Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, August 06, 2007
Chuck Muth :: Townhall.com Columnist
Health Insurance Blues: Give Choice a Chance
by Chuck Muth
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


The nation’s largest health insurer, UnitedHealth Group, wants to buy up Sierra Health Services in Nevada. The merger would give the new company a virtual monopoly over health insurance in the Silver State, reducing competition, which usually means increasing costs. Supporters, however, say the merger will actually reduce costs and improve service due to the efficiencies of scale the giant conglomerate will enjoy.

Nevertheless, being a free-market kinda guy I haven’t yet heard any compelling reason for the government to block this merger of two private companies. And the fact that the self-serving Culinary Union is now in open opposition to the takeover tends to weather-vane me in the opposite direction.

No, the answer to legitimate concerns about giving UnitedHealth a virtual monopoly over the health insurance market in Nevada isn’t to block the takeover of Sierra Health Services, but to open Nevada’s market to interstate competition. In this age of Amazon and eBay, it makes no sense whatsoever that Nevadans are prohibited from buying health insurance from a company located in another state.

And yet, thanks to an anachronistic law passed in 1945, the McCarran-Ferguson Act, combined with the lobbying power of Big Insurance, there is no competitive interstate insurance market similar to the highly competitive interstate banking market. For example, Nevadans can deal with a relatively small local bank or choose to deal with a big interstate bank such as Bank of America or Wells Fargo. Both entities thrive in Nevada and consumers, armed with market choice, benefit greatly.

Not so when it comes to health insurance companies. Why not?

Because state legislators want to retain the ability to force insurance companies to foot the bill and cover expensive benefits which they don’t have the guts to sock directly to taxpayers. These are called “mandates” - as in, the legislature makes it mandatory that the insurance company cover them or the insurance company doesn’t get to operate in Nevada. Yes, legal extortion.

Around the country, many states force insurance companies to cover benefits ranging from acupuncture to marriage counseling; from contraceptives to hearing aids to hairpieces; from podiatry to osteopathy; from chiropractors to even massage therapy. All in all, there are over 1,800 such mandates found across the country. And these mandates jack up the cost of insurance, creating a huge difference in premium costs between some states.

For example, a recent e-HealthInsurance.com study showed that a healthy 25-year-old male could pick up a basic health insurance policy in Kentucky for $960 a year. That same policy in New Jersey, however, would set the lad back a staggering $5,880 a year. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Chuck Muth is President and CEO of Citizen Outreach and a professional political consultant.

Be the first to read Chuck Muth's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

0ne simple problem with health insurance

Benicar (a blood pressure med) goes for about $46 and most insurance plans kick in $11 so that you pay $35.

However, if you don't have insurance, the price jumps to $70. The same pharmacies that are more than happy to sell it for $46 when there is an insurance copay have no trouble charging damn near twice for those uninsured.

The same thing is true if you go into the hospital. There is one cost if you have insurance but if you don't it will be about double and they will sue you to get it. I am not a fan of price controls but health care needs to be treated like other industries - concepts such as "price fixing" and "restraint of trade" need to be dealt with.

We can blame the insurance companies and we can blame the corrupt and incompetent government, but the concepts such as "price fixing" and "restraint of trade" remain....

georgiagal/doctork
If all government mandates, coverage demands, and other non-economic factors were removed from the mix, the"invisible hand" of the market would deliver competing policies and coverages folks could purchase just like they now order pizza. Furthermore, if end users of care were the ones paying its' costs, there would be significant price shopping and demand for simple, non-life-at-risk usage would drop. Basically, I believe forcing doctors, nurses, etc. to deliver care to anyone, regardless of ability to pay, and only at rates of payment determined by government, to be slavery. Perhaps if people knew in advance they and they alone would bear the costs of their healthcare, many foolish behaviours would be bred out of the species, through personal choice or death by attrition. Why should responsible, hardworking people be forced to pay (in higher premiums due to cost-shifting) for the care of a premature crack baby whose mother is broke, uninsured, and unable to pay even a fraction of the cost? Survival of the fittest combined with personal responsibility would lead to a healthier and wiser population, something of long range benefit to mankind as a whole in an age of finite, diminishing resources.Also, why complain about high medical costs for procedures or medecines? No-one is forcing you to use them, you can always ask your next door neighbour to perform your bypass surgery, or substitute castor oil or scotch whisky for nembutal or cardizem.Of course, the success rate of surgeries performed by an elementary school teacher or truck driver might not be as high as those performed by a Harvard Med. trained cardiologist, but you get what you pay for. Where in the constituition does it state unlimited cost-free healthcare is a right for even citizens, let alone illegals who sneak into our home ?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.