Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, April 12, 2007
Congressman Paul Ryan :: Townhall.com Columnist
A Defining Budget Debate
by Congressman Paul Ryan
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


The most outrageous claim House Democrats made about the budget they passed last month is that it doesn't raise taxes. Numbers don't lie, and by the numbers in their budget, Democrats would impose the largest tax increase in American history - nearly $400 billion over the next five years.

While they keep denying it, the Democrats' budget relies on higher tax brackets, cutting the child tax credit in half, significantly increasing capital gains and investment taxes, eliminating marriage penalty and death tax relief, and a host of other tax increases.

The Democrats' budget also increases non-defense discretionary spending by $22 billion in FY08 alone, and promises more than $150 billion in additional "reserve fund" spending with no way to pay for it. Because of this immense new spending - coupled with a complete lack of reform - the Democrats' tax hikes are inevitable: without them, their entire budget falls apart.

None of this is surprising. Democrats favor big government. They trust government to make Americans' most important choices for them, from education to health care to scientific research. They believe the economy should follow the dictates of politics, because they don't really trust free markets to produce the "right" kinds of goods in the "right" ways. For Democrats, "fiscal discipline" means balancing the budget at higher levels of spending and taxing, and with an ever-expanding role for government.

Republicans have a fundamentally different view. We believe that individuals, acting freely and responsibly, are the source of our country's moral strength and prosperity. We believe government tends to smother personal initiative, that it hinders more than it helps. We favor limiting government's imposition on individual and economic choices. We believe, as President Reagan said in his first inaugural: "We are a nation that has a government - not the other way around."

For these reasons, our budget - offered as an alternative to the Democrats' plan - gets to balance by curbing Congress's appetite for spending, not by demanding more money from taxpayers. Our policy is to continue supporting strong economic growth - the mainstay of deficit reduction in the past several years - reforming our largest and least sustainable entitlement programs, and demanding better accountability for government spending.

The entitlement reforms are especially important. It is widely known that programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, as currently structured, face a fiscal and economic train wreck - and they will fail the very beneficiaries they are intended to serve. Ignoring these facts - as the Democrat budget does - only makes the problem worse.

The reforms in our budget take a major step toward making these programs more responsive and flexible, and better aligned with today's economic realities. They also make entitlements more sustainable - not by "cutting" them, but by slowing their growth, from the currently-projected 5.2 percent, to a slightly more sustainable 4.3 percent over the next 5 years.

These are the main reasons why this year's budget debate matters. The philosophies of Republicans and Democrats, as spelled out in our respective fiscal plans, could not be more distinct: whether we opt for more government, more taxes, and an ever-growing burden on the Nation's economy; or limited government, more freedom, and a more resilient and robust economy. That is the defining nature of this year's budget debate - and it is the clear choice for our nation's future.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

U.S. Congressman Paul Ryan is the Ranking Member of the House Budget Committee, where he works to bring fiscal discipline and accountability to the federal government.

Be the first to read Congressman Ryan's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Who is Jason Altmire?
We conservatives have a lot to complain about. But beyond that, what are we going to DO about the situation? An easy: vote the bad guys (and gals) out, and vote the good ones in. I’m doing a series of articles about one of the bad guys, supposedly “new” Democrat Jason Altmire of Pennsylvania’s 4th District. Here’s the beginning of today’s column (one of several on him). I’d love to have you read it – click on the name above – and tell me what you think.


"In medical school . . . about a decade ago, late for a class, I cut through a hospital emergency room and came upon dozens of people on stretchers -- waiting, moaning, begging for treatment. Some elderly patients had waited for up to five days in corridors before being admitted to beds. They smelled of urine and sweat. As I navigated past the bodies, I began to question everything I thought I knew about health care -- not only in Canada, but also in the United States.... I had begun a journey into the heart of one of the great policy disasters of modern times." (Dr. David Gratzer, The Cure: How Capitalism Can Save American Heath Care)

Is this the kind of health care Pennsylvania 4th District Congressman Jason Altmire has in mind for the U.S.? Of course, the good news about the sweat- and urine-soaked patients Gratzer describes is that they all have Canada's universal health coverage. The bad news is that they're in hallways for days, waiting for someone -- anyone -- to take care of them.

Altmire admits he wants the government, mainly through Medicare, to play a much bigger role in the American health care system. He wants to reduce the role of private health insurance companies, including those providing prescription drug coverage for seniors. He wants many more Americans -- people below the age of 65 -- Medicare, whose costs are universally recognized to be out-of-control.

At the same time, Altmire says he wants "evolution, rather than revolution" in health care. He doesn't want, right now, a single-payer system like the one in Canada. However, does he really reject what's known as "Hillarycare?" One wonders, especially when remembering that, a decade-and-a-half ago, Altmire was one of the people who constructed Mrs. Clinton's plan for a government takeover of American health care.

Has he apostacized from his one-time faith in Hillarycare? One wonders, because Altmire has a consistency problem in his approach to issues. Consider his views on the Iraq War timetable . . .

(more to come)


Great ideas, but too late
Like others, this sounds good, but the Repubs didn't really try to do any of that. In fact, they supported a massive entitlement increase in a program that's already projected to run huge deficits!

Not since Gingrich have the Repubs truly made an effort to cut gov't. And after the way the press went after him, I suspect they won't do it again for a long while.

So, while the Repubs bear some blame, the leftist media is the key factor. It must be very unnerving to be assaulted and investigated day after day by leftist activists just for suggesting ways of reducing gov't. Those people, such as the Pelosi and the Clintons, are as vicious as gangsters and just as willing to "rough up" their opponents.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.