Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, December 29, 2008
Dan Gainor :: Townhall.com Columnist
Madoff Gives Us Lots to Think About This Christmas
by Dan Gainor
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


Christmastime is the time of giving. So we can thank Bernie Madoff for giving Americans some special gifts this holiday season.

Yes, I said thank him. OK, maybe not a lot. But the one-time financial wizard’s downfall is a morality tale that provides so many lessons it’s almost impossible to know where to start.

If you’ve been living under a rock, the former chairman of the Nasdaq has been charged with securities fraud. Not just ordinary securities fraud, either. Reportedly, Madoff’s sons turned in their father, and who could blame them. He had allegedly confessed to them “that his investment business was a giant Ponzi scheme’ that cost clients $50 billion, a lawyer for the brothers” told Bloomberg.

How someone could degenerate from such status to being reviled the world over is a story that will soon fill textbooks with lessons for future generations. For starters, Madoff proves P.T. Barnum right. Barnum is credited with the saying, “There’s a sucker born every minute.” Given the world’s population growth, maybe that understates the case.

Besides, you don’t need 6.5 billion people when you know the right ones. Those right people lost $50 billion. The list of victims in this story reads more like a social register than a police report – New York Mets owner Fred Wilpon and charities for U.S. News & World Report Publisher Mort Zuckerman, Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) and Steven Spielberg.

It’s hard to think of such luminaries as “suckers,” but that’s about the size of it. A lot of business is based on trust and Madoff won the trust of the rich and famous. That’s a reminder that difference between rich and poor sometimes is merely the size of their mistakes.

According to The Wall Street Journal, nine of the victims had $1 billion or more under management with Madoff. Five of those were banks. Others included Tufts University, several pension funds and even The Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity. What kind of monster bilks a foundation started by a Holocaust victim?

Since we’re still figuring out the extent of Madoff’s alleged crime, we don’t know enough about him to say. But he’s also giving us a lesson in history, and there we might find some answers. Madoff’s purported crime was a form of pyramid scheme writ large – more commonly known as a Ponzi scheme.

Charles Ponzi, the scam’s namesake, was one of the most unrepentant scumbags in the history of finance. He wasn’t a loveable rogue, just a rogue with no remorse but with oodles of chutzpah. AP describes the Ponzi scam as one where “people are persuaded to invest in a fraudulent operation that promises unusually high returns.” Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Dan Gainor is The Boone Pickens Free Market Fellow and director of the Media Research Center’s Business & Media Institute.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Money Earns = Ponzi Scheme
Ethically it is a Ponzi scheme to expect money to "earn" perpetually. To fix this problem we need to go back to pre-1980 capitalism and focus on dividends, lower the number of stock shares in play. Most people should have their retirement in savings not stocks. The big deception by Republicans over the last 20 years as that Republican policies have indeed been an ownership society where more Americans own stocks and equities than ever before in history, Republicans have forgotten deceptively to mention that almost all of the differences between ownership today and pre-1980 in the general public owning stocks is 100 percent attributable to *retirement* investing. Lose your stocks loses your retirement. That is just not acceptable as a public policy. If anything this guarantees people will need Social Security, something the Republicans claim to be against.

It is time to pull the plug on stocks being the fundamental retirement investment plan for the common american. Expecting 10 percent "earnings" year-after-year is a Ponzi scheme.

We are now seeing the end results.

A true conservative
I remember back in the day when the stock market was about dividends. You invested based on dividends paid.

All that changed after 1980. Investments started trending towards stock price gains, away from dividends. So much so that today no one talks about dividends.

Many of my conservative friends jumped on the stock price wagon and invested in Mutual Funds and 401Ks. Not me. All my retirement is in CDs and savings.

Money cannot "earn". Only people can "earn". Putting in $1 and getting back $2, $10 is not "earning". It's greed.

I believe it is morally unhealthy to expect money to "earn", better phrased grow by greed.

I may lose my savings yet, but I know that every dime I have in savings is money I earned.

Expecting something for doing nothing is the socialist/communist work ethic. It is no different with money.

To fix this current economic debacle we need to change our money ethic. We need to go back to investing for dividends. This takes all the pressure off growing stock price. It encourages companies to keep the stock pool small such that dividends paid are spread out over a smaller pool.

We also need to do away with all the funds. Mutual funds, hedge funds, and go back to just stocks, more or less, back to the pre-1980 era of investing.

Dividends typically paced interest rates of a savings account, with sometimes a little extra. There were no mutual funds. You put your money in IBM and watched it fail or grow. With a mutual fund you have no idea if your money is going to the Colombian Drug Cartel or some Chinese sweat shop.





Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.