Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Friday, March 30, 2007
Charles Krauthammer :: Townhall.com Columnist
The wars against radical Islamic insurgents
by Charles Krauthammer
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you personally know a young voter who has been sucked into Obamamania?


"Our bill calls for the redeployment of U.S. troops out of Iraq so that we can focus more fully on the real war on terror, which is in Afghanistan."

-- Speaker Nancy Pelosi, March 8

The Senate and the House have both passed bills for ending the Iraq War, or at least liquidating the American involvement in it. The resolutions, approved by the barest majorities, were underpinned by one unmistakable theme: wrong war, wrong place, distracting us from the real war that is elsewhere.

Where? In Afghanistan. The emphasis on Afghanistan echoed across the Democratic aisle in Congress from Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee to former admiral and now Rep. Joe Sestak. It is a staple of the three leading Democratic candidates for the presidency, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards. It is the constant refrain of their last presidential candidate, John Kerry, and of their current party leader, Howard Dean, who complains ``we don't have enough troops in Afghanistan. That's where the real war on terror is."

Of all the arguments for pulling out of Iraq, its comparative unimportance vis- a-vis Afghanistan is the least serious.

And not just because this argument assumes that the world's one superpower, which spends more on defense every year than the rest of the world combineddoes not have the capacity to fight an insurgency in Iraq as well as in Afghanistan. But because it assumes that Afghanistan is strategically more important than Iraq.

Thought experiment: Bring in a completely neutral observer -- a Martian -- and point out to him that the United States is involved in two hot wars against radical Islamic insurgents. One is in Afghanistan, a geographically marginal backwater with no resources, no industrial and no technological infrastructure. The other is in Iraq, one of the three principal Arab states, with untold oil wealth, an educated population, an advanced military and technological infrastructure which, though suffering decay in the later Saddam years, could easily be revived if it falls into the right (i.e. wrong) hands. Add to that the fact that its strategic location would give its rulers inordinate influence over the entire Persian Gulf region, including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the Gulf states. Then ask your Martian: Which is the more important battle? He would not even understand why you are asking the question. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Charles Krauthammer is a 1987 Pulitzer Prize winner, 1984 National Magazine Award winner, and a columnist for The Washington Post since 1985.

Be the first to read Charles Krauthammer's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Subject: The Martian's Choice
Yes, but what Mr. Krauthammer's argument presuposes is that the martian would know English, and the basis for this belief is tenuous at best. Earthly interaction with Mars has been minimal, and it is more reasonable to assume a martian would not know English--rendering the argument ineffective and impotent.

K wrong again
Thought experiment: Bring in a completely neutral observer -- a Martian -- and point out to him that the United States is involved in two hot wars against radical Islamic insurgents.
-------------------------------------------

GEN. MAPLES:Attacks by terrorist groups, like al Qaeda in Iraq, account for only a fraction of the insurgent violence.

SOURCE:

Copyright 2006 Federal News Service, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Federal News Service
November 15, 2006 Wednesday
SECTION: CAPITOL HILL HEARING
LENGTH: 18070 words
HEADLINE: PANEL II OF A HEARING OF THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE;
SUBJECT: CURRENT SITUATION AND U.S. MILITARY OPERATIONS IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN;
CHAIRED BY: SENATOR JOHN WARNER (R-VA);
WITNESSES: LIEUTENANT GENERAL (U.S. ARMY) MICHAEL D. MAPLES, DIRECTOR, DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY; GENERAL MICHAEL V. HAYDEN (U.S. AIR FORCE), DIRECTOR, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY;
LOCATION: SH-216, HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING, WASHINGTON, D.C.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily dose of conservative columns, editorial cartoons, talk radio, news, and more!
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.