Bush to hold off on Iraq until after the election. We should attack Iraq, if and when we are ready to do so, not when it is least likely to put the Democrats at an electoral disadvantage. During the campaign, Republicans should do everything they can to remind voters how vitally important it is to have George W. Bush as Commander-in-Chief during wartime. While they're at it, they should use every photo in sight that projects President Bush as the sober, statesmanlike war president that he has proven himself to be, including those from Air Force One on September 11. This is the healthy and proper use of politics -- the kind that advances, not harms, the national interest.
Share:
Digg
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Newsvine
My Web
MySpace
Forward
Print
Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
About The Author
David Limbaugh, brother of radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh, is an expert in law and politics and author of
Bankrupt: The Intellectual and Moral Bankruptcy of Today's Democratic Party
.
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read David Limbaugh's column.
Sign up today
and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
News Articles On This Topic
Report: US helped Yemen's strike against al-Qaida
Moment of truth for health care in Senate
Senate closing in on $626 billion spending bill
Abortion opponents watching Nelson on health care
Adm. Mullen tours Iraqi market
Feds: Arrests in Africa link al-Qaida and drugs
Possible Senate opponent to Reid worth millions
Republican Snowe still courted on health care
Pregnant soldiers could face court-martial
Wrap-up bill clears Senate hurdle
Popular Articles By
Limbaugh
If B's Were F's, Obama Still Wouldn't Deserve a B-Plus
Sally Quinn on Sarah Palin -- Versus Reality
White House Postelection Arrogance
Join The Debate!
Post Your Comment
(
0
comments so Far)
View in ascending order
View in descending order
(
Read all 0 comments
)
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click
here
to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Need an account?
Login
Login
Your Email:
Password:
Get Your Password
|
Register
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (
*
) are required.
Salutation:
Mr.
Mrs.
Ms.
Miss.
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note:
Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
Townhall.com Spotlight
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.
New Blog Posts
Video
Audio
Obama Dispassionately Reads Through Copenhagen Speech: "We Are Running Short Of Time"
posted at 05:24 PM
Is Anyone Surprised By This?
posted at 03:49 PM
Why Does AARP Support Obamacare?
posted at 03:07 PM
Morning Market Update
posted on:06/05/2009
Keepin' Away the Skeeters
posted on:06/05/2009
Man vs. Animal
posted on:06/05/2009
Panel Discussion: Remembering Reagan
posted on:06/23/2009
Chris Daggett
posted on:10/07/2009
The Headliners Hour 1
posted on:12/12/2009
Today's Columns
O'Reilly :
Partying with the Preside...
Driessen :
Life in a box
Eileen McGann :
How Obamacare Will H...
Kudlow :
Without Bipartisan Support,...
Cooper :
Reading This Column While D...
Harsanyi :
All the President's Menda...
Klukowski :
High Court Rejects Chall...
Kennedy :
Gifts Under The Tree: Ther...
Blackwell :
Power Player of the Week...
Gainor :
Class Warfare: Government v...
Fields :
When 'Spiritual Elevation' ...
Chavez :
Climate Hubris
North :
Be Afraid, Very Afraid
Tucker :
The Rising Tide of Red Ink
Buchanan :
Shakedown in Copenhagen
Goldberg :
Global Wealth Can Heal th...
Malkin :
Welcome to the Democratic P...
Krauthammer :
An Anniversary of Sort...
Limbaugh :
Radical Is as Radical App...
Charen :
Giving Thanks for Life
All Columns
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Save my list
THANK YOU
Your email has been sent.
News
Video
Audio
DINA CAPPIELLO : GOP: Obama can't act on climate without Congress
SAM HANANEL : Unions frustrated with Senate health care bill
Today's Cartoons
Saturday, Dec. 19
Lisa Benson
Michael Ramirez
Eric Allie
Gary Varvel
More