Talk Radio:
Bill Bennett
Mike Gallagher
Dennis Prager
Michael Medved
Hugh Hewitt
BREAKING NEWS
Register
|
Sign In
Search
SIGN UP NOW!
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Login
|
What's Hot
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
White House & Capitol Report
Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
Daily Conservative Cartoon
Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Columnists
|
News
|
Video
|
Podcasts
|
Photos
|
Cartoons
|
Blog
|
Your Blogs
|
Issues
|
Get Magazine
|
Finance
Mike Gallagher
|
Mary Katharine Ham
|
Hugh Hewitt
|
Michael Medved
|
Michael Barone
|
Thomas Sowell
|
Tony Blankley
|
Ann Coulter
|
Dennis Prager
|
More
Wednesday, September 18, 2002
Democrats stir confusion over Iraq
by
David Limbaugh
0
David Limbaugh's Email
|
David Limbaugh
|
Author Biography
Read Comments
|
Post Comments
Forward
Print
Share
Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+]
Text
[-]
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?
Yes
No
Maybe/ Don't Know
Yes (57 %)
No (23 %)
Maybe/ Don't Know (20 %)
Does it bother you at all that Democratic leaders and liberal opinion peddlers are increasingly splitting semantic hairs in our war on terror, as if we don't have enough trouble negotiating this war as it is? The latest obfuscation is their mantra that military action against Iraq would be inconsistent with our war on terror. Let's be clear. An action against Iraq would not only be consistent with our war on terror; it would be part and parcel of it. President Bush emphasized from the very beginning that Iraq is a terrorist regime. In first articulating the Bush Doctrine he delineated between good and evil -- causing no small amount of consternation among moral relativists -- and said that nations would have to take sides. "Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists," said Mr. Bush. "From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime." Well, there's very little doubt that Saddam Hussein is himself a terrorist -- he even terrorizes his own people. There's also little question that he harbors terrorists; Donald Rumsfeld recently disclosed that Saddam provides sanctuary for al Qaeda members. Nor is there any dispute that Saddam supports terrorists; just consider his support of the families of suicide bombers. Also remember Bush's axis of evil speech wherein he designated Iraq by name as one of three evil regimes who, "by seeking weapons of mass destruction, ... pose a grave and growing danger." President Bush did not make these remarks in a vacuum, but in the context of our war on terror. So it has been abundantly clear all along that any action we might choose to take against Iraq would be in furtherance of our war on terror. Yet Democratic leaders are behaving as though Mr. Bush, by considering an attack on Iraq, is conflicted and confused. Senator Daschle, perennial presidential hopeful Albert Gore, and our ubiquitous ex-President Clinton, to name just a few, have repeatedly criticized Bush's contemplation of action against Iraq as disruptive of his war on terror. As far back as April, Daschle spoke of the war on terror, our military operation in Afghanistan and action against Iraq as three separate things. "We've got to win the war on terror; we've got to stabilize Afghanistan. We have to do all that we can to ensure that we succeed there before we take on another mission," said Daschle. More recently Daschle questioned whether an attack on Iraq would damage America's relations with countries that are assisting in our war on terror, such as Pakistan and Indonesia. "Is this now more important than the war on terror?" asked Daschle, as if America must make the false choice between attacking Iraq and pursuing its war on terror. And former President Clinton is doing his best to blow smoke and erect mirrors for his colleagues. "We know (al Qaeda members) still have a terrorist network around the world," said Clinton. "And we're already kind of changing the subject here, looking at Saddam Hussein, who's not going anywhere." We're not worried about Saddam leaving the comfort of his palatial surroundings, Mr. Clinton, but his weapons. New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd, who can always be counted on to gratuitously slam President Bush, added her voice to those seeking to create confusion. She concluded her latest column by asking, "Does America have conflicts of interest? Are we fighting one war in two places, or are the two wars tripping each other up?" This is all very strange. The Democratic leaders and their media mouthpieces surely understand that Iraq has been part of the game plan all along. And we know that in 1998 these same Democrats were beating the war drums against Iraq themselves. They weren't cautioning restraint or demanding more proof at the time. So what's changed since then to cause their about-face? Answer: We no longer have a Democrat president. While they claim that President Bush is playing politics with the war, it is Senator Daschle and his cohorts who are fomenting undue confusion, at the potential expense of the national interests.
Share:
Digg
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Newsvine
My Web
MySpace
Forward
Print
Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
About The Author
David Limbaugh, brother of radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh, is an expert in law and politics and author of
Bankrupt: The Intellectual and Moral Bankruptcy of Today's Democratic Party
.
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read David Limbaugh's column.
Sign up today
and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
News Articles On This Topic
Report: US helped Yemen's strike against al-Qaida
Moment of truth for health care in Senate
Senate closing in on $626 billion spending bill
Abortion opponents watching Nelson on health care
Adm. Mullen tours Iraqi market
Feds: Arrests in Africa link al-Qaida and drugs
Possible Senate opponent to Reid worth millions
Republican Snowe still courted on health care
Pregnant soldiers could face court-martial
Wrap-up bill clears Senate hurdle
Popular Articles By
Limbaugh
If B's Were F's, Obama Still Wouldn't Deserve a B-Plus
Sally Quinn on Sarah Palin -- Versus Reality
White House Postelection Arrogance
Join The Debate!
Post Your Comment
(
0
comments so Far)
View in ascending order
View in descending order
(
Read all 0 comments
)
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click
here
to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Need an account?
Login
Login
Your Email:
Password:
Get Your Password
|
Register
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (
*
) are required.
Salutation:
Mr.
Mrs.
Ms.
Miss.
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note:
Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
Townhall.com Spotlight
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.
New Blog Posts
Video
Audio
Obama Dispassionately Reads Through Copenhagen Speech: "We Are Running Short Of Time"
posted at 05:24 PM
Is Anyone Surprised By This?
posted at 03:49 PM
Why Does AARP Support Obamacare?
posted at 03:07 PM
Morning Market Update
posted on:06/05/2009
Keepin' Away the Skeeters
posted on:06/05/2009
Man vs. Animal
posted on:06/05/2009
Panel Discussion: Remembering Reagan
posted on:06/23/2009
Chris Daggett
posted on:10/07/2009
The Headliners Hour 1
posted on:12/12/2009
Today's Columns
O'Reilly :
Partying with the Preside...
Driessen :
Life in a box
Eileen McGann :
How Obamacare Will H...
Kudlow :
Without Bipartisan Support,...
Cooper :
Reading This Column While D...
Harsanyi :
All the President's Menda...
Klukowski :
High Court Rejects Chall...
Kennedy :
Gifts Under The Tree: Ther...
Blackwell :
Power Player of the Week...
Gainor :
Class Warfare: Government v...
Fields :
When 'Spiritual Elevation' ...
Chavez :
Climate Hubris
North :
Be Afraid, Very Afraid
Tucker :
The Rising Tide of Red Ink
Buchanan :
Shakedown in Copenhagen
Goldberg :
Global Wealth Can Heal th...
Malkin :
Welcome to the Democratic P...
Krauthammer :
An Anniversary of Sort...
Limbaugh :
Radical Is as Radical App...
Charen :
Giving Thanks for Life
All Columns
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Save my list
THANK YOU
Your email has been sent.
News
Video
Audio
DINA CAPPIELLO : GOP: Obama can't act on climate without Congress
SAM HANANEL : Unions frustrated with Senate health care bill
Today's Cartoons
Saturday, Dec. 19
Lisa Benson
Michael Ramirez
Eric Allie
Gary Varvel
More