Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Cal  Thomas :: Townhall.com Columnist
Time to Say "Goodbye" To GM and Chrysler
by Cal Thomas
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Some of the cars of my childhood are no more. Kaiser-Frazier was the biggest postwar challenger to the Big Three. Models included the 1949 Kaiser Custom Vagabond, the 1948 Frazer Manhattan four-door sedan, the Dragon sedans and Henry J coupes. In 1970, Kaiser, then known as the Kaiser Jeep Corporation, was sold to American Motors Corporation.

Other auto companies either went out of business or were bought. These included Packard ("ask the man who owns one"), Studebaker ("first by far with a postwar car"), and Hudson, which began making cars in 1909 and, like other automobile companies, in early 1942 was ordered by the U.S. government to stop making passenger cars and concentrate exclusively on fulfilling war contracts. In 1954, Hudson eventually merged with Nash-Kelvinator to become American Motors, a company that lasted in one form or another until 1987 when Chrysler gobbled it up.

None of these companies (and many more before them and after with names such as Tucker, DeLorean and Duesenberg) received government bailouts. If they couldn't sell their products at a profit, they either sold out, or went bust. People who worked for them found other jobs. No one starved to death.

Americans have benefited from capitalism. Our government should not be undermining an economic system that has produced more prosperity for its citizens than any nation on earth. It cannot forever prop up companies that make products not enough people wish to buy. If a growing number of people prefer cars not produced by GM and Chrysler, how will a government rescue plan make them more likely to buy them?

The "going out of business sale" sign should go up now. Taxpayers should not be expected to underwrite dying companies, unless we get a free car for our money. But that only happens on "Oprah."

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Cal Thomas is co-author (with Bob Beckel) of the book, "Common Ground: How to Stop the Partisan War That is Destroying America".
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Cal Thomas' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Goodbye GM-How about Goodbye Banks?
What a mindless piece of over-used writing ability. Most of it is some sentimental journey down automotive lane and the rest is a knee-jurk reaction endorsing some pure capitalism that never existed from the first in America. Just check the railroads and canals from the 19th century.

What does letting GM cease to exist cost America? The government picks up much of the cost for retirees. How much? What about health care? Again, how much will it cost? If GM didn't have legacy costs, would it be making money? At one time recently, one in five people in the United States were receiving some of their health care benefits from GM. What's the cost now? What is the cost if that goes away? What states will be on their backs and asking for bailout money when these companies fail? While your bringing us facts on the auto industry instead of this mindless drivel, pick up a few facts on the banks as well. They got so much more and gave so much less.

Jim CA 2/19 10:43PM
C'mon Jim. You should be careful about calling someone dumb when you believe that our SS money has not been spent but is in Treasury Bonds.

Every single dime of surplus from SS has been stolen every year by Congress and spent in the General Fund. This enabled Congress to keep increasing their spending without having to approach taxpayers for an tax increase.

Government replaced these embezzled funds with Treasury Bonds that actually are nothing other than IOUs. Jim, there is no money in the so-called Trust Fund. When it comes time to pay back those IOUs, those funds will come in the form of future taxes paid by taxpayers who have to make the bonds good.

This also means that contrary to conventional wisdom, there was no budget surplus in the 1990s. If you counted the money stolen from the SS surplus to fund the operating budget (approximately $200 billion per year) and add that to the actual numbers you can see that we still ran actual deficits in those so-called surplus years.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.