Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, March 16, 2007
Charles Krauthammer :: Townhall.com Columnist
Dick Cheney Syndrome?
by Charles Krauthammer
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


I too know Dick Cheney. And I know something about the effects of physical illness on mental functioning. In my younger days, writing in the Archives of General Psychiatry, I identified a psychiatric syndrome ("Secondary Mania," the title of the paper) that was associated entirely with organic (i.e. underlying physical) disorders. The British medical journal Lancet found this discovery notable enough to devote an editorial to it shortly afterward and to alert clinicians to look for its presenting symptoms.

And as a former chief resident of the psychiatric consultation service of the Massachusetts General Hospital -- my house staff was called in to diagnose and treat medical in-patients (many of them post-op, many with cardiac disease) who had developed psychiatric symptoms -- I know something about organically caused dementias. And I know pseudoscientific rubbish when I see it.

I was at first inclined to pass off Cottle's piece as a weird put-on -- when people become particularly deranged about this administration, it's hard to tell -- but her earnest and lengthy piling on of medical research about dementia and cardiovascular disease suggests that she is quite serious.

And supremely silly. Such silliness has a pedigree, mind you. It is in the great tradition of the 1964 poll of psychiatrists that found Barry Goldwater clinically paranoid. Goldwater having become over the years the liberals' favorite conservative (because of his libertarianism), nary a word is heard today about him being mentally ill or about that shameful election-year misuse of medical authority by the psychiatrists who answered the poll. The disease they saw in Goldwater was, in fact, deviation from liberalism, which remains today so incomprehensible to some that it must be explained by resort to arterial plaques and cardiac ejection fractions.

If there's a diagnosis to be made here, it is this: yet another case of the one other syndrome I have been credited with identifying, a condition that addles the brain of otherwise normal journalists and can strike without warning -- Bush Derangement Syndrome, Cheney Variant.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Charles Krauthammer is a 1987 Pulitzer Prize winner, 1984 National Magazine Award winner, and a columnist for The Washington Post since 1985.

Be the first to read Charles Krauthammer's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Liberty
By your # "3. Be the globo-cop for international companies"...I take it you mean companies like Halliburton and GW's big-oil buddies, right? Sounds like you've been sipping some liberal pablum.

And your objection to # "4.Spread democracy" around the world" is a little confusing ...considering it comes from someone who chooses the word 'Liberty' as there chat forum name.

What is there about the 'spreading of democracy' that you find so abhorrent? Would you rather we 'spread' some other form of government around the world? Or just practice isolationism?... we know that works really well in history. I guess Hitler's Nazis would have left us alone if we had just minded our own business...after all it wasn't the Germans that attacked our soil in Pearl Harbor, it was the Japanese. I suspect this latter point of isolationism is your true motivating belief.

So is it your belief that we should just simply hide our heads in the sand while Islamic fanatics continue their quest to dominate the world & destroy anyone or any nation that resists them and doesn't convert to Islam!

That's a real brilliant 'plan'. I know our nation is high on their list for destruction...but we're a little too big and powerful right now for them to succeed in their goals in America. Maybe if we leave them alone they will leave the rest of the world alone. Maybe they won't grow any stronger in numbers or in their ability to destroy all infidels in greater and more devastating ways.

I guess you think your plan to 'mind our own business' while these murderous fanatics attempt to dominate the middle east, the African continent, and all of Europe is far superior to 'spreading democracy'.

Here's an idea I bet you hadn't thought of...Maybe we should just 'give' them the atom bomb! Right? That way they would feel secure that we would not try to 'democratize' their countries. I'm sure they would only use their nuclear program for producing electricity...and peaceful purposes. Right?

History assures us that they are a 'peaceful' lot....Right!?

One last question, Mr. Liberty...what happens when America is the only part of the globe that they have not achieved their goal of world domination?
Will Allah decide to give America a pass?...after all...by your plan we didn't try and stop them in their quest, so they should appreciate our isolationism! Right?

Clyde9
"What is wrong with the United States having the most powerful military in the world?"

Nothing. I am all for it. I believe in peace through strength.

"What is wrong with defending the United States?"

Nothing. That is what our military is for.

"What is wrong with defending the interests of the United States?"

It depends on how you define, "interests". I do not believe that our military should be used to:
1. Carry out UN dictates
2. Nation-build
3. Be the globo-cop for international companies
4. "Spread democracy" around the world

Our troops should be used to defend America.



Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.