Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, October 29, 2007
Chuck Colson :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Victims of Porn
by Chuck Colson
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Note: The following commentary contains information that may not be suitable for children.

A teenage girl was recalling what her childhood had been like—a childhood marred by porn. “When I was eight years old,” she wrote, “my father made me look at [pornographic] pictures” involving sex acts he wanted her to perform. “I went along with him, not knowing any better,” she said.

For years this girl’s father raped her while using these pictures—and at age 16, she had a sexually transmitted disease. “I may die of this disease,” she wrote sadly. “Pornography has ruined my life.”

So much for the claim—often made by porn advocates—that pornography is a victimless crime. This week is White Ribbon against Pornography Week—a good time to remind ourselves of how destructive porn is.

The numbers are staggering. Porn is a 10-billion-dollar-a-year industry. One study revealed that more than 32 million individuals visited an Internet porn site in just one month. Some 800 million pornographic DVDs are rented each month. Other surveys reveal that one in five children on the Internet receives a sexual solicitation.

Christians are not immune to the siren call of porn. A Focus on the Family poll found that 17 percent of Christian adults have visited sexually oriented sites.

There is no longer any doubt that pornography inspires crime. Most child molesters admit that they consume hard-core porn on a regular basis.

And those who create porn are now victimizing even the youngest children. Police who seize pornographic films and pictures note that they are seeing X-rated images of toddlers and even babies—this is sickening. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Chuck Colson was the Chief Counsel for Richard Nixon and served time in prison for Watergate-related charges. In 1976, Colson founded Prison Fellowship Ministries, which, in collaboration with churches of all confessions and denominations, has become the world's largest outreach to prisoners, ex-prisoners, crime victims, and their families.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Chuck Colson's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
zzx375 -
"Irene Graham (Australia) gives no bio so we don't know her credentials or really her motivation so in the absence of other information, I must conclude that she is either a pornography consumer or derives income from the porn industry by direct participation or support for her lobbying efforts."

Funny...you don't give your credentials or motivation either. So in the absence of other information, I must conclude you're bent on destroying American liberties, starting with the First Amendment.

Oh...wait...hmmm...assuming that you are motivated by a particular "side", then using that assumption to "prove" your opinion wrong would be a...DOUBLE FALLACY. Let's refrain from committing those, shall we?

"The first offering in your Austrailian link 'R18 material: its potential impact on people under 18 - An overview of the available literature', is not direct research but merely a survey of literature available on the topic."

Perhaps you should use that survey as a reading list?

"Publication dates for other cited references range from 1986 to 2001 not recent at all."

What's your point? Einstein's E = mc2 is "not recent at all", so I guess you would toss a physics book?

"Your Wiki citation may very well apply to what Colson has written, but you fail to address how Colson can MAKE you or anyone else feel guilty. Isn't that like stating these words I am typing make you feel guilty?"

I said he was trying to make people feel guilty using fallacies to make pornography appear "bad".

"But how does pornography benefit society as a whole or the "greater good"? Would you give up pornography for the "greater good"?"

Fallacy of false dilemma.

"Finally, pornography isn't breakfast cereal."

Likewise, pornography sales are not sex crime.

mrs Paddy -
I would have to read the book to judge the statistical evidence. But just on the face of it, here are my reactions to some of the claims you list:

"Extensive Statistical research & 100s of interviews finds that regular viewers or pornography were
-more likely to suffer from impotence"

This is very counter intuitive. Are you honestly suggesting that material designed to arouse in fact does the opposite? If the author found and interviewed some impotent porn viewers, is it not far more likely that they are impotent for other reasons, and turning to porn to try and deal with the issue?

"-more likely to engage in risky/illegal sexual activity
-normal sexual appetites progressed to violent & criminal behavior after being numbed by fantasies on the net"

Every study I've seen (and I've listed plenty below) show the exact opposite. Is there even one that can support that view?

"-more unhappy with their partners and themselves"
"-women devastated by their husband's/boyfriend's addiction"

I would want to see this evidence analyzed according to the partner's attitude about porn. $100 says that couples where both partners have positive attitudes about porn are more happy with each other and enjoy it together.

"-normalizing behaviors that 20 yrs ago would have been nearly criminal"

There are so many problems with that statement, I'm not sure where to begin. Define "nearly criminal"? Doesn't that in fact mean perfectly legal? What were the laws 20 years ago, and why are they the standard for judgement above the laws for today? Or maybe the laws from 200 years ago? I can think of many very harmful laws from the past 100 years. What behaviors? "Normal" or "abnormal" by what standards? Why?

"-young girls sexualizing themselves"

Are young girls viewing porn? Or poor role models who are, never the less, outside the porn industry?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.