Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, December 25, 2006
Carol Platt Liebau :: Townhall.com Columnist
Victories in the battle to save Christmas
by Carol Platt Liebau
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


It’s been several years since the term “war on Christmas” entered the American lexicon, denoting the politically correct effort to remove all potentially “offensive” religious elements from the public observation of the “winter holiday” that falls on December 25. Certainly emotions on both sides of the debate run high between those who welcome the reaffirmation of a common Judeo-Christian common culture (leavened by believers in other faiths or none at all), versus those who subscribe to the notion that celebrating “diversity” trumps all other considerations.

For a long time, it seemed apparent that the latter were winning the argument. “Happy holidays” largely replaced Merry Christmas, “holiday displays” in stores supplanted areas once designated as “Christmas shops.” Even this year, there’s been the usual, “politically correct” nonsense. The City of Chicago pressured organizers of the annual Christkindlmarket into eliminating New Line Cinemas – the studio that released The Nativity Story – as a sponsor. A city staff member in Riverside, CA, silenced Christmas carolers lest Jewish ice skater Sasha Cohen, who was present, take offense (the staffer obviously hadn’t seen the invitation on Cohen’s website to "Join Sasha On Her Christmas Tree Lighting Tour"). Worst of all, Target continues to ban Salvation Army bell ringers from seeking donations in front of their stores.

Even so, this year – for the first time – there’s been a sense that the tide is starting to turn. Companies that once rejected “Merry Christmas” are now embracing more faith-friendly terminology. Major stores like Wal-Mart (which still welcomes the Salvation Army), Macy’s, J.C. Penney, Walgreen’s, Sear’s and Kohls are unabashedly referring to Christmas in their customer interactions. Food Lion, which had previously relied on messages referencing the “holidays,” likewise is using “Merry Christmas.” In general, “holiday” political correctness run amok no longer goes completely unchallenged; the Dallas Morning News condemned the city for erecting a “downtown holiday tree,” noting sarcastically that “synagogues everywhere are dusting off their holiday candelabras.”

These changes, welcome as they are, didn’t happen spontaneously. They came about because ordinary Americans, frustrated with the gradual “de-Christianizing” of Christmas, finally spoke up. Last year, nearly 300,000 people signed an online petition calling for a boycott of Target in part because of its refusal to use the phrase “Merry Christmas” in store advertising and promotions. And this year, a Wal-Mart spokesman conceded that the company had “learned its lesson” in the wake of its unpopular 2005 policy of forbidding employees to say “Merry Christmas.” Finally, it became clear that tailoring corporate policies to avoid offending the left-learning, politically correct crowd could, in fact, be costly.

With all these favorable developments in the war on Christmas, there’s a heartening reminder for ordinary Americans: As citizens in a capitalist country with a market economy, we wield great potential clout through our spending power. Contrary to what the press and the class warriors would have us believe, our voices (and our choices) do matter. But that power is ours only to the degree that we choose to use it – and too often, it’s easy to stand by and watch with dismay as the culture veers ever leftward.

Instead, wouldn’t it be wonderful if we did something different in 2007? Imagine the impact if we approached a different issue – say, the marketing of sex to little girls through clothes, books, music, movies and television, and the internet – with the same fervor and conviction that’s marked the defense of Christmas.

In time, parents could find clothes for their daughters that seem appropriate for teens, rather than for streetwalkers. The plots of adolescent girl-oriented books and movies could focus on something other than sex. And young women might not find themselves singing along to songs with lyrics that, once upon a time, would have made a sailor blush.

If there’s a lesson from the victories in the war on Christmas, it’s that they needn’t be isolated successes. We have the ability (and the right) to improve the quality of our common culture in general – if only we decide to do so.

Merry Christmas. God bless us every one.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Carol Platt Liebau is an attorney, political commentator and guest radio talk show host based near Los Angeles. Learn more about her new book, "Prude: How the Sex-Obsessed Culture Hurts Young Women (and America, Too!)" here.

Be the first to read Carol Platt Liebau's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Getting facts straight
First, liberalgoodman, I don't believe Fox News Network (indeed, Fox) did not exist in 1988 when a former HS teacher of mine, by then principal of another local high school, banned Christmas from the school. He simply issued a letter from the office telling students and teachers that they were not to say "Merry Christmas" and that the winter break was not to be called Christmas Vacation, nor were any Christmas decorations allowed anywhere in the school. Why did he do that? He'd been contacted by a local secularist with an attorney who wanted the outrage stopped and he feared prosecution of the school, the district and himself (as he was to be named in the suit had it gone forward).

The war on Christmas has been going on for quite some time. I don't think Fox News invented it! I doubt if Mr. Markette did. I think it had been going on a long time before that.

Crossbearer, if you want to ignore Christmas, go for it. Recognize that none of the celebrations of Christianity existed prior to Christ's death. They were an outgrowth of Christians wanting to order their worship. Therefore, Easter came to be celebrated as it occurred at the end of Passover and probably pretty soon after Christ's death. Christmas came much later and the selection of mid-winter had to do with a major pagan festival occuring at that time of the year. Contrary to what some want to believe, it had little to do with replacing the pagan holiday so that former pagans would celebrate a Christian holiday. This was the second century AD, right in the middle of the era of Christian persecution. Christians selected a time when they could gather without drawing undue interest. It was only later that the Christian holiday superceded and replaced the pagan holiday. Still later, when Christianity moved into northern Europe, they encountered Germanic tribes that celebrated a mid-winter holiday with evergreen bows. As German pagans converted to Christianity, they kept some of the decorations that reminded them of the season as part of their celebration of Christ's birth. Other things got added as Christianity entered other cultures. Rather than fight it, the Roman Catholic church in the local parishes re-interpreted the window-dressing with Christian themes -- the evergreens as the everlasting covenant with Christ and such like. During the Protestant Reformation, many new sects of Christianity rejected RC teachings, including the holiday masses. They also took sledge hammers to church art throughout Protestant areas. While that sort of wild rage is rejected by reasonable Christians today, I for one can understand how the newly faithful felt threatened by idolatry. And, I see that same sense of threat within you. Immature faith may look at the comfortable practices of those more mature in the faith and think we are skirting dangerous territory. The Apostle Paul would say that we should eat of the meat of idols so long as we do not cause our brother to stumble, for meat is meat and has no effect on our spirit. My evergreens are window-dressing to the sincere worship of Christ. I don't know if it would help you any to know that we decorate with evergreens until around St. Patrick's Day when we change our silk-flower arrangements for spring-time because I like the seasonal look. The spring, summer and fall decorations are not associated with any holiday, so do you have a problem with those as well? I am not mocking, but I do think you need to consider just how far you want to take the animis you're presenting with regards to Christians celebrating holidays of any sort. A friend who grew up a strict sect tells me that she believes her parents' sect could not run among the streets of Jerusalem to tell the Pentecost crowds how wonderful it is to be a Christian because their faith is as dull as dishwater and nobody would believe it if they said otherwise.

We are in the world, but not of it, and when we hide our light under a bushel basket, we deny Christ His glory. I'm not saying that concerns over the commercialization of Christmas among Christians is misplaced, but that to remove all joy and celebration from Christian life sort of prevents us from drawing people to Christ.

Am I an agnostic?
Commenting on one of my earlier posts, Eutychus asked:

"It would seem to me that you are not a "non-theist." Would't "agnostic" better describe you?"

Possibly. I don't mind being called an "agnostic", but I don't use the term for myself because it seems to imply an attitude of complete neutrality as to whether God does or doesn't exist. I'm not neutral; I have a distinct opinion on the matter; I just don't claim absolute certainty as to the correctness of my opinion.

And I don't call myself an "atheist" because that term has become associated with an absolute certainty and bitter hostility towards all religion that I don't share. Thus, "non-theist". Or, if I'm feeling long-winded, "non-dogmatic non-theist".
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.