Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, February 08, 2008
Charles Krauthammer :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Sheriff Comes to Town
by Charles Krauthammer
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


WASHINGTON -- On Super Tuesday, John McCain secured the Republican nomination. How did that happen? Simple. In the absence of a compelling conservative, the Republican electorate turned to the apostate sheriff.

In the beginning, there were two. There was America's mayor, Rudy Giuliani, determined to "go on offense." And there was America's maverick, John McCain, scourge of Iraq wobblies.

Both aroused deep suspicions among conservatives. Giuliani's major apostasy is being pro-choice on abortion. McCain's apostasies are too numerous to count. He's held the line on abortion, but on just about everything else he could find -- tax cuts, immigration, campaign finance reform, Guantanamo -- he not only opposed the conservative consensus but insisted on doing so with ostentatious self-righteousness.

The story of this campaign is how many Republicans didn't care, and felt that national security trumps social heresy. The problem for Giuliani and McCain, however, was that they were splitting that constituency. Then came Giuliani's humiliation in Florida. After he withdrew from the race, he threw his support to McCain -- and took his followers with him.

Look at the numbers. Before Florida, the national polls had McCain hovering around 30, and Giuliani in the mid-teens. After Florida, McCain's numbers jumped to the mid-40s, swallowing the Giuliani constituency whole.

On Super Tuesday, the Giuliani effect showed up in the big Northeastern states -- New York, New Jersey, Connecticut -- and California. McCain won the first three with absolute majorities of 51 percent or more. And in California, McCain-Giuliani (plus Schwarzenegger, for good measure) moderate Republicanism captured 42 percent of the vote.

Elsewhere, where Giuliani was not a factor, McCain got no comparable boost. In Oklahoma, Missouri, Arkansas, Tennessee, Alabama and Georgia, he could never break through even 37 percent. The vote was divided roughly evenly among McCain, Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney (trailing). But these splits were not enough to make up for the winner-take-all big ones, all of which McCain won.

The other half of the story behind McCain's victory is this: There would have been a far smaller Republican constituency for the apostate sheriff had there been a compelling conservative to challenge him. But there never was.

The first messianic sighting was Fred Thompson, who soared in the early polls, then faded because he was too diffident and/or normal to embrace with any enthusiasm the indignities of the modern campaign.

Then, for that brief and shining Iowa moment, there was Huckabee -- until conservatives actually looked at his record (on taxes, for example) as governor of Arkansas, and listened to the music of his often unconservative populism.

That left Romney, the final stop in the search for the compelling conservative. I found him to be a fine candidate who would have made a fine president. But until very recently, he was shunned by most conservatives for ideological inauthenticity. Then, as the post-Florida McCain panic grew, conservatives tried to embrace Romney, but the gesture was both too late and as improvised and convenient-looking as Romney's own many conversions. (So late and so improvised that it could not succeed. On Thursday, Romney withdrew from the race.)

Conservatives are on the eternal search for a new Reagan. They refuse to accept the fact that a movement leader who is also a gifted politician is a once-in-a-lifetime phenomenon. But there's an even more profound reason why no Reagan showed up this election cycle and why the apostate sheriff is going to win the nomination. The reason is George W. Bush. He redefined conservatism with a "compassionate" variant that is a distinct departure from classic Reaganism.

Bush muddied the ideological waters of conservatism. It was Bush who teamed with Teddy Kennedy to pass No Child Left Behind, a federal venture into education that would have been anathema to (the early) Reagan. It was Bush who signed the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform. It was Bush who strongly supported the McCain-Kennedy immigration bill. It was Bush who on his own created a vast new entitlement program, the Medicare drug benefit. And it was Bush who conducted a foreign policy so expansive and, at times, redemptive as to send paleoconservatives like Pat Buchanan and traditional conservatives like George Will into apoplexy and despair (respectively).

Who in the end prepared the ground for the McCain ascendancy? Not Feingold. Not Kennedy. Not even Giuliani. It was George W. Bush. Bush begat McCain.

Bush remains popular in his party. Even conservatives are inclined to forgive him his various heresies because they are trumped by his singular achievement: He's kept us safe. He's the original apostate sheriff.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Charles Krauthammer is a 1987 Pulitzer Prize winner, 1984 National Magazine Award winner, and a columnist for The Washington Post since 1985.

Be the first to read Charles Krauthammer's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

"Bush has kept us safe"? Pshaw!
By all indications, Bush is clueless about the threat of Islam, by which I mean "basic, garden-variety Islam." [See http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2007/10/29/book-recommendat ion-religion-of-peace-by-gregory-davis/ ] Thus, he's done anything but keep us safe. Instead of ending immigration from Muslim countries, it continues unimpeded, despite the fact that it benefits us not one whit while also filling our futures with anxiety and strife.

As conservative writer Lawrence Auster says:

"We will have terrorist attacks and threats of terrorists attacks and inconvenient and humiliating security measures and the disruption of ordinary activities FOREVER, as long as Muslims are in the West in any significant numbers. The Muslim terrorists are part and parcel of the Muslim community. According to a survey reported in the Scotsman, 24 percent of Muslims in Britain (I never describe them as “British Muslims”) believe the July 2005 London bombings were justified. Imagine that. Not only do these Muslims in Britain support terrorism against Britain, they’re not afraid to say so openly to a pollster! The unchangeable fact is that wherever there is a sizable Muslim community there will be a very large number of terror supporters and therefore —- inevitably -— actual terrorists as well."

{See the rest of Auster's piece here: http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/006198.html ]

Members of Bush's administration are continually "reaching out" to Islamic front groups such as CAIR. And Bush himself, helped along by the ornamental-but-dimwitted Condoleeza Rice, have returned to their predecessors' doomed and stupid approach of hectoring Israel into making concessions for a chimerical piece with her mortal enemies **after** Bush, in 2002, drew a line in the sand against exactly this practice of trying to make nice with terror-organizations.

Safe? Not even close.



What!?!
So Bush is evil b/c he has some compassion, but he is good b/c he is a mass murderer.

Might want to take a look at Isaiah 5:20 Kraut

Oiled Machine?
Charles, the next question is, "Can the squeaky wheel now run smoothly?" Conservatives hold the oil can.
Love your columns,

Wasn't Bush
Nixon declared 'We're all Keynesians now' which to me goes far beyond compassionate conservatism. Nixon instituted price controls and gave us a bevy of laws and policies that showed he was certainly no conservative. His actions in office resulted in the election of Jimmy Carter. Nixon gave us George Bush.

Four Republicans have been elected president since the 60s. One was a conservative. Were McCain to gain the White House the record would stay at one. The powers that be in the Republican Party want it this way.

Contract with Republicans (and McCain)
Conservatives unite! We had a Contract with America that brought Republicans control of Congress and forced Clinton to abandon his socialist ways and sign conservative bills. Now we the people of these United States need to have a Contract with Republicans and if our candidates do not sign it or enforce our contract once in office then we boot them out! I sent this idea to several conservative leaders and am asking all conservatives to do the same. We will not vote for McCain, but our voice can be heard with electing Representatives, state, and local leaders that will be conservative to help us thwart socialism which is on the way! Let's keep conservatism alive and well with this Contract. I could post my proposed Contract, but I prefer the idea to be pushed to our leaders. If y'all want an example let me know.

Conservatives and Conservatism are relevant!!!!!

Neocon Krauthammer's moment of clarity.
I agree with much of what Krauthammer says here.

As a socalled paleoconservative(actually paleoconservatives are "traditional" conservatives...as opposed to "neoconservatives" whose philosophy arose from leftist interventionism), Krauthammer is correct about our rejection of Bush's messianic and meddlesome foreign policy.

For it is not conservative. It in fact is nothing more than an arrogant presumption in deciding what is best for others..a kind of domestic nanny-state mentality extended to foreign affairs.

Bush did far more than merely "muddy the ideological waters of conservatism", Dearest Charles.

Bush polluted those waters.

HOWEVER, some Bush administration efforts in uncovering and defanging Islamic terror plots directed at our nation have been successful.

And Bush should be credited for that.

But Bush continues to live in fantasy-land regarding Islam. And on that, the above comments by Paul are correct.

Krauthammer wrong again!
Dear Charles:
Bad analysis again.
YOU and your Republican Establishment buddies got McCain to this position.

YOU backed a guy who couldn't win, Romney.

YOU distorted the record and positions of the only Republican who could win, Huckabee.

Now, wallow in the mess YOU created. Your own deception and dishonesty produced a win for the dems!

History will reveal your role and America will pay dearly during Hillary's reign.

Bush & McCain are not Conservative
Bush is a member of the Republican party with some Conservative values, but mostly liberal views on social issues.

We Conservatives settled for Bush. Krauthammer has it spot-on. We settled in 1999, and we are settling now (although it feels like we had no choice).

The Conservative movement hasn't been redefined, the Republican party has. The traditional values that liberals abhor (family, faith, low-taxes, small government) are no longer supported by the Republican establishment, although many are clucking away like hens "vote for us, we still believe"! Hence the constant need to bring up Ronaldus Magnus and Barry AuH2O.

Most Conservatives will probably vote for McCain with one hand on the Diebold machine, the other on our nose. Which is appropriate, because I suspect that if McCain wins, he'll be going for our wallets. Small businesses like mine need a guy like Mitt Romney, Fred Thompson, or Ron Paul.

I'm just not sure how long I can stay as a Republican with this metamorphosis occurring. I may be better suited as a Conservative Libertarian.

Take a deep breath liberals - and as you keep reminding us that we cannot go dig up Reagan, quit trying to smother us with your Marx and Rousseau. This contest just got started.

The Sheriff

Let's see.
The Kraut has designated Bush as the retiring sheriff and McCain the newly elected sheriff.
Hmmmm... what part in this scenario is right for the Kraut?
How about the new Max Brand Krauthammer author of pulp westrn Fiction.
Fits!

Semper Fi

The left was waaaay ahead of us
For all this caterwauling about conservatives having no real choices, it is often forgotten that a year and a half ago, we did have a darling, name of George Allen. The true visionaries of the left knew it, too, so the Washington Post set out on a seek and destroy mission to break his legs before he even got into the starting blocks.

Thus were we treated to the macaca bulls#!t, and Allens presidential aspirations were sabotaged. For those who havent figured it out yet, thats the way the Democrap sleaze machine works.

Makes you wonder what kind of low, underhanded crud they have in store for, say, Bobby Jindal, or Sarah Palin.

Don't make the mistake
....of sitting this election out, no matter how you have to hold your nose. I do beleive that McCain will appoint conservative judges, and that is extremely important. There is no question that electing Billary or Obama will turn the country even more left. Are you guys willing to pay that price for our kids jsut to get even with McCain for winning despite a lack of money, organization or anything else????????

SCourt
Once again right on the money.
1. You are 100% right about the too little too late embracing of Mitt Romney. The latest pathetic anti-McCain Dobson's endorsing of Mike Huckabee. I kept waiting for him to accpet reality (preferably before Iowa, certainly before Florida) and endorse Mitt back when his endorsement could have meant something. Now it just looks like he's saying "I hate McCain and I really mean it". Problem is noone is listening any longer.

2. Conservatives need to forgive McCain for McCainFeingold for the very reason you mentioned---McCainFeingold really is McCainFeingold/Bush. I believe that the President signed this horrible law to avoid being targeted as promoting money in politics and secretly hoping that the Supreme Court would "fix it" for him. Well they didn't, but maybe McCain was more or less hoping for the same thing. Pass this law with Feingold and get credit for trying to "reform" the corruption of money in politics. McCain probably also hoped (as no doubt GWB did) that the Supreme Court would "fix" his flawed law or at the very least that the President would veto it.

Charles...You are Completely!...
5 stars spot on...
Unfortunately :(

Ron Paul
We have a darling right now- Ron Paul.

The Son of Bush
Sounds like the name of a 1940's horror movie, but Krauthammer is right, McCain is the Son of Bush.

In early 2000, when Bush claimed that the Republican party was trying to "balance the budget on the backs of the poor" he said everything that you needed to know about his liberal/authoritarian philosophy.

When a man says that he will do whatever it takes to accomplish some goal what he means is that he will take whatever you've got in terms of wealth and liberty. Bush has lived by that principle and became the worst president since Harry Truman. The federal budget rose from 18.5% of the economy to 21% under Bush.

Tell me again that Bush cut taxes. Only a Republican is stupid enough to believe that he has more because his taxes are lower. The higher costs of oil, food and interest have taken more away than any tax cut left. The present interest rate cuts will result in runaway inflation and likely price controls under president McCain (Remember Nixon? He would be McCain's grandfather.) McCain's economic illiteracy knows no bounds.

Since both parties have the wrong ideas about the economy the next president, either McCain or Obama, will be a one term disaster, the Jimmy Carter of the 21st century. The only question is who will succeed the next president? Considering that Republicans still praise Bush despite his utter incompetence, I expect the 2013 president will a perfect idiot.

dbz77
You know what – I love Ron Paul. I wish we had 400 more just like him in Congress. Trouble is, with his sand-in-his-scalp absolute refusal to acknowledge the jihadists’ global war against us, he simply can’t be trusted with the keys to the Pentagon.

Dr. Paul fancies himself a Constitutionalist. Well gee golly gosh, one of the few things the government is Constitutionally authorized – indeed, mandated – to do is to “provide for the common defense.” When he gets that part right, I’m on board quicker than you can say Osama bin Laden.

Mr. Bush?
I think that Mr. Krauthammer got it right.

McCain will be a disaster as well as Obama or Clinton. They will damage our USA. It will be very hard to repair.

God helps all of us!!!

I insist that there is not difference between McCain, Clinton or Obama. They are made with the same mold.

Doc
If The McAmnesty McMidget is the new sheriff, he should arrest himself for The Keating 5.

Spot on
The difference between Bush and McCain, though, is that Bush does not seem to despise those in his own party at every turn like McCain. (See Mona Charen's latest article: http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MonaCharen/2008/02/08/w hy_they_cant_vote_for_mccain)

Marion
You expect that a man who called Justice Alioto too conservative will appoint conservatives to the SCOTUS?

A New Sheriff Comes to Town
Romney talked the talk but never walked the talk. He was arrogant, condescending and vicious. He had the likeability factor of diarrhea. No amount of talk show endorsements and demands could convince me to vote for him. While Guiliani is credited with giving McCain the northeast, why didn't Romney win them if he was so great? After all, one of his "three" "home" states is Massasachusetts. His camp claimed Huckabee was siphoning off his votes; but Huckabee ran first and Romney third in six states. It is more reasonable to argue Romney was siphoning Huckabee's votes. I am tired of this blood-letting by the party. I am getting ready for my anti-Romney movement so I am prepared to keep this new found conservative out of office next time.
Pamela
Baton Rouge, La.

Right Makes Might
You are absolutely correct.

I'm not happy with much of what Bush has done, but his War on Terror, fought in fits and starts as it has been, is one of the two things he has done that make me glad it's Bush, not Gore or Kerry.

Ron Paul isn't physically "pretty," but I sure like everything about him except his refusal to face those who are determined to murder us, who continue to seek ways to destroy us. It's MY most important issue.

I'm afraid his lack of physical attractiveness would have doomed him anyway. Too many Americans just aren't much into "what's inside." And they certainly don't care much about that old piece of paper, our Constitution.

He's honest and that's bad?
"...he not only opposed the conservative consensus but insisted on doing so with ostentatious self-righteousness"

So let me get this straight. He was honest and did what he said he would do. And, perhaps the greatest apostasy, he didn't give a tinkers damn what you thought about it? Well, we can't have any of that, now can we?

charles
did you ever hear that we have an ALL VOLUNTEER military?
Did you ever consider that during WW2 (and you may as well count EVERY other war we've fought) there were more PATRIOTS working on the homefront to make sure the troopers in the action theaters had what they needed than the actual numbers of troopers themselves?
I am interested to know why you feel it so necessary for Romney, or any other Dad for that matter, to define "patriotism" as fighting in a volunteer force, in an optional engagement, in the greater War on Terror?
I'm as sick of the "spewing" from folks like you as I am seeing the 40 year old photos of a saluting McVain!
The nation is demanding "change" and the STUPID PARTY, the GOP, is giving the voters "the best it can offer", a 71 year old who has been a Washington insider for the past 26 years! What a sad joke!

Meet the new boss
Same as the old boss.

wrong on all fronts
First off McCain hasn't won he needs twice as many delagate as he currently has. But I think you have completely missed the talk-radio factor in your analises. Huckabee was only brought in to take out McCain by the talking heads but he caught fire and won Iowa. He would have faired better in SC but talk-radio was too busy pushing Romney after NH. When it came time for Florida they threw him under that bus the Straight EiBS Express. Betting that Huck would drop out they announced his campaign was pulled out of the state. After their man lost again they went into panic mode. They started projecting Huck as part of the McCain plan to get Romney. Then they started rightly attcking McCain on the issues. They floated the notion that a vote for Huck is one taken from Mitt. That was really projection they picked up from the democrats. Mitt may have picked up some of McCains vote but not Hucks. Fast forward to 2/5/8 Huck takes the south, Romney wins a few but look at who finished second. Only in CA where Mitt finished second could he have taken McCain out with the Huck vote. Huck was second in several states where adding Mitts vote gives him double digit victories over McCain. In MO Huck could have added the Ron Paul vote and if McCain gets the Guilani vote he doesn't need Romneys. Huck might not have won in the north east but he would be the lead dog if Mitt would have dropped out a week ago. It still takes 1091 and McCain can't get there without a sweep and Mitt. I hear Ross Perot got his hair cut today. He ironed his ears back and if McCain runs he hates him that alone might cause him to dust off the BBD.(biggerbetterdeal)

My Sheriff Lost
I was hoping Giuliani would win and pick up Micheal Steele as a running mate, I guess in hindsight I was probably delusional but McCain is just not where I want to go. Teddy and he are drinking buddies for christ sakes, this does not bode well for the supreme court if he gets elected. Could you just hear him slurring his words asking Teddy for his top justice nominee, frightening.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.