Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, May 21, 2009
Dan Gainor :: Townhall.com Columnist
If It's a Smart Car, Why Does It Look So Stupid?
by Dan Gainor
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



It’s 8 feet of automotive amusement wrapped around a rockin’ “3-cylinder, 1-liter gasoline powered engine.” OK, that’s only impressive if you like driving around in a golf-cart with sides or you find a riding mower cooler than a Maserati.

Meet the only car that ought to come with a mandatory Mensa membership – the so-called Smart Car. It’s already the car of the present for micro Europeans, but if environmentalists have their way, it might be the kind of car that will be your future. There’s really only one problem – even this dorky motor scooter of a car doesn’t meet Barack Obama’s new mileage standards.

You would think it would. The Smart car is the kind of vehicle only a liberal or a guy who parks his car in a closet could love – because it gets decent gas mileage, is half the size of real car, has none of the space of a popular but evil SUV and won’t let you drive over 90 mph. (In the car’s defense, you’d probably have to fall off a cliff to hit 90 with two people inside – though if you are forced to drive one of these, you might wish that result.)

The Smart Car and its equally ridiculous hybrid friends matter because they might be all that’s left on the roads after Democrats destroy what remains of the American automotive industry.

That’s exactly what Obama’s trying to do. He wasn’t content with the firing General Motors CEO Rick Wagoner or with Chrysler’s bankruptcy. He’s certainly not content just throwing mountains of cash at the industry ($83 billion and counting, according to Time magazine).

So he decided to clog the gears with new requirements for gas mileage. Under the new Obama-nation rules for mileage requirements, each carmaker will have to meet 35.5 mpg for its fleet. Cars will have to meet 39 mpg.

That’s not an easy standard. Only two – the Toyota Prius and the Honda Civic Hybrid – meet that standard in 2009. In other words, the Smart Car, which gets 36 mpg, falls 3 mpg short of the goal. Not so smart after all. A smarter car would have made sure that Obama bailed out its company as well so the president would mandate we buy it instead of hybrids.

These kinds of mandates are definitely in our future. Obama increased the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for cars by 30 percent with a wave of his hand. But he can’t mandate the innovation necessary to make that happen without concessions to physics.

American car companies will be forced to cut size, cut luxuries and make all-around worse cars to meet these draconian mandates.

The only reason Obama can do this backed by smiling auto execs is because, thanks to the bailouts, he’s now their unofficial boss. We now have, in the words of a friend of mine, “Twelve lawyers and a community organizer deciding what cars we get to drive.”

The only group my friend left out were the eco-nuts who are thrilled by the Obama move and clearly had a seat at the table. The environmental groups probably created decades’ worth of carbon dioxide crowing about the decision on every news outlet available. Network after network reported the story like it was good environmental news. NBC called its segment “Clearing the Air.” Journalists parroted the White House line that “President Obama is uniting federal and state governments, the auto industry, labor unions and the environmental community.”

Left out of that equation are taxpayers who have to fund this atrocity and car buyers who will be fighting tooth and claw over the last decent cars left on used car lots.

They’ll have to buy used because the new Obama rules will add $1,300 to the cost of each automobile. That seems an important point. But it’s buried, glossed-over or flat-out ignored by the news reporting because such facts are insignificant to network reporters. But it’s not insignificant if you want to buy a car. In the middle of a recession, our president is striving to make one of the most important purchases that much harder for working people. The Smart Fortwo car (you know it’s a lefty car because they spell it like e.e. cummings would as “smart fortwo”) costs $11,990 base. Tack on $1,300 and that’s almost an 11 percent increase. So much for making an inexpensive car that ordinary people can drive.

Ultimately, this remains what NBC’s Brian Williams called a “truck and SUV nation.” The only way to change that is either making better small cars or by force of law. Obama and his lefty supporters don’t have a clue how to make cars, but they know enough about law to make you buy whatever they make.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Dan Gainor is The Boone Pickens Free Market Fellow and director of the Media Research Center’s Business & Media Institute.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
As Hillary could have said
It takes a village, to make a Smart car smart.

Love to live me in one of those, but I don't.

If you happen to read this, Dan, I suggest you read this:

http://www.rollingstone.com/nationalaffairs/index.php/2009/ 05/19/change-we-can-believe-in-3/?utm_source=daily-newslett er&utm_medium=email

call it "joy in mudville." or something.

Gotta plan ahead
I have a 2004 SUV right now....gotta start planning on what to buy before 2016 to make sure I have a car and/or truck that actually has power to get out of its own way and can carry more than a single bag of groceries.

Why are liberals only "pro-choice" on abortion but want to deny everyone the right to choose their cars, their healthcare, and how best to spend their money?

I saw one today.
Driven by a sour looking woman who looked like she couldn't get lucky in a monastery on a remote island. She had a constipated expression on her face and the car had about 9 Obama, global warming, hope and change and other nitwit stickers on it.

The BEST part? The vanity plate said "Lilly"!! I wanted to rev the big Jeep and run that law mower over.

-Ray
NRA Life Member
Soli Deo Gloria!!

Parts
Invest in Parts companies - cuz these old cars are going to be around for a while (maybe we can one day look like Cuba).

Some mileage standards should exist
Author has the right basic ideas, but car companies should still be required to make some cars that are truly fuel efficient. The fact BHO is pushing extreme mileage standards for all cars is another reason we should be asking for his birth certificate.

Now, I agree the Smart car looks odd, and with an mpg of 33 city/41 highway, it's hard to imagine such a small car getting poorer fuel economy than that. And I'm sure most Smart buyers, gouged by the recent $75 to $100 refill costs, were simply driven to take extreme measures. Still, for other reasons, limited parking space, maneuverabilty, cost, etc., different people have different needs, so, maybe new types of cars isn't so bad, if they actually deliver what the buyer wants.

But so far, the auto makers have FAILED to deliver much to those who want fuel efficiency, so something is needed to change that. This is really a big deal because as ultra fuel efficient cars are made, the practical aspects of their technology would be adopted by all other cars when there is no compelling economic reason to not do so. Ending needless waste advances a society.

So, we really NEED a few truly "Smart" cars, in terms of fuel efficiency, on the market. But I wouldn't consider a car to really be "smart" just because it is little. Using existing technology, it would also therefore need to be a plug-in hybrid with a displacement-on-demand turbo-diesel engine with a similar performance to the current gas engine. This would lower its fuel consumption down to about 2 bottles of Wesson vegetable oil a week, which could be further reduced by also using leftover filtered kitchen grease. That would be SMART.

Smart? My big ole B.....

A few months back my wife and I went to Disney World. For those of you who've driven the interstate in that part of Fla, you know to avoid it if at all possible during the business day. Well, there it was, nearly surrounded by 18wheelers, stugglling to reach 65 MPH ... a little lemon yellow(Hey, it's FLA!)"Smart"(AKA DUMB!) car. I hope that fool got off the interstate fast, by the look on his face he was sure he was going to die! I looked at my wife, she at me, and we said "Oh My God! What fool convinced him to drive that golf cart out here?"

Now we know: (Sound Trumpets) THE MESSIAH!

Obama Wants the U.S. to Be Cuba
Thanks to Obama, the liberals, and the crazy environmentalists in a few years our country will look like Cuba with most Americans driving SUVs and other "monster" cars built in the early 2000s. Of course this situation will create a whole new industry of mechanics and parts stores to keep these vehicles on the road.

Instead, we should be having an auto-de-fey of these liberals right now!

Torpedo Away!
The Administration has fired a torpedo into the US auto manufacturers and the UAW. In the cases of GM and Chrysler, the water-tight doors are already open, so they will sink very quickly. Ford will not be far behind.

The US operations of Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Hundai and others should be able to build "upholstered roller skates" at a profit, because of their lower labor and benefits costs, if they can hold off the UAW until it sinks in the whirlpools caused by the sinking of the US car companies. If not, their imported vehicles will be all that remain.

Fortunately, tickets to the resulting political theater will be free.

No, chip

"but car companies should still be required to make some cars that are truly fuel efficient. "

Rubbish.

$5/gal gas tax (or MUCH better, a carbon tax that produces about the same effect) would be much better.

2001 Hyundai Elantra
Fuel economy is more than some number generated out of the Department of Transportation (remember, government agency, they tend to get things wrong). My 2001 Elantra gets me 33 miles per gallon by the way I drive. Driving behaviors tend to have a big impact on your fuel economy. Don't drive at high RPMs, don't drive too slow (you saw that right) since you get your best efficiency when you maximize speed and minimize engine RPMs, avoid the AC under 50 MPH, close the window over 50 MPH, use cruise control and make sure your vehicle is properly maintained.

The reason the Smart is so poor incomparison to my considerably heavier, more powerful (comparatively speaking) and old vehicle is Smart drivers tend to live in cities. You wouldn't want to take the Smart on the highway. City driving destroys fuel efficiency.

To make it more absurd, my brother drives a custom-built 1989 Nissan 240sx using the SR20 engine that gets the fuel efficiency of the Smart and spits out 400 horsepower. It also looks attractive.

2001 Elantra Pt. 2
The point of all of this? The fuel efficiency sticker on the door of the car is mostly bogus. The only way you can tell what your car can get is if you drive it yourself and compare how many miles you got before filling up the car. Divide the miles by the gallons you dumped into the tank and you get it. The EPA rates my car at 22/28, but my actual results show the EPA doesn't know the first thing about what it's doing. How can my actual average exceed the highway estimate by 5 miles per gallon?

I wouldn't be surprised if the EPA was cooking the numbers just to make hybrids and small cars look good.

Is it Legal?
What part of the U.S. Codes give any president the authority to simply say, "I want cars built this way, so..."?

I thought we had a system of checks & balances, where the Congress & the executive branch had to both agree before new laws could be enacted. Simply having the president saying he wants things done a certain way, and then an entire industry has to totally re-tool does not sound like a representative republic to me. Sounds more like a dictatorship.

What happened to the opposition party? When it comes to anything Obama, why are Republicans cowering in the corner like scared little rabbits?

The peoples Car
What next? Tofu burgers?

Driving to PHX
last Sat to attend the NRA Banquet, and ran up on a slow down on the interstate. When we finally got past the choke point, low and behold, he was one of these soup cans on a roller skate, limping along at a smokin' 60 mph, while the rest of us are trying to keep the speed limit of 75. Sure was scary looking next to all the big trucks.

Our little Corolla is too damn small for me, but we averaged 36.7 mpg on our two trips to the convention, short of the stupid mandate. How the heck can you beat that without sacrificing safety and comfort?

I wanted to take my 92 Fleetwood but it only gets 26 mpg highway. I will next time, as the extra $20 for gas is worth the comfort and security. Besides that, we really look good in that cherry old ride.

EE fuel
is the magic gas additive we use and how we get such great mileage with our Corolla (36+), Cadillac (26), and Dodge diesel 2500 Ram pickup (19).

What I want to know is how Obama is going to move 80,000 pounds of truck, tractor and freight down the highway any more efficiently than we already do? Big trucks used to get 3-4 mpg, but even my 92 Pete could get upwards to 7, if I drove right and didn't idle. Mileage on newer trucks has actually declined because of stupid EGR and emission standards. Besides that, the engines run hotter and wear out sooner, adding to operating expense.

We have pretty much reached the point where technology and efficiency cannot defy the laws of physics.

Tofu Burgers
Yes. According to the UN FAO, ~18% of GHG emissions are from domesticated animals. Therefore, halting global warming takes a vegan diet. Unfortunately, some of the domesticated animal methane emissions may be replaced by methane emissions from humans running on tofu and other beans.

Since the "Smart"
IS made by the now-Gov't-owned Chrysler, what else could we expect?

Funny sight seen upon exiting the grocery store was a Smart car that had parked next to my Expedition. Wow talk about the difference between elephants and mice!

Where cars are concerned, give me personal safety and comfort over silly and downright dangerous exercises in moral superiority every time!

To Each His Own
Hey, when I was in Austria for 12 weeks, I drove a Smart Car. It was big kick in the pants to drive. It had a lot of punch for city driving and I was able to push it up to 90 mph on the highway (using 95 octane fuel without a catalytic convertor). If you think it's ugly, check out the incredibly popular SUV. If I ever bought one, it would be for off-the-road, not local hauling groceries home from the store.

So lay off the Smart Car. It doesn't help your case. What you really want to say is that everyone should be able to buy what they want and can afford. The industry shouldn't be pushed around by the government and told what to build and what not to build. But is this so new?

The last set of CAFE regulations caused the industry to build SUV's in a defensive move to skirt CAFE. Market reaction was, well, spectacular. It wasn't a planned event.

If government didn't walk all over the industry, the barrier to entry probably wouldn't be so high and we'd see 50 or 100 car companies, big and large, serving the market incredibly better than Detroit and the foreign jobs.

Don't knock the Smart. It's a good car for some and I won't tell you what a dumb idea the SUV is.

How to make a powerful, efficient car
1. Get rid of the Department of Energy, specifically the regulations that quadruple the price of our nuclear power plants.

2. Run electromagnets under major roads and highways that are plugged into this non-carbon emitting power and plentiful supply.

3. Build electric engine cars. Electric engines are more powerful than diesel or gasoline engines.

4. The cars run off the electromagnets buried below the roads and use batteries when leaving major road systems, like going into your subdivision or back country roads. Can easily be extended via private initiative to reach less served areas.

We can wipe out the necessity of using oil for our economy and transportation needs by doing this. Fission energy has some 500 million years worth of fuel available on the planet, we won't run out any time soon and if we figure out fusion (maybe in the next two decades), we have some 5 billion years of fuel, limitless if we mine Saturn.

We have the technology right now that is cheap, plentiful and powerful to get rid of oil entirely. We just need to get government out of the way. That way, we can have big, safe cars that make the economy of the Smart seem incredibly dumb.

Only 36 mpg?
The dangerous little Smart car only gets an average of 36 mpg? Not ever intending to ever make such a stupid purchase, I assumed it was much better than that. Heck, my 1991 full-size Oldsmobile got 32 mpg on the highway, and I "drove it like I stole it". Plus, a person could drive that without worrying about dying in a collision with a bicycle.

Yuck!
I first saw one of these in 2005 when I visited New Zealand. I immediately called it a "motorized roller skate". It is so short that it can be parked perpendicular to the curb in half a parallel parking slot and not stick out into traffic (an advantage, I have to admit). It is UH-GLEE!

Smart car?
The problem with even 1 liter cars is that one cannot amend the laws of physics. To move a certain amount of mass requires a certain amount of energy. If gasoline is not used, some other source is required. Batteries must be re-charged, are expensive, often heavy,and when they end their life span, are almost impossible to legally dispose of. Before you purchase a hybrid, go to your dealer's parts counter and find out what it will cost to replace the battery pack. You will be shocked. Ethanol is expensive and deprives people of food. Methanol is mostly made from natural gas, which is needed to heat homes. Both require 2 to 3 times as many gallons to go a given distance as gasoline. LPG, LNG, and hydrogen have storage problems, and also require more gallons to go a given distance than gasoline. It is a shame that so very few of our lawmakers did not stay awake during 9th grade general science classes.

Econonmy
If you really need a two person vehicle that gets more than 40 mpg and can carry a few groceries, buy a Harley Davidson. It is even made in America.

The libs and the eco-nuts ..
(yes, I know that' redundant) are perfectly willing to force families into unsafe vehicles merely to reduce the US's carbon foot print. If a few people die in unsafe vehicles, oh well. For the enviro-whackos, I have to ask, would the deaths be collateral damage or a bonus? I'm guessing the answer would be both.

Tod Kozeluh
Lexington, KY

Engine Noise
I drove a Smart car and the engine/transmission noise was so bad that after 20 minutes I had a headache. What is really stupid is that in Europe they were selling 4 person Smart cars that they stopped making right before they decided to import cars to the US. The 4 person Smart car would have been much better in the US. By the way the Smart car division of Daimler has not made a profit yet. For full disclosure, I am a laid off Chrysler engineer.

Vehicle Requirements,
I'll happily by a "green" car when it meets my requirements.

1. Must be able to hold 2 adults and 4 kids ranging from toddler to teen (note that a kid's car seat takes more space than a non-obese adult). Bonus if it can hold a couple of the kids' friends as well.

2. Must be able to hold a full month of groceries for a family of 6 while the family of 6 is sitting in it. (Groceries in people's laps are not permitted).

3. Must be able to tow a trailer loaded with manure, compost, construction materials, etc.

4. Must be very safe in crashes to protect said kids.

5. Must be readily available at a reasonable price in the used car market and have a good reputation for reliability.

6. Must not cost extra in insurance or taxes.

PROFIT vs. TAX
MellorSJ2:

Why a $5 tax? How about a $5 PROFIT? If that were the case at least some of it would not be confiscated by the Beltway bast%#@s. Some gain in the wealth of the stockholders would be refreshing.

Really Smart Ones...
Does anyone remember the great Detroit cars of about 1972-82??? No, well, there's a good reason for that...they were ugly, slow, ran rough and in general boring.

The Statists hate the automobile in general because it provides mobility to the the individual. For BO, Algore and the rest, this country would be much better off if we all lived in high-rises in New York, Boston, Washington or San Fransissico, worked for the government in cubicle jobs and took the subway to work, certainly had no need for cars and guns and voted for Adam on American Idol and Miss Malibu for Miss California (I just threw those last two in for fun...) The government tried to make cars so boring that we wouldn't want to drive them before and the real thinkers in Detroit outsmarted the policy wonks in DC. Our 2008-09 Dodge Challenger manages to look like the '70-'71 version while having comparable or better acceleration, better handling and safety and much better gas mileage. Of course Chrysler had to be forced into bankruptcy even after selling plenty of trucks and Challengers and 300's last year...they couldn't keep inflicting fun on the poor impressionable proles. GM's Camaro is arguably better looking than the original so they're next on the chopping block. They unfortunately do build what the public really does want...muscle cars, trucks and SUV's and most people could care less what they do to the spotted owls...

My wife, incidentally thinks the Smart Car and the Mini are adorable, but we own a Ram and a Mustang convertible.

Fact
A gallon of gasoline is 128 ounces of fuel.

How far do you think that should get you?

Keep in mind that the laws of physics will not be changed or suspended just because some genius feels that that would be nice.

obama is telling the auto industry that a vehicle should go 5,280 feet on 3 ounces of gas.

Someone needs to get busy on that one.

Small cars
0bama wants us all to be in small (and unsafe) cars.

I hate to sound cynical but there is an agenda here:

If we get killed in a clown car, we no longer have a "carbon footprint" and we no longer need to collect Social Security (which will go bankrupt if too many people collect).

Mindless infantile stupidity!
Why is it so unfathomable to liberals that you can't simply will things into existence? Development of genuine, competitive alternatives requires steady progress, risk, entrepreneurship, and not a little luck. But folks like Obama just have this childlike faith that all that's been missing from the drive to develop WORKABLE alternatives has been the orders from on high. Why didn't he demand 100 mpg?! or 1000?!! Lack of imagination?

You can't make this stuff up!

How fast
will this go from 0 to 60? There is an intersection near me that you enter the bypass on the passing lane in the middle of a blind spot. The only way you can get on safely is to get up to 60 MPH or faster within a few seconds.

Roadmaster #15: Semis aren't included.

My liberal brother wants a 40 MPG car. The way he crashes cars, he should buy them for safety, not mileage.

The Robert Emmett Ginna Nuclear Power Station went from groundbreaking to online generation in 42 months. The Crystal River 3 plant took ten years. The difference is the amount of paperwork required by government.

Ethanol generates more pollution than pure gasoline does, per the EPA.

Had government
not taken half the operating capitol from the carmakers every year for the last 60 years, we would have ten-passenger SUV's for forty years getting 40 MPG for a competitive price.

Frog, Leslie, ragtocaddy
Frog, the Smart car has very high crash safety ratings.

Leslie, I agree that the car should be quieter. I think it should also
have a smoother ride. There's really
much room for improvement in the car.

ragtocaddy, you obviously don't understand that "development" also
requires powerful outside forces to drive it, which was missing from your list of requirements. Car makers, especially US, have failed to produce very fuel efficient cars, which is astounding because there is a powerful market for fuel efficiency and plenty of existing technology.
Interesting everyone here either
doesn't care about the new standards, or they dismiss them all out of hand. Biassed and boring.

Two numbers to always remember:
6.5 billion tons and 6.2 billion tons

The first number is the total amt. of carbon emitted into the atmosphere by humans.

The second is how much would be emitted if we COMPLETELY eliminated all vehicles in the US.

This is another way of saying that if we are attempting to rid the planet of man made carbon, then:

ALL OF THIS IS HORSE SQUEEZE!


Man made carbon
This is part of an article by Dr. Robert Balling who writes on Tech Central Station:

"Across the globe, human activities result in an emission to the atmosphere of approximately 6.5 billion tons of carbon (not carbon dioxide). Of that amount, 23 percent comes from the United States, and of that amount, approximately one-fifth comes from our vehicular fleet. The American fleet constitutes less than five percent of emissions globally: While the global emission of carbon is 6.5 billion tons, the emission from the American fleet is approximately 0.3 billion tons. Even if the fleet vanished from the face of the earth, human activities would still result in 6.2 billion tons of carbon, and the atmospheric concentration would continue to rise. Like it or not, with or without cars and trucks in the United States, the concentration of carbon dioxide will double this century, and the year when this will occur is not impacted much by American cars and trucks."

Welcome to Facism
Hitler built a "people's car" too, the volkswagon.
They are taking control of the banks, cars, health care, and soon energy with the new bill being passed. They are raising taxes on everything they can while playing semantics and claiming they didn't raise your payroll tax.
Chavez, Castro, Stalin, Mussilini, Hitler, etc... at least they had the cajones to tell the people what they were doing and did it up front. Obama is turning us into a Fascist, socialist state through regulation, stimulus, and taxes.
WAKE UP PEOPLE.

new CAFE standards
It's not true that the car makers have to build a fleet of 35.5mpg cars. The dealers have to SELL a bunch of cars that get 35.5 mpg. this means that they can sell a car that gets 18 mpg so long as they also sell another car that gets 53mpg.

and by the way, the Honda CRX, sold in the last century got 40mpg. but you wouldn't want to drive one very far or try and get a suitcase in one.

Chip
you are correct in that the Smart car got good crash test ratings, from a 41 mph frontal and 31 mph side impact. The driver's door latch failed, earning it an "acceptable" rating for structure. I don't think that I would like to bet my life on an acceptable rating for any part of a vehicle. They are fine for a commuter car, but I have seen them on the freeway and even if you are the most careful driver out there, you have to watch out for the other guy.

There is an attractive, safe, family size hybrid vehicle coming out either next month or in July that has the best MPG going, the Ford Fusion. I do not work for Ford, but I have a friend that does. I was able to drive one of these fine cars and I thought that it was awesome. It accelerated well, was quiet and although my trip in it was short, my friend said that in the week that he had it, he was averaging 44 MPG combined hwy/city. In addition, nothing that size is coming out of the foreign manufacturers soon, so it's a great time to support the only US car maker that hasn't taken any bailout money!

Times Sure are Changing
Nowadays we put our golf bag in the car. Pretty soon we'll have to put the car in the golf bag.

The people that really should be worried is boat manufacturers. In a few years there won't be a car big enough to pull one.

What is NASCAR going to do? Are the drivers going to be like the little jockeys in Horse Racing? And come to think of it, maybe a few of those racing teams were way ahead of the curve by going to Toyota. Now that Government Motors is destroying the Dodge and Chevy's they're running and all.

But most of all, how to we realistically expect a policeman to maintain his composure and not burst-out laughing when he walks up to these little go-carts to hand-out a citation? Can anyone picture an episode of COPS -- watching a policeman dropping down on one knee to converse with the driver through the window?

The Answer:
As any truly decent citizen should, I ride a motorcycle. My bike sports a 1.5 liter engine and still gets 9 more mpg than the smart car. This, of course, makes me morally superior to everyone except James, but I ride a Suzuki that cost about half what a comparable Harley would cost. I like to think that in some small way, I'm making up for Hiroshima, however, so I remain morally superior despite my purchase of a non union product.

To the hysterical asseveration that motorcycles are in some way unsafe, I reply that one's carbon footprint is rarely smaller than when one is motionless and supine in the hospital amid all those plants. Dead people, of course, have no footprint at all, carbon or otherwise.

The real answer, though, is to reduce demand for carbon-producing technology by reducing the number of people who depend on it. The old socialist standbys of famine, pestilence, war and genocide have always proved most effective in producing this happy result. They will not fail us now.







ben florida
I read the new WW Pasat diesel gets 40 + mpg ?

Gimme back my DeSoto
Hear! Hear! I do not wish to own a motorized Sardine Can. As an older adult I enjoy comfort and remember all of you more than likely will get older. Jouncing along in one of these Jenneys may be good for you younger folks, but what about the Seniors? Oh, excuse me, I fogot everything is supposed to be "FOR THE CHILDREN" or at least that's what the Democrats say. Anyway with modern political thinking in the automobile industry, you young'uns will have more kidney and internal organ problems when these Sardine cans shake your insides out. Bah!
Humbug!

Hey, I LIKED my CRX!
Of course, as I got older and fatter it got harder & harder to get out of.

Smart Car
It seems to me that many of you have the wrong idea. The Smart Car is cute and it serves it's market well. It is not an 'Obamabile'. It isn't a really great car but for getting around in a city it is just fine. I would rather see a revivification of the old VW Beetle. It is about the same size and seats five, is a good crash survivor and it is simple in construction. A bonus; it is easy to maintain. It even gets good mileage, About 20+MPG. It wouldn't need a lot to get it up to Obama's new standards.
We do need better mileage in our cars and better standards. This would have already have happened if the Government hadn't been standing there protecting and subsidizing the auto industry. If we had all been paying what it costs, at the pump, for gas, we would have been demanding large, powerful, cars that got 60 + MPG. And we would have them! Get the governmental protections out of the Market!
Daimler just put fifty million into Tesla motor. How much further could that company have gone if "we" had let GM or Chrysler fail and left their factories and workers available for a company like Tesla? What if such a company had fifty BILLION dollars like GM and Chrysler? Without governmental interference and protection the markets would have selected winners a long time ago and we would all have been 'conserving' resources just as the 'environmentalists' insist we should be.

The new "Beetle"
Is a much better car. You can get a high performance 180 horsepower turbo, a long range diesel or the standard four-banger. It's also one of the safest small cars ever made. I like them. Can't see myself getting one but THEY are cute. The Smart is a rolling eyesore.

-Ray

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

Closed Minded Conservatives Pt. 1
Wow,You guys really hate Obama! The smart car was being brought to America before PRESIDENT OBAMA (still hurts doesn't it) had even announced he was running for president, so I don't understand why he is getting such credit for the smart car. Also, it was "W" who had been in office for over seven years when gas prices went above $4 per/gal and the U.S. auto industry almost went bust. If we hadn't "bailed-out" two of the big three we would now have the lone one. Also, if cafe standards are so restrictive why has Japan, South Korea, and Germany been able to produce cars which get rather good gas mileage, look good and actually work? (I have two BMW both get fair gas mileage, one has 198000 miles and the other 285000 miles and both still run great, the one American car I have owned got 18 mpg and was in the shop 9 times in 18 months.

Closed Minded Conservatives Pt. 2
I have no problem with SUV's in general for those who need such a vehicle, however when I see someone own one simply because they think bigger is better, that causes me concern. For most a mini-van will do the same job for less money and better gas mileage, and that is just those who "need" the room, I see many people driving SUV's solo, what is all that space for anyway their ego?
I know all of your conservative blood is boiling right now and you are pulling Rush's duo of hate "The way things aught to be" and "See I told you so" off the shelves to get a fix of stupidity. Remember you guys started it.
I do own a Smart car, and I love it. Under the worst conditions it gets 38 mpg, and averages over 42 mpg. I am single so I have plenty of room for myself and a friend, when I do need more room I dust off one of the Bimmers. As to power, no I can't go 0-60 in under 4 seconds as I can in one of my BMW's however, I have no problem making highway speeds and feel safe pulling out in traffic. As to safety, yes I would be safer in a larger car or a SUV but the cost of the fuel would be out of this world and some of us do care about the environment (I know you don't believe in climate change). As to similar small cars, I checked, you should too, the iihs rates the smart better than any car even close to it's size and as good as most mid-size cars, one needs to go to the big monsters to get higher ratings. Also, there is price, to purchase a similar small car with the same features one would pay more.

Closed Minded Conservatives Pt. 3
But to each their own. Some of us live on a budget. What I don't understand is why you conservatives brought up so much hate in your comments about the smart car. In reading the comments, you called liberals everything under the sun, and brought up arguments which were totally unrelated to a conversation about Smart cars or fuel economy, do you feel so insecure you need to call us socialist, facist and communist? We aren't the ones who are desolving the "bill of rights" starting a war for WMDs, oh yeah it was 9/11, oh yeah it was now what was it again, sorry, I don't remember this weeks reason, but no matter I am sure you will create a new reason soon and when that one fails more after that (hint, think oil, and revenge for daddy).

Simple minded liberal
SEZ RAY:
"I have no problem with SUV's in general for those who need such a vehicle, however when I see someone own one simply because they think bigger is better, that causes me concern."

SEZ ME:
And who the hell gave you the right to decide what I need, or what I can own, or what I can drive?

I don't care whether you are "concerned" or not. It's NONE of YOUR @#$%^ BUSINESS! Get that through your thick skull!

You can be a serf if you please. You were born free, and if you want to take your God-given liberty and hand it over to someone else to tell you what to do, go for it. Enjoy your chains.

But you DO NOT have the right to take my liberty, or the liberty of anyone else, and I'll fight you as hard as I can to keep you and your idiot friends from dictating to me how I can live.

Simple-minded liberal, part 2
SEZ RAY:
"We aren't the ones who are desolving the 'bill of rights' starting a war for WMDs..."

SEZ ME:
Yes, liberal Democrats are the most dependable supporters of the 2nd Amendment...oh, wait...no, you're not!

I don't know what you mean by "desolving" (dissolving?) the Bill of Rights, but if you refer to the Patriot Act, 98 Senators voted to approve it in 2001 (Rus Feingold being the only "nay" vote, and Mary Landrieu not voting), and 89 Senators, including OBAMA, CLINTON, and REID, voted in favor of Patroit Act II in 2006.

WMDs?

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

The list goes on and on.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.