Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, January 07, 2009
Carrie Schwab Pomerantz :: Townhall.com Columnist
Yours, Mine and Ours: Investing Together -- or Not
by Carrie Schwab Pomerantz
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



The new year has always been a good time to take a look at past spending patterns and resolve to do better in the future. But what if you're in a relationship? Can you make these decisions alone? Of course you can, but chances are you won't be as effective -- and the results won't be as rewarding -- unless you sit down with your husband, wife or partner and approach your financial New Year's resolutions together.

Money matters for a couple can be tricky and often lead to misunderstanding and worse. With things being tougher than usual, now may be a really good time to take a fresh and honest look at your financial issues as a couple. If it's not something you're used to doing, it might seem a bit touchy at first. But I believe that talking openly and honestly about your mutual and individual goals and your personal feelings about money can actually strengthen your relationship.

Where should you start? Here are a few sometimes sticky -- but essential -- areas to cover.

-- Be honest about financial independence. Whether you're a new couple or "old marrieds," the issue of financial independence needs to be front and center. Joining forces doesn't necessarily mean joining your finances -- at least not completely. And each of you may have a different view of what financial independence means. If you've been together for some time, your ideas about independence may have changed. So make sure you're on the same page.

Begin by taking a look at your daily financial responsibilities. Make sure you're comfortable with who's paying for what bills, whether or not to maintain separate bank accounts and how you're dealing with your individual expenses. If you have some differences here, settle them first. Because how you deal with the everyday can be the basis for how you save and invest.

For instance, if you have a joint account for communal expenses, but keep separate accounts for your personal needs, then you've already established a bit of independence that you can carry over into investing. On the other hand, if you currently pool all your money, do you want to take the same approach with your portfolios? That's a crucial question to answer. Once you agree on how much autonomy - or togetherness -- you want in your investing, you can decide whether having a shared brokerage account, separate brokerage accounts or separate accounts plus a shared account is the best for both of you.

On a personal level, I believe that a certain degree of independence can be good for a relationship. That said, I also recognize that every couple is different. For instance, my husband and I have a joint brokerage account, but we also keep separate accounts. (One of mine is a small inheritance from my grandmother that's very important and personal to me.) But while we invest some of our money separately, we do enjoy talking about our goals and our individual investment choices, and we help each other make decisions. On the other hand, a colleague of mine and his wife have joint accounts for everything and consult each other on every expenditure and every investing decision, and that works well for them.

-- Discuss your individual feelings about risk. Apart from independence, investing style is an important factor in how you handle your assets. The potential for higher returns generally comes with higher risk, but you have to think carefully about how much volatility you can handle. So it's essential to discuss your individual risk tolerance. If you can come to terms with an approach that works for both of you, investing together -- whether all or just a portion of your assets -- can be a great way to plan for the future.

If you completely disagree on how much risk to take, you might be better off with separate investment portfolios. But you don't need to completely agree either. Even if one of you is more comfortable with risk while the other is more conservative, this difference can actually work in your favor by providing a balance -- and the necessary diversification of investments that goes with it. The important thing is to talk it through.

Review your couple goals. Before you were a couple, you probably each had individual goals. Have these changed since you've been together? Do your joint goals take precedence over your individual goals?

If you have three distinct sets of goals -- yours, mine and ours -- there's nothing that says you can't work harmoniously toward all three simultaneously. Having a separate brokerage account for each of you plus a joint account can be a good way to target your investing toward specific goals without one or the other of you feeling short-changed. You could each manage your own accounts and share the decision-making in your joint account. Either way, by working together you're more likely to achieve your goals. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Carrie Schwab Pomerantz is a Motley Fool contributor.

Be the first to read Carrie Schwab Pomerantz's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

He who does best
or she. It just happens I know investments and get the free reign. Unless she sees someone trying to take an advantage then a wink is all there is.

marriage is . . .
My wife and I are all in, voluntarily. Our vows included the ancient phrase about "richer for poorer", and we expected it applied to our assets as well as liabilities, both at the time we said them and for the rest of our natural lives. The tax guys complicate a bit - who gets what when whom dies and all that. Nevertheless, all in is all in and the Feds get in line after, not before that commitment. As I recall, those same vows also included something about "sickness and health," which, in retrospect, has also been a good thing: who knew what would transpire exactly in that realm of experience, either?

Separate accounts, assets, or whatever, suggest to me that the "couple" haven't made a total commitment. Marriage isn't a contract with an escape clause. It's all or nothing. Perhaps our current societal discussions about its "definitions" reflect at minimum an ambivalence, and at worst, shear idiocy about what terms actually mean. And asset sharing, or not, is an element of that creep into nonsense on this particular subject.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.