Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, November 17, 2006
Caroline Glick :: Townhall.com Columnist
Israel's delighted leaders
by Caroline Glick
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


To the delight of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, an international coalition has coalesced around Iran's nuclear weapons program.

In his remarks Tuesday in Los Angeles before the delegates to the United Jewish Communities' General Assembly, Olmert explained his enthusiasm. First he stated, "America's leadership in preventing Iran's nuclearization is indisputable and unequaled. I just met my good friend, a true friend of Israel, President George W. Bush in Washington... His determination to prevent this most serious of developments is unquestionable. But America must have the support of the international community if we are to successfully defuse this mortal threat."

So from Olmert's perspective, it is America's responsibility - not Israel's - to prevent Iran from acquiring the means to destroy Israel. At the same time, he accepts that the US will take no action against Iran without first receiving permission from the French, Russians, Chinese and Arabs.

Olmert then explained that the Arabs have to agree to let the US protect Israel. As he put it, "A coalition of moderate Arab countries can and must unite their common interest in preventing Iran from undermining stability in the Middle East. This coalition must struggle against the dangers of radical Islam that manipulate the very source of Islam itself."

For her part, Livni told the crowd in California that there is little doubt that the nations of the world will shortly unite to prevent Iran from achieving nuclear capabilities. As she put it, "If the promise of 'Never Again' is more important than the price of oil, then the time for international indifference and hesitation in the face of the Iranian threat has long passed."

Livni then explained that she is eager to give Judea and Samaria to the Palestinians and is working to "brand" Israel as a place where it is fun to live. She concluded by recommending that American Jews invite Israeli Nobel laureates to visit their communities.

In sum, our foreign minister is certain that the international community will act against Iran because it means it when it says it thinks that the Holocaust was a bad thing more than it means it when it says, "Fill it up with unleaded."

Moreover, as far as Livni is concerned, the world will protect Israel because the Olmert government is so eager to render Jerusalem and Tel Aviv defenseless by surrendering Judea and Samaria to Palestinian jihadists.

Aside from that, Livni trusts that the world will protect the Jews because thanks to her we have UN forces protecting Hizbullah on our northern border and we're rebranding ourselves to let the international community know that Jews are both good at science and really fun to drink with.

To their credit, Olmert and Livni are correct to say that today an international coalition made up of the US, the EU and some of the Arabs is forming around Iran. But what binds the members together is their collective opposition to taking any effective action to prevent Teheran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

Standing next to Olmert in the White House Monday, Bush limited his remarks on Iran to expressing his hope that the international community would agree to economically isolate Iran. International support is necessary because Iran's chief targets - the US and Israel - don't have the legitimacy to act. As he put it, "My attitude is let's work in concert to convince the government [of Iran] that it's not just the Israeli voices speaking, or the United States' voices speaking, but there's a lot of other voices saying the exact same thing."

There is no doubt that isolating Iran internationally would be a welcome development.

But there can also be no doubt that isolating Iran will not cause it to end its nuclear weapons program. This is particularly true if that isolation involves approving the European draft resolution for mild sanctions against Iran in the UN Security Council. In the best case scenario, the most sanctions can do is make it more difficult to Iran to reconstitute its nuclear program in the aftermath of an Israeli military attack on its nuclear installations.

EACH OF the parties in the "Do-nothing-against-Iran" coalition has its own reasons for not lifting a finger.

Bush's interpretation of the Democrats' victory in last week's Congressional elections convinced him not to act against Iran. Starting with his press conference last Wednesday where he announced Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's replacement by Robert Gates, Bush has made absolutely clear that as far as he's concerned, he lacks the domestic political strength to carry out a successful operation.

In one of his recent daily calls for Israel's destruction, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad offered Europe a Faustian bargain. He promised to leave Europe alone if the Europeans abandon Israel. On Monday, British Prime Minister Tony Blair accepted his offer. In a speech at the London Lord Mayor's annual banquet, Blair explained that success in Iraq and in Iran is contingent on Israel making concessions to Palestinian and Lebanese terrorists and to the US and Europe making concessions to Syria and Iran.

The fact that Blair made this speech four days after the director general of the MI5, Eliza Manningham-Buller, said that today 30 terror plots are being planned in Britain; that future threats could involve chemicals and nuclear devices; that young British Muslims are being groomed to become suicide bombers; and that her agents are tracking some 1,600 suspects, tells us just about everything we need to know about Europe's interests. The fact that he made a similar statement to the Iraq Study Group, which, led by former secretary of state James Baker III is planning on recommending that the US sell out Israel and appease the Iranians and Syrians, tells us everything we need to know about how Europe feels about the US hope to isolate - not attack - Iran.

There is little doubt that the Arab states would prefer a non-nuclear Iran. But the Arabs have no intention of preventing Iran from acquiring such weapons. To the contrary, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia now want to build their own nuclear reactors. Iran's program serves as a justification for Arab A-bombs.c

The implication of the coalescence of this new coalition is inescapable. Despite Olmert and Livni's breathless protestations to the contrary, no one will take action to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. No one will block the prospect of Israel's annihilation. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Caroline B. Glick is the senior Middle East fellow at the Center for Security Policy in Washington, D.C., and the deputy managing editor of The Jerusalem Post, where this article first appeared.

Be the first to read Caroline Glick's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

to Grateful American
IRAN has done nothing to us! However, if we keep killing Muslims, that might change. To date, we have killed more than 650,000 Iraqis. For what? Even Bush has admitted that Iraq had nothing to do with 911.

Everyone is so worried about the muslim boogey man, that you can't see what is going on right in front of your very eyes. Our country is being merged with Canada and Mexico into a North American Union. That is why our politicians don't care about securing the border! These unions are going on all over the world. Do you realize that most of the European Union was done behind the people's backs until it was all but complete? The people are not happy with it and want out. But how? The EU is trying to impose a new Constitution on them. The people say no, but apparently it is going to go forward anyway.

Do you understand? This is happening here. It seems to always happen the same. 1. Establish trade agreements between the countries 2. Build huge roads to connect the countries 3. Get rid of borders 4. Establish a parliament over the "union". 5. Introduce a new currency 6. Introduce a new Constitution.

This is the best collection of articles on the subject that I have found:
http://www.eagleforum.org/topics/NAU/
http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2006/tst082806.htm
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=17334
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCXc8j05Y3w&eurl=
http://www.newswithviews.com/DeWeese/tom63.htm
http://www.newswithviews.com/guest_opinion/guest99.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxCeWQ9Ge38&search=North%20American%20Union

There are many, many others out there. Just do a google search.

Tired of fighting Israel's battles
Someone said Iranians are the next Nazis. Interesting, because it seems to me that the country most interested in overthrowing sovereign nations these days, is either our own government, and Israel. I don't particularly like the Iranian leader, however I don't need to. As long as they leave us alone, we have no right to bomb them into oblivion. If Israel wants to go to war, then THEY should go right ahead and do it, BUT without OUR money, our munitions, or our support in any way.

I am sick and tired of AIPAC dictating or buying off our government representatives to do Israel's bidding. That is in fact what is going on now. We hear so much about them being our good buddies. If that is so, then why have we caught several Israeli spies in our country over the last couple of years? I for one, am still waiting to see a true investigation of why they bombed the ever loving heck out of the USS Liberty.

If we are so worried about a country having nuclear weapons, we don't need to look further than Israel's own 400 nuclear missiles or RED CHINA'S.

We have gotten caught up so much in all the propaganda being stuffed down our throat by the media conglomerate, that we have actually started to believe it. IRAQ HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 911. NEITHER DID IRAN. Bush HAS EVEN ADMITTED IT.

The money to Mohammed Atta was traced to Pakistan. Most of the alleged hijackers came from Saudi Arabia!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Not IRAQ. Not IRAN!

Why is it that we leave those countries alone and go after Iraq and Iran? Look down that path, in addition to looking into the ownership of our major media. You will find it quite enlightening.

At some point, we're going to have to ask ourselves... do we care enough to use our own brains to see what is going on, or have we become so lazy that we just allow network media commentators to tell us what to think?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.